Liberal Forum

Voter fraud is almost impossible to catch....But you always say it's rampant? How would you know that? So where did you get those many, many, many examples, if it's almost impossible to catch?Thanks for showing you don't even read the sources I cite.It's so common, even sheer luck turns up cases, and voluminous direct evidence proves it is common, but because of a lack of voter ID laws, impossible to prosecute.Republicans.....what a bunch of criminals.Bleats the fawning, groveling toady who told countless lies on behalf of a serial felon/ rapist/ impeached disgrace.OIC. So all these Republican governors and state legislatures are passing all these new Voter I.D. laws for crimes that have thus far gone undetected. Kind of like a solution, in search of a problem.Your usual Democrat Talking Point Lie. I've quoted SCOTUS and Democrats saying otherwise.ROFLMAO, you get more **** crazy every day.Even Fox News (a source you like) said in person voter fraud is rare. And the Republican National Lawyers Association own study undercut their own contention that in person voter fraud is rampant (see post #749 in this thread).Bulls***. It's rare that anyone gets caught. Once Repubs take the White House and Justice Dept and voter ID laws kick in, prosecutions will be more commonplace, or those who commit it will stop.And Dems will lose significantly more elections. Edited by RichClem, 26 December 2011 - 04:03 PM.

....voluminous direct evidence proves it is common.....The only thing that's voluminous is the amount of empty space in your head, where your brain should be. Edited by MistyBlue, 26 December 2011 - 09:37 PM.

....voluminous direct evidence proves it is common.....The only thing that's voluminous is the amount of empty space in your head, where your brain should be.How many specific comments have you left to the many, many, many, many examples I've cited?Zero.Says it all.Massive Voter Fraud Found in Close NY-1 RaceSam FosterSet the bar for voter fraud at ground level and NY could find a way to bury it. First, NY couldn't figure out how to use the post office to deliver absentee ballots to the right-leaning military voters, and then a Democrat stronghold discovers two "missing" voting machines. Now, we learn that limousine liberals were afforded the privilege of voting twice; once in hometown Manhattan and another for Democrat incumbent Tim Bishop several congressional districts away in Suffolk County.Yesterday, Fox News fraud investigators reported several Democrat irregularities in the close NY-1 race: A Fox News Voter Fraud Unit review of approximately 438 of the absentee ballot voters, who also maintain mailing addresses in New York City, reveals that 48 have double registrations. They voted by absentee ballot in Suffolk County, but are also listed as current "active" voters on the New York City rolls. Being registered in two separate jurisdictions is illegal and is a felony in New York State.Keep in mind that Fox News took only a sample of ballots and found that nearly 11% of the absentees cast, were ballots where Democrats voted twice. There were over 10,000 absentee ballots cast and Democrat Tim Bishop maintains only a small lead of 235 votes after the absentee count concluded last week.Fox News also found a trend as to where all this voter fraud originated: The overwhelming majority of the Long Island voters, who are also on the New York City voter rolls, appear to be wealthy Manhattanites who own second-homes in the posh resort towns of East Hampton, Southampton, Montauk, Amagansett and Shelter Island. Many of them voted in Manhattan as recently as last November in New York City's mayoral election, and in the presidential election of 2008.So the limousine liberals voted twice. Keep in mind that these are the same massively rich liberals that want to tax small businesses earning $200,000 or over.Today, Tim Bishop and Randy Altschuler will appear before a judge to argue over nearly 2,000 challenged ballots. The media template has been that since Republican Randy Altschuler has challenged more ballots than Tim Bishop, Tim Bishop will be the likely winner. Given the rampant voter fraud discovered, this template is flawed at best. But, the election is now in the hands of NY's judicial activists who have made a career of inventing new rights for liberal groups. I wouldn't put it past them to give Manhattan liberals the right to vote twice.http://www.americant...found_in_c.html Edited by RichClem, 28 December 2011 - 10:40 AM.

