Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 Mar 2023 8:00 pm
So what?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Gaetz tried to get something from The Globalist into the Congressional Record.
In June 2020, the Trump administration, through the State Department, designated that outlet as a foreign mission operating in the US.
These pinheads are not ready for prime time.
But I thoroughly enjoy watching them make fools of themselves.
Biden said in debate vs Trump that intelligence said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation.
Which is worse?
1 Mar 2023 8:04 pm
Lie.murdock » 28 Feb 2023, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑That you support that Chinese spy **** cocksucker says all we need to know about your bitch traitor ***. They need to stand on a wall.
Lie.
Swalwell was not accused of any wrongdoing, except by you MAGAs.
After U.S. intelligence officials briefed him in 2015 on their concerns about an alleged Chinese spy he cut off ties with her.
He then provided information to the FBI about her for which they thanked him.
1 Mar 2023 8:08 pm
Was that entered into the Congressional Record?golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑So what?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Gaetz tried to get something from The Globalist into the Congressional Record.
In June 2020, the Trump administration, through the State Department, designated that outlet as a foreign mission operating in the US.
These pinheads are not ready for prime time.
But I thoroughly enjoy watching them make fools of themselves.
Biden said in debate vs Trump that intelligence said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation.
Which is worse?
I think not.
Let's see, something someone said in a debate, or something someone said during an official government proceeding being entered into the permanent record of the US Congress.
Which is worse?
Hmmm.......
1 Mar 2023 8:09 pm
lol. No wrongdoing?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Lie.
Lie.
Swalwell was not accused of any wrongdoing, except by you MAGAs.
After U.S. intelligence officials briefed him in 2015 on their concerns about an alleged Chinese spy he cut off ties with her.
He then provided information to the FBI about her for which they thanked him.
He employed, and slept with a Chinese spy.
I guess in liberaland, that's not wrong.
Guessing you think Feinstein having a spy as a driver for decades was no big deal either.
1 Mar 2023 8:11 pm
lol. So no liberal, on the floor of the House or Senate ever repeated the lie that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Was that entered into the Congressional Record?
I think not.
Let's see, something someone said in a debate, or something someone said during an official government proceeding being entered into the permanent record of the US Congress.
Which is worse?
Hmmm.......
And if you think it's okay for a Biden to openly lie to get elected, you have no moral standing to EVER attack Trump for lying again.
1 Mar 2023 8:15 pm
Where do you get this ****?golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑lol. No wrongdoing?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Swalwell was not accused of any wrongdoing, except by you MAGAs.
After U.S. intelligence officials briefed him in 2015 on their concerns about an alleged Chinese spy he cut off ties with her.
He then provided information to the FBI about her for which they thanked him.
He employed, and slept with a Chinese spy.
I haven't seen anything about him employing her or sleeping with her.
She did fundraising for him and no one that I can see accused him of sleeping with her.
https://www.axios.com/2020/12/08/china- ... oliticians
I'm not going to waste any more time fact checking you.golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Guessing you think Feinstein having a spy as a driver for decades was no big deal either.
Your track record for posting misinformation is abysmal.
1 Mar 2023 8:26 pm
I don't know. Why don't you tell me?golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑lol. So no liberal, on the floor of the House or Senate ever repeated the lie that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Was that entered into the Congressional Record?
I think not.
Let's see, something someone said in a debate, or something someone said during an official government proceeding being entered into the permanent record of the US Congress.
Which is worse?
Hmmm.......
Do you not understand that Gaetz actually entered a report from a Chinese propaganda outlet into the official Congressional Record?
Oh please get off your high horse.golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑ And if you think it's okay for a Biden to openly lie to get elected, you have no moral standing to EVER attack Trump for lying again.
45 lied tens of thousands of times just during his 4 years in office, not to mention the plethora of lies he told before and after those 4 years, and you accepted that.
So you are the one lacking the moral standing to talk about ANYONE lying EVER AGAIN.
You MAGAs still don't get that do you?
You defended that piece of **** for years no matter what he did or said.
