Liberal Forum

golfboy » 12 Feb 2023, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 10:06 pm

Still waiting for you to show us ANY of the rulings you claimed happened. 
But you can't post one because you lied and made it up.

and I am still waiting for you to show me one court ruling that even HINTED at the idea that the 2020 election was fraudulent and needed to be redone.

But here is this:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact ... SKBN2AF1G1
 

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 10:19 pm

and I am still waiting for you to show me one court ruling that even HINTED at the idea that the 2020 election was fraudulent and needed to be redone.

But here is this:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact ... SKBN2AF1G1

Your article isn't a court ruling, and doesn't quote a court ruling supporting your claim. 
Sorry.  I guess you should have read it first. 

golfboy » 12 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm

Your article isn't a court ruling, and doesn't quote a court ruling supporting your claim. 
Sorry.  I guess you should have read it first.

But it's even better, man. 

It's a FACT CHECK - the gold standard of journalism. You think fact checks are partisan ****? Well you are wrong, sir. And @maineman  is about to prove it!

Hey, maineboy. Hit the poor deluded fool with a quick three fact checks that favored conservatives. That'll teach him! He'll be FORCED to admit that your site isn't partisan ****!

Hurry - slap him!  
 
 

Pastor Blast » 12 Feb 2023, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 7:43 pm

Biden won. There was no fraud of consequence. Trump needed a hell of a lot more fraudulent votes to win.

Wining isn't the whole story, is it? Tomorrow is just a new total sum achieved today never being the same results twice as yesterday was. Death isn't the end of one's time since genetics has one 50% their children left behind, 25% their grandchildren, 12.5% their great grandchildren.

Siblings and cousins keep life going when a child never becomes a parent and that specific DNA becomes extinct, the ancestral lineage in siblings and cousins keeps the bloodline forward one generaiton gap at a time.

self evident eternal life in ever changing form arriving one at a time now. Look at all you missed in life pretending your point of origin was beyond existing here now.

Your brain is always navigating space as one of a kind and you constantly ignore it. Your choices combined is the character you become as a lost soul by consensus.

Welcome to Intellectual Armageddon i.e. instinctive judgement day. See I catch everyone defying their own natural time displaced punishing me psycologically for not believing reality is better than adapting to space I occupy living as equally eternally separated as anything ever occupied time before.

golfboy » 12 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm

Your article isn't a court ruling, and doesn't quote a court ruling supporting your claim. 
Sorry.  I guess you should have read it first.

I really don't want to get into a semantic argument with you.  I have made that mistake several times too often in the past.  

Here is the crux of the issue:

You say that because the rule changes were illegal that the elections themselves are illegal and invalid.

That is simply not the case. To the best of my knowledge, NO court has ruled that the votes cast by well intentioned voters who followed the rules as promulgated do not count. Those bureaucrats who modified election procedures in the midst of a deadly pandemic did so in an explicitly non-partisan fashion and no court has created any punitive remedy for their actions. If you know of some court ruling in any state or any jurisdiction that contradicts either of those statements, please produce it.  If not... let's just put this to rest, shall we?

maineman » 13 Feb 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 11:11 am

I really don't want to get into a semantic argument with you.  I have made that mistake several times too often in the past.  

Here is the crux of the issue:

You say that because the rule changes were illegal that the elections themselves are illegal and invalid.

That is simply not the case. To the best of my knowledge, NO court has ruled that the votes cast by well intentioned voters who followed the rules as promulgated do not count. Those bureaucrats who modified election procedures in the midst of a deadly pandemic did so in an explicitly non-partisan fashion and no court has created any punitive remedy for their actions. If you know of some court ruling in any state or any jurisdiction that contradicts either of those statements, please produce it.  If not... let's just put this to rest, shall we?

Where did the best of your knowledge come from? Comparing theories against theologies while ignoring what it takes to evolve as one of a kind ancestrally being eternally separated as reproductively here.

why two minds believe they are smarter than anyone else's personal brain.

Nostradamus'omh » 13 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm

Where did the best of your knowledge come from? Comparing theories against theologies while ignoring what it takes to evolve as one of a kind ancestrally being eternally separated as reproductively here.

why two minds believe they are smarter than anyone else's personal brain.

I am curious.  Does anyone ever actually understand what it is you are saying, or do you end up talking over everyone's head and not just mine?
 

maineman » 13 Feb 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 12:50 pm

I am curious.  Does anyone ever actually understand what it is you are saying, or do you end up talking over everyone's head and not just mine?
 

You obey power of suggestion, I adapt to evolving as one of a kind, why would you ever want to understand what I accept in real time because the moment you do, your reality is over.
and you already know it.

Nostradamus'omh » 13 Feb 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 7:14 am

Wining isn't the whole story, is it? Tomorrow is just a new total sum achieved today never being the same results twice as yesterday was. Death isn't the end of one's time since genetics has one 50% their children left behind, 25% their grandchildren, 12.5% their great grandchildren.

Siblings and cousins keep life going when a child never becomes a parent and that specific DNA becomes extinct, the ancestral lineage in siblings and cousins keeps the bloodline forward one generaiton gap at a time.

self evident eternal life in ever changing form arriving one at a time now. Look at all you missed in life pretending your point of origin was beyond existing here now.

Your brain is always navigating space as one of a kind and you constantly ignore it. Your choices combined is the character you become as a lost soul by consensus.