Speaking of voter fraud, it seems like every time we hear about a real case and not an imagined one, it's a Republican.You mean not one single one of the many, many, many, many, many examples I've cited of Democrat voter fraud is "real?"It's "imagined?"Lie much?It All Starts with Vote FraudThe Bell city pay scandal has its roots in absentee voter fraud.By JOHN FUNDThe explosive scandal that saw officials in the lower-income city of Bell, California (population 40,000) purged last month due to outrageous salaries and pensions may have had its roots in voter fraud.City Manager Robert Rizzo, who stood to collect a $600,000-a-year pension, and police chief Randy Adams, who was due a $411,300-a-year pension, were just two of the officials forced to resign after their platinum parachutes were uncovered. Now it turns out that they had been hired and kept in their jobs by elected officials who allegedly took advantage of Bell's traditionally low voter turnout to commit ballot fraud.In 2005, fewer than 400 voters cast ballots in a special election that cleared the way for City Council members to dramatically boost their own salaries. In that election, more than half the votes cast were absentee ballots, the method of voting most susceptible to fraud.Four voters told the Los Angeles Times that city officials walked door-to-door urging them to vote absentee. One later was counted as voting absentee even though she said she never filled out a ballot. Two other voters said local council members had personally collected their ballots for delivery, a violation of state law. In addition, a retired Bell police officer has identified at least 19 people he says voted in Bell but were either dead or living outside the country at the time.One Bell resident, who insisted on anonymity, told the Times he was assigned the job of collecting absentee votes. "Our objective was to retrieve [absentee ballots], and if they were not filled out, instruct them how to fill it out, and if not, fill it out for them," he said. The man has provided a statement to Los Angeles prosecutors, who have opened an investigation.http://online.wsj.co...IDDLETopOpinion Edited by RichClem, 29 December 2011 - 11:36 AM.

(Reuters) - A Texas law requiring abortion providers to show or describe an ultrasound image to a woman of her pregnancy and to play sounds of the fetal heart does not violate the Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.The court ruled that the ultrasound requirements do not infringe on abortion providers' free speech rights, overturning a lower federal court's decision."The required disclosures of a sonogram, the fetal heartbeat, and their medical descriptions are the epitome of truthful, non-misleading information," Chief Judge Edith Jones wrote for the three-judge panel.The Texas law, enacted in 2011, requires abortion providers to display the ultrasound images and describe them in detail. While a woman seeking an abortion can decline to view the legally required ultrasound, she cannot decline to hear the physician's description of it unless she qualifies for an exception due to rape, incest or fetal abnormality.A coalition of medical providers sued in June to block the law, arguing that it made doctors a "mouthpiece" for the state's ideological message. The First Amendment includes protections against compelled speech.The challengers, represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, also argued that disclosure of the sonogram and fetal heartbeat was not "medically necessary" and therefore beyond the state's power to regulate the practice of medicine.A federal judge in Austin ruled that the law violated physicians' free-speech rights. But the Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit disagreed."Only if one assumes ... that pregnancy is a condition to be terminated, can one assume that such information about the fetus is medically irrelevant," the judicial panel concluded.The panel cited a 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in which the Supreme Court upheld a law requiring abortion providers to inform pregnant women of relevant health risks and the gestational age of the fetus. The high court ruled that doctors could be required to provide information that is truthful, not misleading and relevant to the decision to have an abortion.The president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, Nancy Northup, said in a statement the decision "clears the way for the enforcement of an insulting and intrusive law whose sole purpose is to harass women and dissuade them from exercising their constitutionally protected reproductive rights."The Texas law is among the most extreme ultrasound requirements in the country. Similar laws requiring the presentation of an ultrasound image to pregnant women have been blocked in Oklahoma and North Carolina.Six other states also require abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and provide women with an opportunity to view the image, according to the Guttmacher Institute, which specializes in research on reproductive issues. But unlike Texas, those states don't require women to hear a description of the image.The Office of the Solicitor General, which represented the Texas officials, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.Texas Governor Rick Perry, while campaigning for the Republican nomination for president, praised the ruling as a victory. "This important sonogram legislation ensures that every Texas woman seeking an abortion has all the facts about the life she is carrying," Perry said in a statement.LinkI thought it was Obama who was going to come between us and our doctors?

