Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:18 pm » wrote:

Misty » 04 Mar 2020 8:50 pm » wrote:Ron Johnson should resign, blah, blah, blah

The 100's of pages Guliani obtained weren't available at that time, psycho.
So your smear of Johnson is a lie, as usual.
And you'l censor the truth, as usual.

Do your research jackass.
Johnson was part of the push to have Shokin fired.
He was on the same page with Biden.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:15 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 12:01 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:50 am wrote:There is no pandemic in the US, not even close.And no mention of the world in Merriam Webster's definition either, contrary to your claim.

Sorry, but when it comes to pandemics, I will take the word of Dr. Fauci over Merriam Webster or a moron like you.

Your quote didn't support either of your lies, psycho.
He didn't say there is a pandemic, only that there might be one.
And he didn't say a pandemic must be world wide.

The very definition of a pandemic is that it is global.
This is the most ridiculous argument I have ever heard.

It seems like you are trying to defend Sniffles by pretending that the U.S. is somehow exempt from this pandemic.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:34 pm » wrote:Oh my gosh, Trump is going to point out how Biden's entire family enriched themselves with taxpayer money?

How exactly did Biden's entire family enrich themselves with taxpayer money?

Are you really this **** oblivious?

When it comes to someone's family enriching themselves on taxpayer money, you really don't wanna go down that road Precious.

Your Dear Leader's family is soaking us dry overcharging the government at their facilities.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:45 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 12:36 pm » wrote:The very definition of a pandemic is that it is global.
This is the most ridiculous argument I have ever heard.

Defined by who or what? Little Miss Marxist's Official Troll Dictoinary?

No. Defined by the World Health Organization.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:45 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 12:36 pm » wrote:It seems like you are trying to defend Sniffles by pretending that the U.S. is somehow exempt from this pandemic.

More **** from a Democrat psychopath. Every statement I've seen from Trump has been accurate and responsible. The US largely will avoid large problems with Corona.

Every statement from Trump is accurate and responsible?
Really?

What about him saying that the WHO's 3.4% worldwide mortality rate is a 'really false number?'

Is that accurate and responsible?

What about him blaming Obama for the lack of testing kits?

Is that accurate and responsible?

What about him suggesting that infected people can still go to work?

Is that accurate and responsible?

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:52 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 12:45 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 12:34 pm » wrote:Oh my gosh, Trump is going to point out how Biden's entire family enriched themselves with taxpayer money?
Often with Biden's assistance while Senator or Vice President?
That his son made millions of dollars from the most corrupt business in Ukraine?
That Biden is a corrupt Beltway hack?
That's like, so unfair!

How exactly did Biden's entire family enrich themselves with taxpayer money?

I've cited many sources about his family. I started a thread that I'm sure you'll refuse to read.

The usual ****.

Apparently Biden was not very good at enriching himself, as he was one of the poorest members of the Senate.

Okay, now let's do Trump's family.

I see you deleted that part out of my post, and completely ignored it.


C'mon Precious.
Go down that road.
It will blow up in your face.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 2:29 pm » wrote:

Misty » 04 Mar 2020 7:22 pm » wrote:Sniffles still trying to blame Obama for his failures.

Trump Blames Obama Decision for Coronavirus Test Kit Shortage

I hate to get all fact-ey on you, but.....

Morning Greatness: Trump Admin. Reverses Obama-Era Regulation Blocking Coronavirus Testing
Liz SheldBy Liz Sheld
.....The Trump Administration has rolled back an Obama FDA rule that required “state-run laboratories to only run medical tests pre-approved by the F.D.A.”
“The Obama administration made a decision on testing that turned out to be very detrimental to what we’re doing, and we undid that decision a few days ago so that the testing can take place at a much more accurate and rapid fashion,” Trump stated. “That was a decision we disagreed with. I don’t think we would have made it, but for some reason it was made. But we’ve undone that decision.”
https://amgreatness.com/2020/03/05/morn ... s-testing/

Fact-ey?
You wouldn't know a FACT is it smacked you upside your pointy head.

What was the Obama administration Regulation called?

There was an Obama administration proposal that would have allowed the Food and Drug Administration to have more oversight over approving diagnostic tests, but that proposal did not go through.

