Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 1:18 pm » wrote:Why didn't the Impeachment Show Clowns include any of the many crimes you've accused Trump of in their bill?
Oh, I thought this was you.Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 1:16 pm » wrote:So what? I didn't criticize Bloomberg for doing that.Misty » 11 Feb 2020 12:53 pm » wrote: Hey moron! Trump was in favor of Stop and Frisk.
Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 12:40 pm » wrote:Gosh, just about the time Democrats thought they'd be saved from Bernie by Bloomberg, this comes out.
Have you got one single candidate who has any chance at all of defeating Trump?
Of which 500 million landed in democrat pockets.Misty » 26 Jan 2020 12:18 pm » wrote: But between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine.
They're being so 'fair and objective' that prosecutors are starting to resign behind that ****.Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 12:30 pm » wrote:Oh my gosh, how dare the Justice Dept. be fair and objective!
There are Democrats living in Ukraine?Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2020 3:27 pm » wrote:Of which 500 million landed in democrat pockets.Misty » 26 Jan 2020 12:18 pm » wrote:But between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine.
No, they just go there to execute quids pro quo with allotted funds. And those are legal, too, so long as "everybody" wants you to do it.Misty » 11 Feb 2020 3:36 pm » wrote: There are Democrats living in Ukraine?
Right. And we should believe that.Three Roger Stone prosecutors resign from case after DOJ backpedals on sentencing recommendation.
Three prosecutors in Roger Stone's criminal case abruptly resigned from the case on Tuesday after the Justice Department said it planned to reduce the recommended sentence for the longtime Trump associate.
The Justice Department on Tuesday said it was pulling back on its request to sentence Stone to seven to nine years in prison after President Donald Trump blasted the sentencing proposal as "a miscarriage of justice."
The revised recommendation doesn't ask for a particular sentence but says the one that was recommended earlier "does not accurately reflect the Department of Justice’s position on what would be a reasonable sentence in this matter."
"The defendant committed serious offenses and deserves a sentence of incarceration," but based "on the facts known to the government, a sentence of between 87 to 108 months’ imprisonment, however, could be considered excessive and unwarranted under the circumstances.
Ultimately, the government defers to the Court as to what specific sentence is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case," the filing said.
After the reports of the imminent softer sentencing recommendation, lead prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky withdrew as a prosecutor in the case.
A footnote in his court filing noted that "the undersigned attorney has resigned effective immediately."
Zelinsky, who was a part of former special counsel Robert Mueller's team investigating Russian election interference, is not resigning from the Justice Department but is leaving the Washington, D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office and returning to his old job with the U.S. Attorney in Maryland.
Another one of the prosecutors, Jonathan Kravis, also resigned— both from the case and his job as an assistant U.S. attorney.
Kravis on Tuesday filed a notice with the judge saying he "no longer represents the government in this matter."
A third prosecutor, Adam Jed, also withdrew from the case.
Trump in a tweet earlier in the day called the department's initial sentencing proposal "disgraceful!"
"This is a horrible and very unfair situation,” the president wrote in a follow-up post on Twitter.
"The real crimes were on the other side, as nothing happens to them.
Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!"
He told reporters in the Oval Office later Tuesday that he did not speak to the Justice Department about Stone's sentencing.
I don't want that deep state **** in my thread.Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 6:36 pm » wrote:You have it all backwards, as usual. The actual criminals are being protected by Mueller's Deep State hacks.Misty » 11 Feb 2020 3:35 pm » wrote:They're being so 'fair and objective' that prosecutors are starting to resign behind that ****.Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 12:30 pm » wrote:Oh my gosh, how dare the Justice Dept. be fair and objective!
Another abuse of power by Trump.
Prosecutor in Roger Stone case resigns after Justice Dept. backs away from sentencing recommendation.
Second Roger Stone prosecutor leaves case after Justice Dept. backs away from sentencing recommendation.
'Bout **** time.
There should be mass resignations at the DOJ in protest of how crooked Baghdad Barr is.
He's supposed to be the chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government.
He's not there to protect Sniffles and his criminal gang.
Again....it's NOT a **** transcript.Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 7:03 pm » wrote:Gosh, Zindman himself testified that the transcript was accurate.Misty » 26 Jan 2020 2:31 pm » wrote:Why are there three ellipses?
What was left out?
And it is NOT an actual transcript.
