Liberal Forum

What's so bad about transforming the country ? A lot of things NEED to be transformed.Sorry, you've exceeded your Stupidity Quota for the day.Heck, for the month, even.

What's so bad about transforming the country ? A lot of things NEED to be transformed.Sorry, you've exceeded your Stupidity Quota for the day.Heck, for the month, even.I agree, Protectionist. Putting up with RichClem's stupidity for as long as you have has to be difficult. Take a break.

I agree, Protectionist. Putting up with RichClem's stupidity for as long as you have has to be difficult. Take a break.Funny how you find allies among the stupidest, most clueless moonbats on the board.Why don't you see if ol' Proto-marxist wants to go out for coffee so you two can discuss what a huge failure Reagan's tax cuts were?Maybe you can share the same psychiatrist.

Funny how you find allies among the stupidest, most clueless moonbats on the board.I'm not your ally, Clem. Quit suggesting I am.Why don't you see if ol' Proto-marxist wants to go out for coffee so you two can discuss what a huge failure Reagan's tax cuts were?Gosh, clemmy - when you look to the right of you on the political spectrum, is anybody there?Maybe you can share the same psychiatrist.Oh, you're the one to speak of psychiatrists!Actually, I seem to have quite a magic wand now. In fact, I'm going to start doing surgery on myself! I had my conscience surgically removed many years ago.

How typical of a lying leftist, trying to claim that a mistake was a lie.You claim that every single one of my posts is a lie, without ever reading the actual post or the sources I used.This is your typical response to one of my posts:I'll bet blind your source is full of crap, biased beyond words.Of course you never bothered to look at my source, and apparently didn't even read far enough down my post to see that it was quite evident that my source was Fox News.Jackhole.MistyBlue, on 27 January 2012 - 01:18 AM, said:Let's get something straight Puss.I don't give a flying **** about Saul Alinsky.Oh gosh, little Miss Marxist has AGAIN refused to answer my question. I did answer it Puss.Maybe you didn't have your reading glasses on.Here I'll make it clearer for you.I don't give a flying **** about Saul Alinsky.Can you see it now?What's the difference if I answer your questions or not? You'll just make up the answer you want, and say that I said it anyway.You already got caught doing that once in regards to Saul Alinsky.http://liberalforum....ost__p__2418773Oh, but that was just a mistake.....right?Jackhole.So let's get this straight Puss. You can ask me about Alinsky 1,000 times (and you probably will) and I'm not going to answer, because I don't give a damn about whether or not Saul Alinsky was a Radical Leftist, or whether or not Obama is a follower of his.It means nothing to me.Got it? Edited by MistyBlue, 27 January 2012 - 11:39 PM.

Funny how you find allies among the stupidest, most clueless moonbats on the board.Why don't you see if ol' Proto-marxist wants to go out for coffee so you two can discuss what a huge failure Reagan's tax cuts were?Maybe you can share the same psychiatrist.I'd suggest a psychiatrist to go see you Rickety, but he doesn't do house (er, attic) calls anymore.

Oh gosh, little Miss Marxist has AGAIN refused to answer my question.I did answer it Puss.Maybe you didn't have your reading glasses on.Here I'll make it clearer for you.I don't give a flying spam about Saul Alinsky.Can you see it now?My, my, my, aren't you sensitive.You always get that way when I have a devastating piece of information that exposes your disgusting lies or exposes the truth about the Radical Left, of which Obama is part. What's the difference if I answer your questions or not?Wow, doesn't that speak volumes about the deeply dishonest nature of the liberal-left.On most important questions I ask of you, you refuse to go on record; refuse to express an honest opinion.Jackhole.So let's get this straight Puss. You can ask me about Alinsky 1,000 times (and you probably will) and I'm not going to answer, because I don't give a damn about whether or not Saul Alinsky was a Radical Leftist, or whether or not Obama is a follower of his.It means nothing to me.Got it?You don't care that the president of the US is a radical leftist? That's a lie, too, because you WANT the president to be a Radical Leftist. That's what you are, despite your dishonest denials.You don't want to honestly admit what Obama is. As David Horowitz, ex-leftist, has noted, the Radical Left lacks the integrity to openly admit what they and their their goals are. They act and talk like moderate liberals like you do, lie that their opponents are extremists like you do, deny their Leftism like you do, and pursue their anti-American goals surreptitiously like you do. Edited by RichClem, 28 January 2012 - 10:25 AM.

Hey Chlemmy.Whats it feel like to be continually bitch slapped around by Misty?Just curious.