Welcome to Intellectual Armageddon i.e. instinctive judgement day. See I catch everyone defying their own natural time displaced punishing me psycologically for not believing reality is better than adapting to space I occupy living as equally eternally separated as anything ever occupied time before.

So how can your intellect be implemented to help people?

Nostradamus'omh » 13 Feb 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 12:53 pm

You obey power of suggestion, I adapt to evolving as one of a kind, why would you ever want to understand what I accept in real time because the moment you do, your reality is over.
and you already know it.

I am just waiting for photos of the things.. Lake Huron was Octoganal. I would suggest we are witnessing a cover up.  Certainly there is imagery by now.


 

Pastor Blast » 13 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm

I am just waiting for photos of the things.. Lake Huron was Octoganal. I would suggest we are witnessing a cover up.  Certainly there is imagery by now.


 

Look what you post, then defend reasonable doubt as a greater good scenario. corruption is all that lasts ignoring the self evident way life evolves naturally living specificlly timed apart now as a constantly changing total sum forward now.

What I offer always worked before I existed, before mankind existend, before life in this atmosphere arrived and it conitues to perate same way.

SSDD.

recite the thermodynamic principles please? You won't being a principal of reasonable doubt and if you do you will always work it in relative time logistics not series parallel streaming a new total sum here.

maineman » 13 Feb 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 11:11 am

I really don't want to get into a semantic argument with you.  I have made that mistake several times too often in the past.  

Here is the crux of the issue:

You say that because the rule changes were illegal that the elections themselves are illegal and invalid.

That is simply not the case. To the best of my knowledge, NO court has ruled that the votes cast by well intentioned voters who followed the rules as promulgated do not count. Those bureaucrats who modified election procedures in the midst of a deadly pandemic did so in an explicitly non-partisan fashion and no court has created any punitive remedy for their actions. If you know of some court ruling in any state or any jurisdiction that contradicts either of those statements, please produce it.  If not... let's just put this to rest, shall we?

You claimed EVERY court rules the votes were legal, yet you can't quote a single such ruling. 
You got caught lying again, and you're simply not man enough to admit it. 
 

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:47 pm

If some court, any court, in the land had ruled that the 2020 election was invalid and required a re-vote, don't you think we'd all know about that?

No court in America is going to call for a Presidential revote, and you know it. 
That's why they refuse to even hear the cases, claiming people who were wronged, don't have "standing" to bring a case. 
It's pathetic.  But liberal sheep like you just bleet along with the game, because you gain political power. 
 

golfboy » 13 Feb 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 8:37 pm

No court in America is going to call for a Presidential revote, and you know it. 
That's why they refuse to even hear the cases, claiming people who were wronged, don't have "standing" to bring a case. 
It's pathetic.  But liberal sheep like you just bleet along with the game, because you gain political power.

Liberal sheep?  SCOTUS was 6-3 the last I looked, and three of them were put there by the clown himself.

golfboy » 13 Feb 2023, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 8:34 pm

You claimed EVERY court rules the votes were legal, yet you can't quote a single such ruling. 
You got caught lying again, and you're simply not man enough to admit it.

Did you miss the part where I refuse to engage in a semantic argument with you again?  If you can find a single court that ruled differently than I stated, you should post it.  My guess is that you cannot.
 

PastorBlast » 13 Feb 2023, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 5:31 pm

So how can your intellect be implemented to help people?

youre beyond help aids

maineman » 13 Feb 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 8:52 pm

Did you miss the part where I refuse to engage in a semantic argument with you again?  If you can find a single court that ruled differently than I stated, you should post it.  My guess is that you cannot.

^^ bitch can't prove his claim.  How unsurprising.
 

maineman » 13 Feb 2023, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 8:50 pm

Liberal sheep?  SCOTUS was 6-3 the last I looked, and three of them were put there by the clown himself.

English not your first language?  YOU are the liberal sheep, *******.
 

golfboy » 13 Feb 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 8:37 pm

maineman » 12 Feb 2023, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:47 pm

If some court, any court, in the land had ruled that the 2020 election was invalid and required a re-vote, don't you think we'd all know about that?

No court in America is going to call for a Presidential revote, and you know it. 
That's why they refuse to even hear the cases, claiming people who were wronged, don't have "standing" to bring a case. 
It's pathetic.  But liberal sheep like you just bleet along with the game, because you gain political power.

The Former Guy's own people told him that they couldn't find any evidence of the massive voter fraud he kept whining about.
He knew that before January 6th but he continued to lie about it.
So by putting pressure on Pence to not certify the election, he actually attempted to steal an election that he knew he had lost.

Trump received this information from a diverse array of actors: his own campaign operatives, his campaign lawyers, senior Justice Department officials, and federal judges.

Evidence That Trump Knew He Had Lost the Election and Lied About Voter Fraud

 
 

Misty » 13 Feb 2023, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2023, 9:19 pm

The Former Guy's own people told him that they couldn't find any evidence of the massive voter fraud he kept whining about.
He knew that before January 6th but he continued to lie about it.
So by putting pressure on Pence to not certify the election, he actually attempted to steal an election that he knew he had lost.

So the vote would have been the same if Democrats didn't change the rules, send out mail ballots to EVERYONE, allow ballot "harvesting" and decline signature matching?

It is amusing though that you can't even say the name Trump.
It's stunning how badly you hate.