I await your answer.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 1:23 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 12:59 pm » wrote:Every statement from Trump is accurate and responsible?
Really?

What about him saying that the WHO's 3.4% worldwide mortality rate is a 'really false number?'

Is that accurate and responsible?

What about him blaming Obama for the lack of testing kits?

Is that accurate and responsible?

What about him suggesting that infected people can still go to work?

Is that accurate and responsible?

Now why would I EVER bother research these when I know 1) you're going to censor any facts I cite,
and 2) you're going to lie.

Like you do about everything.

**** **** artist.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 3:30 pm » wrote:

I deleted all the Russian propaganda and STUPID LIES because they all boil down to you telling THIS LIE AGAIN. You keep telling it because Russian Military Intelligence is INVESTED in the LIE. No matter how often I PROVE you are A LIAR with this LIE you do your GUTLESS COWARD ACT run away then slink back and tell this LIE again. NOT a HOAX rather a FACT. Look up the word collusion then ADDRESS THE FACTS TRAITOR

We've had the Russian Collusion Hoax.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/09/politics ... index.htmlThe Justice Department's inspector general found that the FBI properly opened its investigation into Russian election interferenceThe report released Monday by inspector general Michael Horowitz did not find "documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions" to open investigations that initially focused on campaign advisers Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Michael Flynn and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort.And the report goes on to say Trump, your GOD is a LIAR and the FBI did NOT spy on himThen the FACTS show that they found PLENTY of dirty dealing WITH the Russians even if it was not enough to prosecute for conspiracy it was DEFINITLY enough to justify investigationhttps://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/timel ...July 2016, the FBI began investigating the Russian government’s attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election, including whether President Donald Trump’s campaign associates were involved in those efforts.The START of the whole thing was a bunch of intelligence agencies like Estonia and Germany and Britian was telling OUR intelligence agencies that whenever they were spying on KNOWN and suspected Russian intelligence assets they kept hearing Trump campaign peoplehttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... nks-russiaGCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland.Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.Trump was getting advance notice from wikileaks about their dumps wikileaks was called by Trumps own pick for head of the CIA a hostile intelligence agency but Trump touted them at LEAST 100 timeshttps://www.vox.com/2019/4/19/18507743/ ...Trumps campaign manager repeatedly gave a man he KNEW was connected to Russian Military Intelligence INTERNAL polling data and Manafort discussed their strategy for the midwest with himhttps://www.newsweek.com/paul-manafort- .The report noted that Manafort instructed his longtime colleague Rick Gates to provide Kilimnik with internal Trump campaign polling data and briefings on the campaign's strategies. For years, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together closely on political campaigns in Ukraine. Manafort even nicknamed Kilimnik his "Russian brain." The FBI has determined that Kilimnik, who was once a Russian military translator, has links to Russian intelligence services.Sessions, Page, Manafort, Papadopolous, Jared, Don jr, Gates, Mcfarland ALL had contacts with Russians then LIED about them. Either you can cough up an innocent explanation for all that LYING or that alone justifies the investigationThe Trump campaign had more than 140 contacts with Russians the normal presidential campaign has ZEROhttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... e=REGIWALLJan 26, 2019 -Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediariesADDRESS THE FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 3:25 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 2:53 pm » wrote:What was the Obama administration Regulation called?

You want to know its middle name and S.S. number too, rather than admit the truth?
Psychopath.

So IOW, you have no idea.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 3:25 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 2:53 pm » wrote:I await your answer.

I cited a highly credible source. You have nothing except your psychopath claim to back it up.
No, I won't waste my time refuting your ****.

Typical.
Your 'highly credible source' doesn't give any information about the so-called Obama regulation.

And I sure as hell don't believe a word that the carnival barking clown in the WH says.
Three years in and he's still trying to blame Obama for all of his screw-ups.

As for your (cough, cough) highly credible source, American Greatness, it's just another one of your wingnut websites.





I seriously can't take any more of your ****.
I don't want that crap in my thread.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 3:28 pm » wrote:

Misty » 03 Mar 2020 10:43 am » wrote:Russian bots like you.

