Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Oct 2020 12:24 pm
When you post the same **** over and over, that is spamming.Termin8tor » 13 Oct 2020, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑How is citing factual information about hugely important medical news "harassment," psycho?Misty » 13 Oct 2020, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep harassing me in this thread and you will find yourself in the Dungeon again.
Why don't you go **** yourself?Termin8tor » 13 Oct 2020, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑If you can't take No Holds Barred, why don't you go hide in the Liberals Only section?
13 Oct 2020 12:26 pm
This mother **** just doesn’t give up.
He spams this thread faster than I can clean it up.
I have to spend almost all of my time here taking out the garbage.
Locking the door now.
Soon he will be whining about that in his Little Miss Marxist, My Queen of the Locked Threads.
I knew it.
He bumped it already.
He spams this thread faster than I can clean it up.
I have to spend almost all of my time here taking out the garbage.
Locking the door now.
Soon he will be whining about that in his Little Miss Marxist, My Queen of the Locked Threads.
I knew it.
He bumped it already.
13 Oct 2020 8:35 pm
‘Unmasking’ probe commissioned by Barr concludes without charges or any public report.
The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing, according to people familiar with the matter.
The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department.
The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the “unmasking” of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.
The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing, according to people familiar with the matter.
The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department.
The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the “unmasking” of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.
13 Oct 2020 8:43 pm
Senator Gary Peters Shares His Abortion Story
He’s the first sitting senator in history to do so.
United States Senator Gary Peters, a low-key, moderate Democrat from Michigan, is in a very tight re-election race that could decide whether his party wins the Senate.
But he’s not the kind of guy who typically makes national headlines.
He’s more known for being a dad who enjoys riding his motorcycle and drinking the local beer than he is for saying attention-grabbing things.
So it may come as a surprise that with this story, he will become the first sitting senator in American history to publicly share a personal experience with abortion.
“It's a story of how gut-wrenching and complicated decisions can be related to reproductive health, a situation I went through with my first wife,” he told me in a phone interview Sunday afternoon.
In the late 1980s in Detroit, Peters and his then wife, Heidi, were pregnant with their second child, a baby they very much wanted.
Heidi was four months along when her water broke, leaving the fetus without amniotic fluid—a condition it could not possibly survive.
The doctor told the Peters to go home and wait for a miscarriage to happen naturally.
But it didn’t happen. They went back to the hospital the next day, and the doctor detected a faint heartbeat.
He recommended an abortion, because the fetus still had no chance of survival, but it wasn’t an option due to a hospital policy banning the procedure.
So he sent the couple again home to wait for a miscarriage.
“The mental anguish someone goes through is intense,” Peters says, “trying to have a miscarriage for a child that was wanted.”
As they waited, Heidi’s health deteriorated.
When she returned to the hospital on the third day, after another night without a natural miscarriage, the doctor told her the situation was dire.
She could lose her uterus in a matter of hours if she wasn’t able to have an abortion, and if she became septic from the uterine infection, she could die.
The doctor appealed to the hospital’s board for an exception to their anti-abortion policy and was denied.
“I still vividly remember he left a message on the answering machine saying, ‘They refused to give me permission, not based on good medical practice, simply based on politics.
I recommend you immediately find another physician who can do this procedure quickly,’” Peters recalls.
The Peters were able to get into another hospital right away because they were friends with its chief administrator.
Heidi was rushed into an emergency abortion that saved her uterus and possibly her life.
The whole experience was “painful and traumatic,” Heidi shared in a statement.
“If it weren’t for urgent and critical medical care, I could have lost my life.”
Reflecting on the experience now, Senator Peters says it “enacted an incredible emotional toll.”
So why go public with it? “It’s important for folks to understand that these things happen to folks every day,” he explains.
“I’ve always considered myself pro-choice and believe women should be able to make these decisions themselves, but when you live it in real life, you realize the significant impact it can have on a family.”
