Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm

THE GAPING ASSHOLE SAID: Yes, that's explicitly what the Virginia Governor explained he was willing to do.

Misty » 19 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm

Can you quote him saying that he is 'in favor of executing babies after birth' which is what Trump accused him of?
Of course you can't, because it's not true.

Look at the psychopath play dishonest semantic games again.
If Northam kills a baby, it's dead, whether he used the term "execute" or not.

He's not KILLING or EXECUTING babies you degenerate liar.

Termin8tor » 19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm

Misty » 19 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm

Northam said. "When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent, obviously, of the mother, with the consent of the physicians - more than one physician, by the way.
It’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities.
There may be a fetus that’s nonviable."

And your quote is ****, typically evasive.

It's not my quote you jackass.
It's a direct quote from Northam.

Termin8tor » 19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm

He said explicitly that he'd leave the decision of whether or not to kill the baby, B-A-B-Y, to the mother.

He never said any such thing.
He said that when a fetus is severely deformed or not viable, the decision over whether to perform a third trimester abortion should be made by the parents in consultation with more than one doctor.

What kind of a dishonest piece of **** tries to make it look like Northam supports executing perfectly healthy full term babies after they are delivered?

I'm sick of tired of idiots like you who act as if women are making these decisions lightly or capriciously.

When parents are faced with the heartbreaking decision to abort or not in the third trimester, it's because something went horribly wrong.

They just don't decide to abort because they changed their minds.
And idiots like you who use their pain for political purposes, should be ashamed of yourselves, but unfortunately you have no sense of shame.

 

Misty » 19 Sep 2020, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 3:29 pm

A right winger lecturing me on biased sources.
Can't make this **** up.
     


 
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politifact/

I don't give any sources you stupid libtard

Misty » 19 Sep 2020, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 4:51 pm

Termin8tor » 19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm

 
He's not KILLING or EXECUTING babies you degenerate liar.

It's not my quote you jackass.
It's a direct quote from Northam.

He never said any such thing.
He said that when a fetus is severely deformed or not viable, the decision over whether to perform a third trimester abortion should be made by the parents in consultation with more than one doctor.

What kind of a dishonest piece of **** tries to make it look like Northam supports executing perfectly healthy full term babies after they are delivered?

I'm sick of tired of idiots like you who act as if women are making these decisions lightly or capriciously.

When parents are faced with the heartbreaking decision to abort or not in the third trimester, it's because something went horribly wrong.

They just don't decide to abort because they changed their minds.
And idiots like you who use their pain for political purposes, should be ashamed of yourselves, but unfortunately you have no sense of shame.

.
You're quoting the safest and least controversial quote, of course.

I'm referring to the time he said exactly that; once the baby was outside the womb. And I never wrote one single word about it being healthy.

It was caught on audiotape or video and played widely, but not in the corrupt liberal MSM of course.

there is a Constitutional right to life. A baby outside the womb is exactly that, a baby.

And he spoke casually about letting the mother make the decision to kill it.

Misty » 19 Sep 2020, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 4:51 pm

I'm sick of tired of idiots like you who act as if women are making these decisions lightly or capriciously.

You can't kill any human being, even if the decision wasn't made lightly or capriciously.

Speaking of idiots.

I'm so sick of dishonest liberals who have moved the line so far that babies are being killed.

That fetal parts are being casually and illegally sold for profit.

Misty » 18 Sep 2020, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2020, 7:24 pm

 
See? She noticed it too.
Those are NOT Trump voters.
 
 
Executing babies after birth?
   

Yet Trump is killing babies on the Border, what a crack head!

annLee » 19 Sep 2020, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 5:44 pm

Misty » 18 Sep 2020, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Sep 2020, 7:24 pm

Executing babies after birth?
   

Yet Trump is killing babies on the Border, what a crack head!

And apparently sterilizing women against their will.

 
 
 
 

DHS investigates forced sterilization, hysterectomy allegations of illegal immigrants

The Department of Homeland Security’s internal watchdog launched an investigation into a whistleblower complaint alleging that an outside doctor performed “mass hysterectomies” on immigrant women held in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody at a Georgia detention facility.

