Liberal Forum

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 6:47 pm » wrote:



That's four posts in a row that you mentioned my name.
Obsessed much?

Now, it was four posts to correct your misinterpretations. Do I need to do it four more times?

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 6:48 pm » wrote: The bitch, the bitch, the bitch is back.
Elton John 1974

I have no problem misty, I just repost what was said to correct your comprehension errors and a few facts to support what I wrote. All is good. If you like just keep prattling on with gutter talk.

Or you can do the honest thing and say yes, you made a mistake. I am not interested about your whining, lying rants this evening. I will just repost what you do not have the integrity to post. And we know you don't quote crap. It is easier for you to make it up that way, but I have no issue reporting and reporting. Can we get a multi quote function?

Your call, as usual.

My call is I just ignore you.

I don't even know what the supposed mistake I made was.
You said the Republicans had the outline of a plan to reform health care, but they caved to the Dems before it got off the ground.
I contend that they never made any serious effort to reform health care.
I stand by that.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 6:49 pm » wrote: My call is I just ignore you.

Please do. That means you won't attribute comments and positions to me that I did not make.

Before you do could you acknowledge that I did not in fact claim or imply the democrats a used the filibuster? That in fact was simply commentiing that I found int fücking hilarious how McConnell and Reid switched their position on it?

I'd appreciate it,

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 6:49 pm » wrote: Now, it was four posts to correct your misinterpretations. Do I need to do it four more times?

You can do it 100 times but you'll be shouting into the wind, because I'm logging off now.
Knock yourself out.

I thought Golfboy was an annoying little ****, but you have him beat by a mile.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 6:58 pm » wrote: You can do it 100 times but you'll be shouting into the wind, because I'm logging off now.
Knock yourself out.

I thought Golfboy was an annoying little ****, but you have him beat by a mile.

You ain't got **** on golfboy when it comes to lying. You take the prize. And when you are blatantly caught, as you were on this thread, you huff, puff, and then runaway because you don't have the integrity to admit you were in error.


Don't dong the witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead.

Metaphorically of course in reference to her logging off.

Wow,she first says she was ignoring and then she says she was logging off.

Promises promises.

I notice that you used this posting to run from your factual errors.

Oh, and as advice, you should be real careful how you depict what was posted on the other forum. More an more of the old posts are returning.

Just sayin'....

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 6:33 pm » wrote:This is a repub plan based on the bush plan from 2009:

Gonna stop you with a fresh lie in your mouth.

There is no republican plan from 2009 - you are a liar.

A republican plan would be something the republicans intended to implement, not something they intended for stupid people to quote.

Stop lying now. Call it what it is: republican propoganda that only morons would pretend is a plan.

If it had been their PLAN, they would have impleneted it when they could instead of trotting it our when they couldn't. Now, quick - lie that it would have been filibstered. Hurry.

Lie. Do this now.

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 6:35 pm » wrote:And this discusses the plan misty claims does not exist:

It does not exist. Look for it in my post. Is it there?

No. Because it does not exist and never did. Throw shadows for children, son - they enjoy puppet shows. The bar is a little higher here.

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 6:33 pm » wrote:I don't know if I would support it. But that is not the argument. The argument is whether they had one or not.

And the answer is no - they did not have one. They PRETEDNED to have one.

Unless you are talking about Medicare Part D. Is that what your link led to - the ACTUAL REPUBLICAN PLAN FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM?

The repukes had six years, and they passed Medicare Part D - THEIR ACTUAL PLAN. The rest is carrot shaped vagina, son. Do you fancy carrot shaped vagina?

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 6:35 pm » wrote:And this discusses the plan misty claims does not exist:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... obamacare/

Now we are done with this maybe cannon pointer can return to our discussion.

She makes it too easy,

I never said that the Republican 'outline' you referred to did not exist.
What I said was that they made no serious attempt to reform health care.
An 'outline' and a bill are two very different things.
I noticed that Cannon said pretty much the same thing, yet you were almost sickeningly polite to him.
You never called him 'irritating' or accused him of having 'no integrity', or said he was engaging in 'whining, lying rants.'
You also never called him a 'witch', a 'bitch' and 'a lying sack of ****.'
Those remarks were reserved just for me.
I think you either don't have the balls to talk to CP like that, or you have serious issues with women, HONEY.

I find it ironic that you keep accusing me of gutter talk.
Garbage in garbage out.
You reap what you sow.

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 7:10 pm » wrote:Wow,she first says she was ignoring and then she says she was logging off.

Promises promises.

I notice that you used this posting to run from your factual errors.

Oh, and as advice, you should be real careful how you depict what was posted on the other forum. More an more of the old posts are returning.