Hey Chlemmy.Whats it feel like to be continually [female canine] slapped around by Misty?Just curious.Slapped around? If you mean large letters, name calling, personal attacks and utter BS, I could care less.If you mean establishing the truth or deceitfully avoiding it, she's road kill.Do you think she's telling the truth when she claims she doesn't care if Obama is a Radical Left follower of Alinsky?Do you care about that?

For Clem, who claimed that Morgan Pillsbury seduced poor innocent John Fund......Sex, Lies, and the Tape: The John Fund Storyby John ConnollySept. 4, 2001 -- John Fund, the forty-six year old writer on the staff of the Wall Street Journal's editorial page, has staked out a position as a man of integrity. On his frequent appearances on cable and network talk shows, he espouses the position of the right-wing conservatives. He is friends with people in the Bush White House. He is a dear friend of Conservative Grover Norquist. He recently met with Vice President Dick Cheney. During the Clinton presidency he wrote often of the terrible acts committed by Clinton against women. On his appearances on Television evangelist Pat Robertson's 700 Club show, he often condemns those who do not live up to the highest moral standards. This conservative pundit seems to be on television more often than I Love Lucy reruns.Although he portrays himself as a voice of the religious right, the never-married Fund has cut a wide swath of sexual relationships throughout the Libertarian and Conservative parties. He's a regular right-wing Lothario.He is also a hypocrite.There is nothing newsworthy about consensual sex between two unmarried adults, even if one of those supposed adults acts badly. But, when a high profile public person stakes out the moral high ground, that person had better not be standing on quick sand.A few months ago, Morgan Pillsbury, a twenty-seven year old woman, contacted me with information about her former lover of three years, John Fund. Although I had heard stories of Fund's less-than-cavalier treatment of women and particularly his Clintonesque treatment of one particular woman, I did not think that information worthy of a story. Amusing gossip, yes -- newsworthy, no. But the story Morgan told gave me pause. If her allegations were true, Fund's relationship with her was not only bizarre; it was treacherous and bordered on the perverse. To back up her story of the bad behavior of John Fund, she furnished me with a tape recording she made of a conversation she had with Fund. The tape and conversations with Morgan's' mother, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, and others confirmed Morgan's tale.Twenty years ago, Melinda and John Fund both worked for the then fledgling Libertarian party in California. Fund was the executive director of the local party in Sacramento. Melinda, who at the time was the mother of four children, began sexual relationship with the much younger Fund. Melinda said, "John and I had a sexual relationship for four or five years. When he moved east, we remained friends. It never really ended." Melinda, who is still active in the Libertarian party, went on to say, "Six or seven years ago, John called and during the conversation he told me, 'Melinda, if any of your children come east, have them look me up.' I didn't realize that he was using me as a dating service!" Last year Melinda learned that not only had Fund been sleeping with Morgan, he was the father of the child she would abort.Not only had Fund violated his twenty-year-old friendship with Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, he, much like Congressman Gary Condit (Fund recently wrote a scathing indictment of Condit's behavior), insisted that Morgan keep their three-year-affair secret.Morgan was 23 years old the first time the then-43-year-old Fund took her to bed. Sounds all too familiar, doesn't it? According to Morgan, John Fund was the third man she had been intimate with. She had contacted him when she moved to the New York area after a bad breakup with her previous boyfriend. Instead of receiving consolation from the man who had on occasion been her baby-sitter back in California, Fund took her to bed. In 1999, confronted with an unplanned and apparently unwanted pregnancy, Fund abandoned Morgan and, without attempting to dissuade her, allowed the distraught young women to have an abortion without any support from him.John Fund is a full time writer for the Wall Street Journal. Yet, when I began researching a profile on Mr. Fund, he -- unlike most other journalists -- began a campaign to kill the story. A source close to Fund told me a few days ago that Fund and a confederate were attempting to plant a false and malicious blind item about two people at Talk magazine. They believed that the item would so frighten the victims that they would see to it that my profile of Mr. Fund was spiked. Mr. Fund and his pals can congratulate themselves -- to protect innocent people from being attacked; I have pulled the piece from Talk magazine. Hence this abbreviated piece which is written solely to introduce the reader to John Fund on tape with Morgan Pillsbury, the mother of the aborted child.So that there should be no confusion, this tape was made legally and given to me by Morgan Pillsbury. Ms. Pillsbury also gave me her permission to use her name, as did her mother Melinda Pillsbury-Foster. I have learned that very recently Ms. Pillsbury, who has experienced some financial difficulties, has at Fund's request moved in with him. John Fund lives in an apartment in Jersey City, just a stone's throw from the Holland Tunnel. I have also been told that Mr. Fund, for whatever reason, has given Morgan cash and a new computer.The following is a transcription of the tape of Morgan Pillsbury and John Fund. Mr. Fund makes mention of how he is being threatened by Melinda. He apparently believes that Melinda has no right to be angry for his deceiving her for three years, all the while sleeping with, and impregnation her oldest child. For those who doubt the veracity of the transcript or wish to hear the anger and seething hostility of John Fund, Please listen to the audio tape. John ConnollyMorgan Pillsbury was 23 years old when John Fund slept with her Puss, not 31 as you claimed. Edited by MistyBlue, 03 February 2012 - 01:21 PM.

