Liberal Forum

Oh look, a troll fest.Hey Missy, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel if you have to embrace a lowlife like skeptic for support.Say! Who "supports" that crazy clem-bat, these days?Here's a hint. Start a thread and find out.I've only asked that you do this, what 5, 10, 15 times? You won't, because you know what you find it won't support your lies.

Hey Missy, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel if you have to embrace a lowlife like skeptic for support.You're not even at the bottom of the barrel, you're under the barrel.Skeptic, on 26 February 2012 - 08:18 PM, said:Say! Who "supports" that crazy clem-bat, these days?Here's a hint. Start a thread and find out.I've only asked that you do this, what 5, 10, 15 times? You won't, because you know what you find it won't support your lies.Be careful what you wish for Clem. You have precious few supporters here.Don't beg to be embarrassed.

Here's a hint. Start a thread and find out.I've only asked that you do this, what 5, 10, 15 times? You won't, because you know what you find it won't support your lies.Both have been done. Conservatives gave me more support than they did you! Here's your latest supporter, clem-bat:RichClem is not, has never been and will never be representative of the vast majority of Conservatives of this forum. He makes no effort to make proper arguments but resorts rather to ad hominem attacks. May all you liberals out there recognize that not all Conservatives are like RichClem and that most of us do not sympathize with him.

Here's a hint. Start a thread and find out.I've only asked that you do this, what 5, 10, 15 times? You won't, because you know what you find it won't support your lies.You're not even at the bottom of the barrel, you're under the barrel.Be careful what you wish for Clem. You have precious few supporters here.Don't beg to be embarrassed.I'm in the political mainstream on the board.You're a leftist moonbat.If you or troll skeptic honestly thought you could embarrass me by starting a threat, you'd have done so many times.It's always moonbats, trolls and imbeciles who bleat against me. Big freaking deal.

I'm in the political mainstream on the board.You're a leftist moonbat.If you or troll skeptic honestly thought you could embarrass me by starting a threat, you'd have done so many times.It's always moonbats, trolls and imbeciles who bleat against me. Big freaking deal.You're a far right whack-job and a foul-tempered idiot. It's fairly certain your connection to reality is tenuous, at best.Here's the latest Republican to 'support' you:RichClem is not, has never been and will never be representative of the vast majority of Conservatives of this forum. He makes no effort to make proper arguments but resorts rather to ad hominem attacks. May all you liberals out there recognize that not all Conservatives are like RichClem and that most of us do not sympathize with him.

In a similar vein, the Associated Press found that of the $60 million collected by candidate-aligned super PACs, $33 million came from just 24 individuals.Why bother having an election?Why don't we just ask this elite group who they would like in the White House?I'm sure Clem will be along shortly to tell me that I'm against Free Speech, because I don't agree with the Citizens United decision by SCOTUS.My question for him is (not that he'll answer)......Do you really think that this is good for democracy, and do you believe this is what the Founders of this country would have wanted?Pardon my lateness, but I was traveling.If money automatically = election win then why are there so many liberals in politics? Certainly we could have spent them out of existence by now. Your argument holds no water because it is based on a false assumption, NEXT!!

Weyrich was a religious nut, who would have loved to turn this country into a theocracy.Weyrich also was one of the founders of ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council.I find that group pretty damn unethical.ALEC is very much active today. That's why so many state legislatures have introduced so many similar pieces of legislation in the last couple of years. The laws were written by their corporate masters.But, I'm sure you have no problem with corporations writing legislation. After all, they always have the people's best interest at heart, and not the bottom line, right? Corporations have as much right (non-Constitutional) to try to influence elections as unions, leftist environmental groups, the Socialist Party, lawyers, the, snicker, "affordable housing" business or any Democrat Special Interest, who are just as secretive.Never saw you complain about them.What is "unethical" about Weyrich's actions?I want people to inform themselves, then vote.So would you give them some kind of a test before they could vote?No, but I absolutely don't want government policy encouraging uninformed voters to vote, like Clinton's Motor Voter was meant to do in blatantly partisan manner.As well as being meant to help Democrats commit voter fraud, by making it very difficult for states to clean up voter lists, as states have done routinely for decades. Edited by RichClem, 27 February 2012 - 09:49 AM.

