Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
11 Feb 2023 10:24 pm
Yea, except for the videos of people literally stuffing dozens of ballots in the boxes.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑ there is zero evidence that any ballot boxes were stuffed as a result of the rule changes.
weird eh?
It's stunning how stupid you're willing to look, to defend the indefensible.
11 Feb 2023 10:25 pm
and again... courts across the land have ruled that the rule changes themselves may have been illegal but the votes cast under those rules were not.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Doesn't matter. The fact is that the changes were illegal, and so was the vote.
put on your big boy pants and deal with it, you **** pedophile dyslexic moron.
11 Feb 2023 10:27 pm
yawn.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Yea, except for the videos of people literally stuffing dozens of ballots in the boxes.
It's stunning how stupid you're willing to look, to defend the indefensible.
what do the courts say?
Did those videos capture people breaking the law?
11 Feb 2023 10:27 pm
Thanks for admitting the changes were illegal, just as I said.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑ and again... courts across the land have ruled that the rule changes themselves may have been illegal but the votes cast under those rules were not.
put on your big boy pants and deal with it, you **** pedophile dyslexic moron.
If the changes were illegal, so were the votes under them.
Sorry pedo. Facts suck when you're a liberal.
11 Feb 2023 10:31 pm
The courts said the changes were illegal. Just as you've admitted.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:27 pm » wrote: ↑ yawn.
what do the courts say?
Did those videos capture people breaking the law?
The videos show people stuffing the ballot boxes, just as I said.
But you'll defend anything, as long as it give you political power.
You have no honor.
11 Feb 2023 10:32 pm
not according to the courts adjudicating the election.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Thanks for admitting the changes were illegal, just as I said.
If the changes were illegal, so were the votes under them.
Sorry pedo. Facts suck when you're a liberal.
The rule changes may have been illegal but every court in the land has ruled that the votes cast, in good faith, obeying those rules, are NOT illegal and the legal remedy to address those illegal rule changes is to gain legislative approval for them going forward.
Find our big boy pants...the ones without the little boy butt blood all over the crotch.
11 Feb 2023 10:33 pm
You admitted it.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:32 pm » wrote: ↑ not according to the courts adjudicating the election.
The rule changes may have been illegal but every court in the land has ruled that the votes cast, in good faith, obeying those rules, are NOT illegal and the legal remedy to address those illegal rule changes is to gain legislative approval for them going forward.
Find our big boy pants...the ones without the little boy butt blood all over the crotch.
Why are you now contradicting your own statements?
11 Feb 2023 10:33 pm
The courts specifically ruled as to the remedy for the illegal rule changes.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The courts said the changes were illegal. Just as you've admitted.
The videos show people stuffing the ballot boxes, just as I said.
But you'll defend anything, as long as it give you political power.
You have no honor.
Your videos have not resulted in ANY criminal indictments... because none of those videos captured illegal acts
11 Feb 2023 10:35 pm
I have admitted nothing of the sort. We all are well aware of your reading comprehension disability.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You admitted it.
Why are you now contradicting your own statements?
11 Feb 2023 10:37 pm
How many times do I have to quote you saying the courts deemed the changes illegal?maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I have admitted nothing of the sort. We all are well aware of your reading comprehension disability.
11 Feb 2023 10:38 pm
The changes were illegal. Nothing you can say, will change or deflect from that fact.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑ The courts specifically ruled as to the remedy for the illegal rule changes.
Your videos have not resulted in ANY criminal indictments... because none of those videos captured illegal acts
12 Feb 2023 7:10 am
What separates admire from administrate reasonable doubt playing the parales of language arts/nuaunces of compounding realities against the whole species inside out intellectually screwing with each person's instinctive brain cradle to grave.maineman » 11 Feb 2023, 10:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I admired nothing of the sort. Election officials act in a non-partisan capacity and their rule changes are not written to benefit one party over the other.
Self anointed type cast people governing stereotype behavior following rule of law placed in specific grammar separating eternally separated reproductions into statistically averaged facts used against all 4 generation gaps present training their replacements to obey traditional values or else.
Really pay atention to those 10 commandments or 10 bill of rights as the 20 together operate reasonable doubt within current population forward now.
Did I score(20) ways to pretend life is too complicated for any one brain to pick out the 31 ways self deception manifested Eternity Hell by saving humanity until extinction event happens?
the 31 number, compounding DNA algorithm of mine. Breaks down specific ancestral lineages by conception, not ideologies used cradle to grave.