So nobody wants to hear any criticism from you about the current POTUS.
1 Mar 2023 8:30 pm
Where do I get this ****? I read. Why don't you?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Where do you get this ****?
I haven't seen anything about him employing her or sleeping with her.
She did fundraising for him and no one that I can see accused him of sleeping with her.
https://www.axios.com/2020/12/08/china- ... oliticians
I'm not going to waste any more time fact checking you.
Your track record for posting misinformation is abysmal.
Working on someone's campaign, isn't working for him?
...Fang reportedly worked in California’s Bay Area on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Ministry of State Security, the country’s internal spy agency where she allegedly assisted Swalwell with fundraising during his 2014 re-election campaign.
And I guess you don't care about Feinstein spy buddy.
1 Mar 2023 8:32 pm
Now tell me about Trump's Russia collusion.Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know. Why don't you tell me?
Do you not understand that Gaetz actually entered a report from a Chinese propaganda outlet into the official Congressional Record?
Oh please get off your high horse.
45 lied tens of thousands of times just during his 4 years in office, not to mention the plethora of lies he told before and after those 4 years, and you accepted that.
So you are the one lacking the moral standing to talk about ANYONE lying EVER AGAIN.
You MAGAs still don't get that do you?
You defended that piece of **** for years no matter what he did or said.
So nobody wants to hear any criticism from you about the current POTUS.
Did that get entered into the Congressional record?
Remember the tales Schiff told, submitted into Congressional record, and actually impeached Trump over?
All of it was lies, and you ate it up.
Suddenly you're upset over Gaetz?
1 Mar 2023 8:59 pm
She assisted him with fundraising, just like I said.golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑Where do I get this ****? I read. Why don't you?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Where do you get this ****?
I haven't seen anything about him employing her or sleeping with her.
She did fundraising for him and no one that I can see accused him of sleeping with her.
https://www.axios.com/2020/12/08/china- ... oliticians
I'm not going to waste any more time fact checking you.
Your track record for posting misinformation is abysmal.
Working on someone's campaign, isn't working for him?
...Fang reportedly worked in California’s Bay Area on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Ministry of State Security, the country’s internal spy agency where she allegedly assisted Swalwell with fundraising during his 2014 re-election campaign.
And I guess you don't care about Feinstein spy buddy.
1 Mar 2023 9:06 pm
GOP rams through TikTok ban bill over Dem objections
A lot of people make a lot of money on that platform.
There are going to be a lot of really pissed off people if they try to ban TikTok.Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee forced through a bill that could effectively ban TikTok from all mobile devices in the U.S. despite united opposition from Democrats — a rare breakdown of congressional bipartisanship on the alleged threat posed by Chinese tech.
“Everybody knows what TikTok is,” committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said on Tuesday as the panel debated the fate of the popular Chinese-owned video app. “It’s too dangerous to be on our phones as members of Congress. In my judgment, it’s too dangerous to be on our children’s phones. That’s the whole point of this bill.”
The committee ultimately advanced McCaul’s DATA Act, H.R. 1153, on Wednesday morning by a vote of 24 to 16, with all Democrats voting no. The legislation would grant the president new authorities to ban foreign-owned applications, and would require the imposition of sanctions on companies with ties to TikTok or other Chinese-owned apps.
[.........]
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the committee’s ranking member, disputed the notion that Democrats would oppose any bill that targets TikTok.
In a brief conversation with reporters on Tuesday, he said Democrats are open to “more conversation and dialogue” on a TikTok ban — but, he added, “we have to have all of the facts.”
“I don’t want to supersede CFIUS,” Meeks said. “In the meanwhile, we can be having hearings and conversations, bringing in witnesses and experts on sanctions.”Meeks said the DATA Act was “unvetted” and had been thrust on his staff with little warning. “We could have held hearings before the markup and carefully crafted bipartisan legislation together,” Meeks said Tuesday. “Instead, my staff and I received the text of this legislation a little over a week ago, and have only had several days to review a bill that would dramatically rewrite the rules-based international economic order.”