Have you checked under your bed for Russian bots lately, psycho?

If the Ushanka hat fits, wear it comrade.

solon » 05 Mar 2020 3:35 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 3:30 pm » wrote:(The usual Russian disinformation)

I deleted all the Russian propaganda and STUPID LIES because they all boil down to you telling THIS LIE AGAIN. You keep telling it because Russian Military Intelligence is INVESTED in the LIE.

Why bother solon?
He's a **** Russian bot.
He spews Putin's disinformation and propaganda all day long.

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 4:17 pm » wrote: Why bother solon?
He's a **** Russian bot.
He spews Putin's disinformation and propaganda all day long.

Yeah I get that I just dont want him to WEAR me down and just tell the LIE OVER AND OVER enough times without the REBUTTAL showing that he is a LIAR

Federal Judge Blasts William Barr For Distorting Mueller Report.

The judge questioned whether the attorney general tried to “create a one-sided narrative” that benefited President Donald Trump.

A federal judge appointed by President George W. Bush laid into Attorney General William Barr’s “lack of candor” in a court opinion on Thursday, accusing the nation’s chief law enforcement official of producing a “distorted” summary of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton, in an opinion issued in the course of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by BuzzFeed, questioned whether Barr intended to create a “one-sided narrative” that would benefit President Donald Trump.

“The speed by which Attorney General Barr released to the public the summary of Special Counsel Mueller’s principal conclusions, coupled with the fact that Attorney General Barr failed to provide a thorough representation of the findings set forth in the Mueller Report, causes the Court to question whether Attorney General Barr’s intent was to create a one-sided narrative about the Mueller Report — a narrative that is clearly in some respects substantively at odds with the redacted version of the Mueller Report,” Walton wrote.

DUH!!!

Read the full opinion here.

Lieutenant Colonel Mark Phillip Hertling is a former United States Army officer. From March 2011-November 2012, he served as the Commanding General of U.S. Army Europe and the Seventh Army.
Hertling served in Armor, Cavalry, planning, operations and training positions, and commanded every organization from Platoon to Field Army.
He commanded the U.S. Army's 1st Armored Division and Task Force Iron/Multinational Division-North in Iraq during the troop surge of 2007 to 2008.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:08 pm » wrote:Yeah, everyone knows that Trump personally writes all press releases.

What a WEAK and STUPID excuse Trump LIES CONSTANTLY and everyone KNOWS that is true. He just WIngs it most of the time and NEVER sticks to any script written for him

You have endless excuses to reject actual factual reality.

You are a PROVEN LIAR and a TRAITOR. You are too STUPID to know reality when you see it and your LIES and Russian propaganda are NOT reality

I know, you prefer, guffaw, "credible" sources that carried three years of anti-Trump Fake News, lies, propaganda and ****.

You are a LIAR that never happened those sources were RIGHT and telling the TRUTH about Trump and you just HATE REALITY

I deleted the rest of your LIES. You are a PROVEN LIAR a PROVEN GUTLESS COWARD and a TRAITOR

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:13 pm » wrote:

I love that once again you are a GUTLESS COWARD who will NEVER address the FACTS or arguments made or ANY SUBSTANCE whatsoever.I LOVE that you prove every day that you are too STUPID to even ATTEMPT discourse and too much of a GUTLESS COWARD to face my BEATDOWNS so you just run away SOBBING EVERY SINGLE DAY

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:10 pm » wrote:
:

Except that Mueller said he agreed with Barr's conclusions, wackjob.

Then why did Mueller write a letter to Barr complaining that he MISREPRESENTED his report?

https://www.vox.com/2019/4/30/18524663/mueller-barr-letter-trump-russia

Mueller to Attorney General Barr: You “did not fully capture” my report
For the soft-spoken special counsel, that is quite the statement.

