Liberal Forum

Huey » 03 Jan 2014 3:43 am » wrote:


That is what you said.

Let us not be efeminate, Huey.

She and I were CLEARLY speaking from the adult world - refering to republicans proposing something WHILE THEY WERE IN CHARGE - not some shallow pretense at an "outline" of a "plan" that they had no chance of passing since they were NOT IN CHARGE ANYMORE.

Act like a man, son.

Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2014 4:33 am » wrote:
Let us not be efeminate, Huey.

She and I were CLEARLY speaking from the adult world - refering to republicans proposing something WHILE THEY WERE IN CHARGE - not some shallow pretense at an "outline" of a "plan" that they had no chance of passing since they were NOT IN CHARGE ANYMORE.

Act like a man, son.

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 5:09 pm » wrote:
Actually, they had the outlines of a plan prior to Obama. Tax incentives and more market based. I have posted it before. But they caved to the dems.

ANd as I psoted to YOU last night, and probably lost in the her BS, I again say to you I am not arguing with you on that point.

This is what misty does. She reframes what a poster says, starts a cluster ****, and then the topic of discussion. I never said it was a serious proposal, I CLEARLY said it was an outline for a plan, correct? I never said the dems abused the filibuster, but that whacko continued to claim I did. Even after reposting what I said.

The question I have is she:

1. Purposely reframing it to create a cluster ****.

2. Really does not under stand the written word.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 4:45 pm » wrote: That's pretty rich coming from you considering how you've been dodging my questions in the last few pages of this thread, and for years before that.

Lying is not an expression of balls, ******.

Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2014 1:35 am » wrote:Goooorgeous! You called it, babe.

I don't blame chuck for spending more time here than he spends over there (who doesn't?), but his continued stalking of you in particular is somehow clemmish.

It is clear that he intends to stick to his narrative about you deleting my threads, notwithstanding the timeline that we all know to have occurred.

Those threads were lost when david crashed his own forum to remove evidence of felonious conduct, in the wake of being suspended from the business of selling insurance. A google search of david rutstein yields much unsavory information.

Right. Everyone knows that their threads were there when the forum crashed, and gone when it came back up, so unless I have some kind of magical powers that allowed me to delete threads while the forum was down, there is no way I could have done what he accuses me of.

Of course, after his doctored evidence failed, he now says that he can't prove that I did it, which of course is a bunch of **** because he has access to the logs that show every action that a moderator takes.
He has yet to show us any screenshots of the pages (with the dates and topic titles) where I deleted 'thousands' of threads in the late 2012.
If I did what he said I did, there should be many of them.

Neither the owner of the forum, nor his own Mods back up his story.

Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2014 4:33 am » wrote:Let us not be effeminate, Huey.

She and I were CLEARLY speaking from the adult world - referring to republicans proposing something WHILE THEY WERE IN CHARGE - not some shallow pretense at an "outline" of a "plan" that they had no chance of passing since they were NOT IN CHARGE ANYMORE.

Act like a man, son.

Much like Golfboy, Huey likes to engage in the semantics game.
He knows exactly what we were saying, and he knows we're right, so he'll just nitpick about the wording.
Typical troll tactic.

Huey » 01 Jan 2014 9:28 am » wrote:

It has to do with what you posted. Exactly what problem do you have with it? Honey, you are the poster who stated discussing the intelligence of modern man, aren't you?

Apparently you have some serious issue with the inferior men that, dating back to John Locke and Montesquieu not to mention people like Jefferson, Madison, Mason, and even Hamilton.

They were oh so inferior, right Ozzie? That why you fled the country?

Being dead puts them into the inferior category when discussing modern issues.

Huey » 03 Jan 2014 5:31 am » wrote: The question I have is she:

1. Purposely reframing it to create a cluster ****.

2. Really does not under stand the written word.

I understood those words.
This thread is my own personal cluster **** Zippy.
If you don't enjoy a good cluster ****, then maybe you should stay out of here.

