I read it. It didn't do what you claimed.maineman » 02 Mar 2023, 10:39 pm » wrote: ↑ and we both know you didn't/couldn't read it.
poor little brain damaged moron.
It undoubtedly proved that the election was lost, and not stolen. and there is NO WAY IN HELL that a dyslecxic, aphasic brain damaged moron like YOU read all 68 pages of that. You haven't read 68 pages of anything in your entire life!golfboy » 03 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I read it. It didn't do what you claimed.
That's why you STILL haven't supported your claim that EVERY COURT said the voting rule changes were legal.
Again, not your claim.maineman » 03 Mar 2023, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ It undoubtedly proved that the election was lost, and not stolen.
It most certainly IS my claim.golfboy » 03 Mar 2023, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Again, not your claim.
This is why you'll always be my bitch.
and I have never even said THAT. What I have said is that every court that found voting rule changes to have been illegal found that the remedy for that illegality was proscriptive and required rule changes and legislation goring forward and did NOT invalidate the 2020 election results.golfboy » 03 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I read it. It didn't do what you claimed.
That's why you STILL haven't supported your claim that EVERY COURT said the voting rule changes were legal.
So THIS wasn't you?maineman » 04 Mar 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ and I have never even said THAT. What I have said is that every court that found voting rule changes to have been illegal found that the remedy for that illegality was proscriptive and required rule changes and legislation goring forward and did NOT invalidate the 2020 election results.
We were done when you sided ith this, you piece of **** child danger:maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ so we're done then? cool. I was growing bored anyway. Arrivederci.
maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^^ from the little homo who can't answer a yes or no question
You should go back to the minor leagues and work on your delivery. You're getting pelted at this level.
We're clear that you dick suckers are intimately aquainted with every possible way to thwart the will of the people, fruity.maineman » 17 Feb 2023, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Ballot harvesting is not necessarily illegal.
I guess you didn't know that.
I don't happen to think that ballot harvesting thwarts the will of the people, Mister self-admitted cock sucker.Cannonpointer » 05 Mar 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ We're clear that you dick suckers are intimately aquainted with every possible way to thwart the will of the people, fruity.
silly memes from the admitted cock sucker.Cannonpointer » 05 Mar 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ We were done when you sided ith this, you piece of **** child danger:
Oh, yes yes, groomer - an actual PHOTOGRAPH of the perversions you empower to "celibrate diversity" is a meme.maineman » 05 Mar 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ silly memes from the admitted cock sucker.
classic.
DAMN, but you're predictably boring!
Nor do you think pederaty is a bad thing.maineman » 05 Mar 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't happen to think that ballot harvesting thwarts the will of the people, Mister self-admitted cock sucker.
don't you dare put words in my mouth, you admitted cock sucker.Cannonpointer » 05 Mar 2023, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Nor do you think pederaty is a bad thing.
Did you molest your own children, piece of ****? A little woody allen here, woody allen there?
Mexican circus midgets stick their dicks in there, fruity - I don't think a few words are gonna hurt ya, chlamydia bref.maineman » 05 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ don't you dare put words in my mouth, you admitted cock sucker.
I am curious... do you ever offer ANYTHING other than derisive insults? Is that really your total schtick?Cannonpointer » 05 Mar 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Mexican circus midgets stick their dicks in there, fruity - I don't think a few words are gonna hurt ya, chlamydia bref.
Do you offer anything beyond child endangerment, you germ-sized piece of ****?maineman » 05 Mar 2023, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I am curious... do you ever offer ANYTHING other than derisive insults? Is that really your total schtick?
I guess it takes a special kind of person to look at the above post as not being insulting.Cannonpointer » 05 Mar 2023, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you offer anything beyond child endangerment, you germ-sized piece of ****?
I challenge you to show the board ONE SINGLE TIME when I insulted you, ya **** pederast. You make Woody Allen look like a reasonable person. Any daughter you raised was virtually certain to have been molested - if not by you, then by men you should have protected her from.
You're a weak piece of garbage who will die younger for effeminteness and stupidity than you would have, had you kept your manhood.