It turns out that special counsel Robert Mueller was just as upset with Attorney General William Barr’s characterization of the Trump-Russia report — and the ensuing public discussion — as many Americans were.
On March 24, Barr released his four-page summary of the special counsel’s report in which he said Mueller found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. And while Mueller didn’t absolve President Donald Trump of an obstruction of justice charge, Barr did, saying he didn’t think the evidence the special counsel’s team provided met that standard.
But according to multiple reports, Mueller was unhappy with Barr’s synopsis, and the type of media coverage that synopsis prompted.
Days after the attorney general sent his summary to Congress, Mueller wrote the Justice Department leadership to say that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the full report.
“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” he continued. To rectify the situation, Mueller recommended that Barr release the full 448-page report’s introduction and executive summaries.
https://www.justsecurity.org/64441/a-side-by-side-comparison-of-barrs-vs-muellers-statements-about-special-counsel-report/

A Side-by-Side Comparison of Barr’s vs. Mueller’s Statements about Special Counsel Report

Comparison of Attorney General William Barr’s and Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s
Statements about Special Counsel Report
1. Evidence of conspiracy
Added analysis:
Mueller’s statement is more explicit, in some respects, than what’s in the Report. He states that the bottom-line conclusion in Volume 1 is that there was “insufficient evidence” to bring a charge for conspiring with the Russians. That’s also very different from any suggestion that the
investigation found “no evidence,” or that allegations against the president were proven false, or that the conspiracy with Trump campaign associates did not occur. What’s more, Mueller frames the issue importantly in terms of insufficient evidence to charge “a broader conspiracy.” That’s a significant way of framing the investigation’s scope and findings.

Mueller

“The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was

Barr (1) “f the president is being falsely accused, which the evidence now suggests that the accusations against him were false
….”



This is an entire article about how Muellers PUbLIC STATEMENTS contradict what Barr has said often DIRECTLY


Has Mueller expressed one single word of dissent in the many, many months since then?

YES a BUNCH as that ENTIRE ARTICLE SHOWS LIAR

Imbecile.

Is is perfect irony that someone as STAGGERINGLY STUPID as you questions anyone else's intellect MORON besides the FACT you are a PROVEN LIAR a PROVEN GUTLESS COWARD and a TRAITOR

A White House questionnaire being sent to potential political appointees appears to be a litmus test of the applicant's loyalty to the president.

The questionnaire, a copy of which was obtained by CBS News, includes questions like, "What part of candidate Trump's campaign message most appealed to you and why?"

The questionnaire also asks potential appointees to describe their political evolution and to list media appearances in which they've commented about Mr. Trump.

"The purpose of this document is to expedite Presidential Personnel's vetting process," it says, before asking the applicant to list all social media accounts and references.

The survey is a product of new presidential personnel director Johnny McEntee, who rejoined the administration recently after he was escorted out of the White House in 2018 while under a security-related investigation.

CBS News previously reported McEntee has been scouring the administration for political appointees deemed disloyal to the president.

The White House Presidential Personnel Office is responsible for vetting administration appointees.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/new-wh ... ssion=true

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:13 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Mar 2020 4:17 pm » wrote:

solon » 05 Mar 2020 3:35 pm » wrote:I deleted all the Russian propaganda and STUPID LIES because they all boil down to you telling THIS LIE AGAIN. You keep telling it because Russian Military Intelligence is INVESTED in the LIE. No matter how often I PROVE you are A LIAR with this LIE you do your GUTLESS COWARD ACT run away then slink back and tell this LIE again. NOT a HOAX rather a FACT. Look up the word collusion then ADDRESS THE FACTS TRAITOR
ADDRESS THE FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD

Why bother solon?
He's a **** Russian bot.
He spews Putin's disinformation and propaganda all day long.

I love psychotic moonbat humor.

That's because you're a psychotic moonbat.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:13 pm » wrote:You're so **** desperate to find someone who believes your ****, you have to settle for this raving lunatic.

Says the forum's biggest liar, and **** artist.
And when it comes to being a 'raving lunatic' take a look at your own posts Precious.
The hysteria is off the charts.

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:13 pm » wrote:Even more ironic given that the until recently Democrat front runner is a literal Communist sympathizer.
Who you said you've vote for.

I said I would reluctantly vote for him if he were the nominee, and it looks like I won't have to.

I will happily vote for Joe Biden if he is the candidate, and would have happily voted for almost every one of the other people who ran.

You really don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to voting.

You voted for a reality TV personality who is a carnival barking clown, a fraud, a grifter, and a con- artist, and you will vote for him again.