Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
22 Oct 2020 5:55 pm
22 Oct 2020 6:20 pm
.
Rachel Maddow MSNBC
@maddow
"Man arrested in Kannapolis, N.C. with van full of guns and explosives, researched killing Joe Biden"
Oh my!
Maybe the guy was upset that Joe Biden sold out the country to enrich the Biden Crime Family from whom he got half the grift.
That he sold out to China in the trade negotiations for $150 million in Chinese stock with his son getting $75 million.
The result being that millions of Americans lost their jobs .
Americans don't like traitors, but they absolutely should not commit violence.
Let Biden stand trial.
22 Oct 2020 6:23 pm
.
Rachel Maddow MSNBC
@maddow
"Man arrested in Kannapolis, N.C. with van full of guns and explosives, researched killing Joe Biden"
You comically claimed a while back that Rachie "tells it like it is."
How many minutes has she spent on the revelations of the Biden Crime Family and their grifting?
Not one single minute from what I saw.
She is a con artist, a wackjob and an utter disgrace to her profession.
22 Oct 2020 9:19 pm
You are a LIAR Why would She spend ANYTIME on what looks like Russia disinformation and is NOT verified. You can LIE about it all you want we KNOW you are a LIAR. You are a LIAR and a TRAITOR Maddow is NOT she has a doctorate in political philosophy from OXFORD and a degree in politiics from STANFORD. She is the most intelligent and best qualified Pundit on TV unlike college dropouts like Rush and Hannity
You are a LIAR and aTRAITOR
23 Oct 2020 1:34 pm
The only one standing trial should be Trump and his whole family of grifters.Termin8tor » 22 Oct 2020, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑Oh my!
Rachel Maddow MSNBC
@maddow
"Man arrested in Kannapolis, N.C. with van full of guns and explosives, researched killing Joe Biden"
Maybe the guy was upset that Joe Biden sold out the country to enrich the Biden Crime Family from whom he got half the grift.
That he sold out to China in the trade negotiations for $150 million in Chinese stock with his son getting $75 million.
The result being that millions of Americans lost their jobs .
Americans don't like traitors, but they absolutely should not commit violence.
Let Biden stand trial.
No evidence for Trump claim that Joe Biden earned money in China, according to the Wall Street Journal, contradicting its editorial section.https://www.businessinsider.com/no-evid ... na-2020-10
- The Wall Street Journal found no evidence to support President Trump's claim that Joe Biden did business in China.
- The Journal's reporters reviewed corporate records, emails, and text messages.
- Trump's claim, during Thursday's debate, came the same week it was revealed he himself had a secret bank account in China.
There’s only one presidential candidate who we know accepts money from foreign sources. It’s Donald Trump.
Trump’s Claims About Hunter Biden in China
23 Oct 2020 1:59 pm
So what happened to all of that money?Termin8tor » 22 Oct 2020, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑Oh my!"Man arrested in Kannapolis, N.C. with van full of guns and explosives, researched killing Joe Biden"
Maybe the guy was upset that Joe Biden sold out the country to enrich the Biden Crime Family from whom he got half the grift.
That he sold out to China in the trade negotiations for $150 million in Chinese stock with his son getting $75 million.
The result being that millions of Americans lost their jobs .
How much is Hunter Biden Worth?
Hunter Biden net worth and salary: Hunter Biden is an American lawyer and lobbyist who has a net worth of $3 million.
https://www.celebritynetworth.com/riche ... net-worth/
In all, Joe Biden is reportedly worth $9 million at present, which is significantly more than earlier in his career.
This number, from Forbes and calculated in 2019, is based on a total portfolio of $4 million in real estate (Joe and wife Jill Biden own two homes in Delaware), cash/investments worth $4 million, and a federal pension worth more than $1 million.
The Bidens released their tax returns from 2016 to 2018, which showed that they paid about a third of their income in taxes in 2017 and 2018 ($3.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively), and that they donated a significant amount to charity in 2017 and 2018 ($1 million and $275,000, respectively).
https://www.marieclaire.com/politics/a3 ... net-worth/
23 Oct 2020 8:41 pm
Trump Campaign Draws Rebuke for Surveilling Philadelphia Voters
President Trump’s campaign has been videotaping voters at ballot drop boxes, a tactic that could amount to illegal voter intimidation, Pennsylvania’s attorney general says.
