Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Dec 2013 2:02 pm » wrote: You're the one who keeps whining about how you want real debate Puss, not me.
Real debate is not making statements that you can't or won't back up.
You can't just make a blanket statement and say it's true because you said so.
Also in real debate you don't call people childish names.
You debate like a 5 year old, and I will treat you as such.


Duuuuh!

RichClem » 17 Dec 2013 6:42 pm » wrote:
Oh gosh, the troll is pretending I don't bring a tremendous number of excellent sources to the board, almost every one of which you ignore.

Trolls always go blind when confronted with reality.

RichClem » 17 Dec 2013 6:42 pm » wrote:
Oh gosh, the troll is pretending I don't bring a tremendous number of excellent sources to the board, almost every one of which you ignore.

Trolls always go blind when confronted with reality.

bingster » 17 Dec 2013 7:38 pm » wrote: I would be considered a "prolific" poster by most

and I think I've only seen one source from you.

Skeptic » 17 Dec 2013 7:22 pm » wrote: No need to pretend! On rare occasions, you present a reasonable source, but you've usually misunderstood it, when you do.

RichClem » 17 Dec 2013 6:42 pm » wrote: Oh gosh, the troll is pretending I don't bring a tremendous number of excellent sources to the board....

Misty » 18 Dec 2013 11:44 am » wrote: They must be invisible sources.

You still don't get how this works, do ya Kitten?
If you make a blanket statement, you need to be able to provide a source to prove it contemporaneously.
Saying that you have brought many sources to the board in the past doesn't cut it.
Everyone else here plays by those rules.
You have ruined any shred of credibility that you may have had by playing that silly game.

RichClem » 18 Dec 2013 12:11 pm » wrote:
I can't help you if you go blind every time I cite a source. Consult a physician.


Every reasonable member of the board sees my sources. Only lying trolls like you somehow manage not to.

Yet on 2nd thought, I recall many, many, many times you seeing and refusing to even consider them, on the stupid pretext that they're "opinion," even though you frequently cite opinion yourself.

So you're once again lying.

RichClem » 18 Dec 2013 12:11 pm » wrote: I can't help you if you go blind every time I cite a source. Consult a physician.


Every reasonable member of the board sees my sources. Only lying trolls like you somehow manage not to.

Yet on 2nd thought, I recall many, many, many times you seeing and refusing to even consider them, on the stupid pretext that they're "opinion," even though you frequently cite opinion yourself.

So you're once again lying.

RichClem » 18 Dec 2013 12:11 pm » wrote:
I can't help you if you go blind every time I cite a source. Consult a physician.


Every reasonable member of the board sees my sources. Only lying trolls like you somehow manage not to.

Yet on 2nd thought, I recall many, many, many times you seeing and refusing to even consider them, on the stupid pretext that they're "opinion," even though you frequently cite opinion yourself.

So you're once again lying.

Misty » 18 Dec 2013 8:17 pm » wrote:I knew it was just a matter of time.

Skeptic » 18 Dec 2013 8:19 pm » wrote: Yes he did.
Over at the old forum.

He accused me of stealing members from there (which I was not doing) and called me a moron.
So I deleted my Flying Monkeys thread.
And that was the excuse he used to demote me to a regular member, even though he had already PMed me a few days before that to tell me he was going to do it because people were complaining about me being a mod in both places.

Then he trashed me in a public thread.

I guess there is some kind of a rule that you can't be a Mod on more than one forum.

I stayed out of this whole forum war, and I never bad-mouthed him to anyone.
That's the thanks I get from my friend.

He's pretending to be all outraged over one stupid thread (even though thousands were lost the last time the forum went down).
He made a big show about how terrible I was for doing that.
Now he can feel justified in demoting me, and pretending he wasn't going to do it anyway.

I posted a screenshot of the PM in which he told me he was going to demote me BEFORE I deleted the thread.

(Chuck, if you're reading this, it was you who trashed me in public first. I never said one harsh word about you to anyone during this whole thing, until now.)

Brattle Street » 18 Dec 2013 12:17 pm » wrote: **** off stalker troll scum

Brattle Street » 18 Dec 2013 10:36 pm » wrote:whoa Misty,
was that before or after you whomped him and his buddy by revealing some behind the scene workings of the mud squad?

Misty » 18 Dec 2013 10:38 pm » wrote:
What are you talking about?
Who did I whomp, what did I supposedly reveal and what or who is the mud squad?

this is one of my posts that luzerfir deleted what I said and wrote this love letter to himself

now you know I wouldnt say this mushy crap

Brattle Street » 18 Dec 2013 10:45 pm » wrote: this post




Chuck doesn't seem to mind when his boys do that.

Misty » 18 Dec 2013 10:50 pm » wrote:
I posted that tonight after all this happened.
I guess it's okay to have senior Mods who change people's posts.
They don't get demoted for that. LOL

He was going to demote me because I am a Mod on this forum.
This is the PM he sent me 3 days before I deleted my thread.





Then he proceded to trash me in a public thread, so that's why I deleted it.