Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:39 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 1:30 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:13 pm » wrote:The judge is full of ****, because Mueller told Barr that he agreed with his conclusions.

When and where did he tell him that?
Surely not in the letter he sent to Barr

When asked about that letter, Mueller complained not about Barr's conclusions, which he said he agreed with, but about media coverage.

When and where did he say that?
Link?
Who am I kidding?
You don't need no stinkin' links.
You just pull your facts straight from your ***.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:39 pm » wrote:It's hardly my fault the judge is so stupidly wrong.

But you're not smearing him.

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 1:51 pm » wrote: It came from a bartender working at the venue where the fundraiser was being held.
He was not part of any group that receives millions of dollars in donations from Democrats to spy on Republicans.

The ‘47% tape’ and the man who revealed the real Mitt Romney

You're citing MS-LSD, the network that has carried three years of lunatic lies about Trump?

You're kidding, right?

Despite its flaws, Gateway is far, far, far more reliable.

I don't believe it was a random bartender, no.

Both parties get involved in spying, opposition research etc. This is SOP for both parties.

But you only complain about one side, because you're a dishonest partisan hack.

You really are terminally stupid.

There is no law that mandates that everyone be registered in a political party.

As a Liberal it is only natural that my views align more with the Democratic Party, but that doesn't mean that I must be a registered Democrat.

So when you constantly call the Democratic Party my party, you are the one being terminally dishonest.

The usual **** from someone who's terminally dishonest.

If a prominent Republican politician forgot to register, what would you say if he denied being a Republican?

You'd accuse him of lying, and you'd be correct.

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:09 pm » wrote:

When asked about that letter, Mueller complained not about Barr's conclusions, which he said he agreed with, but about media coverage.


Mueller said specifically that he did agree with Barr's conclusions.

When and where did he say that?
Link?
Who am I kidding?
You don't need no stinkin' links.
You just pull your facts straight from your ***.

Barr and Mueller discussed the issue, and Barr related the conversation in testimony before Congress, psycho.

And as usual you censored the important part of my post.

If Barr lied, why haven't Democrats bitterly complained ever since and tried to impeach Barr?


Why hasn't Mueller gone public and accused Barr of lying?

And if Trump did commit crimes according to the Mueller Report, why didn't the Impeachment Clowns cite one single one of them?

Run, Forrest, run!

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:03 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:42 pm wrote:Anyone who makes false claims about Trump or his officials deserve to get hit.

Based on what?

What proof do you have that the judge is making a false claim?
Don't answer that, it's rhetorical.
You have none, of course.

I cited two, and you censored them.

The Justice Dept. said the judges claims were "contrary to the facts."

And I'll bet every conservative source will have commented on the judge's appalling claim by the end of the day.

WTF do you know about integrity?

I know you have none, which is why you censor the truth when I cite it.

Everyone in this administration lies through their **** teeth all the time.
Yet you believe them and smear anyone who dares to point out their lies.

When he wins in an electoral landslide, you'll have four more years to shriek, lie, smear and propagandize.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:15 pm » wrote:

You're citing MS-LSD, the network that has carried three years of lunatic lies about Trump?

You are a LIAR they told the TRUTH about him for three years you just HATE the truth and are mad they wouldnt tell the LIES you want to push

You're kidding, right?

You are STUPID BRAINWASHED and a TRAITOR right?

Despite its flaws, Gateway is far, far, far more reliable.

You are a LIAr we have shown MANY TIMES what NORMAL HUMANS know about Gateway that they often run with LIES FAKE NEWS and conspiracy theories and fact check sites SAY SO. You just LIKE the LIES they tell

I don't believe it was a random bartender, no.

That you do not BELIEVE REALITY will not CHANGE REALITY. You certainly have NO EVIDENCE to contradict the REALITY

Both parties get involved in spying, opposition research etc. This is SOP for both parties.

You are a LIAR it is standard for YOUR SIDE TO LIE and be dishonest and you FAILED MISERABLY at showing both sides are doing it. The reason you cannot SUBSTANTIATE your claim is you are a LIAR and you cannot substantiate things you pull out of your lower torso

But you only complain about one side, because you're a dishonest partisan hack.

GOD you are STUPID you are lucky irony is not fatal or your head would have exploded. YOU are saying this? AS IF you EVER complain about your side you are pathetic


The usual **** from someone who's terminally dishonest.