PHILADELPHIA — The Trump campaign has been videotaping Philadelphia voters while they deposit their ballots in drop boxes, leading Pennsylvania’s attorney general to warn this week that the campaign’s actions fall outside of permitted poll watching practices and could amount to illegal voter intimidation.
The campaign made a formal complaint to city officials on Oct. 16, saying a campaign representative had surveilled voters depositing two or three ballots at drop boxes, instead of only their own.
The campaign called the conduct “blatant violations of the Pennsylvania election code,” according to a letter from a lawyer representing the Trump campaign that was reviewed by The New York Times.
The campaign included photos of three voters who it claimed were dropping off multiple ballots.
“This must be stopped,” a local lawyer for the Trump campaign, Linda A. Kerns, wrote in the letter, adding that the actions “undermine the integrity of the voting process.”
Both the Trump and Biden campaigns are focused on Pennsylvania, seen as one of the most important swing states in the election and where polls show Joseph R. Biden Jr. with a seven-point lead.
The Trump campaign’s aggressive strategy in Philadelphia suggests its aim is to crack down on people dropping off ballots for family members or anyone else who is not strictly authorized to do so.
Ms. Kerns demanded that the names of all voters who had used a drop box in front of Philadelphia’s City Hall on Oct. 14 be turned over to the campaign, and insisted that the city station a staff member around every drop box “at all times.”
She also asked for footage from municipal cameras around City Hall.
But city officials rejected the assertion that the voters who had been photographed had necessarily done something improper.
The city’s lawyers forwarded the campaign’s complaints to the local district attorney, but did not make a formal referral and cast doubt on the assertions.
They also said they do not track which voters use which drop box.
“Third party delivery is permitted in certain circumstances,” Benjamin H. Field, a deputy city solicitor and counsel to the city Board of Elections, wrote in a letter sent to Ms. Kerns on Monday.
“The Board cannot agree with your conclusion on the basis of the information you provided.
Nor can the Board, in exercising its duties, assume that an individual is violating the Election Code when that person can act as an agent for a voter who required assistance.”
Under Pennsylvania law, voters are allowed to deliver only their own ballots to drop boxes, unless they are assisting a voter with a disability or who otherwise needs assistance.
But voting has been upended by the pandemic and many voters are unfamiliar with the rules around drop boxes, which they may be using for the first time.
Earlier this month, a Trump campaign official told The Times that the campaign would be videotaping drop boxes but was only interested in people who were dumping large numbers of ballots — not in those bringing an extra ballot or two.
That assertion appears to have been false.
The Trump campaign’s Oct. 16 letter described three voters who had been videotaped by a Trump campaign staff member.
One was “wearing a striped baseball cap” and deposited “what appears to be three separate ballots.”
Another voter was “a woman wearing a face mask and a long sweater jacket over a yellow shirt” who appeared to put three ballots into the drop box, while a woman “with gold bangles” dropped off what appeared to be two ballots.
“We believe these to be just the tip of the iceberg,” Ms. Kerns wrote.
“Without reasonable checks, this behavior continues unabated and with impunity.”
Her letter aligns with a broader strategy by the campaign to amplify relatively minor voting issues to bolster baseless claims by the president that the election is rigged by Democrats against him.
The drop box issue could also factor into any challenges brought by the campaign after polls close on Election Day.
The campaign has paid particularly close attention to Philadelphia.
Its Election Day operations across the country are led by Michael Roman, a Philadelphia native who cut his teeth in city politics and who has made numerous public statements seeking to undermine public confidence in the election, as has President Trump.
Mr. Roman previously ran a secretive operation for the billionaire brothers Charles G. and David H. Koch that surveilled and gathered information on liberal adversaries.
In a statement to The Times, the Pennsylvania attorney general, Josh Shapiro, excoriated the campaign’s tactics.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/p ... lance.html
President Trump’s campaign has been videotaping voters at ballot drop boxes, a tactic that could amount to illegal voter intimidation, Pennsylvania’s attorney general says.