The Office of the Inspector General, which provides independent oversight and accountability within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, has opened an investigation into the allegations presented in a whistleblower’s complaint from a former nurse at the Irwin County Detention Center in Ocilla, Ga. Dawn Wooten, a licensed practical nurse, alleged in the 27-page complaint filed by Project South and Government Accountability Project Monday that immigrant women referred to one unnamed doctor outside the facility for additional medical care were receiving a “high rate of hysterectomies.”

Though Wooten did not appear to observe the procedures herself, she testified in the complaint that a number of immigrant women told her they underwent surgery without fully understanding why.

ICE said in a statement that only two immigrants held at the Irwin County Detention Center have been referred to an outside gynecologist for hysterectomies since 2018.

“The accusations will be fully investigated by an independent office, however, ICE vehemently disputes the implication that detainees are used for experimental medical procedures,” Ada Rivera, medical director of the ICE Health Service Corps, said in a statement, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The doctor was not mentioned by name in the complaint, but his lawyer, Scott Grubman, identified him as Dr. Mahendra Amin and vehemently denied the claims.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ice-hy ... stigations

Funny that ICE would deny that any 'experimental medical procedures' were taking place.
I don't think anyone was alleging that.
 

Since they denied the use of experimental medical procedures and no one suggested they were, the assumption could be made that they are. Why deny you are doing something when no one said you were?

Arris » 19 Sep 2020, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 8:39 pm

Since they denied the use of experimental medical procedures and no one suggested they were, the assumption could be made that they are. Why deny you are doing something when no one said you were?

Exactly.
 

Termin8tor » 20 Sep 2020, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2020, 9:21 am

Misty » 19 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm

Can you quote him saying that he is 'in favor of executing babies after birth' which is what Trump accused him of?
Of course you can't, because it's not true.
Northam said.....

Typical dishonesty, quoting irrelevant words from Northam.
And no, he didn't use the word "execute," nor did Trump claim he did.

Trump said that Northam is in favor of EXECUTING babies after they are born.
That's ****.
You anti-choice pinheads are always trying to make it look like women are having late term abortions for silly reasons.
When someone has a late term abortion, it is usually because something is terribly wrong with the fetus, and the fetus is most likely not viable.
These parents wanted those babies and were forced to make a heartbreaking decision.
And for you to exploit their pain for political reasons is pretty disgusting.

Termin8tor » 20 Sep 2020, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2020, 9:21 am

 a state bill sponsored by Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran (D-Fairfax), which would have “allowed abortion up until birth, eliminated informed consent, and permitted late-term abortions in outpatient clinics.”

In January of 2019, Northam shared his support for Tran’s bill, claiming in a radio interview that babies born alive despite an attempted abortion would only be kept alive and resuscitated if “that’s what the mother and the family desired” after a “discussion” between them and doctors.

“[Third trimester abortions are] done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam said. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/19/tw ... -comments/

A discussion whether or not to kill a baby.

Cases where the fetus has severe deformities, or is nonviable.

Can a woman really get an abortion 'moments before birth’?

The idea that new legislation under consideration or that passed in several states would allow this to happen made headlines after a video of Virginia Del. Kathy Tran (D-Fairfax) went viral.

In the 30-second clip, a Republican asked Tran whether a woman in labor would be allowed to have an abortion, and she answered yes.

Tran later said she misspoke and that such a procedure would not be allowed: 

“Clearly, no, because infanticide is not allowed in Virginia, and what would have happened in that moment would be a live birth.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2019/02/06/tough-questions-answers-late-term-abortions-law-women-who-get-them/

Are you going to adopt these babies with severe deformities?
No, you are not.
And you would take away the healthcare the parents will need to take care of that child born with a preexisting condition.
You would also force parents to deliver an unviable fetus and then watch their child suffer until it dies.

You're a heartless, soulless bastard.
 
 

Termin8tor » 20 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm

Little Miss Marxist claimed that Obama handled the H1N1 pandemic very well and cited a fake "Fact Check" source to back it up.

What are "Fact Check": websites? Just more liberal lies and ****.

Of course you would say that, because you are allergic to facts.


 
 
 

 
 

Termin8tor » 20 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm

Why did you censor the quote of Klain admitting that Obama officials "did everything wrong?"

