Liberal Forum

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:08 pm » wrote: Ooooh, scary......

RichClem » 30 Dec 2013 4:15 pm » wrote:
Hey, be careful. She's so-o-o-o-o tough.....

That she'll tell ugly lies about you.

Then whine endlessly when you respond.

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:20 pm » wrote: She is still mad because I don't think we should have to subsidize her sex life.

RichClem » 30 Dec 2013 4:15 pm » wrote: Ooooh, scary......

People across the country got a look at what package delivery will look like if the Postal Service is privatized after both UPS and FedEx ruined Christmas by being unable to delivery holiday packages on time.
UPS admitted[/url] that some children would not receive their Christmas gifts on time because their system could not keep up with demand, "We understand the importance of your holiday shipments. However, the volume of air packages in our system exceeded the capacity of our network." A spokesperson for Fed Ex said, "We’re sorry that there could be delays and we’re contacting affected customers who have shipments available for pickup." Fed Ex’s solution was to make customers who paid for Christmas delivery go to their local Fed Ex store and pick up their packages on Christmas Day. If you didn’t have a local Fed Ex store, you were out of luck.
Things were so bad at Fed Ex that local depots were overwhelmed with packages to the point where they didn’t attempt to make deliveries. The AP confirmed that the delivery issues impacted Alabama, California, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:22 pm » wrote: Why don't you tell us how exactly you are subsidizing my sex life Zippy?

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:20 pm » wrote: She told me to GTFO. That is tough. Imagine if she said get the fück out.

She is still mad because I don't think we should have to subsidize her sex life.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:25 pm » wrote: Hey Puss? UPS and FedEx did a great job delivering all those Christmas packages, didn't they?
Tell us again how much better it would be if we privatize the USPS.

UPS and FedEx Ruin Christmas and Prove Republicans Wrong About Killing the Post Office

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:27 pm » wrote: By having to pay for contraceptives, maternity, and abortifacients when neither my wife can become pregnant nor can I impregnate someone. All so they can be free. Prior to this we did not pay for those services . Now I do. Do you agree with pricing model?

That's how.

RichClem » 30 Dec 2013 4:32 pm » wrote:
Hey, when the going gets tough, the tough....;

well, the tough give orders that no one will pay attention to!

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:32 pm » wrote: I bet people won't wait so long next year.

So it is your contention that the Usps Would have delivered those next air packages? Yeah, good luck with that.

Moral of the story. Regardless of the service used don't wait until the last minute.

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:34 pm » wrote: Ain't the the truth. I have issues with authority and being told what to do. That is why I despise progs so much. I guess I will stick around this thread for a while.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:33 pm » wrote: You said you are subsidizing, 'MY sex life'.
If you're paying for contraceptives for me, then you are wasting your money.
I doubt if I have any eggs that are not powdered at this point, and my husband has been snipped.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:36 pm » wrote: Thanks for the warning.
I would love to stay and hang with you, but I need to make dinner.

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:36 pm » wrote: So you enjoy subsidizing the sex life's of others.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:41 pm » wrote: Will you get over that uptight crap about sex already?
Sex is a normal and natural part of life and contraception should be considered a routine part of women's health care.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:41 pm » wrote: Will you get over that uptight crap about sex already?
Sex is a normal and natural part of life and contraception should be considered a routine part of women's health care.

How will I ever get the stench of you and Clem out of here?

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:36 pm » wrote:
So you enjoy subsidizing the sex life's of others. Well tell you what. You go ahead and do that and than start a push to this bullshît personal mandate repealed.

As I have said on other forums I don't give a fück who ya fück, or what. That is your problem. You just pay for it yourself.

Misty » 30 Dec 2013 4:22 pm » wrote: Why don't you tell us how exactly you are subsidizing my sex life Zippy?

Brattle Street » 30 Dec 2013 4:56 pm » wrote:
so that is your qualification? whether you ENJOY IT or not? it is irrelevant. do you enjoy paying for bullets or food for the hungry? equally irrelevant.

i think what you mean is somethings you object to subsidizing and others not. Your ancient morbid attempt to attach your complaint to some quality of sexual shame, not withstanding.

Huey » 30 Dec 2013 4:48 pm » wrote: Oh, shut the fück up with the reframing prog. I have no hang ups with sex. This is not about sex, moron. This is about people paying for the elective choices of others.

This is what these disengnous prog bastards do. They reframe an issue. I have no hang ups about sex. I can care less about who, what, where or when anyone fücks misty. That is each persons choice and I or the federal government should have no say in it. Got that? Understand it ?

Now that diversion is killed let's get to the heart of the matter. Like misty, my wife can no longer have children. I can't impregnate anyone. So we do not need those services. So we never chose those services so we did not pay for them. Now, because of the ACA I do have to carry them.

That is the issue, honey. Not hang ups about sex. You want to fück, that is an elective activity. You pay for it.