PHILADELPHIA — The Trump campaign has been videotaping Philadelphia voters while they deposit their ballots in drop boxes, leading Pennsylvania’s attorney general to warn this week that the campaign’s actions fall outside of permitted poll watching practices and could amount to illegal voter intimidation.
The campaign made a formal complaint to city officials on Oct. 16, saying a campaign representative had surveilled voters depositing two or three ballots at drop boxes, instead of only their own.
The campaign called the conduct “blatant violations of the Pennsylvania election code,” according to a letter from a lawyer representing the Trump campaign that was reviewed by The New York Times.
The campaign included photos of three voters who it claimed were dropping off multiple ballots.
“This must be stopped,” a local lawyer for the Trump campaign, Linda A. Kerns, wrote in the letter, adding that the actions “undermine the integrity of the voting process.”
Both the Trump and Biden campaigns are focused on Pennsylvania, seen as one of the most important swing states in the election and where polls show Joseph R. Biden Jr. with a seven-point lead.
The Trump campaign’s aggressive strategy in Philadelphia suggests its aim is to crack down on people dropping off ballots for family members or anyone else who is not strictly authorized to do so.
Ms. Kerns demanded that the names of all voters who had used a drop box in front of Philadelphia’s City Hall on Oct. 14 be turned over to the campaign, and insisted that the city station a staff member around every drop box “at all times.”
She also asked for footage from municipal cameras around City Hall.
But city officials rejected the assertion that the voters who had been photographed had necessarily done something improper.
The city’s lawyers forwarded the campaign’s complaints to the local district attorney, but did not make a formal referral and cast doubt on the assertions.
They also said they do not track which voters use which drop box.
“Third party delivery is permitted in certain circumstances,” Benjamin H. Field, a deputy city solicitor and counsel to the city Board of Elections, wrote in a letter sent to Ms. Kerns on Monday.
“The Board cannot agree with your conclusion on the basis of the information you provided.
Nor can the Board, in exercising its duties, assume that an individual is violating the Election Code when that person can act as an agent for a voter who required assistance.”
Under Pennsylvania law, voters are allowed to deliver only their own ballots to drop boxes, unless they are assisting a voter with a disability or who otherwise needs assistance.
But voting has been upended by the pandemic and many voters are unfamiliar with the rules around drop boxes, which they may be using for the first time.
Earlier this month, a Trump campaign official told The Times that the campaign would be videotaping drop boxes but was only interested in people who were dumping large numbers of ballots — not in those bringing an extra ballot or two.
That assertion appears to have been false.
The Trump campaign’s Oct. 16 letter described three voters who had been videotaped by a Trump campaign staff member.
One was “wearing a striped baseball cap” and deposited “what appears to be three separate ballots.”
Another voter was “a woman wearing a face mask and a long sweater jacket over a yellow shirt” who appeared to put three ballots into the drop box, while a woman “with gold bangles” dropped off what appeared to be two ballots.
“We believe these to be just the tip of the iceberg,” Ms. Kerns wrote.
“Without reasonable checks, this behavior continues unabated and with impunity.”
Her letter aligns with a broader strategy by the campaign to amplify relatively minor voting issues to bolster baseless claims by the president that the election is rigged by Democrats against him.
The drop box issue could also factor into any challenges brought by the campaign after polls close on Election Day.
The campaign has paid particularly close attention to Philadelphia.
Its Election Day operations across the country are led by Michael Roman, a Philadelphia native who cut his teeth in city politics and who has made numerous public statements seeking to undermine public confidence in the election, as has President Trump.
Mr. Roman previously ran a secretive operation for the billionaire brothers Charles G. and David H. Koch that surveilled and gathered information on liberal adversaries.
In a statement to The Times, the Pennsylvania attorney general, Josh Shapiro, excoriated the campaign’s tactics.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/p ... lance.html
24 Oct 2020 1:49 pm
So you spam the same STUPID lies and propaganda on different threads word for word?Termin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Little Miss No Balls at All must have freaked out, and the restraints had to be fastened again.
Wow, if Trump is even close to even in Blue Counties, things really suck for Slow Joe and the Biden Crime Family.
Maybe China, Ukraine, Kazakhistan, Romania and Iraq should ask for their bribes back.
