Liberal Forum

Hey moonbat, the judge didn't write the headline. Quote where he admitted it was racist.Lie much?Defend it? I noted that it was in very poor taste. Lie much?I didn't defend the email, just noted that one supposedly private email isn't that big a deal.My god, you're totally phucking clueless. To pass on an email through his court email account, and the intent is to offend an ENTIRE CLASS OF PEOPLE,That is racist. It doesn't matter whether he admits it was racist or not.The scuzzball judge has issued a formal apology to the President and his family. They were offended by it. Why aren't you?Do you enjoy licking conservative azz so much that you would defend any action by a conservative against the first family, no matter how despicable?

ROFL, you hypocrite.Clem, you don't even read the OP's before you respond..you post a script, non stop.Keep up the crazy Clem, it's what you do best. Quote where he admitted it was racist.Speaking of not reading.My god, you're totally phucking clueless. To pass on an email through his court email account, and the intent is to offend an ENTIRE CLASS OF PEOPLE,That is racist. It doesn't matter whether he admits it was racist or not.The scuzzball judge has issued a formal apology to the President and his family. They were offended by it. Why aren't you?Do you enjoy licking conservative azz so much that you would defend any action by a conservative against the first family, no matter how despicable?What, are you blind, stupid or just lying? I said the joke was "very offensive."Can't read clear English?

Quote where he admitted it was racist.Speaking of not reading.What, are you blind, stupid or just lying? I said the joke was "very offensive."Can't read clear English?Post 1267 You would know this IF you had read the OP.

Hey moonbat, the judge didn't write the headline. Quote where he admitted it was racist.Skeptic already did that. Open your freaking eyes.“There’s no doubt it’s racist,” (Judge) Cebull said, according to The Billings Gazette.http://blogs.wsj.com...president-obamaFrom my link:The Great Falls Tribune, which initially obtained the email and interviewed Cebull about it, said the judge conceded the content was racist....Cebull told the Tribune. “I didn’t send it as a racist, although that’s what it is.http://articles.lati...-obama-20120229Lie much?Apparently not nearly as much as you.Still waiting on proof of these two statements:Almost the entire liberal base lives off Other People's MoneyObama's family including his mother and father worked for the CIADo you enjoy licking conservative azz so much that you would defend any action by a conservative against the first family, no matter how despicable?Allow me. The answer to that question would be, Yes he does. Edited by MistyBlue, 02 March 2012 - 06:51 PM.

Hey moonbat, the judge didn't write the headline. Quote where he admitted it was racist.Skeptic already did that. Open your freaking eyes.I have that troll on Ignore and don't read most of his drivel.Congrats. You actually quoted him. I was wrong.Still waiting on proof of these two statements:Obama's family including his mother and father worked for the CIAI quoted a source twice and brought up the relevant thread. What, is your amnesia kicking in or your vision going, as it almost always does when I cite a source?Do you enjoy licking conservative azz so much that you would defend any action by a conservative against the first family, no matter how despicable?Allow me. The answer to that question would be, Yes he does.Where did I "defend" the judge? I called the email "very offensive." Lie much?

I have that troll on Ignore and don't read most of his drivel.Congrats. You actually quoted him. I was wrong.I quoted a source twice and brought up the relevant thread. What, is your amnesia kicking in or your vision going, as it almost always does when I cite a source?Where did I "defend" the judge? I called the email "very offensive." Lie much?CLEM Oh gosh, the Race Card againNo, that email isn't racist, but it's very personally insulting to Obama's mother and in very poor taste.Sorry, your Race Card is way, way, way over the limit. Please cut it in half and send it back to its Issuer. So you did read it, as your response was " that e-mail isn't racist.... Yet it had to be proven to you that he admitted it was racist...interesting selective reading ability you possess.

Where did I "defend" the judge? I called the email "very offensive." Yet it had to be proven to you that he admitted it was racist...interesting selective reading ability you possess.I skimmed the test and focused on the joke itself. So?No, I don't think it was racist, but it was very insulting to Obama's mother.As a lot of things in private emails are.

I skimmed the test and focused on the joke itself. So?No, I don't think it was racist, but it was very insulting to Obama's mother.As a lot of things in private emails are.Private email? He sent it from his court account, fool.

I quoted a source twice and brought up the relevant thread. What, is your amnesia kicking in or your vision going, as it almost always does when I cite a source?I guess you mean the source that you described as 'highly credible and informed' who said this:In sum, though the only evidence available is circumstantial, Barack Obama, Jr.'s mother, father, stepfather, grandmother, and grandfather seem to have been well connected, body and soul, with the U.S. government's then extensive and well-financed trans-public-private influence operations.ROFLMAOSo I guess I could say that you seem to have been abducted by aliens and anally probed, then say that only evidence available is circumstantial, or I could say 'it's self apparent', like you did about this other statement you made:Clem: Almost the entire liberal base lives off Other People's Money and uses the massive power of the federal government to enrich themselves.That's not an opinion Puss, that's a declarative sentence. When you make a statement like that, you need to be able to prove it.Saying 'it's self apparent' is not good enough. Edited by MistyBlue, 03 March 2012 - 10:58 AM.