It says so right on the front page.That's a big fat lie!Twice in a press conference earlier this month, Trump went out of his way to say the rough transcript was, in fact, a verbatim recounting of his call with Zelensky. "I had a transcript done by very, very talented people -- word for word, comma for comma," said Trump at one point in that early October news conference. "Done by people that do it for a living. We had an exact transcript." Later, he added that the document was "an exact transcript of my call, done by very talented people that do this -- exact, word for word."
Trump echoed that sentiment on Twitter as well.
Should he be indicted for perjury, psycho?![]()
And why are you replying to posts from January?Colonel Vindman and Ms. Williams were the first two witnesses at a public hearing who listened in real time to Mr. Trump’s now-infamous July call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Both said they were alarmed; Ms. Williams called the call “unusual and inappropriate” while Colonel Vindman said it was “wrong.”
[.......]
Colonel Vindman testified that he believed that Mr. Trump’s request for Ukraine to open investigations into the “2016 election, the Bidens and Burisma” — inquiries that could help Mr. Trump’s re-election chances — should be viewed as demands that were “inappropriate and had nothing to do with national security.”
[......]
Ms. Williams and Colonel Vindman added texture to the frustration inside the government about the shadow Ukraine foreign policy being conducted by the president’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani and others.
Colonel Vindman testified that he quickly became aware of “former mayor Rudy Giuliani’s promoting false narratives that undermined the United States’ Ukraine policy.”
Their testimony confirms many of the other impeachment witnesses who have described Mr. Giuliani, who has no official government job, as having an outsize role in influencing Mr. Trump’s position on Ukraine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/19/us/p ... hment.html
Misty » 11 Feb 2020 12:53 pm » wrote: Hey moron! Trump was in favor of Stop and Frisk.
All of them.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epoll ... _election/
Termin8tor » 12 Feb 2020 7:34 am » wrote:
Yes, a lot of people are going to be indicted for fired from Obama's corrupt Deep State. I can't remember in my lifetime so many high FBI officials being fired for cause.
First those prosecutors are part of the corrupt Mueller team.
Second, the sentence they asked for as absurdly high and went grossly against Justice Dept sentencing guidelines.
Third, they misinformed or lied to the Justice Dept about the sentence they were seeking.
I'll bet their resignations were not voluntary, but demanded by Barr.
And good riddance.
Oh gosh, no one got fired.SJConspirator » 12 Feb 2020 7:56 am » wrote:
Who got fired or indicted? Besides Roger Stone and Manafort?
Good. Lots more will have to be pushed aside, fired or indicted in Trump's quest to drain the Swamp.Misty » 12 Feb 2020 1:09 pm » wrote:Trump pulls nomination of former US attorney in charge of Roger Stone case.
President Trump pulled the nomination of a former US attorney who oversaw the prosecution of Roger Stone for a top position in the Treasury Department, according to a report.
/
Are you really this **** stupid?Termin8tor » 12 Feb 2020 1:10 pm » wrote:Good. Lots more will have to be pushed aside, fired or indicted in Trump's quest to drain the Swamp.Misty » 12 Feb 2020 1:09 pm » wrote:Trump pulls nomination of former US attorney in charge of Roger Stone case.
President Trump pulled the nomination of a former US attorney who oversaw the prosecution of Roger Stone for a top position in the Treasury Department, according to a report.
Trump ALONE chooses who he nominates as a US Attorney! And he's free to use whatever criteria he wants! He clearly doesn't believe that Roger Stone, who was found guilty of a "process crime", should be serving more jail time than convicted murderers and rapists! His arrest should not have involved sending a caravan of armed SWAT teams to his house before dawn, terrorizing his family in order to give CNN a headline exclusive story, and there was no reason to have him placed in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day!Misty » 12 Feb 2020 2:38 pm » wrote: Are you really this **** stupid?
Trump IS the swamp.
This is all about retribution by the most vindictive man to ever hold the office of president.
And he now has an AG who is doing his bidding by covering up for his friends and going after people whom he sees as his enemies.
That is NOT what the AG is supposed to do.
Only you stupid Trump sychophantic lickspittles think this is a good thing.
I deleted the SAME STUPID LIES you have been telling over and over for MONTHS they are meaningless noise at this pointTermin8tor » 12 Feb 2020 3:27 pm » wrote: