Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 233 234 235 236 237 1,190
User avatar
Nobody
10 Jan 2014 8:04 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Crickets.
User avatar
Nobody
10 Jan 2014 8:27 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Hmmmm......
Christie said he was blind-sided by this whole thing. He said at his press conference, "I knew nothing about this."

According to the WSJ Christie called Governor Cuomo of New York in December to ask him to back off the GW Bridge story.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo this week to complain about a Cuomo appointee's handling of a growing controversy over traffic pattern changes on the George Washington Bridge, a person familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Christie, a Republican, complained in a private phone call to Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, that Patrick Foye, the executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, was pressing too hard to get to the bottom of why the number of toll lanes onto the bridge from...

Governors Spoke Privately About Bridge Controversy -
Chris Christie Complained to Andrew Cuomo That His Appointee Was Pressing Too Hard for Answers

User avatar
Brattle Street
10 Jan 2014 9:23 pm
User avatar
  
180 posts
Skeptic » 09 Jan 2014 5:02 pm » wrote:
Please don't summarize your entire history here in one post!
he is just mad because his credibility has been fed into the wood chipper. Kids act out when that kind of thing happens. You would think that there weren't already enough sand-box threads…. by the nightstalker alone.
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 8:29 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 10 Jan 2014 8:04 pm » wrote:Crickets.
Your usual response to anything about the horrific Obama Economy. :loco:

Five years of failure, and you're dead silent about it.
92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE...

1,500 people camp out for chance to apply for job...
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/24415110/m ... union-jobs

'For Every One Job Added, Nearly 5 People Left the Workforce'
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ses ... 74106.html

MSNBC: 'Awful,' 'Very bad,' 'Ugly'...
http://freebeacon.com/msnbc-december-jo ... -bad-ugly/
User avatar
Brattle Street
11 Jan 2014 9:02 am
User avatar
  
180 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 8:29 am » wrote:
Your usual response to anything about the horrific Obama Economy. :loco:

Five years of failure, and you're dead silent about it.
is that my spittle running down you troll boss's face? HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA… what a weakling
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 12:27 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 8:29 am » wrote:Your usual response to anything about the horrific Obama Economy. :loco:
(Little Miss Marxist) other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?
Rachel Maddow.
WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 12:34 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 12:27 pm » wrote:WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?
Where did you tell this lie?

The link is gone, so you can safely deny it. :)
(Little Miss Marxist) Not only is (RichClem) hopelessly stupid, he's hopelessly dishonest.

Hey, that's believable. :rofl:
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 12:44 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 12:27 pm » wrote: WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?
.

Let me help you out here. Here's yet another of countless great sources I've cited about the horrific Obama Economy.

Which you always ignore, until the time comes I make a claim based on these sources, without actually citing them.

At which point you lie that I "don't cite sources." :\

So this time, keep your eyes open! :rofl:
The Latest Jobs Miss
The fifth year of the Obama recovery brings more dispiriting news.

....The Labor Department says the U.S. produced only 74,000 net new jobs in the month, while the jobless rate fell to 6.7% from 7% mainly because some 347,000 Americans left the labor force....

There isn't much else good to say about the report. Average hourly earnings rose a paltry two cents to $24.17, or a mere 1.8% for the year. Average hours worked in a week fell a tic to 34.4. Even with inflation low, this suggests that real median income may have declined for all of 2013. In the fifth year of an expansion, this is dreadful underperformance.

Another sign of the weak recovery is the failure of the employment-population ratio to rebound. This is a favorite of labor economists because it signals how well the economy is luring Americans into the labor market. The bad news is that the ratio remained at 58.6% in December, barely above its post-recession low of 58.2% in July 2011 and well below the 59.4% in June 2009 when the recession ended.

Image


This is more revealing than any single month's jobless figures because it underscores the danger that the U.S. may be close to having what the Europeans have long called their "structural" unemployment problem. As the nearby chart shows, the employment ratio fell off a cliff in 2008 and hasn't been able to climb more than a little of the way back. This reflects the overall lack of job creation and helps to explain why the larger jobless rate, which includes "discouraged" workers who have left the workforce, remains a dispiriting 13.1%.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... oveLEFTTop
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 1:56 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 12:44 pm » wrote: Let me help you out here. Here's yet another of countless great sources I've cited about the horrific Obama Economy.
You didn't answer my question.

WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?

Hey Clem, David R. is trying to get in touch with you on Facebook.
He probably wants you to come back to .org.
You should go.
User avatar
Skeptic
11 Jan 2014 2:30 pm
User avatar
 
27 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 1:56 pm » wrote:
You didn't answer my question.

WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?

Hey Clem, David R. is trying to get in touch with you on Facebook.
He probably wants you to come back to .org.
You should go.
Maybe clem can save David's forum!

Naaaaaaaah! He didn't help it before; he can't now. Nobody wants clem around.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 2:55 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Skeptic » 11 Jan 2014 2:30 pm » wrote: Maybe clem can save David's forum!

Naaaaaaaah! He didn't help it before; he can't now. Nobody wants clem around.
Now now Skeptic, you know he made that forum. LOL

Image
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 3:08 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 2:55 pm » wrote:Now now Skeptic, you know he made that forum. LOL
Hey, great job at ignoring my source showing Obama's horrific performance on the economy. :\
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 3:25 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 3:08 pm » wrote: Hey, great job at ignoring my source showing Obama's horrific performance on the economy. :\
Great job at ignoring my question.
(Little Miss Marxist) other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?
Rachel Maddow.
WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?

You're stuck on stupid Kitten.
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 4:19 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 3:25 pm » wrote: Great job at ignoring my question.
Oh gosh, should I worry about a question that literally cannot be answered, because the records are gone?

Or should you comment on what is the #1 or #2 issue for all Americans, the horrific Obama Economy?

The "head ballbreaker" will avoid the most important issue and bleat forever about chump change. :loco:
User avatar
Skeptic
11 Jan 2014 5:21 pm
User avatar
 
27 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 4:19 pm » wrote:
Oh gosh, should I worry about a question that literally cannot be answered, because the records are gone?

Or should you comment on what is the #1 or #2 issue for all Americans, the horrific Obama Economy?

The "head ballbreaker" will avoid the most important issue and bleat forever about chump change. :loco:
Aren't you worried about poor, poor David R?

What's he to do without his favorite troll?

Go back - do your best to save the board that you 'made.'
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 5:35 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 4:19 pm » wrote: Oh gosh, should I worry about a question that literally cannot be answered, because the records are gone?
Just because the records are gone, that doesn't mean you can just make **** up, put it in a quote box and attribute it to me.
(Little Miss Marxist) other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?
Rachel Maddow.
1. I would never say that Lou Dobbs isn't a hack.
2. I would never say that Keith Olbermann occasionally isn't a hack.
3. I know how to spell Keith Olbermann.
4. I would never word a sentence so clumsily.

I never wrote that ****.
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 6:16 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 5:35 pm » wrote:1. I would never say that Lou Dobbs isn't a hack.
2. I would never say that Keith Olbermann occasionally isn't a hack.
3. I know how to spell Keith Olbermann.
4. I would never word a sentence so clumsily.

I never wrote that ****.
And you'd never lie! :rofl:
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 6:20 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 6:16 pm » wrote: And you'd never lie! :rofl:
Projection is a defense mechanism that involves taking our own unacceptable qualities or feelings and ascribing them to other people.
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jan 2014 6:23 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2014 6:20 pm » wrote: I'm not a liar.
Oh, so the following is true?
(Little Miss Marxist) I guess they prefer to penetrate a woman's vagina without her consent.
Kind of like you.
Liar.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2014 6:24 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 6:23 pm » wrote: Oh, so the following is true?
Liar.
Hyperbole is the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech.
I have no idea what you prefer to do with a woman's vagina.
Although I do know that you once said that a 'lack of consent' does not mean rape.
1 233 234 235 236 237 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 3876 users online :: 15 registered, 14 bots, and 3847 guests
Bots: Pinterest, DuckDuckGo, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, CriteoBot, proximic, TTD-Content, Applebot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot
Updated 5 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search