I quoted a source twice and brought up the relevant thread. What, is your amnesia kicking in or your vision going, as it almost always does when I cite a source?You mean the source that said:In sum, though the only evidence available is circumstantial, Barack Obama, Jr.'s mother, father, stepfather, grandmother, and grandfather seem to have been well connected, body and soul, with the U.S. government's then extensive and well-financed trans-public-private influence operations.ROFLMAOCriminal convictions are allowed on circumstantial evidence, moonbat, and as usual, great job at ignoring the powerful evidence in the rest of the source.Such as this:Madelyn Dunham must have supervised the accounts that the U.S. government used to funnel money to its "gray" and "black" activities throughout Asia. Among the conduits of the CIA money through these accounts to secret CIA proprietaries was a companyBishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wongsome of whose officers were serving CIA officers. This is a company whose 1983 IRS audit the CIA stopped. Vice President Madelyn Dunham, in charge of these very matters and hence necessarily "witting" (as they say at Langley), would have had to be more than a small cog in the machine. People do not rise to such stations from one day to the next.What do the words "must have" mean?So I guess I could say that you seem to have been abducted by aliens and anally probed, then say that only evidence available is circumstantialI guess you could be a shameless lying hack and pretend that silliness is equal to Codevilla's informed opinion. or I could say 'it's self apparent', like you did about this other statement you made:Clem: Almost the entire liberal base lives off Other People's Money and uses the massive power of the federal government to enrich themselves.That's not an opinion Puss, that's a declarative sentence. When you make a statement like that, you need to be able to prove it.Saying 'it's self apparent' is not good enough.I can prove it. Why would I waste my time with a person of low integrity like you, who will just lie and stonewall once I do?

I suspect Chuck! and teacher as well as Tim always laughed about setting you up for Clem's craziness, behind the scenes. They probably still do. And ya'll wonder why I have a picture of myself, first post in The Mighty Horse Thread of me wearing a tin foil hat.

I can prove it. Why would I waste my time with a person of low integrity like you, who will just lie and stonewall once I do?You can't prove ****. You've lowered yourself to the level of the tin foil hat wearing, crazy conspiracy theorists now.You reek of desperation.

Well....well.....well...looky here:Limbaugh Apologizes To Sandra FlukeConservative radio commentator Rush Limbaugh has issued a statement apologizing for "insulting word choices" directed at a Georgetown University law student who testified to Congress in support of an Obama administration birth control rule.http://content.usato...-and-politics/1Finally the drug addled gasbag had to admit that he went too far, because he was losing all his sponsors. ROFLIn his 'apology' Rush said:I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress. I personally do not agree that American citizens should pay for these social activities.If he had bothered to watch Ms. Fluke's testimony, he would know that she was not talking about her 'personal sexual recreational activities'. She relayed the stories of women, some of them married, who could not afford birth control, and of women who need oral contraceptives for many other medical reasons.All they are asking is that these services be covered by their medical insurance under the Affordable Care Act. Edited by MistyBlue, 03 March 2012 - 07:04 PM.

I wouldn't have known he said it, if not for here.

I wouldn't have known he said it, if not for here.Either you live under a rock, or you only watch Fox News, because from what I heard, they didn't talk about it much.

You can't prove [excrement]. You've lowered yourself to the level of the tin foil hat wearing, crazy conspiracy theorists now.You reek of desperation.Bleats the moonbat who ignored my citation about Obama's family and the CIA.Who ignores almost all the sources and information I cite. Desperation is being unable to acknowledge reality, moonbat.Madelyn Dunham must have supervised the accounts that the U.S. government used to funnel money to its "gray" and "black" activities throughout Asia. Among the conduits of the CIA money through these accounts to secret CIA proprietaries was a companyBishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wongsome of whose officers were serving CIA officers. This is a company whose 1983 IRS audit the CIA stopped. Vice President Madelyn Dunham, in charge of these very matters and hence necessarily "witting" (as they say at Langley), would have had to be more than a small cog in the machine. People do not rise to such stations from one day to the next.What do the words "must have" mean?

Private email? He sent it from his court account, fool.You never sent a personal e-mail at work?

You never sent a personal e-mail at work?Don't go backing up Mayhem Clem around here, unless you want to join him in that crazy uncle attic they've got him locked up in.

Don't go backing up Mayhem Clem around here, unless you want to join him in that crazy uncle attic they've got him locked up in. Birds of a feather......

Motel 6 is your friend.