.
Biden took no bribes you are a LIAR all you do is tll lies for Russia as for Miami Dade country I could explain this to yo ubut WHY BOTHER? You are VERY STUPID and simpleminded and even if you could understand it all you would do is run away like the GUTLESSCOWARD you are anyway bottom line Biden is AHEAD in Florida in several polls but it will probably be close and could go either way if Trump loses Florida however he is DONE there is no real path to the White House for a Republican that does not include Florida
24 Oct 2020 1:53 pm
****.Termin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑He's upset that Trump is trying to prevent the massive voter fraud Democrats commit every election as Standard Operating Procedure.Trump Campaign Draws Rebuke for Surveilling Philadelphia Voters
President Trump’s campaign has been videotaping voters at ballot drop boxes, a tactic that could amount to illegal voter intimidation, Pennsylvania’s attorney general says.
Trump will win the state if he can prevent it from being stolen from himself and from Pa voters.
You don't give a rat's ***.
He only won PA by 44,292 votes in 2016.
He hasn't gained any voters since then, and in fact he has lost a lot.
And he's not running against HRC this time.
You don't give a rat's *** about the massive amount of voter suppression carried out by your corrupt party in every election.
24 Oct 2020 1:54 pm
That's exactly what he does.solon » 24 Oct 2020, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑So you spam the same STUPID lies and propaganda on different threads word for word?Termin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Little Miss No Balls at All must have freaked out, and the restraints had to be fastened again.
Wow, if Trump is even close to even in Blue Counties, things really suck for Slow Joe and the Biden Crime Family.
Maybe China, Ukraine, Kazakhistan, Romania and Iraq should ask for their bribes back.
24 Oct 2020 2:08 pm
You are A LIAR and you know it. Trump is TOAST you are a TRAITOR so you are doing Putins bidding telling the LIES that will make simpleminded morons question the election after Biden KICKS TRUMPS *** which is what is happening RIGHT NOW
You are a LAIR and aTRAITOR H8er and that is all you have EVER been or will ever be
24 Oct 2020 2:14 pm
You are a gutless coward and a childish PUNK. I have given you EPIC BEATDOWNS on the FACTS and NOT ONCE have you even TRIED to stand up and defend your position because you KNOW you are too stupid to even TRY. I OWN you punk. You are a coward who runs from me NOT because I dont make sense but because I DO and you cant HOPE to address the facts I show or the poiints I makeTermin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ .
She whines, as she responds to one of the biggest lunatics on the board.
24 Oct 2020 2:45 pm
They lost another court case.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court says ballots can’t be rejected based on signature comparisons.
The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court ruled Friday that ballots in the state cannot be rejected because of signature comparisons, backing up guidance issued by the state’s chief elections officer heading into Pennsylvania’s first presidential election with no-excuse mail voting.
The ruling is a defeat for President Donald Trump’s campaign and other Republicans, who had challenged the decision by Pennsylvania election officials, arguing that efforts to match signatures on ballots to signatures on voter rolls were necessary to prevent fraud.
“We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,” the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, including five Democrats and one Republican.
The seventh justice, another Republican, concurred with the ruling.
The court directs “the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons.”
Already, just under 1.5 million Pennsylvanians have already submitted their ballots in 2020, according to the U.S. Elections Project. That’s a significant share of the vote in Pennsylvania, where about 6.2 million people voted in the 2016 general election.
Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar had issued guidance earlier this year saying local election officials cannot toss ballots because of signature comparisons alone.
“If the Voter’s Declaration on the return envelope is signed and the county board is satisfied that the declaration is sufficient, the mail-in or absentee ballot should be approved for canvassing unless challenged in accordance with the Pennsylvania Election Code,” Boockvar’s mid-September guidance read.
“The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections.”
The court concluded that there was no clause in the state’s election code that allowed ballots to be rejected based on signature comparisons, and if the state’s lawmakers wanted one, they would have included it.
“It is not our role under our tripartite system of governance to engage in judicial legislation and to rewrite a statute in order to supply terms which are not present therein, and we will not do so in this instance,” the court wrote.
