Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 137 138 139 140 141 1,190
User avatar
RichClem
7 Mar 2012 11:26 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
To the extent that you've 'left' many, many, many substantive posts, none of them were ever directed at me.All I ever get from you are accusations of lying, name calling, and some crazy rants about me having defended a rapist.A lot of 'bleating'......not much substance.So the following isn't substance?Lie much?The country is running a $1.3 trillion annual deficit, the real Obama unemployment rate is 12%, maybe higher. inflation is running 8% annually and rising, but what does little Miss Marxist bleat about?An unreasonable voluntary pledge at the County level.public/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif
Oldschool
8 Mar 2012 12:10 am
Oldschool
posts
So the following isn't substance?Lie much?no because the "real unemployment", since you like measuring that way, is also going down. We are slowly but surely coming out of the Bush Recession. Now please go back to talking about social issues so Obama can maintain is 7% lead over Romney in the last "Rasmussen Poll". Maybe we can discuss how the GOP has lost any chance of getting the woman vote in 2012. Better yet we could talk about how truly pathetic the Catholic Clergy is. Even better we could discuss how Rick Santorum, the only chance the GOP had for a "Conservative" nominee, is getting smoked.
User avatar
RichClem
8 Mar 2012 8:24 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
no because......Way to bungle the clear English I wrote, moonbat. as well as the facts.No, not enough jobs are being created to lower real unemployment.And the lie was about "substance," which you totally missed.
User avatar
RichClem
8 Mar 2012 9:14 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Speaking of pinheads, could a sane, honest person deny the existence of evidence of Clinton's crimes and impeachable acts, just because I personally haven't "seen" them?Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected?The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 years?Does that give you a hint?Yes. It gives me a big hint that you're banned word Looney Tunes.You think you can see things that are in sealed boxes.Liberals can't win by debating honestly on issues, so they lie and dissemble.
User avatar
Nobody
8 Mar 2012 11:25 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cause I am poking and knowing I am hitting some of your buttons.Sweetie, you don't even know where my buttons are.To me you're just a minor annoyance, like a gnat.
User avatar
RichClem
8 Mar 2012 11:34 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Bump for the moonbat..MistyBlue, on 07 March 2012 - 05:14 PM, said:To the extent that you've 'left' many, many, many substantive posts, none of them were ever directed at me.All I ever get from you are accusations of lying, name calling, and some crazy rants about me having defended a rapist.A lot of 'bleating'......not much substance.So the following isn't substance?The country is running a $1.3 trillion annual deficit, the real Obama unemployment rate is 12%, maybe higher. inflation is running 8% annually and rising, but what does little Miss Marxist bleat about?An unreasonable voluntary pledge at the County level.Lie much?
User avatar
Nobody
8 Mar 2012 11:45 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Who's Paying? Georgetown Undergraduates Pay Over $1800 Per Year for Health InsuranceThe right-wing noise machine has attempted to make the contraception argument about who "pays" for birth control, and Rush Limbaugh and commenters on Fox have gone so far as to claim that contraception advocates "want me to pay for them to have sex." The debate was instigated by concerns at Georgetown University, a Catholic institution that does not provide contraception through their student health insurance program. It is shocking to discover, then, that undergraduate students pay over $1800 per year for health insurance.Dear Student: The Premier Plan offered by Georgetown University is underwritten by the United HealthCare Insurance Company (United). Because you are responsible for understanding your health benefits, carefully read the enrollment and benefit details, including the Exclusions and Limitations, in the Premier Plan Description of Benefits, Policy #2011-32-1, before making an enrollment decision. Listed under exclusions:#19-b] Birth control and/or contraceptives, oral or other, whether medication or deviceSandra Fluke was only asking that contraceptives be covered by the insurance that students pay for.She never asked Rush or anyone else to 'pay for her to have sex'.Rush Limbaugh is a big fat liar.
