Liberal Forum

According Rush's first book, a feminazi is "a feminist to whom the most important thing in life is ensuring that as many abortions occur as possible."In the YouTube video I posted, Rush said, "So, Miss Fluke and the rest of you feminazis...."So by calling Sandra Fluke a feminazi, he was deceitfully attributing to her the view that the most important thing in her life is ensuring that as many abortions occur as possible.I guess that was another part of her testimony that no one else but Rush heard.I guess that's what happens when you make yourself deaf from ingesting all that Oxycontin.Rush applies the term to whatever woman is currently annoying him. He's a propagandist, pure and simple.

Rush applies the term to whatever woman is currently annoying him.That's not how certain people here have deceitfully described it. I won't mention any names.RichClemWhen Rush Limbaugh first began using the term "feminazi" in the 1990s, he said that it described "a specific type of feminist" and that there were "probably no more than 25 of them." However, since then, he has used the term as a broader slur to attack feminists, pro-choice activists, and progressive women. Edited by MistyBlue, 12 March 2012 - 02:13 PM.

Rick Santorum blamed his lack of charitable donations on his disabled child (even before she was born).Rick Santorum was on Fox News Sunday this (yesterday) morning with Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace questioned Rick Santorum on his lack of donations to charity: On Fox News Sunday this morning, Chris Wallace challenged Rick Santorum on why hes given such a small percentage of his salary to charity (1.76 percent) compared to Mitt Romney (13.8 percent) and President Obama (14.2 percent). Santorum explained that he was unable to give because the costs of caring for his daughter Bella who has a severe genetic disorder were so high because they are not covered by his insurance: SANTORUM: Well, we always need to do better. I was in a situation where we have seven children and one disabled child who we take care of, and shes very, very expensive. We love her and we cherish the opportunity to take care of her, but its an additional expense. We have to have around-the-clock care for her, and our insurance company doesnt cover it so I have to cover it.Rick Santorum asks Chris Wallace to look back to previous years before the birth of his disabled daughter and examine his charitable donations from then. It seems that Chris Wallace had already examined his previous donations. Chris Wallace claimed to have examined Rick Santorum's tax returns as far back as 2007 an in every case it was around 2 percent. Rick Santorum counters by saying that there were some cases it was as high as 3 or 4 percent and again focusing on his disabled daughter Bella (who had yet to be born). Rick Santorum should just be honest and admit that he's not a charitable person.Santorum had an annual income of about one million dollars for the last four years, and he complains that he can't give more to charity because he has a special needs child.I wonder what people who make much less and have a child with special needs do?

Senator claiming mentally ill are defective?! More unsubstantiated bullschit. Doesn't anyone check any of the garbage they post? Now we have "he said, she said" BS that passes as fact? Edited by Shredaspud, 12 March 2012 - 02:34 PM.

Check out the Flying Monkey Award as Left-Wing Noise Machine. My favorite political analysis site. leftwingnoisemachine.com

Senator claiming mentally ill are defective?! More unsubstantiated bullschit. Doesn't anyone check any of the garbage they post? Now we have "he said, she said" BS that passes as fact?Can you give me a clue what you're talking about?Check out the Flying Monkey Award as Left-Wing Noise Machine. My favorite political analysis site.leftwingnoisemachine.comThanks for the link Landru, and a belated welcome to the forum.What better embodies the malignant and freakish cultural fantasies that make up the Tea Party, the GOP, and the conservative movement, than the flying monkeys from the Wizard of Oz? Absolutely nothing. Edited by MistyBlue, 12 March 2012 - 02:52 PM.

Santorum had an annual income of about one million dollars for the last four years, and he complains that he can't give more to charity because he has a special needs child.I wonder what people who make much less and have a child with special needs do?Why did the Obama's give so little over the course of their career? Why did Biden and other Democrats give so little?Do they have special needs children?And why aren't you asking about them?Because you're a partisan smear artist..What kind of worthless, pathetic excuse for a human being would smear a rape victim?

Why did the Obama's give so little over the course of their career? Why did Biden and other Democrats give so little?Do they have special needs children?And why aren't you asking about them?Because you're a partisan smear artist..Somebody doesn't understand the concept of hypocrisy, which means somebody is a conservative.Santorum and the rest of the freakish GOP circus politicize their family life and their so called personal charitable instincts while demonizing public policy (on things like helping handicapped children). So Santorum is a hypocrite from his position. Obama is right on: public policy, backed by high taxes on the superwealthy should be used to deal with social problems, not Santorum's bogus charity.What kind of worthless, pathetic excuse for a human being would smear a rape victim?

Can you give me a clue what you're talking about?I'm referring to the original quote with the link. That is in post #1.

.Oh gosh, I've missed the opportunity for her to call me a Nazi again.I'm really saddened by that.

Oh gosh, I've missed the opportunity for her to call me a Nazi again.I wish that instead of chasing that slut around all day, you'd remember to bring me some food once in a while My Clemmy. I don't mean to complain, but I'm feeling a little weak. It's been two days since you've fed me. If you want me to be able to keep up with your voracious sexual appetite, I really could use a little sustenance.

That's not how certain people here have deceitfully described it. I won't mention any names.RichClemWhen Rush Limbaugh first began using the term "[slur deleted]" in the 1990s, he said that it described "a specific type of feminist" and that there were "probably no more than 25 of them." However, since then, he has used the term as a broader slur to attack feminists, pro-choice activists, and progressive women.The Democrats' Propaganda artists and fawning, lying supporters in the conservative-hating MSM have been bleating loudly for days now.Surely millions of American women must be deeply outraged, right?NOT!Obama Fares Worse Among Women after Month-Long Contraception Mandate BattleWashington Post poll contradicts Washington Post narrative about female voters.By JOHN MCCORMACKHow's the great contraception mandate battle of 2012 playing out? If you read the Washington Post's news coverage, the issue is supposedly killing Republicans among female voters. But the newest Washington Post/ABC poll tells a different story.During the first few days of February, about a week before Obama declared a so-called "accommodation" to the contraception/abortifacient mandate, a Washington Post/ABC poll showed Obama's approval rating at 50 percent, with 46 percent of Americans disapproving.Then, from March 7 to 10--a week into the national media firestorm surrounding Rush Limbaugh's degrading remarks about Georgetown Law student and liberal activist Sandra Fluke--Washington Post/ABC conducted another poll. It found Obama's approval rating at 46 percent, down four points from February, and his disapproval rating at 50 percent, up four points from February.In February, Obama was leading Mitt Romney, 51 percent to 45 percent among registered voters. In March, Obama was trailing Mitt Romney, 47 percent to 49 percent among registered voters. The Post/ABC pollster finds that Obama "did better among men and women alike last month, and has lost ground slightly among both sexes this month."....The bottom line is that it's not clear at all that the fight over the contraception/abortifacient mandate has hurt Republicans. The Post/ABC pollster attributes Obama's dip in the polls to high gas prices. Of course, the biggest story in February was the mandate, so it's possible that the mandate is actually hurting Obama.But if you read the Washington Post's report by Karen Tumulty this weekend on the GOP's slide among female voters, you'd think the new mandate was a terrible issue for Republicans..http://www.weeklysta....html?nopager=1

BREAKING: Rush Limbaugh Syndicator Suspends National Ads For Two WeeksRadio-Info.com reports that Premiere Networks, which syndicates the Rush Limbaugh show, told its affiliate radio stations that they are suspending national advertising for two weeks. Rush Limbaugh is normally provided to affiliates in exchange for running several minutes of national advertisements provided by Premiere each hour. These ads are called barter spots. These spots are how Premiere makes its money off of Rush Limbaugh and other shows it syndicates. But without explanation, Premiere has supended these national advertisements for two weeks. Radio-Info.com calls the move unusual. The development suggests that Rush Limbaughs incessant sexist attacks on Sandra Fluke have caused severe damage to the show.From the memo: Attention Traffic Managers of Premiere News/Talk Affiliates: We are suspending the requirement to run barter spots for two weeks, March 12th and March 19th, for our News/Talk affiliates only. Please replace/re-traffic any Premiere barter spots immediately. Contractual requirements to run barter spots are being suspended for these two weeks only. Replace them with Lifelock and Lear Financial or a local spot of your choice. Earlier today, ThinkProgress exclusively reported that 140 advertisers, including dozens of major national corporations, had requested their ads no longer air on Rush Limbaugh. Lifelock and Lear Financial are among the only companies standing by Limbaugh. Over the last several days much of the advertising time during the Rush Limbaugh show on his flagship station, WABC, has been filled with free public service announcements.Ed Schultz discussed this on his show last night with talk radio consultant Holland Cooke and Eric Boehlert of Media Matters.VIDEO

Ed Schultz ......Is a windbag, a moonbat and a liar, though he might or might not be on this particular occasion.Could a sane, honest person really believe that the millions of mainstream Americans who make up the Tea Party, oppose vast overspending and want to bring us back to abiding by the Constitution be "destroying the country?Tea Party Has WonWTF have they won?For 50 years, the Russians tried to destroy this nation.Now, within a couple of years, the Tea Party is succeeding.

Boehner Struggling For Republican UnityMarch 7th: Deep fissures are dividing House Republicans on the highway bill and 2013 budget and Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is making late, urgent efforts to restore unity.During a closed-door conference meeting Wednesday he implored conservatives to support five-year, $260 billion transportation legislation that has been stalled for weeks, warning them that if they failed to do so, they have to swallow the $109 billion Senate bill or something that looks just like it.According to a source in the room, Boehner said, You dont like that? I dont like it either. Why would any of us like it? It means punting on the opportunity to pass an infrastructure bill that bears our stamp. It means giving up on the opportunity to make sure a bill is enacted that is responsibly paid for; that has full-scale reforms in it; and most importantly, that is linked to increased production of American energy, Boehner said. But right now, its the plan, Boehner added.At the same time, Boehners chief lieutenant, Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), planned to meet Thursday morning with Budget Committee members to help resolve a dispute over 2013 spending levels.[...]In his private exhortation on Wednesday, the Speaker made a broader plea for unity as the election season draws closer. The American people entrusted us with the majority in the House. What we do with it is up to us, he said. We can use it to take steps together, one at a time, toward the vision we share. Or we can do nothing. We can squander the time weve been given allowing our internal disagreements to paralyze us.Read More: http://thehill.com/h...-highway-budgetOn March 8th Speaker Boehner's Transportation bill died an unceremonious death.Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, a former Republican congressman, called it "the worst transportation bill I've ever seen during 35 years of public service."Boehner is a total failure who can't even get his own caucus in line.

On March 8th Speaker Boehner's Transportation bill died an unceremonious death.Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, a former Republican congressman, called it "the worst transportation bill I've ever seen during 35 years of public service."Boehner is a total failure who can't even get his own caucus in line.It's not entirely his fault that Senate Dems and likely some Repub hacks want to continue vast deficit overspending, whereas conservatives and Tea Party supporters want to cut it a little.From your source:Senior members on the Appropriations Committee are urging the leadership to stick to a spending cap of $1.047 trillion agreed to as part of last year's debt-limit deal with the White House. Conservatives are pushing for a lower number of $931 billion.How does someone honestly describe those politicians who want to cut or control spending and reduce this dangerously unsustainable deficit?For 50 years, the Russians tried to destroy this nation.Now, within a couple of years, the Tea Party is succeeding..Lie much? Edited by RichClem, 13 March 2012 - 01:51 PM.

Can you give me a clue what you're talking about?Thanks for the link Landru, and a belated welcome to the forum. Thanks. Good to be here to show just how pitiful the tea baggers are.

Thanks. Good to be here to show just how pitiful the tea baggers are.Oh yeah, sure, anyone who wants the federal government to be restricted to what's permissible under the Constitution, who wants to control the massive overspending of leftist Beltway politicians, who wants to protect our freedom, is "pitiful."Where do you moonbats come from?

This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by RichClem . View it anyway?DEAD TO ME