Liberal Forum

Well, that was weakI'm referring to real deception and lies and all you can do is a weak "you too"It wasn't a 'weak' you too, it was emphatic.For you to pretend that only one political ideology or party engages in deception is ludicrous.

Nipple Slips Targeted By N.C. Lawmakers: Too Much "Exposure" Could Mean FelonyNorth Carolina representatives have introduced a bill that would "clarify" a state law to ban nipple slips and otherwise prohibit the baring of breasts.Women worried about showing too much of their "private area" should use pasties or even duct tape from now on... or they could be breaking the law.The proposed legislation, House Bill 34, would make it a Class H felony to expose "external organs of sex and of excretion, including the nipple."The law also extends to "any portion of the areola." Good to know.Depending on the intent, women could face up to six months in prison for an errant areola, with "more mundane" exposure resulting in a 30-day sentence.There is an exemption for breastfeeding.Rep. Rayne Brown {R}, who co-sponsored the bill, tells WRAL in Raleigh that while it may seem frivolous or even funny, it can also be a serious issue."There are communities across this state, local governments across this state, and local law enforcement for whom this issue is really not a laughing matter."Not a laughing matter? I think it's downright hysterical.I guess there's some kind of an epidemic of 'nipple slips' in North Carolina, because I'm sure that serious lawmakers would never waste time on a bill like this.

The pro freedom side doesn't need to lie about our agenda The anti-freedom side does, so they do. Your feeble excuse is just the means you use to avoid addressing the subject at hand.

The pro freedom side doesn't need to lie about our agenda. The anti-freedom side does, so they do. Your feeble excuse is just the means you use to avoid addressing the subject at hand. Which side is the 'pro freedom' side? The side that....... 1. tells doctors what they can or cannot say to their women patients 2. mandates that women undergo totally unecessary and invasive medical procedures 3. uses government regulations to shut down clinics and deny women access to their constitutional right to abortions That side? Tell me about how that side is 'pro freedom' when it comes to women and their own bodies?

lol. constitutional right to abortion. that's funny. and pretty f**king messed up. hitler would be sincerely proud of the pro-choice movement today. especially considering most of the women who have them are ill bred and inferior.

Constitutional right to an abortion?? LOLOLOLOLOLOL Let me ask you this: What should be more regulated, abortion or bearing arms?

A mulatto is not black. As hard as he tries he can not erase the fact that he is a mulatto.Crimson hyah can give us awl the skinny on your negroid races - from your mix up (or half cast) to your quadroon, your octaroon, and the highly prized macaroon.You've got your high yaller and your red bone, your blue gum and your mandingo.But your most feared and ferocious negro is your kenyan muslim antichrist marxist neocon socialist banker's boy. He can destroy an entire nation of good christian white folk.There's nothin to fear but a black planet. I now return control of your television to you, good people of Rivery City. Constitutional right to an abortion??LOLOLOLOLOLOLLet me ask you this:What should be more regulated, abortion or bearing arms?Of COURSE there is a Constitutional right to an abortion. Derr. Read the fourth amendment, and try to understand it.Your defense of the 2nd WOULD be admirable, if it were not an obvious obssession - an obssession MADE obvious by your disdain for the other nine.You guard that second jealously, while making nary a peep about - indeed, while CALLING for - incursions on the others.And the second is made obsolete, anyway, by the advent of the rape whistle.

the racists were irrelevent until liberals began calling everyone a "racist" simply because they disagreed with obama's political views. once you all started claiming 1/2 the country were "racists", the division went from there. Well Lews, it is that they agreed when the idea was White, but disagreed when the same exact idea was Black. And once Romney claimed the 47% were scum he wouldn't help, the division was there!!! LMAO!! Need some videos to chaw on, do let me know!! lol. constitutional right to abortion. that's funny. and pretty f**king messed up. hitler would be sincerely proud of the pro-choice movement today. especially considering most of the women who have them are ill bred and inferior. Ah, the Pro-Freedom movement to you. ill bred & inferior? LMAO!!! No, they aren't from the Ozarks & Alabama. lol

Well Lews, it is that they agreed when the idea was White, but disagreed when the same exact idea was Black. And once Romney claimed the 47% were scum he wouldn't help, the division was there!!! LMAO!! Need some videos to chaw on, do let me know!! the same thing can be said of liberals who despised bush for the patriot act and gitmo, but now either remain silent when obama re-signs it and even escalates it. that's not a matter of race, it's a matter of media manipulation.