No one on this SITE is anywhere NEAR as dishonest as YOU are. You LiE constantly get TOTALLY DEBUNKED with FACTS and REALITY then tell the SAME STUPID LIES AGAIN you DEFINE dishonesty

If a prominent Republican politician forgot to register, what would you say if he denied being a Republican?

That may well be the STUPIDEST thing ever said in the English language. No one here is a POLITICIAN neither of us are PAID by political parties or RUN FOR OFFICE getting money from a political party. You are just too STUPID to get that not EVERYBODY is either a Democrat or a Republican you PATHETIC SIMPLEMINDED MORON

You'd accuse him of lying, and you'd be correct.

Not in ANY way relevant ant it is SAD you are SO STUPID you dont even UNDERSTAND the simplest of concepts

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:19 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:09 pm » wrote:

THE GAPING ASSHOLE SAID: When asked about that letter, Mueller complained not about Barr's conclusions, which he said he agreed with, but about media coverage.
Mueller said specifically that he did agree with Barr's conclusions.

When and where did he say that?
Link?
Who am I kidding?
You don't need no stinkin' links.
You just pull your facts straight from your ***.

Barr and Mueller discussed the issue, and Barr related the conversation in testimony before Congress, psycho.

OIC, so Barr is the one who said that, not Mueller.
So why do you keep saying that Mueller agreed with Barr's conclusions?

Obviously he didn't because he wrote a letter to that effect, which you keep dismissing.

Here's a hint.....Barr is a liar.
I don't believe a **** word he says.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:28 pm » wrote:
Proving that you censor my posts without even reading them, p[sycho.

.

a CLAIM by the justice dept is proof of NOTHING but that they disagree. GOD you are SUCH A PUNK and TROLL your GISH GALLOP of LIES and STUPIDITY are WEAK and you are STIlL a GUTLESS COWARD who will NOT ADDRESS THE FACTS

ADDRESS the FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD and TRAITOR

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:28 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:03 pm » wrote:What proof do you have that the judge is making a false claim?
Don't answer that, it's rhetorical.
You have none, of course.?

Proving that you censor my posts without even reading them, p[sycho.

I posted that myself you pinhead.

That has NOTHING to do with what the judge said about Barr's 4 page summary of the Mueller report.

The judge said that Barr's "misleading public statements" about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report make him untrustworthy.

That's why he wants to see the unredacted report, and I don't blame him.
We can't trust anything that comes out of this Justice Dept.

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 1:30 pm » wrote:So **** typical.

Anyone who dares go up against any member of TrumpCo. must be destroyed.

Who has been "destroyed," psycho?

Zindman? No, he was simply moved out of the White House.

Zindman's brother? No, same thing.

Have any critics of Trump been indicted on spurious if not false charges and been professionally and personally ruined, like General Flynn?

Who lost his house and is deeply in debt?

But at some point the anti-Trump criminals will face justice, almost certainly before the election.

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:35 pm » wrote:I posted that myself you pinhead.

That has NOTHING to do with what the judge said about Barr's 4 page summary of the Mueller report.

The judge said that Barr's "misleading public statements" about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report make him untrustworthy.

And that's why he wants to see the unredacted report.

And the judges claims were refuted many, many months ago.

I did just a little while ago, and you censored every single word.

If the judge hasn't corrected his false claims by Monday or Tuesday, it can safely assumed he's either incompetent or part of the corrupt Swamp.

Yes, even Reagan judges can make mistakes or go bad. That's why it's called the Swamp.

Better censor this, psycho, because it refutes your **** that the Corona death rate will remain at the original rate because of, guffaw, "basic math" as you stupidly claimed.

Liberals mocked President Trump for saying coronavirus mortality rate was lower than initially reported; now health official says he's right

.....At a press briefing on Friday morning, Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Admiral Brett Giroir declared, "The best estimates now of the overall mortality rate for COVID-19 is somewhere between 0.1% and 1%."

Giroir noted the figure is "lower than you heard probably in many reports," but that the real mortality rate is "not likely in the range of 2% to 3%."
https://www.theblaze.com/news/liberals_ ... oronavirus

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:38 pm » wrote:

And the judges claims were refuted many, many months ago.