Says the bigot who uses a racist image as his siggy.Its a pity that you lack the intelligence to discern the difference between bigotry and irony. I really had you pegged wrong.I thought you were one of the decent Conservatives that was capable of having a civil debate, but now you've shown your true colors.This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by White Bread . View it anyway? Sorry Bunkey. I had to do it. I have no use for racist homophobes.Too bad you weren't on the Ohio Turnpike with me last night when I gave a black man, that was out of gas and had no money, enough gas to get him to his family in Michigan. I'm sure that he'd agree with your assessment after he thanked me profusely. I dont give a rats *** about a persons color. I do care about the content of their character and respond accordingly. Your character has been found to be wanting. People like you that get their asses handed to them in a debate and then yell racism! are the most unintelligent disingenuous kind of posters, so please keep me on ignore. Pond scum shouldnt be disturbed.

Newt Gingrich has just released a nearly 30 minute long TV ad that`s all about rising gas prices and what president Newt Gingrich will do to bring them down. According to Newt Gingrich and his 30-minute infomercial, the Obama administration is, quote, "anti-oil."The truth?Newt Gingrich is a big fat liar.Who's the liar? Little Miss Marxist, as usual. Gingrich is correct, as anyone who's followed Obama's three years in office would know.this past weekend, the president made a startling claim: Under my administration, America is producing more oil today than at any time in the last eight years.The claim is true, but as always, a very crafty lie of omission. America is producing more oil than eight years ago, but not because of anything the president has done. In fact, production is up only because Americans are resourceful and have battled past the obstructions Mr. Obama has erected.Since taking office, he has declared 85 percent of our offshore areas off-limits, decreased oil and gas leases in the Rockies by 70 percent, rejected the Keystone XL pipeline and has 10 federal agencies planning more regulation of hydraulic fracturing, which is key to oil and natural-gas development, says Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute.The administrations own Energy Information Agency estimates that oil production in the Gulf was down 22 percent in 2011 and projected to be down 30 percent in 2012 after Mr. Obamas Gulf moratorium policies were put in place, the API said.So, how on Earth is America producing more oil? Because of action taken by President Bush, and even his predecessors.That production is a direct result of leases issued before this administration and as result of development on private and state lands, Mr. Gerard said, according to Fox News.On private lands, oil production is booming, wrote Fox reporter Jim Angle. In North Dakota, the oil and gas are on private or state land and beyond the presidents control. The state has gone from producing a small amount of oil to some 450,000 barrels a day. Unemployment is 3.3 percent, the lowest in the country. And the state has a budget surplus in the billions.http://www.washingto...our-more-years/

You're not even at the bottom of the barrel, you're under the barrel.Be careful what you wish for Clem. You have precious few supporters here.Don't beg to be embarrassed.And with that silliness in mind, let's see the latest liberal-left stupidity.Even though he previously criticized Newt Gingrich for calling President Obama a food stamps president, Jesse Jackson said over the weekend, Its an honor to be a food stamp President. He then listed every benefit associated with food stamps, including, food stamps hire people.http://www.nationalreview.com/cornerThe scary part is, this pinhead actually believes it.

Awww! Look how cute. Clem and Toast are BFFs.RichClem, on 26 February 2012 - 09:21 PM, said:I'm in the political mainstream on the board.You're a far right whack-job and a foul-tempered idiot. It's fairly certain your connection to reality is tenuous, at best.Here's the latest Republican to 'support' you:Republicans4USA, on 20 February 2012 - 06:30 PM, said:RichClem is not, has never been and will never be representative of the vast majority of Conservatives of this forum. He makes no effort to make proper arguments but resorts rather to ad hominem attacks. May all you liberals out there recognize that not all Conservatives are like RichClem and that most of us do not sympathize with him.Clem gets more delusional every day.It's sad really.

Clem gets more delusional every day.It's sad really.That's it? Post silly pictures, brag about how you ignore me?Quote someone who was on the board for a day or so, then disappeared?Quote skeptic, as if his bleating means something?This is the best you can do?Pathetic.Hey, great job at ignoring how I exposed your lies about Gingrich and oil production under the Marxist-in-Chief. Edited by RichClem, 27 February 2012 - 12:42 PM.