Constitutional right to an abortion?? LOLOLOLOLOLOL Let me ask you this: What should be more regulated, abortion or bearing arms? What freedom are your trying to deny Chuck? Regulating either is a loss of freedom of the other. Anytime you take away someone else's rights you have just limited your own. You just made it eaiser for them to come after your guns. the same thing can be said of liberals who despised bush for the patriot act and gitmo, but now either remain silent when obama re-signs it and even escalates it. that's not a matter of race, it's a matter of media manipulation. Wise choice to move the goal posts.

lol. constitutional right to abortion. that's funny.SCOTUS said so. Deal with it.

Constitutional right to an abortion??LOLOLOLOLOLOLRoe V Wade 1973.Holds just as much weight as the Heller decision.Let me ask you this:What should be more regulated, abortion or bearing arms?I'm sure you don't think there should be any regulations at all when it comes to bearing arms, but lots of regulation on what a woman can do with her own body.Am I right?Of COURSE there is a Constitutional right to an abortion. Derr. Read the fourth amendment, and try to understand it.Your defense of the 2nd WOULD be admirable, if it were not an obvious obssession - an obssession MADE obvious by your disdain for the other nine.You guard that second jealously, while making nary a peep about - indeed, while CALLING for - incursions on the others.What he said.

Keith Ellison Explodes At Sean Hannity: 'The Worst Excuse For A Journalist I've Ever Seen' (VIDEO)Sean Hannity got an earful from Democratic congressman Keith Ellison on his Tuesday show. Ellison exploded at the Fox News host, calling him "the worst excuse for a journalist I've ever seen."What made Ellison so angry was a short series of clips of President Obama that Hannity ran just before bringing him on. The clips, which showed Obama talking about the looming budget sequester, were scored to the famously apocalyptic "Carmina Burana." Hannity said Obama was guilty of fearmongering when he talked about the potential effects of the cuts the sequester would impose.After playing the clips, Hannity welcomed Ellison, who was in no mood to be chummy:HANNITY: I guess that's what we can describe as staying on message, something the Democratic Party I would argue is very good at.ELLISON: You're pretty good at it too.HANNITY: Thank you.ELLISON: Quite frankly you are the worst excuse for a journalist I've ever seen.HANNITY: I can't hear you.ELLISON: You heard me.HANNITY: No, say it again. I didn't hear you.ELLISON: What you just displayed was not journalism, It was yellow journalism. It wasn't anything close to trying to tell the American people what's really going on, and I mean, it's just shocking.Things did not get friendlier from there. Ellison also called Hannity a "shill for the Republican party," an "immoral" man, and said he was violating "every journalistic ethic" in the book. Eventually, Hannity cut the interview short, saying it was a "waste of time" to continue.Hannity is not used to having real Liberals or Progressives challenging him. LOLYou can view the video of Hannity's intro that Congressman Ellison was responding to here.I defy any one to compare that to anything ever seen on MSNBC as regards to George Bush.The playing of 'O Fortuna' in the background is a classic GOP move.

the same thing can be said of liberals who despised bush for the patriot act and gitmo, but now either remain silent when obama re-signs it and even escalates it. that's not a matter of race, it's a matter of media manipulation. I'm not happy with it either. I don't know any liberals that are happy about the patriot act or gitmo. We don't harp on it on forums like this because there's no shortage of you cons attacking him for nothing. The way you guys attack Obama is almost unprecedented. He's continued virtually Bush's entire foreign policy, but you guys accuse him of "leading from behind". Virtually all of the rest of his policies have been supported by moderate Republicans in the past, but you guys act like he's the most severe liberal in history. You guys even attack his wife, for Christ's sake! Edited by bingster, 27 February 2013 - 11:46 AM.

Hannity is not used to having real Liberals or Progressives challenging him. LOL I don't watch Hannity and they don't do his clips very often on MSNBC but I do remember a thing he did on the radio. I was driving back to civilization from Victorville, Ca to San Diego and couldn't get a decent radio station and was stuck with Hannity. This was late in 2010, when liberals were complaining about talk like "2nd amendment remedies" and Sarah Palin's "targetting" Democratic Senator's headquarters to be taken out. Some of those headquarters were taken out with rocks and bricks. Hannity went on to say that we were hypocrites and that their rhetoric wasn't any worse than our "gun speak" like forming "battle plans." He didn't see the difference between a Republican talking about gun rights and taking out Democrats in the same sentence and a Democrat forming a battle plan to win a district. I never heard him say that stuff again when two months later Gabby Giffords was shot. She had actually spoken out against the same thing a month before. Edited by bingster, 27 February 2013 - 11:59 AM.

