Liberal Forum

What do the words "must have" mean?I know what they mean, and I can even use them in a sentence.RichClem "must have" been dropped on his head reapeatedly as a child.Motel 6 is your friend.Who ya talkin' to, Clem and Burnt Toast?WTF is going on here?

OCD

OCDI guess that's what you have, because you're always telling me that my posts are irrelevant and/or stupid, but it seems like you can't stop checking them out, both in my Clem Kadiddlehopper thread and this one.

GOP Rep: Id Have To Personally Kill Some Senators To Get The Ryan Budget PassedRep. John Sullivan (R-OK) a conservative Republican from Oklahomas First District, was at a town hall meeting in Bixby, Okla., last Wednesday when he lamented that the Paul Ryan Budget which the House passed in 2011 had no chance of passage in the Senate: Like I said, after this last election, the first order of business is pass a budget. Now, I believe that. I supported the Paul Ryan budget and sent it over to the Senate. Now I live with some Senators, I yell at them all the time, I grabbed one of them the other day and shook him and Id love to get them to vote for it boy Id love that. You know but other than me going over there with a gun and holding it to their head and maybe killing a couple of them, I dont think theyre going to listen unless they get beat.VIDEOCue RichClem to defend this guy.

Otherwise known as Larry, Curly and Moe. Edited by crimsongulf, 04 March 2012 - 05:02 PM.

GOP Rep: I'd Have To Personally Kill Some Senators To Get The Ryan Budget PassedRep. John Sullivan (R-OK) a conservative Republican from Oklahoma's First District, was at a town hall meeting in Bixby, Okla., last Wednesday when he lamented that the Paul Ryan Budget which the House passed in 2011 had no chance of passage in the Senate:Oh my gosh, a Republican made a bad joke? This must stop!!! Cue RichClem to defend this guy.If he were a liberal Dem and raped someone, you'd be lying on his behalf.RichClem "must have" been dropped on his head reapeatedly as a child.Nice job at ignoring my impeccable source about Obama's family having worked for the CIA.

ROFL Advertiser: we won't reinstate our ads with Rush Limbaugh, even though he's apologizedBy Cory Doctorow at 2:09 pm Sunday, Mar 4 David Friend, CEO of the company Carbonite (which makes backup software), explains why his company won't be reinstating its advertising on the Rush Limbaugh show. Carbonite was one of the advertisers that pulled its Limbaugh dollars after the radio host described a law student a "[promiscuous person]" and a "prostitute" for testifying on the cost of contraception for students whose Catholic university wouldn't extend insurance coverage to reproductive control. No one with daughters the age of Sandra Fluke, and I have two, could possibly abide the insult and abuse heaped upon this courageous and well-intentioned young lady. Mr. Limbaugh, with his highly personal attacks on Miss Fluke, overstepped any reasonable bounds of decency. Even though Mr. Limbaugh has now issued an apology, we have nonetheless decided to withdraw our advertising from his show. We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse. http://boingboing.ne..._medium=twitter* Disingenuous apology does not earn rewards for the PIG IN CHIEF.

The Big Lie, Perpetrated By Rush Limbaugh And Furthered By His DittoheadsAfter reading the posts by the many dittoheads on this forum who parroted Rush's words that Sandra Fluke testified that she was having 'so much sex' that she couldn't afford to pay for contraception, and that she wanted taxpayers to 'pay for her to have sex', IOW she wanted contraceptives to be 'free', I decided to sit down and watch her entire testimony, to see what she actually said.First of all, the only time she ever said anything about herself was when Rep. Elijah Cummings asked her, "For the benefit of those who may not understand, can you describe your qualifications for testifying about the restrictions on insurance coverage for contraceptives?She answered, "I'm an American woman who uses contraception, so let's start there. That makes me qualified to talk to my elected officials about my health care needs."Second of all, she was not asking for contraceptives to be free. What she testified about was how important it was for contraceptives to be included in insurance coverage under the Affordable Health Care Act, something that is being threatened by the Roy Blunt Amendment and the Marco Rubio bill.Students at Georgetown pay for their own health care coverage, and it is not subsidized by the University.What Sandra Fluke was asking is that Georgetown or any other university or employer not be able to block women from having contraceptive coverage in their insurance plans.Anyone interested in the truth can watch her testimony here.http://www.c-spanvid...rogram/304550-1

Don't go backing up Mayhem Clem around here, unless you want to join him in that crazy uncle attic they've got him locked up in. Backing him up? I asked a simple question. How many poeople do you know that DON'T use company networks to send personal e-mails from time to time? People make dumb *** statements and I'll call them on it. I don't care what side of the spectrum they're on.I know what they mean, and I can even use them in a sentence.RichClem "must have" been dropped on his head reapeatedly as a child.Who ya talkin' to, Clem and Burnt Toast?WTF is going on here?It's refreshing to see that MistyBlack&Blue still has me on ignore after I ripped her a new *** last time. I feel bad when I'm forced to shoot fish in a barrel. LOL

Should Fluke sue Limbaugh for defamation?Gil Cranberg, an expert on libel law and no fan of defamation suits, would give the go-ahead. He says Limbaugh, by attacking the Georgetown Law student three days in a row, intended to damage her and her reputation" and that "his actions were aggravated and egregious.By Gilbert CranbergRush Limbaugh handed his lawyers a hot potato when he thuggishly attacked a Georgetown University law student, Sandra Fluke, for her support of contraception. Among other things, he called Fluke a [promiscuous person] and a prostitute. Limbaughs lawyers evidently urged an apology, for he then admitted that he chose the wrong words.my choice of words was not the bestI sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.An apology is a good way to head off a defamation suit. Fluke is reported to be contemplating one. The downside of an apology is that in the event a suit is filed, anything admitted in the apology can be used in court. You can bet that Limbaughs admission that he insulted Fluke will be cited against him.I am not a fan of defamation suits, either against the press or against individual journalists. Debate on public issues, the Supreme Court has said, should be robust and wide open. Defamation actions can inhibit debate. That said, I hope Sandra Fluke takes Limbaugh to court.Read MoreSandra Fluke's status as a private citizen makes her entitled to stronger protection against slander than someone who lives their life very much in the public eye. So, there's a strong chance she could beat Rush big time.