That is A LIE never ONCE refuted you just LIE with every post its all you do TRAITOR. SHOW that refutation of STFU

Then all you did was repeat the SAME LIES over and over its all you EVER DO since you are too much of a GUTLESS COWARD to deal with the FACTS CITED already that PROVE you are a LIAR so I just deleted the LIES

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:15 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 1:51 pm » wrote:It came from a bartender working at the venue where the fundraiser was being held.
He was not part of any group that receives millions of dollars in donations from Democrats to spy on Republicans.
The ‘47% tape’ and the man who revealed the real Mitt Romney

You're citing MS-LSD, the network that has carried three years of lunatic lies about Trump?

Don't give me that ****.
The bartender is directly quoted in the story.

No answer to this?

Is it true that everyone who needs to be tested for CORVID-19 right now can get a test?

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:02 pm » wrote:Awww, isn't it cute that a psychopathic liar and a raving lunatic share the same lies together.
And from that hack source Mediamutters no less.

Awww, isn't it cute that the moron who uses hack sources like Gatewaypundit is criticizing anyone else's sources?

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:02 pm » wrote:Veritas's videos speak for themselves, and almost nothing is out of context.

And you accuse us of lying?
O'Keefe's videos have repeatedly been found to be highly and deceptively edited.
He's a **** joke.

5 times James O’Keefe embarrassed himself trying to out liberal bias.

What about this Precious?

Is it true that everyone who needs to be tested for CORVID-19 right now can get a test?

Is that just one of Trump's little 'fibs' which doesn't really matter because unlike Obama's big lies, it doesn't involve a life or death issue?

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:43 pm » wrote:

You are a GUTLESS COWARD who is trying to do a GISH GALLOP while RUNNING AWAY from the FACTS SOBBING. Telling the SAME STUPID LIES OVER AND OVER WORD FOR WORD. ALREADY SEEN them deleted them meanwhile the FACTS ARE Barr misprepresented Muellers report which he SAID in his letter and the FACTS are not going away

Then why did Mueller write a letter to Barr complaining that he MISREPRESENTED his report?


https://www.vox.com/2019/4/30/18524663/mueller-barr-letter-trump-russiaMueller to Attorney General Barr: You “did not fully capture” my reportFor the soft-spoken special counsel, that is quite the statement.It turns out that special counsel Robert Mueller was just as upset with Attorney General William Barr’s characterization of the Trump-Russia report — and the ensuing public discussion — as many Americans were.


On March 24, Barr released his
four-page summary of the special counsel’s report in which he said Mueller found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. And while Mueller didn’t absolve President Donald Trump of an obstruction of justice charge, Barr did, saying he didn’t think the evidence the special counsel’s team provided met that standard.But according to
multiple
reports, Mueller was unhappy with Barr’s synopsis, and the type of media coverage that synopsis prompted.Days after the attorney general sent his summary to Congress,




Mueller wrote the Justice Department leadership to say that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the full report.“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. T


his threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” he continued. To rectify the situation,
Mueller recommended that Barr release the
full 448-page report’s introduction and executive summaries



.
https://www.justsecurity.org/64441/a-side-by-side-comparison-of-barrs-vs-muellers-statements-about-special-counsel-report/A Side-by-Side Comparison of Barr’s vs. Mueller’s Statements about Special Counsel ReportComparison of Attorney General William Barr’s and Special Counsel Robert Mueller’sStatements about Special Counsel Report1. Evidence of conspiracy


Added analysis:Mueller’s statement is more explicit, in some respects, than what’s in the Report. He states that the bottom-line conclusion in Volume 1 is that there was “insufficient evidence” to bring a charge for conspiring with the Russians. That’s also very different from any suggestion that the


investigation found “no evidence,” or that allegations against the president were proven false, or that the conspiracy with Trump campaign associates did not occur. What’s more, Mueller frames the issue importantly in terms of insufficient evidence to charge “a broader conspiracy.” That’s a significant way of framing the investigation’s scope and findings.Mueller“The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was


Barr (1) “f the president is being falsely accused, which the evidence now suggests that the accusations against him were falseThis is an entire article about how Muellers PUbLIC STATEMENTS contradict what Barr has said often DIRECTLYADDRESS the FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD and TRAITOR

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:45 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:02 pm wrote:Awww, isn't it cute that a psychopathic liar and a raving lunatic share the same lies together. And from that hack source Mediamutters no less.

Awww, isn't it cute that the moron who uses hack sources like Gatewaypundit is criticizing anyone else's sources?

You mean your sources that carried three years of anti-Trump Fake News, lies, **** and propaganda?

Gateway didn't do that, psycho. They got almost everything right.

Your sources did; they got almost everything wrong.