Threats to Democratic Representative: 'I Hope Someone Giffords Your *** With A Gun' Franklin Sain, a 42-year-old Colorado Springs man, was arrested last Friday for threatening Colorado lawmaker Rep. Rhonda Fields (D-Aurora) over gun control legislation that she is currently sponsoring and that recently passed in the state House. Franklin Sain is accused of threatening Fields and her daughter using racial and sexual slurs. Fields told KOA Radio that she does not know Sain, and said "All I know is the kinds of things that he said were very inappropriate, and they're alarming, and they were very intimidating." "It started last week around the 13th or the 14th," Fields told KOA. "And then the emails got worse; it started to escalate until it got to a letter that was sent to the Capitol. At first, I was really taken aback by the tone and the language in it, especially the racial overtones - I've just never seen something like that before. No one has ever said those things or written those things towards me in the last two-and-a-half years that I've been serving the state. So, I was like 'Wow, this is unbelievable.' And then they kept coming." 9News has obtained the arrest affidavit, and now the full scope of threats allegedly left by Sain over a nine day period are viewable. The threat of violence and use of racist language is prevalent throughout the messages, and they messages appear to escalate in tone by the ninth day. Caution: The language used is explicit and extremely offensive. There are many misspelled words and incorrect grammar usage in the messages, and they appear as written in the affidavit, along with censoring of offensive words.According to an affidavit, one of the letters alleged to have been written by the Colorado Springs man reads, "Rhonda Fields, mother of [Field's daughter]. Death to both." The letter goes on to say "There will be blood! I'm coming for you, N----- B----." In one of the emails, Sain allegedly wrote, "hopefully somebody Gifords [sic] your asses with a gun." The following is one of seven emails police say Sain sent to Fields: "THANKS N----- C---! You really think passing nay more laws will stop gun violence? You and that other N----- OBAMA are living in fantasy land. Chicago and DC have the most strict gun laws in the nation and more people die from gun violence than anywhere. You f---ing c---s are pathetic excuse for civil servants. Hell, n-----s love shooting themselves with GATS, isn't that what your people call it. What you have done here is creater [sic] criminals out of law abiding citizens, and put yourself out of a job. You politicians have no idea what you are even doing anyway, do you know how long it takes some to change a magazine, less than a second, so what if some with experience decides to flip out and bring their gun in with 5 or so 10 round magazines, they can do the same amount of damage. Limiting magazine sizes is stupididty, [sic] and will not work..." Then the most unhinged of Sain's messages also refers to Field's daughter:Rhonda Fields, N----- C---, Mother of -----, Death to Both, All N----- Back to Africa, F--- you, F--- Your Laws, I Keep my 30 Round Magazines, There Will Be Blood!, I'm Coming For You, N----- B---- Sain told police that he didn't mean to threaten Fields, and regrets the language he used. He has no prior record, and is the chief operating officer at SofTec Solutions in Englewood, Colorado, where he does consulting work for the government and private organizations House Speaker Mark Ferrandino and two other Democratic Reps also received similar threatening messages. Tuesday afternoon, SofTec announced the suspension of Sain via Facebook:"SofTec Solutions, Inc. has been informed of allegations against our employee, Mr. Frank Sain. We are shocked to learn of these allegations and are taking this matter very seriously. If true, these actions are highly inappropriate and will not be tolerated. Pending SofTecs investigation into this matter, Mr. Sain has been suspended immediately from further duties at SofTec. SofTec Solutions is a minority-owned, small business and we employ a large diverse workforce. We will absolutely not tolerate any racial, sexual, gender-based slurs or threats of violence by employees." The full arrest affidavit is available online here, but caution, as the language is explicit and offensive. Sain is scheduled to appear in court on March 8, 2013. So much for living in a post racial society. I guess this is the guy we want to have the FREEDOM to KABA. "There Will Be Blood!, I'm Coming For You, *** Bitch"

these idiots need to stop talking and just pull the damn trigger already.

these idiots need to stop talking and just pull the damn trigger already.What am I supposed to say to that?

What am I supposed to say to that? i just don't see why people get so upset over decent americans being angered at political traitors. anytime one of our federal politicians is threatened, harassed, or assaulted....it's a good day. that simply means these people care.

anytime one of our federal politicians is threatened, harassed, or assaulted....it's a good day. that simply means these people care.That sounds like something my ex-husband would have said.I only hit you, because I care. LOL