Just sayin'....

not to muddy up your fresh stalker boots but, your insinuation about the evidence potential of something new that is yet to be revealed about files that are under the control of cluck is less than a non-starter. The minus factor being that you have NO idea what the **** you are talking about, AND, your motivation is laying in the street with its viscera exposed.

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 7:10 pm » wrote:Wow,she first says she was ignoring and then she says she was logging off.

That's right I was ignoring you, before I logged off.
My dog needed to go out, and I wanted to take a shower.
And now I'm back.
Is that too complicated for you to comprehend?

I notice that you used this posting to run from your factual errors.
Oh, and as advice, you should be real careful how you depict what was posted on the other forum. More an more of the old posts are returning.

Just sayin'....

WTF is that supposed to mean?
That almost sounds like some kind of a veiled threat.
What have I depicted differently here, than I did there?
My opinions have not changed from one forum to another.

I wouldn't trust a word that is printed there, as the guy from 'way up the holler' has told so many lies about me, It wouldn't surprise me in the least if he is changing my posts.

I don't know WTF you are talking about, and I doubt if you do either.
You are one crazy MoFo, maybe even crazier than Clem, if that's possible.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 8:19 pm » wrote: That's right I was ignoring you, before I logged off.
My dog needed to go out, and I wanted to take a shower.
And now I'm back.
Is that too complicated for you to comprehend?


WTF is that supposed to mean?
That almost sounds like some kind of a veiled threat.
What have I depicted differently here, than I did there?
My opinions have not changed from one forum to another.

I wouldn't trust a word that is printed there, as the guy from 'way up the holler' has told so many lies about me, It wouldn't surprise me in the least if he is changing my posts.

I don't know WTF you are talking about, and I doubt if you do either.
You are one crazy MoFo, maybe even crazier than Clem, if that's possible.

has huey taken official leave? otherwise we must conclude that he is running away or that he is ignoring you by a snub and a half.

Brattle Street » 02 Jan 2014 8:35 pm » wrote: has huey taken official leave?

If you mean of his senses, yes.
Maybe he went back to the other forum to consult with the lying piece of **** that runs that place.
Or maybe he is that lying POS.

Miind your own **** business Chuck.
Those are the same exact rules that you wrote at .org.
I have been using images that people posted on the other forum themselves for years and you never accused me of 'outing someone'.
I have never used an image that was obtained off the forum.
You even laughed at them yourself, even the ones with your own pic in them.
No personal info can be gleaned from the image I posted, and you know it.

Your forum is dying, yet you have nothing better to do than to come here, spy on me, and tattle on me like a 5 year old?
You wanna see a picture that is actually outing someone?



Nobody likes a **** rat.

Goooorgeous! You called it, babe.

I don't blame chuck for spending more time here than he spends over there (who doesn't?), but his continued stalking of you in particular is somehow clemmish.

It is clear that he intends to stick to his narrative about you deleting my threads, notwithstanding the timeline that we all know to have occurred.

Those threads were lost when david crashed his own forum to remove evidence of felonious conduct, in the wake of being suspended from the business of selling insurance. A google search of david rutstein yields much unsavory information.

Brattle Street » 02 Jan 2014 8:35 pm » wrote:
has huey taken official leave? otherwise we must conclude that he is running away or that he is ignoring you by a snub and a half.

She told me she was ignoring me and that she was logging off.

Brattle Street » 02 Jan 2014 8:16 pm » wrote:
not to muddy up your fresh stalker boots but, your insinuation about the evidence potential of something new that is yet to be revealed about files that are under the control of cluck is less than a non-starter. The minus factor being that you have NO idea what the **** you are talking about, AND, your motivation is laying in the street with its viscera exposed.

I didn't stalk her. She commented to me. Let's get the facts straight.

As far as the comment about what she posted at the other forum she blatantly lied something I posted to her.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 8:12 pm » wrote: I never said that the Republican 'outline' you referred to did not exist.
What I said was that they made no serious attempt to reform health care.
An 'outline' and a bill are two very different things.
I noticed that Cannon said pretty much the same thing, yet you were almost sickeningly polite to him.
You never called him 'irritating' or accused him of having 'no integrity', or said he was engaging in 'whining, lying rants.'
You also never called him a 'witch', a 'bitch' and 'a lying sack of ****.'
Those remarks were reserved just for me.
I think you either don't have the balls to talk to CP like that, or you have serious issues with women, HONEY.

I find it ironic that you keep accusing me of gutter talk.
Garbage in garbage out.
You reap what you sow.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 6:10 pm » wrote: Took the words right out of my mouth, or off my fingers as the case may be.
I'll wait with you.

Not only is Huey pretending that the Republicans ever even thought about proposing any health care reforms, he's also pretending that the Dems abused the filibuster in the same fashion as the Republicans do now.

That is what you said.