Liberal Forum

Phelix_Dacat » 25 Dec 2013 6:24 pm » wrote: Glad we have that cleared up, you racist bastard. Merry Christmas and may African Americans treat you and yours over the coming year just as well as you and yours have treated African Americans over the last several centuries.

Me and mine? It's my fault there was slavery?

Racist psychotic.

Slavery still exists in Africa. May you and yours be treated over the coming year just as well as you and yours have treated slaves of all races over the last several centuries.

Is there ever going to be a time when I click on my thread and Clem is NOT the last one to post in it?

Misty » 27 Dec 2013 11:29 am » wrote:Is there ever going to be a time when I click on my thread and Clem is NOT the last one to post in it?

he has to prove that he is a scumbag stalker, as if we didn't already know

Brattle Street » 27 Dec 2013 11:36 am » wrote: he has to prove that he is a scumbag stalker, as if we didn't already know

I think he proved that almost 6 years ago.

Speak of the devil.

I am posting this here, because I can't trust that anything I post at .org will stand as written, and I'm sure if I used a sock, it would be banned just like my regular account.
The guy from 'way down the holler' wants to be able to lie about me with impunity, and continues to lie about me, even up until today.
His lies are getting more and more outrageous.
I'm pretty much getting blamed for the death of .org.
He wants people to believe that I was involved in some kind of a sinister plot to destroy that forum, which apparently started in September 2012.

So, I went back to my site that we were using temporarily when .org was down, to read some of the threads concerning .org.
I wanted to look through the threads from around the time that the guy from 'way down the holler' said I was feverishly deleting threads over there in an effort to destroy the forum.
I saw nothing but concern for the forum, and hope that it would soon come back online.

He said that I was deleting threads in September, October and November.

As his 'proof' of that, he posted several screenshots like this:



Notice that he cut off the topic titles and the dates that the threads were deleted.
He will not show you the dates that the topics were deleted, because if he did it would show that they were deleted almost a year ago.
He also will not show you the topic titles, because if he did, you would see by the subjects of the threads that they were very old topics going back as far as 2004 and 2005.
Those were old unapproved threads, that had zero replies in them, and they were deleted with Chuck's full knowledge and permission.

His second piece of proof, was this:



Those were empty threads also from the time in October of this year when the forum was not completely down.
You could start threads, but not make posts, as you can see by the third topic from the bottom.
When the forum came back online it was filled with a bunch of empty threads.


I sent Chuck a PM about it, and this was his reply:





A few days later at PM Place, I told people to stop starting threads, because they were filling the forum with empty threads.
Here is that post.







So when the forum came back online on October 24, I cleaned up a bunch of those empty threads.
Notice he only showed part of that page, because if he showed the whole page, you would see that I was not the only Mod cleaning up those threads, and It wouldn't surprise me in the least, if his name wasn't there also.

Chuck's lies don't even make sense.
He wants you to believe that at the same time I was so concerned about cleaning up the forum, I was also trying to destroy it.

It doesn't pass the smell test.

He also said that he recruited the help of four others to restore over 11,000 posts that I deleted.
This is how one of those four, vouches for that lie, when someone said that he was only made a Senior Mod because the site lost so many of it's Mods.

RLF: Listen here Cunt, the reason I was made a senior mod is because I actually earned it by helping Chuck restore thousands of topics maliciously deleted by Misty when she was a Mod (that's the story I've been told. Whether or not it was her that did it IDK and IDC).

That's the story he's been told? ROFL

I am gobsmacked by what a prolific, though not very clever, liar the guy from 'way down the holler' is.
His lies are so easily disproven.
It's sad to see that he is still going around his little internet kingdom acting as if everyone believes him, and professing his honesty.

RichClem » 25 Dec 2013 9:40 am » wrote:
Name a name, psycho.

Which liberal on the board is able to debate and win on the basis of evidence and logic?

Rotsa ruck.

Glory Hole, if you mean "debate" the likes of you, goofy or nighthawk - or any other dishonest hacks, - the mere ATTEMPT at honest debate is a fail.

So which was it 11,350 'posts' or 11,350 'topics'?

That's the story I've been told.
Can't get over that one.

Shame on the guy from 'way up the holler' for trying to get that poor kid to lie for him.

From Facebook:

Oh, who cares? Move on for god sake.

Huey » 29 Dec 2013 4:20 pm » wrote:Oh, who cares? Move on for god sake.

Like the way you stalk me and whine when I refuse to respond to your nonsense.

Move on, for god's sake.

greatnpowerfuloz » 29 Dec 2013 4:33 pm » wrote:
Like the way you stalk me and whine when I refuse to respond to your nonsense.

Move on, for god's sake.

Are you mentally stable? I don't think you are. I don't stalk you honey. I start a thread and you post to it that is not stalking.

You have some serious mental problems honey. I suggest you utilize that great UK health system and get treatment.

Wasn't even posting to her and she call me a stalker. **** moron.

Huey » 29 Dec 2013 4:20 pm » wrote:Oh, who cares? Move on for god sake.

do you think anyone cares if you care? really, its a serious question... did you anticipate that someone would care whether you cared or not, and especially in the case of your not caring. did you think this through?

Huey » 29 Dec 2013 5:23 pm » wrote: Are you mentally stable? I don't think you are. I don't stalk you honey. I start a thread and you post to it that is not stalking.

You have some serious mental problems honey. I suggest you utilize that great UK health system and get treatment.

Wasn't even posting to her and she call me a stalker. **** moron.

Typical stalker response.

greatnpowerfuloz » 29 Dec 2013 6:59 pm » wrote:
Typical stalker response.

Let me get this straight. I make a comment to misty. Wasn't even talking to you. You weren't even in the conversation. Then you come along, quote my post, and claim I am stalking you?

Really? You are a sick women. If you really are a women.

Cannonpointer » 28 Dec 2013 9:13 pm » wrote: Glory Hole, if you mean "debate" the likes of you, goofy or nighthawk - or any other dishonest hacks, - the mere ATTEMPT at honest debate is a fail.

Oh look, the psychotic dodged the question.

Which liberal on the board is able to debate and win on the basis of evidence and logic?

RichClem » 30 Dec 2013 8:36 am » wrote:
Oh look, the psychotic dodged the question.

Which liberal on the board is able to debate and win on the basis of evidence and logic?

wonka wonka wonka? Wonka wonka.

Brattle Street » 29 Dec 2013 6:55 pm » wrote:
do you think anyone cares if you care? really, its a serious question... did you anticipate that someone would care whether you cared or not, and especially in the case of your not caring. did you think this through?

Don't really care.

RichClem » 30 Dec 2013 8:36 am » wrote: Which liberal on the board is able to debate and win on the basis of evidence and logic?

What is it that you would like to debate with us Kitten?
Whether or not we are moonbats?

Huey » 29 Dec 2013 4:20 pm » wrote:Oh, who cares? Move on for god sake.

I'll make this very simple for you.
If you don't care what I have to say, then GTFO of my thread.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:03 pm » wrote: I'll make this very simple for you.
If you don't care what I have to say, then GTFO of my thread.

Ooooh, scary......