Liberal Forum

Gosh, where did "Head Ballbreaker" little Miss Marxist go?Oh gosh, it's "low" of me to oppose pillaging taxpayers to subsidize spoiled, overpaid postal workers even more than they have been for decades?I would never wish that on anyone, but then I'd expect no less from you.Jesus H. Christ Clem, do you really hate me that much?WTF did I do to you to cause you to develop this irrational hatred of me, almost from the moment I started posting here, that would make you wish that my husband and I would lose our income?Because I disagreed with you politically?You're certifiable.It has nothing to do with "disagreeing politically," as you full well know. That's just another of endless lies from you.Gosh, why indeed? Other than that you've accused Rush Limbaugh and John Fund of being child molesters.Dishonestly meared every conservative public figure I can think of.Or smeared me for years.RichClem supports rape!And ironically:We all know you lie a lot.

Oh gosh, it's "low" of me to oppose pillaging taxpayers to subsidize spoiled, overpaid postal workers even more than they have been for decades?It's very low of you to wish that my husband and would lose our incomes.I can't think of anything much lower than that....you've accused Rush Limbaugh and John Fund of being child molesters.Dishonestly smeared every conservative public figure I can think of.Yeah, like you don't do the same to liberal public figures. WTF, you act like you're related to them. I never 'accused' Rush of being a child molester, I just questioned why he takes trips to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra. And I said that John Fund slept with the daughter of his ex-girlfriend (which he did). I never said she was child.Ayway, you were obsessed with me, way before I posted anything about those things.Or smeared me for years.You started it Puss.

Oh gosh, it's "low" of me to oppose pillaging taxpayers to subsidize spoiled, overpaid postal workers even more than they have been for decades?It's very low of you to wish that my husband and would lose our incomes.I can't think of anything much lower than that.Where did I write one single word about "losing incomes?" Quote me.I simply oppose bilking taxpayers to support the ridiculously over-generous pensions postal workers bought from Beltway politicians with contributions and political clout.If the Post Office can't support all of the burden, it can pay a percentage, and anyone effected can go find work, just like almost everyone in the private sector has to do.But the first reaction of people like you is to reach into other people's wallets by lobbying Beltway politicians.you've accused Rush Limbaugh and John Fund of being child molesters.Dishonestly smeared every conservative public figure I can think of.Yeah, like you don't do the same to liberal public figures. I've never spread lies about Democrats, let alone the deeply ugly ones you have.WTF, you act like you're related to them. I hold them in high respect, so I defend them when appropriate.I find it despicable to smear honest figures of integrity, on either side.I never 'accused' Rush of being a child molester, I just questioned why he takes trips to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra. And I said that John Fund slept with the daughter of his ex-girlfriend (which he did). I never said she was child.Ayway, you were obsessed with me, way before I posted anything about those things.Oh bulls***. Don't hide behind weasel words. Your rhetoric strongly implied that both are child molesters. Show enough courage to stand behind your accusations.You started it Puss.More bulls***. I've never lied about you or liberals.You lie like you breathe. Edited by RichClem, 29 October 2012 - 12:06 PM.

Gosh, where did "Head Ballbreaker" little Miss Marxist go?I'm right here Puss.You can post whatever you want to make me look like the bad guy.The truth is that you became fixated on and obsessed with me from almost the very day I started posting here.You started the name calling and insults, not me.You're like the schoolyard bully, who pushes people around and then whines when they retaliate.I took you off ignore today, because I was hoping that you would post something in my Hurricane Sandy thread.I saw you reading it yesterday, but you didn't comment.To RichClem: I'm sure that you are probably hoping that a tree or two falls on me, but it looks like your state is going to get hit pretty hard, and I just wanted you to know that I also hope that you and yours will remain safe and sound.At times like this we need to put politics aside. Good luck.I offered an olive branch.....and as usual you spit on it.That's okay. I expected no less.It does not change what I said.I wish you no harm.I hate the way you treat me on this forum.I don't hate you.