Should Fluke sue Limbaugh for defamation?Gil Cranberg, an expert on libel law and no fan of defamation suits, would give the go-ahead. He says Limbaugh, by attacking the Georgetown Law student three days in a row, intended to damage her and her reputation" and that "his actions were aggravated and egregious.Sandra Fluke's status as a private citizen makes her entitled to stronger protection against slander than someone who lives their life very much in the public eye. So, there's a strong chance she could beat Rush big time.The defense against slander and libel is "the truth". Let's see if she wants her sex life drug through the courts. I'd personally like to see her indicted for lying to Congress. No woman is spending $3000 on contraceptives. That's perjury when you make such a ridiculous claim before Congress.

Should Fluke sue Limbaugh for defamation?Gil Cranberg, an expert on libel law and no fan of defamation suits, would give the go-ahead. He says Limbaugh, by attacking the Georgetown Law student three days in a row, "intended to damage her and her reputation" and that "his actions were aggravated and egregious."Sandra Fluke's status as a private citizen makes her entitled to stronger protection against slander than someone who lives their life very much in the public eye. So, there's a strong chance she could beat Rush big time.From the OP..this would be damaging beyond words for him, the PIG IN CHIEF:A libel action against him would require that he be deposed and compelled to disclose under oath how he chose her as a target and what prompted him to denigrate her as a slu*t and prostitute. That would be a valuable learning experience for Limbaugh's large following. Edited by Henry_, 04 March 2012 - 09:05 PM.

The Big Lie, Perpetrated By Rush Limbaugh And Furthered By His DittoheadsCan anyone spell I-R-O-N-Y?Hey, remember these?There was no credible evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton raped anybodyWhat sources? The only source you seem to cite on this subject is David Schippers book, claiming it's full of 'evidence'.What someone writes in a book is not 'evidence'.OWS are the moonbat Hard Left.Hard left my ***.Why do Republicans love to shoot protesters (Nixon-Kent State)?For 50 years, the Russians tried to destroy this nation.Now, within a couple of years, the Tea Party is succeeding.

Can anyone spell I-R-O-N-Y?Hey, remember these?Nope ! I don't remember any of those. None of them. Sorry ! Now get back in that attic.

From the OP..this would be damaging beyond words for him, the PIG IN CHIEF:A libel action against him would require that he be deposed and compelled to disclose under oath how he chose her as a target and what prompted him to denigrate her as a slu*t and prostitute. That would be a valuable learning experience for Limbaugh's large following.Heck, if we're going to depose Americans, let's depose Clinton and ask him about the rape, felonies and impeachable acts he committed. And Algor about his felonies.And heck, let's ask Hillary about her role in using the IRS to intimidate American citizens.What's more serious, Rush's words or their crimes? Edited by RichClem, 04 March 2012 - 09:14 PM.

Heck, if we're going to depose Americans, let's depose Clinton and ask him about the rape, felonies and impeachable acts he committed. And Algor about his felonies.And heck, let's ask Hillary about her role in using the IRS to intimidate American citizens.What's more serious, Rush's words or their crimes?RETREAD for Clem, another stupid response, as usual from you Clem.Hail to the PIG IN CHIEF, Rush..the innocent prankster.

It's refreshing to see that MistyBlack&Blue still has me on ignore after I ripped her a new *** last time.First of all you don't rip someone a new ***. You rip (tear) them a new asshole.I don't know whose ***(hole) you think you 'ripped', because I still have the same old one (and only one) I've always had.I feel bad when I'm forced to shoot fish in a barrel. LOLYou're as delusional as RichClem. I put you on ignore because I don't like people like you who spout right wing talking points and lies in my thread.Arguing with pinheads like you is a useful as repeatedly bashing your head against a wall.Stick to your new BFF Clem's threads. You two have a lot in common.

First of all you don't rip someone a new ***. You rip (tear) them a new asshole.I don't know whose ***(hole) you think you 'ripped', because I still have the same old one (and only one) I've always had.You're as delusional as RichClem. I put you on ignore because I don't like people like you who spout right wing talking points and lies in my thread.Arguing with pinheads like you is a useful as repeatedly bashing your head against a wall.Stick to your new BFF Clem's threads. You two have a lot in common.Thank you for taking the hook and proving that you're a liar. You post claiming I'm on ignore, but as soon as I bait you, you respond, proving that you aren't ignoring me. Fish...meet barrel. LOL

Heck, if we're going to depose Americans, let's depose Clinton and ask him about the rape, felonies and impeachable acts he committed.Seriously Clem? Clinton again?What is this **** obsession you have with Bill Clinton?It's really gone way beyond crazy now.This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by White Bread . View it anyway? See if you can talk your BFF Clem down off the ledge.I have other things to do.Goodnight. Edited by MistyBlue, 04 March 2012 - 09:30 PM.

Seriously Clem? Clinton again?What is this banned word obsession you have with Bill Clinton?It's really gone way beyond crazy now.Well gosh, what's more serious, Rush's over the top satire or Clinton's rape, felonies and impeachable acts, all of which you lied aboutRush's over the top satire or Obama violating the Catholic Church's Constitutional rights, which you lied about?Rush's over the top satire or Obama's Radical Left agenda, which you lied about?Who's the wackjob, someone concerned about serious issues, or you bleating about Rush?