I didn’t CENSOR anything.
You can spin like a top and twist yourself into a **** pretzel.
Nothing you can say is going to make Trump’s handling of this pandemic look any better.

On metric after metric, the coronavirus pandemic has been worse in the U.S. than nearly any other country.
We needed one comprehensive federal response, not a 50 state piecemeal solution.
Trump totally abdicated his responsibility to keep us safe.

https://twitter.com/AdamParkhomenko/sta ... 04481?s=19
 
 

Termin8tor » 20 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm

Fact check: eliminate the 2nd Amendment blah, blah Constitutional amendment, blah, blah, blah

That's just stunningly dishonest.

All it takes is five judges willing to gradually eliminated it, and there are already four quite willing to do so.

Liberal judges are perfectly willing to violate many of Americans' God given rights.

Judges can't eliminate the Second Amendment you gaping asshole.
The Constitution would have to be amended.

How To Amend The Constitution 

Step 1: Two-thirds of both houses of Congress pass a proposed constitutional amendment.
This sends the proposed amendment to the states for ratification.

Step 2: Three-fourths of the states (38 states) ratify the proposed amendment, either by their legislatures or special ratifying conventions.
 
 

Roe v. Wade Was Decided By A Republican-Nominated Supreme Court

In 1973, Roe vs. Wade was decided by a Court that was comprised of a majority of justices who were nominated by Republican presidents.

The vote on Roe vs. Wade was 7-2.

Those justices supporting the case’s pro-choice outcome were as follows, including the president nominating each and the president’s party affiliation:

• Harry Blackmun (Nixon, R)
• Warren Burger (Nixon, R)
• William Douglas (FDR, D)
• William Brennan (Eisenhower, R)
• Potter Stewart (Eisenhower, R)
• Thurgood Marshall (LBJ, D)
• Lewis Powell (Nixon, R)

Those dissenting on Roe vs. Wade — only two – and both were not Republican-president-nominated to the Court:

• Byron White (Kennedy, D)
• William Rehnquist (Nixon, R; chief justice under Reagan, R)

Nixon nominated four justices.
Three concurred on Roe vs. Wade— arguably a decisive factor in the outcome of the case.
 
 
 

@twitter https://twitter.com/stevennelson10/stat ... 31937?s=19



https://nypost.com/2020/09/21/nyc-brand ... ssion=true

Trump essentially calling RBG's granddaughter a liar.


 
 

#ConspiracyTrump

@twitter https://twitter.com/ReallyAmerican1/sta ... 22432?s=19
 

CDC removes guidelines saying COVID-19 can travel beyond six feet.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has pulled its updated guidance that the coronavirus is airborne and can travel distances beyond 6 feet – saying a draft version was posted in error on its website.

“It is possible that COVID-19 may spread through the droplets and airborne particles that are formed when a person who has COVID-19 coughs, sneezes, sings, talks, or breathes,” the CDC said in an update posted Friday.

The CDC had said for months that the disease is mainly transmitted between people in close proximity through large droplets.

But after adding last week that tiny particles known as aerosols could transmit the virus, the agency restored its earlier guidelines about how the deadly pathogen is spread, according to the Wall Street Journal.

“A draft version of proposed changes to these recommendations was posted in error to the agency’s official website,” a CDC spokesman told the news outlet.

The agency is still working on updating its recommendations about airborne transmission of the bug, the rep added.

“Once this process has been completed, the update language will be posted,” he said.

The CDC’s about-face adds to scientists’ concerns that the agency is facing pressure from the White House to encourage reopening of schools and businesses, as well as to reduce testing, the Wall Street Journal reported.

“I think the statement on airborne transmission that was briefly available on the CDC website was correct,” Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech professor who is an expert on airborne transmission of viruses, told the news outlet.

“I hope that they are just refining the language and that they’re planning to put it back up there,” she added.

Last week, the CDC reversed a controversial recommendation that close contacts of coronavirus patients don’t have to get tested if they are asymptomatic.

In July, the World Health Organization acknowledged the possibility of aerosol transmission – though it said it believed that transmission mainly occurs through larger, respiratory droplets and close contact.
 

COVID denier Tony Tenpenny didn't believe in wearing a mask.