I'd call you stupid, but in fact you're just dishonest.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:48 pm » wrote: \

You are a PROVEN LIAR a GUTLESS COWARD and a TRAITOR I PROVE you are a LAIR you just IMMEDIATELY repeat your LIES AGAIN and AGAIN. HOPING your GISH GA:LOP of LIES will fool people who do not SEE that you are a GUTLESS COWARD that your LIES have been DEBUNKED and you just SPEW them again because you are a TRAITOR and a GUTLESS COWARD who NEVER addresses the FACTS

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:43 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:29 pm » wrote:

THE GAPING ASSHOLE SAID: Barr and Mueller discussed the issue, and Barr related the conversation in testimony before Congress, psycho.

OIC, so Barr is the one who said that, not Mueller.
So why do you keep saying that Mueller agreed with Barr's conclusions?
Obviously he didn't because he wrote a letter to that effect, which you keep dismissing.
Here's a hint.....Barr is a liar.
I don't believe a **** word he says.

Lie, lie, lie, lie, and censor the truth.
Barr related the conversation in his sworn testimony.

He's a liar.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:43 pm » wrote:If Barr lied, why haven't Democrats bitterly complained ever since and tried to impeach Barr?

They have complained about his lying under oath which he also did during his confirmation hearing.

As for Impeaching him, they were a little busy impeaching Sniffles.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:48 pm » wrote:

You are a LIAR and a GUTLESS COWARD REPEATING the same exact LIES over and over WORD FOR WORD ignoring the FACTS that PROVE you are a LIAR

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/09/politics ... index.htmlThe Justice Department's inspector general found that the FBI properly opened its investigation into Russian election interferenceThe report released Monday by inspector general Michael Horowitz did not find "documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions" to open investigations that initially focused on campaign advisers Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Michael Flynn and former campaign chairman Paul Manafort.And the report goes on to say Trump, your GOD is a LIAR and the FBI did NOT spy on himThen the FACTS show that they found PLENTY of dirty dealing WITH the Russians even if it was not enough to prosecute for conspiracy it was DEFINITLY enough to justify investigation


https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/timel ...July 2016,


the FBI began investigating the Russian government’s attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election, including whether President Donald Trump’s campaign associates were involved in those efforts.The START of the whole thing was a bunch of intelligence agencies like Estonia and Germany and Britian was telling OUR intelligence agencies that whenever they were spying on KNOWN and suspected Russian intelligence assets they kept hearing Trump campaign people


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... nks-russia


GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland.Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.


Trump was getting advance notice from wikileaks about their dumps wikileaks was called by Trumps own pick for head of the CIA a hostile intelligence agency but Trump touted them at LEAST 100 time


shttps://www.vox.com/2019/4/19/18507743/ ...



Trumps campaign manager repeatedly gave a man he KNEW was connected to Russian Military Intelligence INTERNAL polling data and Manafort discussed their strategy for the midwest with him



https://www.newsweek.com/paul-manafort- .


The report noted that Manafort instructed his longtime colleague Rick Gates to provide Kilimnik with internal Trump campaign polling data and briefings on the campaign's strategies. For years, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together closely on political campaigns in Ukraine. Manafort even nicknamed Kilimnik his "Russian brain." The FBI has determined that Kilimnik, who was once a Russian military translator, has links to Russian intelligence services.


Sessions, Page, Manafort, Papadopolous, Jared, Don jr, Gates, Mcfarland ALL had contacts with Russians then LIED about them. Either you can cough up an innocent explanation for all that LYING or that alone justifies the investigation


The Trump campaign had more than 140 contacts with Russians the normal presidential campaign has ZERO


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... e=REGIWALLJan 26, 2019 -Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediaries


ADDRESS THE FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD AND TRAITOR

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 2:50 pm » wrote:

Misty » 07 Mar 2020 2:45 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2020 1:02 pm » wrote:Awww, isn't it cute that a psychopathic liar and a raving lunatic share the same lies together.
And from that hack source Mediamutters no less.
Veritas's videos speak for themselves, and almost nothing is out of context.
And there isn't one single honest, common sense liberal on the board.

And you accuse us of lying?
O'Keefe's videos have repeatedly been found to be highly and deceptively edited.
He's a **** joke.

5 times James O’Keefe embarrassed himself trying to out liberal bias.

Vice.com?

Again, you have no business criticizing anyone else's sources.
None of yours are rated HIGH for factual reporting.