I'm right here Puss.You can post whatever you want to make me look like the bad guy.Oh more baloney. I quote your own words, and based on them reveal you for what you are..RichClem supports rape!Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?Since you seem to think that sex is only for procreation, why would you suppose that Rush Limbaugh was traveling to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra?Was he going there to start a family? Isn't it curious that a man of Rush's means can't get laid here in the United States?I wonder what he can find in the DR, that he can't get here?I'm just sayin'.....The Dominican Republic has a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector..What kind of dishonest lowlife would ever make accusations about rape or child molestation, even slightly indirect?Does falsely accusing someone of child molestation make you a "bad guy?"You're like the schoolyard bully, who pushes people around and then whines when they retaliate."Retaliate?" Do your best against me honestly.But you can't, so you lie and smear.I took you off ignore today, because I was hoping that you would post something in my Hurricane Sandy thread.I saw you reading it yesterday, but you didn't comment.I offered an olive branch.....and as usual you spit on it.That's okay. I expected no less.It does not change what I said.I wish you no harm.I hate the way you treat me on this forum.I don't hate you.And my reaction is the same as Dick Cheney's, when after being dishonestly smeared by Sen. Patrick Leahy for years said "f*** you." That was a genuine reaction to scurrilous behavior.You want to get along with me? Admit most of your endless lies and smear and be genuinely repentant. I honestly believe that would be good for you.Otherwise, f*** you. Edited by RichClem, 29 October 2012 - 12:27 PM.

Where did I write one single word about "losing incomes?" Quote me....what are the chances a President Romney and the new Repub Congress will bail out your precious Post Office pension?If the CSRS goes bust, both my husband and I will lose our incomes.A thought which seemed to make you positively giddy.If the Post Office can't support all of the burden, it can pay a percentage, and anyone effected can go find work, just like almost everyone in the private sector has to do.Yes, because it's so easy for folks of retirement age to 'go find work'.I guess people in the private sector never retire. Why don't you ever bitch and moan about Congressional pensions Puss?Now there's a real scandal.While the rest of the country has been focused on state and local government pensions, those whizzes in Washington have continued to quietly ride their gold-plated gravy train. They pay less -- far less -- into their pensions than other government workers while taxpayers kick in more. And oh yeah, they also get a 401(k)-type plan, to which we get to contribute yet again. In all, taxpayers are kicking in 23 percent of our leaders' pay toward their retirement -- or more than $40,000 per Congress member per year.[...]A guy serving just six years qualifies for more than $17,000 a year for the rest of his life once he turns 62 -- more once cost-of-living adjustments are added in. As of October 2009, congressional pensions averaged nearly $60,012 under an older plan and $40,140 for those elected since the mid- 1980s. And that's before their 401(k)-style plans are added in. Today's members of Congress are sinking all of 1.3 percent of their salary into their own pensions. We, the people they serve, meanwhile, are contributing 18.3 percent, plus another 5 percent into their 401(k)-style plans. Read more: http://www.azcentral...l#ixzz2Ai4uspqo

I took you off ignore today, because I was hoping that you would post something in my Hurricane Sandy thread.I saw you reading it yesterday, but you didn't comment.I offered an olive branch.....and as usual you spit on it.That's okay. I expected no less.It does not change what I said.I wish you no harm.I hate the way you treat me on this forum.I don't hate you.And my reaction is the same as Dick Cheney's, when after being dishonestly smeared by Sen. Patrick Leahy for years said "f*** you." You want to get along with me? Admit most of your endless lies and smears and be genuinely repentant. I honestly believe that would be good for you.Otherwise, f*** you.Bless me Father, for I have sinned.....Just kidding..... Don't hold your breath Puss. Edited by MistyBlue, 29 October 2012 - 12:39 PM.

Bless me Father, for I have sinned.....Just kidding..... Don't hold your breath Puss. This is you. Someone who spreads ugly lies and smears, then laughs about it.What I write about you simply documents it.RichClem supports rape!Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?Since you seem to think that sex is only for procreation, why would you suppose that Rush Limbaugh was traveling to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra?Was he going there to start a family? Isn't it curious that a man of Rush's means can't get laid here in the United States?I wonder what he can find in the DR, that he can't get here?I'm just sayin'.....The Dominican Republic has a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector..My reaction is the same as Dick Cheney's, when after being dishonestly smeared by Sen. Patrick Leahy for years said "f*** you." That was a genuine reaction to scurrilous behavior.You want to get along with me? Admit most of your endless lies and smear and be genuinely repentant. I honestly believe that would be good for you.Otherwise, f*** you.

