Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Feb 2023 9:46 am
maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ ducky dodging a simple yes or no question.
who didn't see THAT coming??
hahahahahahhahahaha
listen you retarded bitch, you never answer y/n questions
17 Feb 2023 9:46 am
doesn't make the votes cast illegal.FJB » 17 Feb 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ seems MM can't grasp the fact that it was illegal to change the voting laws.
sorry.
Th clown lost. Joe won. deal with it.
17 Feb 2023 9:47 am
sez the guy who just dodged a y/n question.
funny stuff.
17 Feb 2023 9:48 am
maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ doesn't make the votes cast illegal.
sorry.
Th clown lost. Joe won. deal with it.
just proves democrats don't follow the rule of law
17 Feb 2023 9:55 am
syllogism by yes or no questions creates fruition of things that don't naturally evolve in real time. Just defines bad habits one species does all the time against each other currently..maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ ducky dodging a simple yes or no question.
who didn't see THAT coming??
hahahahahahhahahaha
17 Feb 2023 10:31 am
yawn.
call the waaaaambulance.
**** crybaby
17 Feb 2023 10:38 am
so you admit that fact
17 Feb 2023 10:46 am
what fact? No party cheated. Public officials modified election rules to protect the public. Neither party was precluded from using the new rules.
Do you admit you can't answer a simple yes or no question?
Let's try again: Were any election rules written that specifically precluded either party from following them? Y/N
17 Feb 2023 10:47 am
maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ what fact? No party cheated. Public officials modified election rules to protect the public. Neither party was precluded from using the new rules.
Do you admit you can't answer a simple yes or no question?
Let's try again: Were any election rules written that specifically precluded either party from following them? Y/N
democrats changed the law illegally. What don't you get about that?
17 Feb 2023 11:08 am
Protect the public from what? each other or what reasonable doubt was deigned to coverup in plain sight.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ what fact? No party cheated. Public officials modified election rules to protect the public. Neither party was precluded from using the new rules.
Do you admit you can't answer a simple yes or no question?
Let's try again: Were any election rules written that specifically precluded either party from following them? Y/N
17 Feb 2023 11:19 am
do you think that all the public officials who modified election rules were democrats?FJB » 17 Feb 2023, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ democrats changed the law illegally. What don't you get about that?
Y/N
and did the rules that got changed only apply to democrats?
Y/N
17 Feb 2023 11:23 am
1. I JUST SAID nothing of the sort.Z09 » 17 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey Maineman..
You just said that no cash bail is a great idea..
Did you check out my post about California?
2. no... nor will I.
17 Feb 2023 11:24 am
both questions are semantics protecting reasonable doubt and keep the conflicting interpretations going for generations added forward from here.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ do you think that all the public officials who modified election rules were democrats?
Y/N
and did the rules that got changed only apply to democrats?
Y/N
17 Feb 2023 11:53 am
So the law violations in precisely those five states that flipped WERE illegal, but were all identically oopsie doopsies?maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ The entire concept of "breaking the law" requires some degree of criminal intent, I believe. In this case, the rules were modified in a good faith effort to protect the public health in the midst of a deadly global pandemic. Nobody set out to CHEAT the system... they only sought to save lives
Okay, Karen.
The illegal rules made it easier to cheat and harder to catch. When EVERYBODY is mail-in, ballot harvesting opportunities are rife.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ There was absolutely NOTHING in the revised rules that favored one party over another. Voters who might have voted in person in previous elections had the luxury to vote early from the safety of their own homes. No party was precluded from encouraging their voters to use mail in ballots.
You know this. You are a dishonest person. If you have to lie, you weaken your own argument and demonstrate piss-poor character.
The GOP was not limited same day voting - if you have to lie, you are admitting that your argument is ****. They had PLENTY of opportunities to go in and vote over a span of a couple of weeks. You do not want in-person voting because fraud is harder. An actual person has to care enough to show up. It defeats ballot harvesting.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑And if the GOP had not so vigorously eschewed mail in voting, and had embraced it instead, as the democrats did, they would have undoubtedly increased the voter participation over that achieved by their reliance on same day voting alone.
I'm passing on the rest of your trite, jejune, shopworn appeals to drama and emotion, there, emo. Spare us the canned and ready crocodile tears. My eyes can only roll heavenward so many times before God tires of my pleas for His help to forebear.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 Feb 2023 12:24 pm
First and foremost...nothing I said in the post you just quoted was a lie. NOT ONE WORD. If you continue to question my integrity, I will no longer continue engage with you in any form of discourseCannonpointer » 17 Feb 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So the law violations in precisely those five states that flipped WERE illegal, but were all identically oopsie doopsies?
Okay, Karen.
The illegal rules made it easier to cheat and harder to catch. When EVERYBODY is mail-in, ballot harvesting opportunities are rife.
You know this. You are a dishonest person. If you have to lie, you weaken your own argument and demonstrate piss-poor character.
The GOP was not limited same day voting - if you have to lie, you are admitting that your argument is ****. They had PLENTY of opportunities to go in and vote over a span of a couple of weeks. You do not want in-person voting because fraud is harder. An actual person has to care enough to show up. It defeats ballot harvesting.
I'm passing on the rest of your trite, jejune, shopworn appeals to drama and emotion, there, emo. Spare us the canned and ready crocodile tears. My eyes can only roll heavenward so many times before God tires of my pleas for hIS help to forebear.