RichClem » 03 Jan 2014 8:00 am » wrote:


Lying is not an expression of balls, ******.

**** off you slimy **** troll that encourages that women be raped by packs of dogs.
and tell that stupid little worm that emails you your instructions every morning that we recognize that YOUR failure is HIS failure. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAA…. and we are laughing at his amateur bumbling

RichClem » 03 Jan 2014 8:00 am » wrote:

Lying is not an expression of balls, ******.

******?
Are you trying to get fresh with me Kitten?

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 6:58 pm » wrote: You can do it 100 times but you'll be shouting into the wind, because I'm logging off now.
Knock yourself out.

I thought Golfboy was an annoying little ****, but you have him beat by a mile.

Huey is equal parts RichClem stupidity and Golfboy's naggy, whiny, hair splitting, goal post moving annoyance.

greatnpowerfuloz » 03 Jan 2014 1:52 pm » wrote:
Huey is equal parts RichClem stupidity and Golfboy's naggy, whiny, hair splitting, goal post moving annoyance.

Cool.

greatnpowerfuloz » 03 Jan 2014 1:52 pm » wrote:
Huey is equal parts RichClem stupidity and Golfboy's naggy, whiny, hair splitting, goal post moving annoyance.

some day, I would love to see him pull his weak cowardly "honey" routine with my wife. She would replace his eyeball with his testicle before any anesthetic hit his blood stream

greatnpowerfuloz » 03 Jan 2014 1:52 pm » wrote: Huey is equal parts RichClem stupidity and Golfboy's naggy, whiny, hair splitting, goal post moving annoyance.

You have him down perfectly.
He must be their love child.

I feel an image coming on..........

Brattle Street » 03 Jan 2014 2:01 pm » wrote: some day, I would love to see him pull his weak cowardly "honey" routine with my wife. She would replace his eyeball with his testicle before any anesthetic hit his blood stream

Have you noticed how condescending he is to women?
What's up with that?

Huey » 03 Jan 2014 1:59 pm » wrote: Cool.

Yeah....that's very cool.

Misty » 03 Jan 2014 2:08 pm » wrote: Have you noticed how condescending he is to women?
What's up with that?

it comes from weakness. When one lacks self confidence, especially to a debilitating degree, one feels compelled to go outside of the self in search of a means of validating their self. So they choose targets that they assume as being less capable. This is standard 'bully' mentality.

greatnpowerfuloz » 03 Jan 2014 1:52 pm » wrote:Huey is equal parts RichClem stupidity and Golfboy's naggy, whiny, hair splitting, goal post moving annoyance.

Well then, we should call him Gallows 420.

Misty » 02 Jan 2014 4:32 pm » wrote: When exactly did you START posting civilly Huey, because I must have missed it.
You have more times than I can count called me ignorant, mentioned me having sex with a variety of barnyard animals, and spoken to me in a very misogynistic and condescending tone, HONEY.

Yeah, he dishes the HONEY out to me too. The pretense that his gender gives him a leg up when I'm kicking his sorry *** from thread to thread, is mildly humorous. The fact that he assumes I'm intimidated by the pretense is **** hilarious.

Huey » 02 Jan 2014 4:39 pm » wrote: Missed? You fücking replied to it honey.

Since you want to play Sybil and go from civil poster to a bitchy poster I will use any fücking tone I chose with you.

PS. Now you are a lying sack of ****. I did not mention you having sex with barn yard animals, hoodie momma. I will go dig up the thread and post it here

They are right. This chick is a bitch.

Ooh, the big man puts his foot down.

"They" are Clem Kadiddlehopper and Goofy. You're in good company.

greatnpowerfuloz » 03 Jan 2014 2:34 pm » wrote:
Ooh, the big man puts his foot down.

"They" are Clem Kadiddlehopper and Goofy. You're in good company.

Cool.

I thought moderators were supposed to be the adults?