Peters decided to share the story at this moment because the right to make such decisions as a family, free of politics, has never been more at stake.
He is alarmed by the threat President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, poses to women’s reproductive rights.
The very conservative nominee once signed her name onto a newspaper ad calling Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion, “barbaric.”
If Republicans successfully confirm her to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat, she could reverse legal abortion in America or significantly curtail it.
“It’s important for folks who are willing to tell these stories to tell them, especially now,” Peters says.
“The new Supreme Court nominee could make a decision that will have major ramifications for reproductive health for women for decades to come.
This is a pivotal moment for reproductive freedom.”
He’s the first sitting senator in history to do so.
United States Senator Gary Peters, a low-key, moderate Democrat from Michigan, is in a very tight re-election race that could decide whether his party wins the Senate.
But he’s not the kind of guy who typically makes national headlines.
He’s more known for being a dad who enjoys riding his motorcycle and drinking the local beer than he is for saying attention-grabbing things.
So it may come as a surprise that with this story, he will become the first sitting senator in American history to publicly share a personal experience with abortion.
“It's a story of how gut-wrenching and complicated decisions can be related to reproductive health, a situation I went through with my first wife,” he told me in a phone interview Sunday afternoon.
In the late 1980s in Detroit, Peters and his then wife, Heidi, were pregnant with their second child, a baby they very much wanted.
Heidi was four months along when her water broke, leaving the fetus without amniotic fluid—a condition it could not possibly survive.
The doctor told the Peters to go home and wait for a miscarriage to happen naturally.
But it didn’t happen. They went back to the hospital the next day, and the doctor detected a faint heartbeat.
He recommended an abortion, because the fetus still had no chance of survival, but it wasn’t an option due to a hospital policy banning the procedure.
So he sent the couple again home to wait for a miscarriage.
“The mental anguish someone goes through is intense,” Peters says, “trying to have a miscarriage for a child that was wanted.”
As they waited, Heidi’s health deteriorated.
When she returned to the hospital on the third day, after another night without a natural miscarriage, the doctor told her the situation was dire.
She could lose her uterus in a matter of hours if she wasn’t able to have an abortion, and if she became septic from the uterine infection, she could die.
The doctor appealed to the hospital’s board for an exception to their anti-abortion policy and was denied.
“I still vividly remember he left a message on the answering machine saying, ‘They refused to give me permission, not based on good medical practice, simply based on politics.
I recommend you immediately find another physician who can do this procedure quickly,’” Peters recalls.
The Peters were able to get into another hospital right away because they were friends with its chief administrator.
Heidi was rushed into an emergency abortion that saved her uterus and possibly her life.
The whole experience was “painful and traumatic,” Heidi shared in a statement.
“If it weren’t for urgent and critical medical care, I could have lost my life.”
Reflecting on the experience now, Senator Peters says it “enacted an incredible emotional toll.”
So why go public with it? “It’s important for folks to understand that these things happen to folks every day,” he explains.
“I’ve always considered myself pro-choice and believe women should be able to make these decisions themselves, but when you live it in real life, you realize the significant impact it can have on a family.”
Peters decided to share the story at this moment because the right to make such decisions as a family, free of politics, has never been more at stake.
He is alarmed by the threat President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, poses to women’s reproductive rights.
The very conservative nominee once signed her name onto a newspaper ad calling Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion, “barbaric.”
If Republicans successfully confirm her to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat, she could reverse legal abortion in America or significantly curtail it.
“It’s important for folks who are willing to tell these stories to tell them, especially now,” Peters says.
“The new Supreme Court nominee could make a decision that will have major ramifications for reproductive health for women for decades to come.
This is a pivotal moment for reproductive freedom.”
13 Oct 2020 8:59 pm
Typhoid Trump's Rose Garden super spreader event has claimed another victim.
https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/stat ... 40033?s=19
https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/stat ... 40033?s=19
14 Oct 2020 12:14 pm
This is very smart.