Pennsylvania, like many states, is expected to see a big wave of ballots submitted via the mail this year due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The critical battleground state is expected to be slow at tallying votes, because it does not allow for election officials to start processing mail ballots until Election Day, meaning definitive results are not expected in the state on Nov. 3.
Republican legislative leaders and Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf held talks about extending those processing times, but it appears they have totally collapsed.
The state legislature adjourned earlier this week, and is not expected back until after Election Day, with no deal with the governor.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/2 ... res-431794
Pennsylvania Supreme Court says ballots can’t be rejected based on signature comparisons.
The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court ruled Friday that ballots in the state cannot be rejected because of signature comparisons, backing up guidance issued by the state’s chief elections officer heading into Pennsylvania’s first presidential election with no-excuse mail voting.
The ruling is a defeat for President Donald Trump’s campaign and other Republicans, who had challenged the decision by Pennsylvania election officials, arguing that efforts to match signatures on ballots to signatures on voter rolls were necessary to prevent fraud.
“We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,” the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, including five Democrats and one Republican.
The seventh justice, another Republican, concurred with the ruling.
The court directs “the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons.”
Already, just under 1.5 million Pennsylvanians have already submitted their ballots in 2020, according to the U.S. Elections Project. That’s a significant share of the vote in Pennsylvania, where about 6.2 million people voted in the 2016 general election.
Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar had issued guidance earlier this year saying local election officials cannot toss ballots because of signature comparisons alone.
“If the Voter’s Declaration on the return envelope is signed and the county board is satisfied that the declaration is sufficient, the mail-in or absentee ballot should be approved for canvassing unless challenged in accordance with the Pennsylvania Election Code,” Boockvar’s mid-September guidance read.
“The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections.”
The court concluded that there was no clause in the state’s election code that allowed ballots to be rejected based on signature comparisons, and if the state’s lawmakers wanted one, they would have included it.
“It is not our role under our tripartite system of governance to engage in judicial legislation and to rewrite a statute in order to supply terms which are not present therein, and we will not do so in this instance,” the court wrote.
Pennsylvania, like many states, is expected to see a big wave of ballots submitted via the mail this year due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The critical battleground state is expected to be slow at tallying votes, because it does not allow for election officials to start processing mail ballots until Election Day, meaning definitive results are not expected in the state on Nov. 3.
Republican legislative leaders and Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf held talks about extending those processing times, but it appears they have totally collapsed.
The state legislature adjourned earlier this week, and is not expected back until after Election Day, with no deal with the governor.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/2 ... res-431794
24 Oct 2020 2:50 pm
Yeah....I'm the one who relies on fake news.Termin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑If you didn't rely on Fake News, you'd know how many voters he's picked up since last time.Misty » 24 Oct 2020, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑He only won PA by 44,292 votes in 2016.
He hasn't gained any voters since then, and in fact he has lost a lot.
And he's not running against HRC this time.
It's over. Biden has lost.
24 Oct 2020 2:56 pm
This is of COURSE The right decision. Signtures change over time. I am betting mine is nto the same now as more than 25 years ago when I signed up for absentee. Elections officials are do not have the expertise to analyze what is a changing signiture and what is a forgery. If they DID it would take DAYS or at the LEAST HOURS per signitutre. After the election they can run down any they believe to be forrgeries which is a felony but this is clearly the correct decisionMisty » 24 Oct 2020, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ They lost another court case.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court says ballots can’t be rejected based on signature comparisons.
The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court ruled Friday that ballots in the state cannot be rejected because of signature comparisons, backing up guidance issued by the state’s chief elections officer heading into Pennsylvania’s first presidential election with no-excuse mail voting.
The ruling is a defeat for President Donald Trump’s campaign and other Republicans, who had challenged the decision by Pennsylvania election officials, arguing that efforts to match signatures on ballots to signatures on voter rolls were necessary to prevent fraud.
“We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,” the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, including five Democrats and one Republican.
The seventh justice, another Republican, concurred with the ruling.
The court directs “the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons.”
Already, just under 1.5 million Pennsylvanians have already submitted their ballots in 2020, according to the U.S. Elections Project. That’s a significant share of the vote in Pennsylvania, where about 6.2 million people voted in the 2016 general election.
Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar had issued guidance earlier this year saying local election officials cannot toss ballots because of signature comparisons alone.
“If the Voter’s Declaration on the return envelope is signed and the county board is satisfied that the declaration is sufficient, the mail-in or absentee ballot should be approved for canvassing unless challenged in accordance with the Pennsylvania Election Code,” Boockvar’s mid-September guidance read.
“The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections.”
The court concluded that there was no clause in the state’s election code that allowed ballots to be rejected based on signature comparisons, and if the state’s lawmakers wanted one, they would have included it.
“It is not our role under our tripartite system of governance to engage in judicial legislation and to rewrite a statute in order to supply terms which are not present therein, and we will not do so in this instance,” the court wrote.
Pennsylvania, like many states, is expected to see a big wave of ballots submitted via the mail this year due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The critical battleground state is expected to be slow at tallying votes, because it does not allow for election officials to start processing mail ballots until Election Day, meaning definitive results are not expected in the state on Nov. 3.
Republican legislative leaders and Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf held talks about extending those processing times, but it appears they have totally collapsed.
The state legislature adjourned earlier this week, and is not expected back until after Election Day, with no deal with the governor.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/2 ... res-431794
24 Oct 2020 3:13 pm
When you apply for a mail-in ballot here in PA you have to prove your identity and place of residence by giving your state ID number ( Driver's License or Non-Driver ID). So they know exactly who got that ballot.solon » 24 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑This is of COURSE The right decision. Signtures change over time. I am betting mine is nto the same now as more than 25 years ago when I signed up for absentee. Elections officials are do not have the expertise to analyze what is a changing signiture and what is a forgery. If they DID it would take DAYS or at the LEAST HOURS per signitutre. After the election they can run down any they believe to be forrgeries which is a felony but this is clearly the correct decisionMisty » 24 Oct 2020, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ They lost another court case.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court says ballots can’t be rejected based on signature comparisons.
24 Oct 2020 3:41 pm
You are A LIAR and you know it. I have SHOWN how bad many of those sources are and you ar a LIAR none of the mainstream sources have collapsed you just LIES about everything all the time doing Putins bidding bcause YOU are a TRAITORTermin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ ,
Of course you are, which is why all the hoaxes you and your sources have collapsed.
And even Gateway Pundit is far, far, far more reliable than the corrupt liberal MSM.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gate ... 2C67&ssl=1[/img]
QUESTIONABLE SOURCEA questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracies and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.
You are a LIAR and a TRAITOR just CLAIMING your ridiculous and totally debunked sources are real while REAL sources are not because you HATE that they wont tell the LIES you want to push
25 Oct 2020 12:41 pm
25 Oct 2020 12:43 pm
You know nothing.Termin8tor » 24 Oct 2020, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑What about the ones that were mass mailed to every resident in the state?Misty » 24 Oct 2020, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑When you apply for a mail-in ballot here in PA you have to prove your identity and place of residence by giving your state ID number ( Driver's License or Non-Driver ID). So they know exactly who got that ballot.
Now a corrupt judge has declared, likely illegally and unConstitutionally, that they don't need to verify signatures.
No intent to voter fraud there, right?
That didn't happen here in PA.
There was no mass mailing.
If you wanted a mail-in ballot you had to request one and prove your identity.
25 Oct 2020 2:06 pm
My mistake, but my point about the judge and voter fraud stands.Misty » 25 Oct 2020, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑You know nothing.What about the ones that were mass mailed to every resident in the state?
Now a corrupt judge has declared, likely illegally and unConstitutionally, that they don't need to verify signatures.
No intent to voter fraud there, right?
That didn't happen here in PA.
There was no mass mailing.
If you wanted a mail-in ballot you had to request one and prove your identity.
But without mass mailed ballots, I doubt Dems can commit enough ballot fraud to steal the entire state.
My condolences that Slow Joe stupidly told the truth about phasing out fossil fuels.
Nothing radical left there, right?
Who is online
In total there are 3721 users online :: 11 registered, 16 bots, and 3694 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: proximic, FDM, Mediatoolkitbot, facebookexternalhit, DuckDuckGo, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, coccocbot, Kinza, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7