(Reuters) - A Texas law requiring abortion providers to show or describe an ultrasound image to a woman of her pregnancy and to play sounds of the fetal heart does not violate the Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.I thought it was Obama who was going to come between us and our doctors?Oh no! Women who are considering an abortion are given information about the fetus and its arguable life?How horrible!It should be killed without any consideration whatsoever.I thought liberals supported informed choice.

Deceptive Conservative videographer (hack) James O'Keefe recently set out to blow the whistle on an almost non-existent balloting problem; citizens impersonating other people at the polling place. Ironically in his efforts to prove that in person voter fraud is a real issue, it appears that O'Keefe and his team may have broken the law by falsely identifying themselves at the polling place, as well as by failing to get both parties to consent to be videotaped. Election officials and election law experts are suggesting that he may be implicated in another illegal scheme. Federal law bans not only the casting of, but the procurement of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held. O'Keefe is still on probation after pleading guilty to entering U.S. property under false pretenses in 2010, when he attempted to infiltrate the office of Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu. I hope they throw his worthless *** in jail this time.

Deceptive Conservative videographer (hack) James O'Keefe recently set out to blow the whistle on an almost non-existent balloting problem; citizens impersonating other people at the polling place."Almost non-existent."I'm so sorry your vision is failing so badly. You haven't read a single on of the many, many, many examples I gave of this, including one in Brooklyn in which many thousands of people voted illegally.It's never too late for medical care, moonbat.O'Keefe is still on probation after pleading guilty to entering U.S. property under false pretenses in 2010, when he attempted to infiltrate the office of Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu.I hope they throw his worthless *** in jail this time.What kind of twisted individual would tell endless lies in defense of a rapist/ serial felon/ sociopathic liar/ impeached disgrace, but demand an ordinary American, an honest whistle-blower against corrupt Big Government, be thrown in jail?

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway?

Is repeating yourself in different threads becoming an issue? Does Alzheimer's run in your family?

Is repeating yourself in different threads becoming an issue? Does Alzheimer's run in your family?No. I dug up my little peeing man for one thread, (Can Anyone Actually See The Pee Stream?) but he's so cute I decided to use him elsewhere also.As a matter of fact, I just had him pee on you in that thread.BTW there are currently two topics concerning urination, so I think the peeing man is very apropos.WTF is wrong with you? Have you completely lost your sense of humor?You're such an old **** crab lately.Go take a nap. Edited by MistyBlue, 14 January 2012 - 07:52 PM.

WTF is wrong with you? Have you completely lost your sense of humor?You're such an old banned word crab lately.Go take a nap.Ya know better than that, you have taken some shots today, so it is just playing the game on my part.We are not sideways.

MistyBlue, on 14 January 2012 - 03:14 PM, said:This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway? Yes, you close your eyes to facts that refute your lies.So?Here, try again.Deceptive Conservative videographer (hack) James O'Keefe recently set out to blow the whistle on an almost non-existent balloting problem; citizens impersonating other people at the polling place."Almost non-existent."I'm so sorry your vision is failing so badly. You haven't read a single on of the many, many, many examples I gave of this, including one in Brooklyn in which many thousands of people voted illegally.It's never too late for medical care, moonbat.O'Keefe is still on probation after pleading guilty to entering U.S. property under false pretenses in 2010, when he attempted to infiltrate the office of Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu.I hope they throw his worthless *** in jail this time.What kind of twisted individual would tell endless lies in defense of a rapist/ serial felon/ sociopathic liar/ impeached disgrace, but demand an ordinary American, an honest whistle-blower against corrupt Big Government, be thrown in jail?