Aside from that debate on process, Tuesday’s markup discussion revealed a widening gap in how Republicans and Democrats perceive the threat they say TikTok poses. The GOP increasingly frames the company as a willing participant in Beijing’s espionage activities — McCaul called it a “spy balloon in your phone.” But Democrats appear hesitant to ban an app that roughly 100 million Americans use each month.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/0 ... n-00084951
A lot of people make a lot of money on that platform.
1 Mar 2023 9:13 pm
Worked for him, as I said.
1 Mar 2023 9:15 pm
Anyone can raise money for any candidate.golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 10:13 pm » wrote: ↑Worked for him, as I said.
She was not on his payroll.
1 Mar 2023 9:15 pm
So, you don't care that Joe's already banning it?Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ GOP rams through TikTok ban bill over Dem objections
There are going to be a lot of really pissed off people if they try to ban TikTok.
A lot of people make a lot of money on that platform.
1 Mar 2023 9:16 pm
She worked on his campaign and planted spies in his organization.Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Anyone can raise money for any candidate.
She was not on his payroll.
Wondering why Chinese spies wanted Swalwell in office... seems strange, doesn't it?
1 Mar 2023 10:17 pm
I'm sure you've conjured up some kind of a wacky conspiracy theory in your pointy little head.golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑She worked on his campaign and planted spies in his organization.Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Anyone can raise money for any candidate.
She was not on his payroll.
Wondering why Chinese spies wanted Swalwell in office... seems strange, doesn't it?
He wasn't the only one targeted.
No mention of her sleeping with Swalwell you liar.Christine Fang, targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.
Through campaign fundraising, extensive networking, personal charisma, and romantic or sexual relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors, Fang was able to gain proximity to political power, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials and one former elected official.
https://www.axios.com/2020/12/08/china- ... oliticians
1 Mar 2023 10:21 pm
lol. When his staff was asked directly if he slept with her, they refused to answer saying it was classified.Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure you've conjured up some kind of a wacky conspiracy theory in your pointy little head.
He wasn't the only one targeted.
No mention of her sleeping with Swalwell you liar.
And it's what she was known for.
1 Mar 2023 11:48 pm
I don't believe you.golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 11:21 pm » wrote: ↑lol. When his staff was asked directly if he slept with her, they refused to answer saying it was classified.Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure you've conjured up some kind of a wacky conspiracy theory in your pointy little head.
He wasn't the only one targeted.
No mention of her sleeping with Swalwell you liar.
And it's what she was known for.
That sounds like some crap from one of your far right wingnut websites.
How Fox News distorted a story about Representative Eric Swalwell
"The right-wing reaction to the story is a textbook example of distortion as disinformation."
Distortion as disinformation.
That sounds just like you.
https://www.businessinsider.com/eric-sw ... py-2020-12
2 Mar 2023 5:20 am
How convnient.Misty » 01 Mar 2023, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Was that entered into the Congressional Record?
I think not.
Let's see, something someone said in a debate, or something someone said during an official government proceeding being entered into the permanent record of the US Congress.
Which is worse?
Hmmm.......
Gee guess those in control decide for everyone else what is fact and what is insignifcant to relative realities within one species legally divided by interpretation of race, creed, color, national origin, gender genetic results, gender intellectual preference after birth, whatever else power of suggestion legalized throughout history to sustain reasonable doubt relative time logistics is as close to real any reality gets to being honest about now was always eternity regardless universal geogrpahical point of displacement here now.
Your mind over matter mystical misdirection ran out of power of suggesting eternal life originated anywhere else but here now.
2 Mar 2023 8:10 am
"Like McCabe, Strzok and Page didn’t exactly win anything on Friday, other than the right to carry on with their lawsuits."
Who is online
In total there are 3582 users online :: 16 registered, 17 bots, and 3549 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, roadkill, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, *GHETTO BLASTER, MR-7, *Beekeeper, jerra b, murdock, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove
Bots: DuckDuckBot, proximic, MicroMessenger, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, Applebot, YandexBot, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, GPTBot, bingbot, Googlebot, BLEXBot