I don't need the respect of anyone who thinks that Trump is a good president, nor do I want it.Rock » 18 Jun 2020, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑Congratulations Misty. On Tuesday you had the highest post count of 72. You're almost up there with BV. It's a shame you're coming off as a delusional member of the Trump Derangement Syndrome crowd.
I used to have a modicum of respect for you but you've become totally unhinged. I can't wait until November 4th when we see you completely lose it.
Misty » 19 Jun 2020, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need the respect of anyone who thinks that Trump is a good president, nor do I want it.
Bolton's book has just confirmed what we already knew.
That Trump gives personal favors to dictators that he likes including interfering with ongoing criminal investigations.
That he continues to solicit help from foreign countries to help him in his election.
That he engages in what looks like "obstruction of justice as a way of life.”
And that every decision he makes in office is driven by self interest and not in the interest of the country.
I really don't give a damn what any Trump supporter thinks about me, because IMO they're on the wrong side of history.
P.S. I really don't understand this penchant that some people have for using someone's post count as an insult against them.
I have never once checked anyone's post count.
That seems really pretty to me.
The more people post the better for the forum, so you should be encouraging people to post more and not shaming them into posting less.
Rock » 19 Jun 2020, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑Misty » 19 Jun 2020, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need the respect of anyone who thinks that Trump is a good president, nor do I want it.
Bolton's book has just confirmed what we already knew.
That Trump gives personal favors to dictators that he likes including interfering with ongoing criminal investigations.
That he continues to solicit help from foreign countries to help him in his election.
That he engages in what looks like "obstruction of justice as a way of life.”
And that every decision he makes in office is driven by self interest and not in the interest of the country.
I really don't give a damn what any Trump supporter thinks about me, because IMO they're on the wrong side of history.
P.S. I really don't understand this penchant that some people have for using someone's post count as an insult against them.
I have never once checked anyone's post count.
That seems really pretty to me.
The more people post the better for the forum, so you should be encouraging people to post more and not shaming them into posting less.

And let's not forget the two Boogaloo Boys who were arrested for the murder of two cops in Oakland, CA.Federal arrests show no links to 'Antifa' at protests despite Trump administration's claims.
Donald Trump and his attorney general William Barr, among the president's other Republican allies and members of the administration, have repeatedly blamed so-called members of "Antifa" for recent protest violence in the wake of the police killings of black Americans.
But federal prosecutors have not linked any protest arrests for federal crimes to the loosely organised group of antifascist demonstrators that the administration has argued are staging a coordinated campaign to incite violence.
The term does not appear in any of the more than 50 arrest records and charging documents from more than a dozen states reviewed by The New York Times, NPR, Reuters and The Independent, among others.
Only one "extremist" group has been named by prosecutors in cases related to demonstrations: three men arrested during Black Lives Matter protests in Nevada are allegedly linked to the far-right "Boogaloo" conspiracy to incite a civil war.
The suspects allegedly armed themselves and wore bulletproof vests before walking into a Las Vegas crowd and provoking nearby police officers, according to US District Court filings.
They were arrested on 30 May after preparing Molotov cocktails, prosecutors allege. The men have denied the charges.
It got your attention and ankle-biting comment as intended. WIN. Now on to business.duck615 » 19 Jun 2020, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Poor Phelix the ******... giving me 5 down votes at one time....
Unless you have prove of your claim... you had better stfu...Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ It got your attention and ankle-biting comment as intended. WIN. Now on to business.
Why did you, duck615, conspire with Str8tEdge at OLF to harass the ladies over here, the day he was banned from this forum?
Don't be shy. Are you saying you didn't do it? If you say you didn't, then you're a liar.duck615 » 19 Jun 2020, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑Unless you have prove of your claim... you had better stfu...Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ It got your attention and ankle-biting comment as intended. WIN. Now on to business.
Why did you, duck615, conspire with Str8tEdge at OLF to harass the ladies over here, the day he was banned from this forum?
duck615 » 19 Jun 2020, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Poor Phelix the ******... giving me 5 down votes at one time....
Show your prove or stfu...Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't be shy. Are you saying you didn't do it? If you say you didn't, then you're a liar.
Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑Don't be shy. Are you saying you didn't do it? If you say you didn't, then you're a liar.duck615 » 19 Jun 2020, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑Unless you have prove of your claim... you had better stfu...Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ It got your attention and ankle-biting comment as intended. WIN. Now on to business.
Why did you, duck615, conspire with Str8tEdge at OLF to harass the ladies over here, the day he was banned from this forum?
Here you go. kFOOLs is in this thread, too.duck615 » 19 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑Show your prove or stfu...Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't be shy. Are you saying you didn't do it? If you say you didn't, then you're a liar.
https://tinyurl.com/y7ptbhcrStr8tEdge » wrote: On 6/16/2020 at 9:08 AM, Str8tEdge said:
I exposed Isabel pretty well for a few hours of her vile treachery and deceit.