For Clem, who claimed that Morgan Pillsbury seduced poor innocent John Fund......Morgan Pillsbury was 23 years old when John Fund slept with her Puss, not 31 as you claimed.Gosh, who should people believe, a shameless liar like you and some moonbat website?Or a journalist who has worked for very prestigious publications, one the largest newspaper in the country?Gosh, tough choice.It is true that I had a short romance in 1999 with the then-31-year-old woman in question, who now admits to having been diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder.And how much credibility should we give to a Democrat Talking Point Liar who for years has told lies in defense of a rapist/ serial felon/ sociopathic liar/ impeached disgrace?Deposition Transcript dated February 22, 2001 in the case of Pillsbury-Foster v. Franklin, Civil Action No. 233136 (Cal. Super Ct.). This case concerns the woman's mother and stepfather and is unrelated to any dispute between us. In it, she testifies under oath that she has "borderline personality disorder." Her condition manifests itself in "mood swings, all sorts of things," she stated, adding, "[y]ou're just not functional." When asked during the deposition, "What lies have you told in the past?," she replied, "Too many to name." When pressed to give an example, she said, "That I had a heart problem." She then described how she bilked her stepfather out of $10,000 by falsely telling him that she had a heart condition that required medical surgery to correct. This deposition transcript is not the only occasion in which she has discussed her emotional troubles on the official record. In a Pro Se Answer to a Complaint filed in California in In re Morgan Pillsbury, Debtor, Case No ND01-10494-RR, she admitted that she has "borderline personality disorder. One of the symptoms of this condition is an inability to discriminate truth from fiction." She further admitted that by June 1998, she was having severe emotional problems" and "was entirely non-functional." She also stated that she "has told whoppers [lies] all her life." Answer and Verified Counterclaim of John H. Fund dated January 23, 2003 in the case of Morgan Pillsbury v. John Fund, Citicorp Group and Jane Doe, Index No. 121868/02 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). In this document, I describe how a few weeks before the woman in question's most recent accusation that I committed domestic violence against her, she stole and forged several checks drawn on my Chase Manhattan bank account totaling almost $30,000. She also took out a credit card in my name and charged jewelry worth $8000. Shortly thereafter, she began demanding $150,000 apparently in return for peace. http://www.johnfund.com/ Edited by RichClem, 03 February 2012 - 01:30 PM.

Gosh, who should people believe, a shameless liar like you and some moonbat website?You ARE the shameless liar on this board, and everybody having their own brain knows it.

You ARE the shameless liar on this board, and everybody having their own brain knows it.Isn't it hilarious how lying trolls come to each others' defense?If you couldn't lie, would you even exist?

Isn't it hilarious how lying trolls come to each others' defense?If you couldn't lie, would you even exist?If I ever did lie, how could you tell?You prove endlessly that you can't tell the difference between lies, and opinions that merely differ from your own.

If you couldn't lie, would you even exist?If a Rich Clem trips on his dick and no one is there to see it did it really happen?See, I can play philosopher too.

If I ever did lie, how could you tell?Your lips would be moving, duuh.You prove endlessly that you can't tell the difference between lies, and opinions that merely differ from your own.You mean like the following lies?Clinton had great integrity as presidentconservatives like RichClem (Spot) are just hoping and praying for more economic collapse.Reagan was a complete FOOL and a complete FAILURE. Only the myth in the minds of lemmings survives.Yeah, they're just, snicker, honest opinions. Edited by RichClem, 03 February 2012 - 02:45 PM.

Your lips would be moving, duuh.Evades the question -- as usual.You mean like the following lies?Yeah, they're just, snicker, honest opinions.That's correct. They're honest opinions. And, as I said, you have no ability to differentiate between a lie and an opinion that differs from your own. And you prove it - day after day after day.If a Rich Clem trips on his dick and no one is there to see it did it really happen?See, I can play philosopher too.I wouldn't worry about DickClem tripping on his Dick. His ego, more likely.

That's correct. They're honest opinions.He lies.Taxes do not affect 'economic growth,' "Konymist Klem."Anyone believe Obama is a centrist?Of course, he's a centrist.Reagan's presidency - at its end - was generally considered a failure.....NO president has ever been gotten better press than Reagan! NONE!

If I ever did lie, how could you tell?Easily. Your lips would be moving. LOL