User avatar
Nobody
8 Mar 2012 11:52 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
File this one under 'turnabout is fairplay'. Ohio State Senator Nina Turner Introduces Legislation to Protect Men From ED MedicationState Senator Nina Turner is very, very concerned about men being cavalier about their use erectile dysfunction medication, and has introduced legislation to protect men, "the greatest gender."TURNER: Well, it's Senate Bill 307. Simply all I'm trying to do is protect vulnerable men and make sure that they understand the consequences for their actions. If in fact they need to be treated for erectile dysfunction, that it's most important that they receive an affidavit that must be signed by their current or former partner to make sure that it is physical and not psychological and that the doctor takes the steps and the time to really explain to them their other options, including natural remedies or celibacy.Senate Bill 307 protects men by requiring the following prior to receiving a prescription to treatment for erectile dysfunction: a signed affadavit from at least one sex partner confirming the man has indeed experienced the symptoms of impotence in the past 90 days a psychological screening to ensure the condition is, in fact, medical in nature ongoing cardiac stress tests and outpatient counseling about potential side effects information from the prescribing physician about risks, complications as well as non-medical options including counseling and celibacy copy of medical rationale for treatment filed in patients medical record Also, this most awesome appeal for co-sponsors: TO: All Senate MembersFROM: Senator Nina TurnerDATE: March 2, 2012RE: Co-Sponsor RequestI will be introducing a bill to address an issue that has gone unaddressed for far too long. The diligence with which men in state legislatures across the nation have considered the fragile health and feeble minds of women has prompted me to reflect on the welfare of the more powerful breed: men. This legislation will take strong steps to protect men from the harmful effects of PDE-5 inhibitors (phosphodiesterase type 5). PDE-5 inhibitors are prescribed to men who are experiencing symptoms of male impotence and carry serious side effects such as priapism, hearing loss, and vision loss. Such medications should be considered with the utmost concern and caution. These medications can be seriously detrimental to men with heart problems, including heart pain (angina), heart failure, abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmias), high or low blood pressure, a history of stroke within the last six months, eye problems such as retinitis pigmentosa, sickle cell anemia, or leukemia. The legislation will implement procedures that will ensure the vigorous reproductive health of men who experience non-psychological erectile dysfunction symptoms. This means that men will have to certify their impotence, confirm their comprehension of risk, and undergo outpatient counseling services to inform them of alternative treatment options to PDE-5 inhibitors. Please join us in this fight to protect those who are our greatest protectors. The men in our lives generously devote time and debate to fundamental female reproductive issues; the least we can do is return the favor. If you would like to be included as a co-sponsor, please contact Matthew Adair at [redacted]. The deadline to sign on to this legislation is 5:00pm on Monday, March 5, 2012. Thank you for your consideration.
User avatar
RichClem
8 Mar 2012 12:02 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Sandra Fluke was only asking that contraceptives be covered by the insurance that students pay for.She never asked Rush or anyone else to 'pay for her to have sex'.Rush Limbaugh is a big fat liar.Oh well gosh, then it's just fine for Obama to violate the Catholic Church's Constitutional rights.Could a sane, honest person hold the following opinion?An honest person would acknowledge that I leave many posts of substance as well on many, many topics. However, you're not honest.Well I don't know where you're leaving those posts Puss, but it sure as hell ain't here. Edited by RichClem, 08 March 2012 - 01:04 PM.
User avatar
Nobody
8 Mar 2012 12:20 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
MistyBlue, on 08 March 2012 - 12:45 PM, said:Sandra Fluke was only asking that contraceptives be covered by the insurance that students pay for.She never asked Rush or anyone else to 'pay for her to have sex'. Rush Limbaugh is a big fat liar.Oh well gosh, then it's just fine for Obama to violate the Catholic Church's Constitutional rights.Obama is not violating the church's rights. The students pay for their own health care coverage.It is not subsidized by Georgetown. Why should the university be able to deny them coverage for something they pay for themselves?Does it bother you at all that Rush lied about Sandra Fluke saying that she was having 'so much sex' that she couldn't afford her birth control (something she never said) and that he lied about her wanting us to 'pay for her to have sex'?C'mon Puss, you're the one always going around calling people liars. Do you excuse Rush for the lies he told about Ms. Fluke?And don't give me that 'satire' crap. Could a sane, honest person hold the following opinion?WTF do you know about being sane or honest?
User avatar
RichClem
8 Mar 2012 12:26 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Oh well gosh, then it's just fine for Obama to violate the Catholic Church's Constitutional rights.Obama is not violating the church's rights. The students pay for their own health care coverage.It is not subsidized by Georgetown. Why should the university be able to deny them coverage for something they pay for themselves?The Catholic Church has legal authority over the health insurance it offers. They feel so strongly about this issue, they likely would shut down all their schools, hospitals, charities, etc.Who should we believe, them or a Democrat Talking Point Liar like you? If students want contraceptives, they can go to a doctor and get it on their own No one's stopping them.Does it bother you at all that Rush lied about Sandra Fluke saying that she was having 'so much sex' that she couldn't afford her birth control (something she never said) and that he lied about her wanting us to 'pay for her to have sex'?Look, a squirrel! Pay no attention to the Breitbart video that shows Obama literally embracing a virulent racist/ Marxist/ radical leftist. Sounds just like Obama's spiritual adviser Reverend Wright, no? "Open up your hearts and your minds to the words of Professor Derrick Bell," Obama said.... WTF do you know about being sane or honest?I know you can't be trusted with the time of day.
Oldschool
8 Mar 2012 2:18 pm
Oldschool
posts
The Catholic Church has legal authority over the health insurance it offers. They feel so strongly about this issue, they likely would shut down all their schools, hospitals, charities, etc.I know you can't be trusted with the time of day.That would be great news but they won't. The Catholic Church's breeding desires aren't shared by most of its members. If they want to run businesses, schools, or hospitals they're just going to have to follow the law like everyone else. When it comes down to it Money is still the Catholic churches biggest mission and so they will learn to cope with the new law.
User avatar
crimsongulf
8 Mar 2012 9:31 pm
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
Just one simple question....................................who pays for it. BC is not free, so someone has to pay for it. So, for the left side, just who pays for it?
User avatar
RichClem
9 Mar 2012 7:19 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
WTF do you know about being sane or honest?Could a sane, honest person hold the following opinion?That's what (Republicans) care about. Not jobs, not the economy, not the 9/11 first responders, or the START Treaty, but banned word plastic forks that break too easily.
User avatar
Nobody
9 Mar 2012 8:26 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
'Rush Limbaugh Show' Broadcasts Five Minutes of Dead Air as Sponsors Continue to FleeOf the 86 ads aired during Thursday's New York broadcast, 77 were public service announcements and seven were from companies seeking to pull ads from the talk radio program.The fallout over Rush Limbaughs controversial comments about a Georgetown University law student continues. After dozens of sponsors said they would no longer advertise on The Rush Limbaugh Show, Thursdays New York broadcast included five minutes of silence and an advertising lineup consisting almost entirely of public service announcements.Among professional broadcasters, dead air is considered one of the worst things that can occur. Edited by MistyBlue, 09 March 2012 - 09:30 AM.
User avatar
RichClem
9 Mar 2012 9:19 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Among professional broadcasters, dead air is considered one of the worst things that can occur.Thanks for showing again how anti-Free Speech the liberal-left is.Did you bleat in outrage over worse comments by Bill Maher?No, of course not.I think losing all his sponsors and being pulled from radio stations is what he deserves, and that's exactly what he seems to be getting.
Skeptic
9 Mar 2012 9:55 am
Skeptic
posts
Thanks for showing again how anti-Free Speech the liberal-left is.Did you bleat in outrage over worse comments by Bill Maher?No, of course not.Oh, good! Brain-dead conservatives are STILL defending Rush Limbaugh.Keep it up, guys.Could a sane, honest person hold the following opinion?Most a sane, honest person(s) recognize the context of the comment as a bit different than expression of some perceived universal truth.But, you're neither sane nor honest.
User avatar
crimsongulf
9 Mar 2012 10:17 am
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
What are y'all gonna get your panties all wadded up about next week?
User avatar
RichClem
9 Mar 2012 11:19 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
What are y'all gonna get your panties all wadded up about next week?Anything except the country's most pressing issues.Could a sane, honest person hold the following opinion?. you're neither sane nor honest. Edited by RichClem, 09 March 2012 - 12:20 PM.
User avatar
Nobody
9 Mar 2012 11:27 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Today I said goodbye to my sweet little Sage. We're not sure exactly how old she was. She was a stray, and when I took her in 17 years ago, the Vet said she was probably about two years old, so she had a good long run.Politics seems so unimportant to me right now. I'm heartbroken.
1 137 138 139 140 141 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 4815 users online :: 6 registered, 17 bots, and 4792 guests
Bots: Bolt, oBot, Yahoo! Slurp, DuckDuckGo, facebookexternalhit, proximic, YandexBot, Baiduspider, Firefox/7.0, Kinza, CriteoBot, ADmantX, curl/7, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search