Liberal Forum

How much does the GOP pay you to be an internet shill and liar for them?I'm a "shill" for making a rare mistake?Lie much?What would you call someone who told the following outrageous lie? I'd call them a lying, fawning groveling toady for a corrupt politician.There was no credible evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton raped anybody, yet a wingnut like you ignored that and tried to ruin him.You failed. You do realize that we all have computers and can fact check your ****, right Clem?That's an average of 7 & 1/2.....not 2.My mistake.

Oh my gosh, Mitt Romney's friend and adviser made a great investment and lots of money! That's outrageous!I guess you were unable to get very far into the article before your knee started jerking.You must have missed the part about how Romney failed to disclose his investments in Delphi Automotive.Or the part about how he made a fortune off extorted government money.Meanwhile Paul Ryan is claiming to be upset that former non-union Delphi workers are not getting full pensions, which is grotesquely ironic considering Romney made a career of pension destruction that was part of his vulture capitalism formula.What a couple of **** hypocrites. Oh I know Puss.....Mitt hides behind the blind trust and all that.In 1994, when Romney ran unsuccessfully against Ted Kennedy for the Senate, Mitt declared: The blind trust is an age-old ruse. I'm a "shill" for making a rare mistake?A rare mistake? You lie like a **** rug all day and every day.

You must have missed the part about how Romney failed to disclose his investments in Delphi Automotive.Or the part about how he made a fortune off extorted government money.Extorted government money? Yes, I missed that, and I doubt you or your source are correct.Whenever I see a claim you make, I almost automatically assume it's false, given your track record.A rare mistake? You lie like a **** rug all day and every day.Can't you even tell believable lies?You're just upset because there are no Democrat rapists for you to defend.

I'm a "shill" for making a rare mistake?My mistake.So, then you agree that Romney should release at least seven years of tax returns, right?A rare mistake? You lie like a **** rug all day and every day.Now that's funny!Actually, the clem-bat illustrated his favorite ploy - just make something up!No wonder he identifies so well with the Mittster.

MistyBlue, on 02 November 2012 - 02:30 PM, said:You must have missed the part about how Romney failed to disclose his investments in Delphi Automotive.Or the part about how he made a fortune off extorted government money.Extorted government money? Yes, I missed that, and I doubt you or your source are correct.Whenever I see a claim you make, I almost automatically assume it's false, given your track record.Of course you do, because that's the only way you can continue to live in denial.If you actually looked into the truth, it would shatter your illusions or should I say 'delusions'.Mitt Romney and his partners made a killing on the GM bankruptcy by gaining control of bankrupt parts supplier Delphi, then threatening to withhold components critical to the production of GM vehicles. Romney's business partners were willing to force GM into liquidation and cause a national economic calamity unless they got more money. In the end, the Romney investor group got what it wanted and earned a profit of more than 3,000 percent on its initial investment.This is the real Romney, a man who objected to the rescue of the domestic auto industry, then made astronomical profits after his business partners threatened the survival of GM.http://www.usatoday....er-uaw/1672501/Actually, the clem-bat illustrated his favorite ploy - just make something up!No wonder he identifies so well with the Mittster.I'm amazed that he still thinks that he can just pull stuff out of his ***, and no one will call him on it. Edited by MistyBlue, 02 November 2012 - 01:45 PM.

I'm amazed that he still thinks that he can just pull stuff out of his ***, and no one will call him on it. Speaking of making things up and pulling them out of their a**:RichClem supports rape!Could an honest, sane person really believe that?I'm a "shill" for making a rare mistake?My mistake.So, then you agree that Romney should release at least seven years of tax returns, right?Sure, but I won't vote for the incompetent lying leftist who brought the real unemployment rate to 12% and still rising.At a cost of $6 trillion in debt.Deal with that, troll.Now that's funny!Actually, the clem-bat illustrated his favorite ploy - just make something up!No wonder he identifies so well with the Mittster.From the master of deceit.I love moonbat humor. Edited by RichClem, 02 November 2012 - 01:55 PM.

MistyBlue, on 02 November 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:I'm amazed that he still thinks that he can just pull stuff out of his ***, and no one will call him on it.Speaking of making things up and pulling them out of their a**:[Another quote about Clem's favorite subject, rape.]Could an honest, sane person really believe that?It's ironic that you are always whining about how you want 'honest debate'.Yet everytime you are presented with an opportunity to engage in one, you engage in diversion, distraction, or projection.Sure, but I won't vote for the incompetent lying leftist who brought the real unemployment rate to 12% and still rising.No. You'll vote for Grover Norquist's puppet instead.We are not auditioning for fearless leader, Grover Norquist told conservatives at the CPAC convention in February. We dont need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. We just need a president to sign this stuff. We dont need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate.Norquist went on: Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become president of the United States. This is a change for Republicans: the House and Senate doing the work with the president signing bills. His job is to be captain of the team, to sign the legislation that has already been prepared.