I disagree with your assertions that rule changes were identical in all five states. I also disagree with your assertion that the rule changes were all made BY democrats as well as the concurrent implication that they were made for the exclusive benefit OF democrats.
When everyone is mail in, the ballot processing at the counting locations is slower, to be sure, but a ballot is a ballot and if it is filled out correctly by a registered voter, there is no inherent fraud. And why would YOU care who drops off MY sealed ballot? If the name on the ballot matches a name on the voter rolls, and the voter hasn't voted yet, the poll worker draws a line through the voters name and puts the ballot in the pile. Just like poll workers have done with MY ballots mailed in from all over the world during my time in the Navy. Bottom line: if you could show me data that indicates that there is rampant voter fraud in the eight states that currently conduct ALL MAIL elections, you'd have done so long ago.
And I agree.. the GOP was NOT limited to same day, in person voting...but the clown certainly ENCOURAGED it. (even though he and his family voted by mail) The rule changes that made it easier for more democrats to safely vote from the comfort of their own homes over an extended period of time rather than being herded like cattle through a COVID infested polling place were all available for republicans to use as well. Why so many of you chose to not avail yourselves of the clear benefits of voting by mail is a mystery to me, to be sure, but certainly nothing I have ever lost even a moment's sleep worrying about.
17 Feb 2023 12:25 pm
True to what people believe isn't the honest answer to how everyone is here as evolving forward one at a time now.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ First and foremost...nothing I said in the post you just quoted was a lie. NOT ONE WORD. If you continue to question my integrity, I will no longer continue engage with you in any form of discourse
I disagree with your assertions that rule changes were identical in all five states. I also disagree with your assertion that the rule changes were all made BY democrats as well as the concurrent implication that they were made for the exclusive benefit OF democrats.
When everyone is mail in, the ballot processing at the counting locations is slower, to be sure, but a ballot is a ballot and if it is filled out correctly by a registered voter, there is no inherent fraud. And why would YOU care who drops off MY sealed ballot? If the name on the ballot matches a name on the voter rolls, and the voter hasn't voted yet, the poll worker draws a line through the voters name and puts the ballot in the pile. Just like poll workers have done with MY ballots mailed in from all over the world during my time in the Navy. Bottom line: if you could show me data that indicates that there is rampant voter fraud in the eight states that currently conduct ALL MAIL elections, you'd have done so long ago.
And I agree.. the GOP was NOT limited to same day, in person voting...but the clown certainly ENCOURAGED it. (even though he and his family voted by mail) The rule changes that made it easier for more democrats to safely vote from the comfort of their own homes over an extended period of time rather than being herded like cattle through a COVID infested polling place were all available for republicans to use as well. Why so many of you chose to not avail yourselves of the clear benefits of voting by mail is a mystery to me, to be sure, but certainly nothing I have ever lost even a moment's sleep worrying about.
17 Feb 2023 12:29 pm
You could always start posting honestly.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ First and foremost...nothing I said in the post you just quoted was a lie. NOT ONE WORD. If you continue to question my integrity, I will no longer continue engage with you in any form of discourse
If you read my post, they IDENTICALLY were oopsie doopsies. All in good faith - nay, EXCELLENT faith, - all designed in a way that would make cheating easier, none of them related, all of them in a critical state that flipped.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I disagree with your assertions that rule changes were identical in all five states. I also disagree with your assertion that the rule changes were all made BY democrats as well as the concurrent implication that they were made for the exclusive benefit OF democrats.
Those who write the laws against ballot harvesting care. Why would YOU have something against people keeping their hands above the table? If you have to lie - even implicitly - you are admitting that you're full of ****.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ When everyone is mail in, the ballot processing at the counting locations is slower, to be sure, but a ballot is a ballot and if it is filled out correctly by a registered voter, there is no inherent fraud. And why would YOU care who drops off MY sealed ballot?
I'm not addressing the rest of your tripe - I stopped reading when you vomited the spew that defends ballot harvesting.
When you complain, your friends roll their eyes and your enemies smile
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 Feb 2023 2:35 pm
so we're done then? cool. I was growing bored anyway. Arrivederci.Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You could always start posting honestly.
If you read my post, they IDENTICALLY were oopsie doopsies. All in good faith - nay, EXCELLENT faith, - all designed in a way that would make cheating easier, none of them related, all of them in a critical state that flipped.
Those who write the laws against ballot harvesting care. Why would YOU have something against people keeping their hands above the table? If you have to lie - even implicitly - you are admitting that you're full of ****.
I'm not addressing the rest of your tripe - I stopped reading when you vomited the spew that defends ballot harvesting.
17 Feb 2023 2:44 pm
17 Feb 2023 2:46 pm
^^^^ from the little homo who can't answer a yes or no question
You should go back to the minor leagues and work on your delivery. You're getting pelted at this level.
Who is online
In total there are 2368 users online :: 22 registered, 20 bots, and 2326 guests
Registered users: *Beekeeper, roadkill, LowIQTrash, michaelf, jerra b, PhiloBeddo, Johnny You, murdock, *GHETTO BLASTER, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, Cannonpointer, Buck Naked, Blackvegetable, Fuelman, NEILCAR, Mrkelly, RebelGator, MR-7, *Huey, 31st Arrival, ROG62
Bots: CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, MicroMessenger, Not, Pinterest, DuckDuckBot, app.hypefactors.com, DuckDuckGo, Mojeek, proximic, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, semantic-visions.com, Applebot, YandexBot, linkfluence.com, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7, GPTBot