New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo this week to complain about a Cuomo appointee's handling of a growing controversy over traffic pattern changes on the George Washington Bridge, a person familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Christie, a Republican, complained in a private phone call to Mr. Cuomo, a Democrat, that Patrick Foye, the executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, was pressing too hard to get to the bottom of why the number of toll lanes onto the bridge from...
Governors Spoke Privately About Bridge Controversy -
Chris Christie Complained to Andrew Cuomo That His Appointee Was Pressing Too Hard for Answers
he is just mad because his credibility has been fed into the wood chipper. Kids act out when that kind of thing happens. You would think that there weren't already enough sand-box threads…. by the nightstalker alone.Skeptic » 09 Jan 2014 5:02 pm » wrote:
Please don't summarize your entire history here in one post!
Your usual response to anything about the horrific Obama Economy.Misty » 10 Jan 2014 8:04 pm » wrote:Crickets.
92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE...
1,500 people camp out for chance to apply for job...
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/24415110/m ... union-jobs
'For Every One Job Added, Nearly 5 People Left the Workforce'
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ses ... 74106.html
MSNBC: 'Awful,' 'Very bad,' 'Ugly'...
http://freebeacon.com/msnbc-december-jo ... -bad-ugly/
is that my spittle running down you troll boss's face? HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA… what a weaklingRichClem » 11 Jan 2014 8:29 am » wrote:
Your usual response to anything about the horrific Obama Economy.![]()
Five years of failure, and you're dead silent about it.
RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 8:29 am » wrote:Your usual response to anything about the horrific Obama Economy.![]()
WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?(Little Miss Marxist) other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?
Rachel Maddow.
Where did you tell this lie?Misty » 11 Jan 2014 12:27 pm » wrote:WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?
(Little Miss Marxist) Not only is (RichClem) hopelessly stupid, he's hopelessly dishonest.
.Misty » 11 Jan 2014 12:27 pm » wrote: WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?
The Latest Jobs Miss
The fifth year of the Obama recovery brings more dispiriting news.
....The Labor Department says the U.S. produced only 74,000 net new jobs in the month, while the jobless rate fell to 6.7% from 7% mainly because some 347,000 Americans left the labor force....
There isn't much else good to say about the report. Average hourly earnings rose a paltry two cents to $24.17, or a mere 1.8% for the year. Average hours worked in a week fell a tic to 34.4. Even with inflation low, this suggests that real median income may have declined for all of 2013. In the fifth year of an expansion, this is dreadful underperformance.
Another sign of the weak recovery is the failure of the employment-population ratio to rebound. This is a favorite of labor economists because it signals how well the economy is luring Americans into the labor market. The bad news is that the ratio remained at 58.6% in December, barely above its post-recession low of 58.2% in July 2011 and well below the 59.4% in June 2009 when the recession ended.
This is more revealing than any single month's jobless figures because it underscores the danger that the U.S. may be close to having what the Europeans have long called their "structural" unemployment problem. As the nearby chart shows, the employment ratio fell off a cliff in 2008 and hasn't been able to climb more than a little of the way back. This reflects the overall lack of job creation and helps to explain why the larger jobless rate, which includes "discouraged" workers who have left the workforce, remains a dispiriting 13.1%.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... oveLEFTTop
You didn't answer my question.RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 12:44 pm » wrote: Let me help you out here. Here's yet another of countless great sources I've cited about the horrific Obama Economy.
Maybe clem can save David's forum!Misty » 11 Jan 2014 1:56 pm » wrote:
You didn't answer my question.
WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?
Hey Clem, David R. is trying to get in touch with you on Facebook.
He probably wants you to come back to .org.
You should go.
Now now Skeptic, you know he made that forum. LOLSkeptic » 11 Jan 2014 2:30 pm » wrote: Maybe clem can save David's forum!
Naaaaaaaah! He didn't help it before; he can't now. Nobody wants clem around.
Hey, great job at ignoring my source showing Obama's horrific performance on the economy.Misty » 11 Jan 2014 2:55 pm » wrote:Now now Skeptic, you know he made that forum. LOL
Great job at ignoring my question.RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 3:08 pm » wrote: Hey, great job at ignoring my source showing Obama's horrific performance on the economy.
WHEN AND WHERE DID I SAY THAT?(Little Miss Marxist) other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?
Rachel Maddow.
Oh gosh, should I worry about a question that literally cannot be answered, because the records are gone?Misty » 11 Jan 2014 3:25 pm » wrote: Great job at ignoring my question.
Aren't you worried about poor, poor David R?RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 4:19 pm » wrote:
Oh gosh, should I worry about a question that literally cannot be answered, because the records are gone?
Or should you comment on what is the #1 or #2 issue for all Americans, the horrific Obama Economy?
The "head ballbreaker" will avoid the most important issue and bleat forever about chump change.
Just because the records are gone, that doesn't mean you can just make **** up, put it in a quote box and attribute it to me.RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 4:19 pm » wrote: Oh gosh, should I worry about a question that literally cannot be answered, because the records are gone?
1. I would never say that Lou Dobbs isn't a hack.(Little Miss Marxist) other than Lou Dobbs and occasionally Kieth Olbermen who in the news media isn't a hack?
Rachel Maddow.
And you'd never lie!Misty » 11 Jan 2014 5:35 pm » wrote:1. I would never say that Lou Dobbs isn't a hack.
2. I would never say that Keith Olbermann occasionally isn't a hack.
3. I know how to spell Keith Olbermann.
4. I would never word a sentence so clumsily.
I never wrote that ****.
Projection is a defense mechanism that involves taking our own unacceptable qualities or feelings and ascribing them to other people.RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 6:16 pm » wrote: And you'd never lie!
Oh, so the following is true?Misty » 11 Jan 2014 6:20 pm » wrote: I'm not a liar.
Liar.(Little Miss Marxist) I guess they prefer to penetrate a woman's vagina without her consent.
Kind of like you.
Hyperbole is the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech.RichClem » 11 Jan 2014 6:23 pm » wrote: Oh, so the following is true?
Liar.