Liberal Forum

Misty » 11 Feb 2023, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 5:53 pm

Ironic that he stuffed so many lies into one post on a platform ironically called Truth Social.

I thought Jack Smith was at a world court investigating war crimes before his current job?  How did he get in 2000 mules?

Misty » 11 Feb 2023, 5:53 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 5:53 pm

Ironic that he stuffed so many lies into one post on a platform ironically called Truth Social.

Wait, you're not STILL denying the FBI spied on the Trump campaign, are you?
Or that Democrats used Covid to change voting rules, to stuff ballot boxes?
Or that the FBI was coordinating "disinformation" to be removed from Twitter and Facebook?


 

Misty » 08 Feb 2023, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2023, 9:12 pm

Mike Lee said that President Biden was lying when he said that some Republicans (not all) want to do away with Social Security and Medicare.

Mike Lee is on video saying that it is his objective to phase out SS.
"Pull it out by the roots and get rid of it" he said.



Who's the real liar?

Joe Biden actually introduced and voted for a bill to do away with socialist security.
But liberals like Misty don't give a rat's *** about the truth. 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:14 pm

Wait, you're not STILL denying the FBI spied on the Trump campaign, are you?
Or that Democrats used Covid to change voting rules, to stuff ballot boxes?
Or that the FBI was coordinating "disinformation" to be removed from Twitter and Facebook?

Democrats didn't use COVID to do anything.  Pubic election officials modified voting rules to protect voters from the scourge of a deadly world-wide pandemic.  NOTHING in any modified voting procedures was aimed at voters from any particular party.  BOTH parties knew the rule changes and both parties were free to modify their GOTV efforts to take advantage of those rule changes.  One party clearly did a better job, while the other party sat on their fat lazy asses and did nothing.

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:22 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:22 pm

Democrats didn't use COVID to do anything.  Pubic election officials modified voting rules to protect voters from the scourge of a deadly world-wide pandemic.  NOTHING in any modified voting procedures was aimed at voters from any particular party.  BOTH parties knew the rule changes and both parties were free to modify their GOTV efforts to take advantage of those rule changes.  One party clearly did a better job, while the other party sat on their fat lazy asses and did nothing.

So you state a lie in your first sentence, then IMMEDIATELY contradict that lie with your second. 
Congratulations *******. 

Question, who has the legal authority to change voting rules in a State?
 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:24 pm

So you state a lie in your first sentence, then IMMEDIATELY contradict that lie with your second. 
Congratulations *******. 

Question, who has the legal authority to change voting rules in a State?

1.  Courts have ruled that the election officials in some states overstepped their authority by adopting rules to protect the citizens from a deadly global pandemic without getting legislative authorization.

2.  NONE of those rule changes were written to specifically aid one political party over the other

3.  ALL courts have ruled that the remedy for the missteps made by election officials in 2020 are to gain legislative confirmation of those rule changes in future elections or rescind them, and that the votes of well intentioned voters following the promulgated rules of their local officials should not be disallowed for the 2020 election

NEXT?
 

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:33 pm

1.  Courts have ruled that the election officials in some states overstepped their authority by adopting rules to protect the citizens from a deadly global pandemic without getting legislative authorization.

2.  NONE of those rule changes were written to specifically aid one political party over the other

3.  ALL courts have ruled that the remedy for the missteps made by election officials in 2020 are to gain legislative confirmation of those rule changes in future elections or rescind them, and that the votes of well intentioned voters following the promulgated rules of their local officials should not be disallowed for the 2020 election

NEXT?

So once again, you are forced to admit I was right, but then you try to spin your way out of your lies. 
Democrat politicians illegally manipulated voting rules to steal a Presidential election.  
 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:43 pm

So once again, you are forced to admit I was right, but then you try to spin your way out of your lies. 
Democrat politicians illegally manipulated voting rules to steal a Presidential election.

you are right about nothing.  Nothing you have presented proves that democrats bent the rules for their advantage.  The rule changes were ALL non-partisan in nature and the court ordered remedies for the bureaucratic overreach is to simply get legislative approval going forward.  There is no ex post facto remedy that would discount votes cast by registered voters in good faith following the rules their local authorities had promulgated.  You lost in 2020.  Put on your big boy pants and deal with that, you **** pedophile pervert!
 

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:49 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:49 pm

you are right about nothing.  Nothing you have presented proves that democrats bent the rules for their advantage.  The rule changes were ALL non-partisan in nature and the court ordered remedies for the bureaucratic overreach is to simply get legislative approval going forward.  There is no ex post facto remedy that would discount votes cast by registered voters in good faith following the rules their local authorities had promulgated.  You lost in 2020.  Put on your big boy pants and deal with that, you **** pedophile pervert!

I said Democrats used Covid to illegally change voting rules, and you were forced to admit I was right. 
Now go **** yourself, instead of that little neighbor boy.

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:52 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:52 pm

I said Democrats used Covid to illegally change voting rules, and you were forced to admit I was right. 
Now go **** yourself, instead of that little neighbor boy.

I admired nothing of the sort.  Election officials act in a non-partisan capacity and their rule changes are not written to benefit one party over the other.

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:59 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:59 pm

I admired nothing of the sort.  Election officials act in a non-partisan capacity and their rule changes are not written to benefit one party over the other.

Of course you did:

1.  Courts have ruled that the election officials in some states overstepped their authority by adopting rules to protect the citizens from a deadly global pandemic without getting legislative authorization.

Lying ****.
 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:05 pm

Of course you did:

Lying ****.

nothing done to protect voters from COVID was targeted for one party over the other.


idiot.

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:09 pm

nothing done to protect voters from COVID was targeted for one party over the other.

idiot.

lol.   No one made any such claim.   But thanks for playing, you stupid ****. 
You look pretty funny trying to move those goalposts like that. 
 
 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:09 pm

lol.   No one made any such claim.   But thanks for playing, you stupid ****.

you said that the rules helped democrats.

If the rule changes were, in fact, non-partisan in nature, how were they concocted to assist one party and not the other?

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:11 pm

you said that the rules helped democrats.

If the rule changes were, in fact, non-partisan in nature, how were they concocted to assist one party and not the other?

It did. 
It was Democrats that illegally changed the rules, and Democrats that were ready to take advantage of the changes. 
Weird, right?

 
 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:17 pm

It did. 
It was Democrats that illegally changed the rules, and Democrats that were ready to take advantage of the changes. 
Weird, right?

Did the rule changes specifically benefit one party over the other?

Y/N?

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:17 pm

It did. 
It was Democrats that illegally changed the rules, and Democrats that were ready to take advantage of the changes. 
Weird, right?

and weren't the rule changes made at such a time that both parties had ample opportunity to  modify their GOTV efforts to maximize the positive benefits of those new rules?

Y/N

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:18 pm

Did the rule changes specifically benefit one party over the other?

Y/N?

Weird how you're trying to change the subject from the FACT that liberals illegally changed voting rules, and took advantage of those changes to stuff ballot boxes for the idiot who is now destroying America.
 

maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:20 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:20 pm

and weren't the rule changes made at such a time that both parties had ample opportunity to  modify their GOTV efforts to maximize the positive benefits of those new rules?

Y/N

Doesn't matter.  The fact is that the changes were illegal, and so was the vote. 
 

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:21 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 11:21 pm

Weird how you're trying to change the subject from the FACT that liberals illegally changed voting rules, and took advantage of those changes to stuff ballot boxes for the idiot who is now destroying America.

there is zero evidence that any ballot boxes were stuffed as a result of the rule changes.

weird eh?