Making fun of senior citizens.
(From a 74 year old man.)
That should really help get their votes.
Making fun of senior citizens.
(From a 74 year old man.)
That should really help get their votes.
14 Oct 2020 7:08 pm
Proof Clem is a psycho stalker.
So I'm sitting here perusing the forum and making a post here and there, and every time I make a post, I get that annoying little sound and a notification pops up at the bottom if my screen.
I never check my alerts because usually 99% of them are from Clem, but I decided to take a look.
Check out how close the times on those posts are.
The **** psycho pounds them out faster than I can reply to them.
In that first batch he was actually able to make two posts within one minute.
So I'm sitting here perusing the forum and making a post here and there, and every time I make a post, I get that annoying little sound and a notification pops up at the bottom if my screen.
I never check my alerts because usually 99% of them are from Clem, but I decided to take a look.
Check out how close the times on those posts are.
The **** psycho pounds them out faster than I can reply to them.
In that first batch he was actually able to make two posts within one minute.
15 Oct 2020 11:22 am
15 Oct 2020 11:24 am
15 Oct 2020 12:41 pm
15 Oct 2020 5:30 pm
In an op-ed for Vanity Fair this Thursday, Rudy Giuliani’s daughter rebuked the Trump administration and called upon people to elect Joe Biden for president in 2020.
“To anyone who feels overwhelmed or apathetic about this election, there is nothing I relate to more than desperation to escape corrosive political discourse,” Caroline Rose Giuliani wrote.
“As a child, I saw firsthand the kind of cruel, selfish politics that Donald Trump has now inflicted on our country. It made me want to run as far away from them as possible.
But trust me when I tell you: Running away does not solve the problem.
We have to stand and fight. The only way to end this nightmare is to vote. There is hope on the horizon, but we’ll only grasp it if we elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.”
Giuliani, who is a filmmaker, describes how as a child she would get into debates with her father, but found that his opinions were immovable.
“It was disheartening to feel how little power I had to change his mind, no matter how logical and above-my-pay-grade my arguments were.
He always found a way to justify his party line, whatever it was at the time,” she wrote, later adding that even though there was an “occasional flash of connection in these disagreements with my dad, it felt like nothing changed for the better, so I would retreat again until another issue I couldn’t stay silent on surfaced.”
“Women, immigrants, people with disabilities, and people of color are all also under attack by Trump’s inhumane policies—and by his judicial appointments, including, probably, Amy Coney Barrett.
Trump’s administration has torn families apart in more ways than I even imagined were possible, from ripping children from their parents at the border to mishandling the coronavirus, which has resulted in over 215,000 in the U.S. dying, many thousands of them without their loved ones near.”
Read her full op-ed over at Vanity Fair.
15 Oct 2020 6:09 pm
There is literally no decency left in the Republican Party any more.
I'm sure those of Dr.Gosar's constituents who may be dealing with addiction issues will appreciate him mocking them.
I'm sure those of Dr.Gosar's constituents who may be dealing with addiction issues will appreciate him mocking them.
15 Oct 2020 6:32 pm
The King of Russian and Ukranian disinformation, Rudy Giuliani told you he wrote that......ROFL.Termin8tor » 15 Oct 2020, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑Gosh, psycho. Why did Biden write that half the money grifted by Slow Joe's family must be paid to "Pop?"
I won't believe any of this until the FBI verifies that the hard drive belonged to Hunter Biden and that none of its contents were planted or tampered with.
16 Oct 2020 6:04 pm
So Trump’s National Security Adviser Robert O'Brian warned him that his lawyer
Rudy Giuliani has been worked by Russian assets in Ukraine, and that any information Giuliani brought back from Ukraine should be considered contaminated by Russia.
And Trump shrugged it off and dismissed concern about his lawyer’s activities by saying, “That’s Rudy.”
At this point, one might be able to say that Rudy in an unwitting Russian asset.