How nice of Missy Poo to leave her thread for me.But you always say (voter fraud is) rampant? How would you know that?Because unlike you, I keep my eyes open to the many, many, many times it's exposed.That's why most Democrats work so hard to obstruct any attempt to prevent it.In late December (Holder) announced that the U.S. Department of Justice would block South Carolina's new law requiring voters to present photo IDs at the polls..... Holder may soon regret his action which, like nearly everything else done by the Obama Administration these days, is intended to help get Mr. Obama reelected. South Carolina's attorney general, Alan Wilson, has announced that the Palmetto state is going to court to clear this blockage. He announced that his investigation shows at least 900 dead people voted in South Carolina in the 2010 election. If only Holder had left things alone, those 900 dead folks might just have easily voted again this year.http://spectator.org...nd-other-voters Edited by RichClem, 17 January 2012 - 11:36 AM.

The Iowa Republican Party on Thursday officially called the state caucus a tie between Santorum and Romney even though Santorum received 34 more votes 29,839 to 29,805 for the former Massachusetts governor. Romney was initially declared the winner by a mere 8 votes.The Iowa Republican Party, however, decided to call the vote a tie because the tally from eight precincts are inexplicably missing. The result: no one really knows who won what was clearly a very close election.As the votes were recounted over the past week, the results changed several times before Santorum ended up on top.LinkOkay, so let me get this straight.....the Iowa Caucuses are run by the same Republican Party who constantly whines about Democratic voter fraud. We're supposed to trust them when it comes to running elections?

Okay, so let me get this straight.....the Iowa Caucuses are run by the same Republican Party who constantly whines about Democratic voter fraud. We're supposed to trust them when it comes to running elections?Oh wow, they're missing what, a few hundred votes? Would have made a huge difference, right?Any accusations of fraud? No.Any evidence of fraud? No.Anyone caught illegally registering Mickey Mouse or real people multiple times, like ACORN has? No.Any indictments? No.Any convictions? No.Yet she ignores the many, many, many, many real cases of actual Democrat voter fraud I've cited.Lie much?

Oh wow, they're missing what, a few hundred votes? Would have made a huge difference, right?Do you intentionally try and make yourself look this stupid?In an election as close as that...yes. It would have made a HUGE difference.You'll whine all day about one supposed dead person voting, for a Democrat, but if a Republican held caucus is off by a few hundred votes, that's no big deal. What a **** hypocrite you are.Any accusations of fraud? No. Any evidence of fraud? No.Well actually it looks like someone was screwing with the numbers.....Mitt Romney received 20 fewer votes than were reported in a Moulton precinct by the Republican Party of Iowa, the Appanoose County GOP chairman said Friday. Moulton Iowa resident Edward True signed an affidavit saying that he helped count the vote at the Garrett Memorial Library in Moulton and that the precinct had two votes for Romney, not 22, as reported online by the state GOP.http://www.desmoines...nct-county-saysYet she ignores the many, many, many, many real cases of actual Democrat voter fraud I've cited.I always ignore things that don't exist.

Oh wow, they're missing what, a few hundred votes? Would have made a huge difference, right?Do you intentionally try and make yourself look this stupid?In an election as close as that...yes. It would have made a HUGE difference.Why, who would have taken office? No one, so who's being stupid, stupid?In real elections, not primaries, that Democrats love to steal, the winner actually takes office.A slight margin of victory for Romney or Santorum is symbolic, duuh.Say, why did you cut out the rest of my post? So you didn't have to respond, of course.Any accusations of fraud? No.Any evidence of fraud? No.Anyone caught illegally registering Mickey Mouse or real people multiple times, like ACORN has? No.Any indictments? No.Any convictions? No.You'll whine all day about one supposed dead person voting, for a Democrat, but if a Republican held caucus is off by a few hundred votes, that's no big deal. What a **** hypocrite you are.Because there's this eensy weensy difference between mistakes and stealing elections.Yet she ignores the many, many, many, many real cases of actual Democrat voter fraud I've cited.I always ignore things that don't exist.Don't exist? Lie much?

You have chosen to ignore all posts from: RichClem.Here you Puss. This one's for you.Say what you will about Obama, He's sexy as hell.

You have chosen to ignore all posts from: RichClem.Of course, you don't want to see the many, many, many examples I've given of widespread Democrat voter fraud.Say what you will about Obama, He's sexy as hell.He's a danger to the Constitution and country as president.