It is all described in this little figure the positions of genetic compounding into the arrival of their 5th additional generation gap living in series parallel energy flow sustained by perpetual motion has physical limitations universally self evident by results in plain sight never same total sum again individually forward now.
12 Feb 2023 7:20 am
Indeed...the rule changes were deemed to have been illegal by the courts. SO what? When asked what the remedy for that mistake should be, those same courts deemed that any remedy would be prospective and that no votes cast by well intentioned voters playing by the rules would fail to be counted. Nothing YOU can say, will change or deflect from THAT fact. The rules were incorrectly instituted, but those rules were in effect for BOTH parties. Nobody cheated. I am sure that if election officials in some state had written the rules to allow democrats more time to submit their absentee ballots than republicans were given, the remedies would have been retrospective. They weren't. No PARTY was given any explicit benefit over the other. The clown lost. Suck it up.golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:38 pm » wrote: ↑ The changes were illegal. Nothing you can say, will change or deflect from that fact.
12 Feb 2023 7:21 am
we can make sure it never happens again.maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ Indeed...the rule changes were deemed to have been illegal by the courts. SO what? When asked what the remedy for that mistake should be, those same courts deemed that any remedy would be prospective and that no votes cast by well intentioned voters playing by the rules would fail to be counted. Nothing YOU can say, will change or deflect from THAT fact. The rules were incorrectly instituted, but those rules were in effect for BOTH parties. Nobody cheated. I am sure that if election officials in some state had written the rules to allow democrats more time to submit their absentee ballots than republicans were given, the remedies would have been retrospective. They weren't. No PARTY was given any explicit benefit over the other. The clown lost. Suck it up.
12 Feb 2023 7:24 am
the statement you made that I disagree with is this:golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑ How many times do I have to quote you saying the courts deemed the changes illegal?
"If the changes were illegal, so were the votes under them."
Courts have repeatedly reaffirmed that all votes cast by well intentioned voters following the rules as promulgated are legal votes and will be counted. The remedy for the bureaucratic overreach was prospective and has already been accomplished.
12 Feb 2023 7:25 am
you can try. My suggestion would be to run better candidates.
12 Feb 2023 7:26 am
maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ the statement you made that I disagree with is this:
"If the changes were illegal, so were the votes under them."
Courts have repeatedly reaffirmed that all votes cast by well intentioned voters following the rules as promulgated are legal votes and will be counted. The remedy for the bureaucratic overreach was prospective and has already been accomplished.
the votes should have been nullified. The law was illegal. But thanks for admitting now that there was fraud.
12 Feb 2023 7:26 am
your we assures it never stops, just relabeled as another issue never resolved.
12 Feb 2023 7:48 am
I never admitted that there was fraud, for the simple fact that there was no fraud. Well meaning bureaucrats simply modified election rules in order to protect the voting public in the midst of a global pandemic. The rules applied equally to all voters and to all political parties. The remedy for that error was prospective and it has already been realized.FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ the votes should have been nullified. The law was illegal. But thanks for admitting now that there was fraud.
12 Feb 2023 9:30 am
what are you doing being a single ancestor within 8 billion ancestors evolving at the same time, same way? Fighting over who is in charge of 8 billion equally alive reproductions. oh my nobody does it alone using "Chain of command" principals honoring hypothetical principles.maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ I never admitted that there was fraud, for the simple fact that there was no fraud. Well meaning bureaucrats simply modified election rules in order to protect the voting public in the midst of a global pandemic. The rules applied equally to all voters and to all political parties. The remedy for that error was prospective and it has already been realized.
well I posted this in NHB and less than a couple hours it will be in peanut gallery. I get it, Misty and Maineman share a reality where self deception is better than existing equally here.
That "better to rule in hell than be obedient in an intellectual utopia." 99% of the residents honor reasonable doubt cradle to grave..
Who is online
In total there are 2437 users online :: 15 registered, 19 bots, and 2403 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, roadkill, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, jerra b, Skans, murdock, PhiloBeddo, Sumela, Cannonpointer, nefarious101
Bots: Not, LCC, Pinterest, facebookexternalhit, DuckDuckBot, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, proximic, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, app.hypefactors.com, semantic-visions.com, ADmantX, curl/7, linkfluence.com, BLEXBot, Googlebot, GPTBot, bingbot