It's ironic that you are always whining about how you want 'honest debate'.Yet everytime you are presented with an opportunity to engage in one, you engage in diversion, distraction, or projection.Every time I broach a important topic or ask an important question, you run away on your little troll feet and refuse to address them.Then you bleat in outrage, when I quote your own words that expose you as a scurrilous liar.RichClem supports rape!You wrote that. You spread that and other lies all over the board for days.It exposes what a lying lowlife you are. No. You'll vote for Grover Norquist's puppet instead.Hey, that's objective.A key principle on which Repubs stand is refusing to raise taxes. Why should Beltway politicians get more of Americans' hard earned money to waste?There's yet another question you'll stonewall.

So, then you agree that Romney should release at least seven years of tax returns, right?SureWow! Time to ask why other conservatives could possibly disagree with the Glorious RichClem!

SureWow! Time to ask why other conservatives could possibly disagree with the Glorious RichClem!Oh look, the troll cut out almost my entire post.Sure, but I won't vote for the incompetent lying leftist who brought the real unemployment rate to 12% and still rising.At a cost of $6 trillion in debt.Deal with that, troll.Run away, run away!

What, is your sense of humor broken, after all the whining you did about mine? Sorry, when it comes to rape, I have no sense of humor.As I noted the first time you expressed the absurd falsehood that I support rape, I responded that your Modus Operandi like that of the Hard Left is to falsely attack your opponents because you're unable to debate on the merits.I wish I was the one who first wished you'd be raped by wild dogs. How imaginative.You said that you would have liked to have been the first to wish that I get raped.So it seems obvious that you support rape, as long as it's someone you don't like.You're deeply dishonest, and a person of very low character.Say's the supporter of rape.See, this type of smear works well in the liberal MSM echo chamber. If I were a public figure, you could destroy my reputation, because I'd have no chance to adequately respond.However in this medium, I'm happy as hack to hang this around your neck to expose your deceit.I wish I was the one who first wished you'd be raped by wild dogs. How imaginative.Those are your words, Puss. Live with them.Go ahead, quote me forever. Only the clueless will fall for it. RichClem supports rape! Edited by Skeptic, 02 November 2012 - 03:47 PM.

RichClem supports rape!Could an honest, sane person really believe that?Tell your usual lies.

Oh look, the troll cut out almost my entire post.Not the relevant part, troll.So, then you agree that Romney should release at least seven years of tax returns, right?SureWow! Time to ask why other conservatives could possibly disagree with the Glorious RichClem!Could an honest, sane person really believe that?Tell your usual lies.Certainly!But, you're dishonestly quoting me, liar.

Every time I broach a important topic or ask an important question.....When did that happen?I must have missed it.

Misty: You'll vote for Grover Norquist's puppet instead.Hey, that's objective.A key principle on which Repubs stand is refusing to raise taxes. Why should Beltway politicians get more of Americans' hard earned money to waste?So I guess it's okay with you that Grover said that they don't want a POTUS to think or have any part in shaping legislation, and that he only need to have working digits so he can handle a pen and just sign whatever he's handed (IOW, a PUPPET)?You're good with that Puss?

You're good with that Puss?lol. awwwwwwwwwwwww. are you lovebirds talking again?

Only problem with this: it implies that Romney objects to Grover's hand up his ***.lol. awwwwwwwwwwwww. are you lovebirds talking again?Did Thrash leave you, lewser?

MistyBlue, on Feb 27 2009, 04:06 PM, said:RichClem supports rape!Could an honest, sane person really believe that?Says the expert on honesty and sanity.Yes Puss. An honest and sane person could believe that when you are positively gleeful about the prospect of them being raped, then you do indeed support rape.RichClem, on Feb 27 2009, 03:05 PM, said:I wish I was the one who first wished you'd be raped by wild dogs. How imaginative.

Did Thrash leave you, lewser?yep. a few months ago. didn't really expect for that young. hot thing to stay with this old dog forever, did ya?no. we still talk everyday and stuff. still friends.

MistyBlue, on 02 November 2012 - 05:02 PM, said:You're good with that Puss?lol. awwwwwwwwwwwww. are you lovebirds talking again?Only in this thread, and not for long.