ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haMisty » 20 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn I wish the Peanut Gallery function still worked in this thread.
:twisted:
No, what I can't escape is your long rambling posts filled with incoherent nonsense.Nostradamus'omh » 20 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haMisty » 20 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn I wish the Peanut Gallery function still worked in this thread.
time has come you cannot escape your own mistakes.
Reality was your fantasy life reached fruition, not changed how evolving works in plain sight. Keep pretending I never existed, eveyone has done it so far. Not my fault you won't accept your actual form evolving in plain sight.Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, what I can't escape is your long rambling posts filled with incoherent nonsense.
^^ Rule #1slideman » 20 Feb 2023, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ You probably think that's clever.
It makes you look dumb
Not my responsibility to disprove your lie, simply because you got caught.
I spoke the truth.... did you read the report "lost, not stolen"?golfboy » 21 Feb 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Not my responsibility to disprove your lie, simply because you got caught.
You said "EVERY COURT" said it..maineman » 21 Feb 2023, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I spoke the truth.... did you read the report "lost, not stolen"?
Why... of course you didn't.
we both know you can't read ANYTHING beyond three sentences without it all swirling around into word soup in your damaged brain.
Did you read the report? It discusses a number of them.golfboy » 21 Feb 2023, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ You said "EVERY COURT" said it..
Weird you can't find a single ruling to support your ****.
Truth to historical consensus isn't the accurate definition of evolving here in real time in plain sight of genetically here naturally living in series parallel displacement.maineman » 21 Feb 2023, 8:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I spoke the truth.... did you read the report "lost, not stolen"?
Why... of course you didn't.
we both know you can't read ANYTHING beyond three sentences without it all swirling around into word soup in your damaged brain.
I read your article. No court ruled as you claimed.maineman » 21 Feb 2023, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you read the report? It discusses a number of them.
Weird that you can't find ONE SINGLE court that supports your ridiculous assertion.
but then.... you're just that stupid.
I hate to break this to you, but your gobbledygook has NEVER made any sense to me... and, I would imagine, it's seen as deliberately insanely purposely wacko by just about everybody else see as well. I notice how you quote me fairly frequently, but I really am going to decline any further interaction.... it feels like the Twilight Zone.Nostradamus'omh » 21 Feb 2023, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Truth to historical consensus isn't the accurate definition of evolving here in real time in plain sight of genetically here naturally living in series parallel displacement.
You know, spontaneously alive since conceived simultaneosuly sensing being alive one at a time adapting geographically present as one-self.
You read my article?golfboy » 21 Feb 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ I read your article. No court ruled as you claimed.
You lied. You got caught.
,
This happens to you all the time. You're either a masochist or you simple are incapable of learning from your mistakes.
Poor mainbitch. Still telling me I have to prove his lie is a lie, simply because he can't support his stupid lies.maineman » 21 Feb 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You read my article?
wait...what?
hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahahahaha
I was born at night, but no LAST night, golfie
You can't read....
and it is STILL weird that you can't find ONE SINGLE court that supports YOUR ridiculous assertion. Illegal rule changes do not make for illegal elections, no matter HOW much you want to claim otherwise.
"Lost Not Stolen" proves my claim and disproves yours.golfboy » 21 Feb 2023, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Poor mainbitch. Still telling me I have to prove his lie is a lie, simply because he can't support his stupid lies.
No it doesn't. If you want to prove your claim, just produce ONE court ruling.maineman » 21 Feb 2023, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ "Lost Not Stolen" proves my claim and disproves yours.
If you could actually read, you would know that.
poor dyslexic aphasic retarded boy....
sad.
The report produces dozens of them.golfboy » 21 Feb 2023, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ No it doesn't. If you want to prove your claim, just produce ONE court ruling.
But you won't, because it doesn't exist.
Quote one.
why.... cuz you can't read yourself?
lol. Typical mainbitch.
That's what should happen to leftist traitor whores.Misty » 11 Mar 2011, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ This is my signature thread where I post about a variety of issues that interest me instead of starting a bunch of new threads.
I can't start many new threads because there is a sick psycho stalker on this forum who destroys every thread I start.