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway? Sorry Sparky. Not right now.I've had my fill of crazy for a while.

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway? Sorry Sparky. Not right now.I've had my fill of crazy for a while.It appears to me that you've had your fill of people taking chunks out of your ***, so you put your head in the sand and pretend you're not paying attention while your dripping blood makes a mess of the beach. LOL

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by White Bread . View it anyway? Guess you'll have to hang with your BFF today, Bunkey.

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by White Bread . View it anyway? Guess you'll have to hang with your BFF today, Bunkey.Keep that head in the sand and that fanny wagging in the breeze. It's a good lok for a moron like you. LOL

This is what goes on in the legislature in Virginia?State Del. David Albo (R-Fairfax Station) was addressing the House of Delegates Friday when he described his failed seduction of his wife Tuesday night. Albo had driven home from Richmond following debate on the bill, which would have required women to have a transvaginal ultrasound procedure before receiving an abortion. Albo's remarks -- which he delivered with laughter -- and mood music -- were aimed in particular at that TV-talking colleague, Del. David Englin (D-Alexandria), a leading opponent of the bill.This childish buffoon, could not even bring himself to say the word vagina, even though if he had his way, women in Virginia would be forced to have their vaginas penetrated with a probe against their will.Trans V this, and Trans V that. Jackhole. Edited by MistyBlue, 27 February 2012 - 01:26 PM.

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway? Sorry Sparky. Not right now.I've had my fill of crazy for a while.Oh yeah, someone would have to be crazy to think Obama has tried to severely US oil production.This is what goes on in the legislature in Virginia?State Del. David Albo (R-Fairfax Station) was addressing the House of Delegates......Oh my gosh, he made a joke via a personal anecdote? How awful!Hey moonbat, even his Democrat opponent thought it was funny.This childish buffoon, could not even bring himself to say the word vagina, even though if he had his way, women in Virginia would be forced to have their vaginas penetrated with a probe against their will.Which increasingly looks like a falsehood. The transvaginal procedure is already required by the abortionists for all abortions, at least those done by Planned Parenthood, which performs most abortions.Rape, They CriedAbout the proposed ultrasound legislation in Virginia, a most pernicious lie.By Kathryn Jean Lopez it was a brilliant strategy that Planned Parenthood and friends used to defeat a bill in Virginia that would have required pre-abortion ultrasounds: Get as many people as possible to repeat the word "transvaginal" in news and commentary, in order to accomplish two things: defeat the legislation at hand and make your opposition look like a freak show....In recent days (weeks and years, too), media coverage of just about all things regarding women have taken on new frenzied proportions. George Orwell would be impressed even Saturday Night Live got into the messaging.Go ahead and read the bill that caused the "rape" cries. The word "transvaginal" never appears in it.The bill was an update on Virginia's informed-consent law, and didn't require a particular kind of ultrasound, but mandated that the "standard medical practice in the community" for an ultrasound be followed. So doctors on site, not the governor or the house of delegates or the legendary exorcist Rick Santorum, would be making the calls about exactly what kind of ultrasound would be best for a particular woman. Planned Parenthood clinics already do ultrasounds (it helps with the pricing of abortions, among other things). The law wasn't meant to do anything but make sure no women fell through the cracks....critics of the bill simply, as a matter of principle, don't want anyone to be reminded what exactly is done in an abortion clinic. No one went into a demonizing overdrive because of ultrasound per se; they're already routinely done. The real kick was that women would be offered the chance to look at the ultrasound. If they did, they would see the beating of a tiny human heart. And that's a threat to the abortion industry. A glimpse of this fight shows that, while these critics of the bill talk about women's health, they don't really have the interests of either patient in mind.http://www.nationalr...hryn-jean-lopez

Oh yeah, someone would have to be crazy to think Obama has tried to severely US oil production.Oh my gosh, he made a joke via a personal anecdote? How awful!Hey moonbat, even his Democrat opponent thought it was funny.Watch out! She might go POSTAL on you!

Watch out! She might go POSTAL on you!I do sense a deep sense of barely controlled rage in her.In my experience, Leftists have very, very bad tempers. Simply express a different opinion, and they go bonkers.