But since Trump was warned and is still perfectly willing to use information that he was warned should be considered contaminated by Russia, that would probably make him a witting Russian asset.
Rudy Giuliani has been worked by Russian assets in Ukraine, and that any information Giuliani brought back from Ukraine should be considered contaminated by Russia.
And Trump shrugged it off and dismissed concern about his lawyer’s activities by saying, “That’s Rudy.”
At this point, one might be able to say that Rudy in an unwitting Russian asset.
But since Trump was warned and is still perfectly willing to use information that he was warned should be considered contaminated by Russia, that would probably make him a witting Russian asset.
16 Oct 2020 6:09 pm
ROFLTermin8tor » 15 Oct 2020, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ From what I know, Guliani is squeakly clean and always has been...
I guess that's why he's under investigation by the same U.S. Attorney's office that he once ran.
16 Oct 2020 6:18 pm
Ask Trump’s National Security Adviser.Termin8tor » 16 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑What "Russian and Ukrainian disinformation" has Rudy spread?
Be specific and give evidence.
He's the one who told Trump that his lawyer was a Russian dupe.
Not me.
16 Oct 2020 6:26 pm
Geoffrey Berman was the US Attorney who opened the investigation into Giuliani you gaping asshole.Termin8tor » 16 Oct 2020, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑Yes, by corrupt Establishment hacks, the same kind who investigated Trump for three years and found zero, zip,nada.Misty:ROFL
I guess that's why he's under investigation by the same U.S. Attorney's office that he once ran.
And who committed a lot of felonies in their attempt to force Trump out of office.
He's a Republican who was appointed to that position by the Trump administration.
You **** idiot.
16 Oct 2020 6:39 pm
Giuliani said.......ROFL.Termin8tor » 16 Oct 2020, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑****. I've never heard any such thing, and Guliani said his contact with Russians had nothing to do with Hunter Biden at all.Misty » 16 Oct 2020, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑Ask Trump’s National Security Adviser.
He's the one who told Trump that his lawyer was a Russian dupe.
Not me.
Is that the same Giuliani who told Jake Tapper that there is nothing wrong with taking information from Russia?
That it's not illegal?
And the same Giuliani who when Chuck Todd asked him whether there was anything wrong with a campaign using information stolen by foreign adversaries said that it depends on the stolen material?
That Giuliani?
Trump himself told George Stephanopoulos that if a foreign country offered him dirt on an opponent, he would look at it.
He said there was nothing wrong with that.
Those are NOT talking points.
I heard all of that with my own two ears.
16 Oct 2020 6:46 pm
In December 2019, National Security Advisor chief Robert O'Brien conveyed concerns to President Trump that Giuliani was being targeted by a Russian disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting Joe Biden, current and former advisors in the Trump administration told CBS News' Paula Reid.
Giuliani's meeting with the Ukrainian lawmaker - Andriy Derkach - was one of the reasons for those concerns.
The Treasury Department leveled sanctions against Derkach in September, describing him as an "active Russian agent" who has done the Kremlin's bidding for more than a decade.
Derkach and Giuliani met in Ukraine last December at the height of the impeachment saga, as Giuliani worked to uncover damaging information about Hunter Biden.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-bid ... story/#app
Giuliani's meeting with the Ukrainian lawmaker - Andriy Derkach - was one of the reasons for those concerns.
The Treasury Department leveled sanctions against Derkach in September, describing him as an "active Russian agent" who has done the Kremlin's bidding for more than a decade.
Derkach and Giuliani met in Ukraine last December at the height of the impeachment saga, as Giuliani worked to uncover damaging information about Hunter Biden.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-bid ... story/#app
16 Oct 2020 7:01 pm
Go Georgia Who is online
In total there are 3751 users online :: 9 registered, 16 bots, and 3726 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, RebelGator, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: DuckDuckBot, coccocbot, Kinza, DuckDuckGo, Not, Pinterest, LCC, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot