Liberal Forum

Folks over at True The Vote are whining because they won't be able to carry out their voter intimidation tactics unimpeded.The more Democrats whine about, snicker, voter intimidation," the more obvious is it they're terrified of clean elections and reduced voter fraud.Voter ID and a crackdown on voter fraud are the wave of the future, moonbat. Without that, Democrats have little chance of being the majority party.

Anything to keep the colored guy from being re-elected.I love moonbat humor.Meanwhile, back to reality.Obama Job Losses Hit 7 Of 10 Battleground StatesBy JOHN MERLINE, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY Posted 10/19/2012 04:19 PM ETSeven out of the 10 presidential toss-up states have lost jobs since President Obama took office, and the unemployment rate is higher today in six of those states than in January 2009, according to data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.What's more, six of those states listed as toss-ups by Real Clear Politics have seen their labor force shrink since January 2009, which masks the true size of their unemployment problem.http://news.investor...x#ixzz2A8f9caMJ

He continues to reply to your posts because you keep on reacting to his posts. How many times have you told him that you're ignoring him? Do you think that he'll stop replying if you just tell him one more time? Aren't your actions meeting the definition of insanity? Here's the solution: Try saying nothing to him forever.So since you posted that, I tried not reacting to any of his posts, and as you can see. it's working very well.

What a display of courage that is.Don't mess with the Head Ball Breaker if you'd like to keep your testicles intact.No truth in advertising there.She runs off whimpering.

****.

Unbanned wordbelievable.What, that despite the Obama-fawning MSM's attempts to prevent his collapse, Obama's on the verge of defeat? CO: R 50% O 46%...http://www.rasmussen...orado_presidentVirginia Rasmussen Reports Obama 47, Romney 49 Romney +2New Hampshire ARG Obama 46, Romney 50 Romney +4Colorado Denver Post/SurveyUSA Romney 48, Obama 47 Romney +1Florida Rasmussen Reports Romney 51, Obama 47 Romney +4Florida ARG Romney 49, Obama 46 Romney +3Socialism's dead, moonbat. Hold a funeral, already.

Who Knew? Romney Agrees With Obama on Foreign PolicyFor a presidential election where the choices between two approaches to the economy, health care, and the role of the federal government couldn't be wider, Monday night's final presidential debate featured an unusual amount of agreement between the two candidates. This was in part because Mitt Romney, having taken positions to Obama's right during the Republican primary and in the run up to the election's final weeks, moderated his positions during the debate. It was a startling shift from Romney, who a month ago implied that the president sympathizes with people who kill Americans, and it undermined Romney's argument that recent foreign policy challenges have been little more than the result of the Obama administration displaying "weakness."Read MoreRomney was hugging Obama so much, I thought he would reach over and tongue kiss him at any moment.

Ann Coulter Calls Obama a 'Retard,' Igniting OutrageThe conservative commentator's remark drew immediate protest from both Hollywood and some conservative allies, including Michelle Malkin.Although most pundits and the public at large gave the nod to President Obama as the winner of the third debate, held Monday night in Florida, Coulter saw it differently. After live-tweeting the rumble on foreign policy, the conservative author and commentator summed up her thoughts on the evening by writing, "I highly approve of Romney's decision to be kind and gentle to the retard."She drew backlash Immediately.[...]Fellow firebrand Michelle Malkin wrote, "What a stupid, shallow thing to say, Ann," and pointed to the conservative Twitter site Twitchy, which lambasted Coulter and said that her tweet did not represent their views.In 2010 Sarah Palin said that President Obama should fire his Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel when he called he plans by liberal groups to run ads against moderate Democrats "Fing retarded."Palin said that "Rahms slur on all Gods children with cognitive and developmental disabilities and the people who love them is unacceptable, and its heartbreaking."Last night Sarah Palin Tweeted this:Was that directed at Ann Coulter? Who knows?

Romney was hugging Obama so much, I thought he would reach over and tongue kiss him at any moment.He's winning and didn't want to create any controversy.The Empty Suit is going down in flames. Want to lie about the accuracy of my prognostications like you'v done so many times?other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?Rachel Maddow.http://liberalforum....showtopic=63884Maddow strongly disagreed with MS-LSD's pet Republican who claimed that Romney used the debate to strengthen his bid to win.Imbecile.

President Obama To Mitt Romney: "But Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s."

President Obama To Mitt Romney: "But Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s." The 1920's were a time of prosperity, moonbat, until Progressive Herbert Hoover was elected and followed destructive leftist policies.The 1980's were when Ronald Reagan was in office, greatest president of the 20th Century. Gosh, who'd want to emulate him.And heck, who'd want to go back to low illegitimacy rates, low crime rates, little drug use and social peace?Not moonbats.

Edited by MistyBlue, 23 October 2012 - 01:55 PM.

About that Voting Machine Company Tied to Mitt Romney and Bain Capital...Late last month, Gerry Bello and Bob Fitrakis at FreePress.org broke the story of the Mitt Romney/Bain Capital investment team involved in H.I.G. Capital which, in July of 2011, completed a "strategic investment" to take over a fair share of the Austin-based e-voting machine company Hart Intercivic. [...]Once again, we're reminded of the dangers of the privatization of our once-public electoral system. The company's ties to Romney aren't the only disturbing ones we've seen with similar companies over the years. The fact is, that nobody other than the public should have any sort of control of our elections. The proprietary voting systems now in use in all 50 states, whether owned by Romney associates, a George W. Bush associate (as with Diebold in 2004) or even a company tied to Venezuela's Hugo Chavez (as with Sequoia Voting Systems which blatantly lied about that tie to public officials, and the Canadian firm Dominion which purchased Sequoia and also immediately lied about the fact that Intellectual Property of their voting systems used all across the U.S. is still owned by the Venezuelan firm), continue to be a grave threat to American democracy and confidence in U.S. Elections.There has been a false Rightwing story that's been bubbling around this cycle, charging, inaccurately, that perennial Republican target George Soros owns or controls a company (a Spanish-based firm named Scytl) which will count 25% of U.S. votes in this year's election. While the story, spread first by public airwaves clown and radio host Michael Savage and, naturally, Fox "News," is completely false, the general concern at the heart of it is not. Indeed, it underscores, yet again, the very point we've been making on this topic here for years.[...]Despite the Rightwing reports, Soros has no apparent control of the Scytl outfit, but it doesn't matter. Other private corporate entities ---unaccountable to the public --- do. Either way, whether it's Soros or entities tied to Mitt Romney, George W. Bush, Hugo Chavez or anybody else, the fact that we have allowed this complete corporatization of the machinery of our public elections, the very lifeblood of our democracy --- the first and most important element of true self-governance --- is, in and of itself, a continuing shame for what was once regarded as "the world's greatest democracy."NBC News Election Expert Chuck Todd: Voting Machine Concerns are 'Conspiracy Garbage'Former Ohio election official: Tagg Romneys stake in voting machine firm doesnt look good.

Folks over at True The Vote are whining because they won't be able to carry out their voter intimidation tactics unimpeded.Oh yeah, Democrat voter fraud NEVER happens.Especially when the son of a prominent sitting Democrat Congressman is involved. New Undercover Video: Did Congressman's Son Commit Voter Fraud? James O'Keefe has struck again. O'Keefe is the guy who broke the big ACORN scandal with his undercover video reporting. Now, he's out with a video that may land a Congressman's son in trouble for voter fraud. Watch below as Patrick Moran, the son of Virginia Congressman Jim Moran(and the Field Director for his father's campaign), is caught on tape talking to an undercover reporter about how to allegedly cast ballots deceitfully for registered voters.Folks, this is the new wave of reporting in this viral, social media world.O'Keefe may be controversial in some circles and his tactics have been criticized by some but you can't argue with the fact that he gets people's attention.With the liberal mainstream media lacking when it comes to true investigative journalism, these type of videos will become the norm sooner rather than later.Here's part of the transcript below:Undercover Reporter: There are 100 people who dont vote. Hes looking for two guys to help him with. Patrick Moran: Crank it out?Undercover Reporter: Yes. Hes got a van and he and me were going to go around. Patrick Moran: Rally these people up and get them to the polls.Undercover Reporter: Well, he was actually going to get in a van and vote for them.Patrick Moran: OhhhhUndercover Reporter: I know, but Undercover Reporter: Its scary, but Im not. I dont want to lose, and Im frightened.Patrick Moran: Yeah.Then later in the video there's talk about creating fake utility bills to serve as voter identification.Patrick Moran: So, if they just have the utility bill or bank statement bank statement would obviously be tough but faking a utility bill would be easy enough."Undercover Reporter: How would you do that?Patrick Moran: I mean, I would just find, I dont know, I guess. Undercover Reporter: Microsoft Word and type it up."Patrick Moran: Yeah, something like that."http://blogs.cbn.com...oter-fraud.aspx

U. S. Senate Candidate Richard Mourdock's View Of Rape As A Gift Of God, Echoes Islamic (Sharia) Law Mourdocks position appears to reflect a theology of predestination, that events in this world are preordained as Gods will. As he later explained, God does not will sin or rape, which is a human choice. But he does will that life come into existence, so that a conception occurs in rape is divine will even if the rapists action is not. Mourdocks position is also taken by some Muslim religious scholars who interpret Islamic law or Sharia:I believe that the value of life is the same whether this embryo is the result of fornication with relatives or non-relatives or valid marriage. In Sharia life has the same value in all cases. Sheikh M. A. Al-Salami, Third Symposium on Medical JurisprudenceThe problem with Mourdocks position, which is shared by some advocates of Islamic Sharia, is that it is a theological one. That this is so is obvious in Sheikh Al-Salamas fatwa, just as it is obvious in Mourdocks diction. Ironically, US evangelicals who have attempted to pass laws in state legislatures forbidding the use of sharia or Islamic law in the American system would in this case be disallowing Sheikh Al-Salamis position, which is identical to that of Mourdock. But apparently it is all right with them if Christian Sharia is imposed on us all.

U. S. Senate Candidate Richard Mourdock's View Of Rape As A Gift Of GodCan't have an ugly smear of a conservative without little Miss Marxist jumping on it with both feet. What's next, are you going to lie that he's a child molester, the way you did about Rush and John Fund?Can you quote Mourdock calling rape a "gift from God?"No? Never thought you could. But apparently it is all right with them if Christian Sharia is imposed on us all.Hilarious coming from a supporter of the most repressive presidency in US history, trying to micromanage Americans' lives by force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment.The liberal agenda is Totalitarian-lite.

Can't have an ugly smear of a conservative without little Miss Marxist jumping on it with both feet. What's next, are you going to lie that he's a child molester, the way you did about Rush and John Fund?Can you quote Mourdock calling rape a "gift from God?"No? Never thought you could.So, telling the truth about Mourdock is a 'smear?'Only YOU, clem-bat.Hilarious coming from a supporter of the most repressive presidency in US history, trying to micromanage Americans' lives by force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment.The liberal agenda is Totalitarian-lite.Please tell us what laws passed by conservatives don't carry the "force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment," you incorrigible little cuckoo-clock?

U. S. Senate Candidate Richard Mourdock's View Of Rape As A Gift Of God, Echoes Islamic (Sharia) Law Mourdocks position appears to reflect a theology of predestination, that events in this world are preordained as Gods will. As he later explained, God does not will sin or rape, which is a human choice. But he does will that life come into existence, so that a conception occurs in rape is divine will even if the rapists action is not. Mourdocks position is also taken by some Muslim religious scholars who interpret Islamic law or Sharia:I believe that the value of life is the same whether this embryo is the result of fornication with relatives or non-relatives or valid marriage. In Sharia life has the same value in all cases. Sheikh M. A. Al-Salami, Third Symposium on Medical JurisprudenceThe problem with Mourdocks position, which is shared by some advocates of Islamic Sharia, is that it is a theological one. That this is so is obvious in Sheikh Al-Salamas fatwa, just as it is obvious in Mourdocks diction. Ironically, US evangelicals who have attempted to pass laws in state legislatures forbidding the use of sharia or Islamic law in the American system would in this case be disallowing Sheikh Al-Salamis position, which is identical to that of Mourdock. But apparently it is all right with them if Christian Sharia is imposed on us all.lol. but...but...but...obama has been backing sharia law in governments for years now.......haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

lol. but...but...but...obama has been backing sharia law in governments for years now.......haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaReally! Care to back that up?