But Voter ID laws aren't "voter suppression."That depends on how it's coded into law. My problem with these laws are mostly that it becomes a tax in order to vote via buying an ID. The fact that it is cheap is notwithstanding. The Constitution clearly forbids charging anything in order to vote.-NW Edited by NaughtyWord, 29 October 2012 - 12:59 PM.

You want to get along with me?No, not really Puss.You are but an insignificant little blip on my radar screen.

You are but an insignificant little blip on my radar screen.Other than the fact that you whine on and on and on and on.This is you. Someone who spreads ugly lies and smears, then laughs about it.What I write about you simply documents it.

MistyBlue, on 29 October 2012 - 02:06 PM, said:You are but an insignificant little blip on my radar screen.Other than the fact that you whine on and on and on and on.Actually I've been ignoring you for quite some time.The only one doing any whining is you.

Mitt Romney then......At a GOP primary debate in June 2011, Romney, when asked about FEMA's budget woes and how he would deal with it, had said, "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better." During that debate, the moderator, CNN's John King, had gone on to ask if that included "disaster relief." Romney suggested it did.Mitt Romey now......I believe that FEMA plays a key role in working with states and localities to prepare for and respond to natural disasters, Romney said in a statement. As president, I will ensure FEMA has the funding it needs to fulfill its mission, while directing maximum resources to the first responders who work tirelessly to help those in need, because states and localities are in the best position to get aid to the individuals and communities affected by natural disasters.

Oh gosh, it's "low" of me to oppose pillaging taxpayers to subsidize spoiled, overpaid postal workers even more than they have been for decades?It's very low of you to wish that my husband and would lose our incomes.I can't think of anything much lower than that.No, I want your incomes to be what the Post Office is capable of, without one extra penny from taxpayers. If your union demanded too much, tough luck. Go find a job, just like almost everyone in the private sector would have to.I never 'accused' Rush of being a child molester, I just questioned why he takes trips to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra. And I said that John Fund slept with the daughter of his ex-girlfriend (which he did). I never said she was child.Nice try at putting a tiny fig leaf over your ugly deceit. You directly or indirectly tried to smear both Rush and John Fund as child molesters.You started it Puss.Lying and smearing? No, I refuse to do that.You are unable to be honest, aren't you.

Go find a job, just like almost everyone in the private sector would have to.I had a job for 30 years and paid into my pension.I'm retired you pinhead.I guess people in the private sector never retire.Jackhole. Edited by MistyBlue, 31 October 2012 - 03:59 PM.

At a GOP primary debate in June 2011, Romney, when asked about FEMA's budget woes and how he would deal with it, had said, "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."As opposed to liberals and the Marxist-in-Chief, who want Beltway politicians and bureaucrats to run the biggest issues and smallest details of Americans' lives by force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment.Say, why did Obama and officials dissemble and lie about the Benghazi attack?Isn't that far, far more important than an occasional Romney flip flop?Dead silence from the "Head Ballbreaker."

As opposed to liberals and the Marxist-in-Chief, who want Beltway politicians and bureaucrats to run the biggest issues and smallest details of Americans' lives by force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment.Say, why did Obama and officials dissemble and lie about the Benghazi attack?Isn't that far, far more important than an occasional Romney flip flop?Dead silence from the "Head Ballbreaker."Who's the 'Marxist-in-Chief?'I thought the neocons were laying low for awhile.

..an occasional Romney flip flop...When you take one position one day and another the next, and you deny that you ever held the previous position, even tough there is video evidence that shows otherwise, that's not a flip flop it's called a lie. Edited by MistyBlue, 01 November 2012 - 03:06 PM.

When you take one position one day and another the next, and you deny that you ever held the previous position, even tough there is video evidence that shows otherwise, that's not a flip flop it's called a lie.Why did Romney and his officials dissemble and lie about the Benghazi attack?Who refused to order a military strike over the seven hours the attack took place?

emphasis changedWhy did Romney and his officials dissemble and lie about the Benghazi attack?That's a damn good question, you psycho, stalking, Freudian slipping, piece of racist crap.Why DID Romney and his officials dissemble and lie about the Benghazi attack? Edited by Phelix_Dacat, 01 November 2012 - 03:19 PM.