The BEST was her getting caught red handed handing out posters IP addresses to a known hacker. \duck615 » some time ago » wrote: ↑ On 6/16/2020 at 09:10 AM, Duck615 said:
I will use that against her
Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑
Here you go. kFOOLs is in this thread, too.
https://tinyurl.com/y7ptbhcr
Phelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑
Here you go. kFOOLs is in this thread, too.
https://tinyurl.com/y7ptbhcr
To manipulate a beautiful video like this is disgusting.Parent of toddler in 'manipulated' Trump video forces Facebook and Twitter to remove it.
Facebook and Twitter on Friday removed a video posted by President Donald Trump's account that had twisted a viral video of two toddlers after one of the children's parents lodged a copyright claim.
The video had more than 4 million views on Facebook (FB) and more than 20 million views on Twitter (TWTR) before it was taken down.
The now-removed clip is a crude and misleading edit of a video that went viral last year which shows a Black child and a White child running to hug each other.
The version posted to Trump's account made it first appear as if the Black child was running away from the White child.
Jukin Media, a company that represents creators of videos including the parent who owns this video, said in a statement provided to CNN Business Friday afternoon,
"Neither the video owner nor Jukin Media gave the President permission to post the video, and after our review, we believe that his unauthorized usage of the content is a clear example of copyright infringement without valid fair use or other defense."
Jukin said in its statement that it had submitted a takedown request to Twitter.
Jukin did not confirm it had sent the takedown request to Facebook, but Andy Stone, a Facebook spokesperson, said "We received a copyright complaint from the rights holder of this video under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and have removed the post."
Twitter also confirmed it removed the video following a copyright claim.
The video was put on Trump's Facebook account after he tweeted it Thursday night, the eve of Juneteenth, the oldest known holiday honoring the end of slavery in the United States.
Michael Cisneros, the father of one of the boys in the video, said last year he had posted the original video to social media because he thought it was a beautiful, candid moment to share in the midst of racism and hate in the world.
"The reason that it's getting attention [is] because it is with a little black boy and a little white boy...But if it can change someone's mind, you know, or just change their view on things, then it's totally worth it," Cisneros said last year.
The version of the video tweeted and posted by Trump first showed a part of the viral video in which one of the boys was chasing the other, which had been overlaid with a fake CNN graphic that read, "Terrified todler [sic] runs from racist baby."
The rest of the video -- in which the two children run to embrace one another -- is then shown.
Responding to Trump's use of the video, Cisneros wrote in a Facebook post Thursday night, "HE WILL NOT TURN THIS LOVING, BEAUTIFUL VIDEO TO FURTHER HIS HATE AGENDA!! !! !! !!"
CNN Business has reached out to Cisneros for comment.
The clip Trump promoted suggested that CNN would have spun the viral video to make it appear negative.
In fact, CNN covered the full version of the viral video in 2019.
The toddlers and their fathers also appeared on the "The Van Jones Show" on CNN.
Twitter labeled the video Trump tweeted as "manipulated media" shortly after he tweeted it Thursday night.
"This Tweet has been labeled per our synthetic and manipulated media policy to give people more context," a Twitter spokesperson said.
Facebook also has a manipulated media policy.
The company declined to comment on whether the video violated that policy.
Facebook took no action until a copyright claim was filed.
A spokesperson for CNN responded to Trump's tweet Thursday night, "CNN did cover this story - but exactly as it happened.
Just as CNN has reported your positions on race (and your poll numbers).
We'll continue working with facts and invite you to do the same, rather than tweeting fake videos that exploit innocent children. Be better."
Asked about the video Friday, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said she thought it was funny.
"I think the President was making a satirical point that was quite funny if you go and actually watch the video," McEnany said during a press briefing.
Jim Acosta, CNN's chief White House correspondent, pointed out, "It seems as though he's exploiting children to make some sort of crass political point."
McEnany responded by claiming that Trump was "making a point about CNN specifically.
He was making a point that CNN has regularly taken him out of context."
The video Trump tweeted included a credit to @CarpeDonktum, who regularly publishes memes and parody videos supporting the President.
After Trump tweeted the video it quickly went viral on Twitter, racking up millions of views in less than two hours.
Twitter twice flagged Trump tweets over the past month.
The labels Twitter puts on flagged tweets are relatively unobtrusive, but they have enraged the President and his supporters and even prompted Trump to sign an executive order targeting social media companies.
In May, Twitter labeled two Trump tweets that made false claims about mail-in ballots in California.
A few days later, Twitter labeled as a glorification of violence a Trump tweet in which he said, "when the looting starts, the shooting starts."
Earlier on Thursday, Facebook removed ads run by the Trump campaign, saying the ads violated its policy against organized hate.
The ads, attacking the leftwing group antifa, featured a symbol that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) said was "practically identical to that used by the Nazi regime to classify political prisoners in concentration camps."
The Trump campaign defended itself claiming the symbol was used by antifa activists.
The ADL said in response that some antifa activists have used the symbol, but it is not particularly common.
You said about Isabel, "I will use that against her."duck615 » 19 Jun 2020, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑Sad you liberal **** take things out of context!!!! Keep on lying bitchPhelix_Dacat » 19 Jun 2020, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Here you go. kFOOLs is in this thread, too.
https://tinyurl.com/y7ptbhcr
you don't know what we were talking about before this statement... sad futz is a putzMisty » 19 Jun 2020, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑You said about Isabel, "I will use that against her."
In what context would that sound good?