Liberal Forum

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 12:19 pm » wrote: Even as a journalist, he's a GOP operative and a professional liar.

Very sad how trolls melt down into a puddle of lies and bulls***.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:20 pm » wrote:
I've quoted your exact words for literally years, troll.

shove it up your *** you self-admitted rape endorser

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:20 pm » wrote: I've quoted your exact words for literally years, troll.

It's your words that I'm calling into question Jackhole.
"a real life, actual rapist"

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:21 pm » wrote: Very sad how trolls melt down into a puddle of lies and bulls***.

Google 'John Fund lies'. They are all very well documented.

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 12:23 pm » wrote:It's your words that I'm calling into question Jackhole.

"a real life, actual rapist"

Who cares?

You're a psychopatic liar.

Tell everyone again how there was no evidence in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence that Schippers and staff collected; how I had to prove there was evidence in those sealed boxes.

That's how shamelessly dishonest you are.

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 12:25 pm » wrote:Google 'John Fund lies'. They are all very well documented.

Yeah, there are lots of liberal-left Disinformation websites. So?

I've read his columns for many years and can't even recall a single mistake, let alone a lie.

F*** off, liar.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:28 pm » wrote:
Yeah, there are lots of liberal-left Disinformation websites. So?

I've read his columns for many years and can't even recall a single mistake, let alone a lie.

F*** off, liar.

shove it up your *** you self-admitted rape endorser


your credibility is ZERO.... you are a paid troll

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 12:25 pm » wrote: Google 'John Fund lies'. They are all very well documented.

Media Mutters? Daily Kos? Those hacks and psychotics?

Is that what you call "very well documented?"

Imbecile.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:27 pm » wrote: Who cares?
You're a psychopatic liar.
Tell everyone again how there was no evidence in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence that Schippers and staff collected; how I had to prove there was evidence in those sealed boxes.
That's how shamelessly dishonest you are.

The only things that you have proven is that you're a demented circus freak, and a right wing partisan hack.
The only arrow you have left in your quiver is to play the liar card.

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 12:32 pm » wrote: The only things that you have proven is that you're a demented circus freak, and a right wing partisan hack.
The only arrow you have left in your quiver is to play the liar card.

"All I have left?" That's the same blatant lie you've told for months if not years. I have roughly 40 threads filled with sources, evidence and logic.

But I don't waste much time with liars like yourself, because no matter what reality is, you simply stonewall and lie.

You're so dishonest, you wouldn't even admit that there was evidence in those sealed boxes of evidence.

So f*** off.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:40 pm » wrote:
"All I have left?" That's the same blatant lie you've told for months if not years. I have roughly 40 threads filled with sources, evidence and logic.

But I don't waste much time with liars like yourself, because no matter what reality is, you simply stonewall and lie.

You're so dishonest, you wouldn't even admit that there was evidence in those sealed boxes of evidence.

So f*** off.

blah bla blah….. get your dogs out and find someone that deserves to be raped…ok?
scumtroll

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:31 pm » wrote: Media Mutters? Daily Kos? Those hacks and psychotics?
Is that what you call "very well documented?"
Imbecile.

No. I'm talking about things like a video of Barney Frank describing how Fund made up a story about how he and Chuck Schumer were going to be introducing legislation for "universal voter registration."
It was a myth and a total lie, and of course it was picked up by the likes of The Washingtom Moonie Times, Glenn Beck and Rush (the drug addled gasbag) Limbaugh.
Fund later admitted that he was 'in error' but never retracted the story. That's how the right operates.

Here's a piece from Forbes, not Media Matters, on John Fund's dishonesty about voter fraud.
I'm sure you'll dismiss that too, as you dismiss anything that comes from someone on the left, which is ironic considering the amount of phony info that comes from the right, which you seem to swallow without any hesitation.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:40 pm » wrote:I have roughly 40 threads filled with sources, evidence and logic.

The only evidence in your threads is evidence of your partisan hackery and your mental illness.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 12:40 pm » wrote:You're so dishonest, you wouldn't even admit that there was evidence in those sealed boxes of evidence.
So f*** off.

How the **** did you see any evidence that's in 'sealed' boxes?
Do you have x-ray vision?

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 1:10 pm » wrote: The only evidence in your threads is evidence of your partisan hackery and your mental illness.

Hey, that's believable.

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 1:11 pm » wrote: How the **** did you see any evidence that's in 'sealed' boxes?
Do you have x-ray vision?

You actually expect anyone to fall for that?

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 1:08 pm » wrote: No. I'm talking about things like a video of Barney Frank describing how Fund made up a story about how he and Chuck Schumer were going to be introducing legislation for "universal voter registration."
It was a myth and a total lie

Since when is Bawney Fwank considered the word of God?

And who says it wasn't an honest mistake, a mis-communication or a set up by Fwank to undermine Fund?

and of course it was picked up by the likes of The Washingtom Moonie Times, Glenn Beck and Rush (the drug addled gasbag) Limbaugh.
Fund later admitted that he was 'in error' but never retracted the story. That's how the right operates.

Oh wow, one possible mistake over a career that has spanned decades. So on that basis, you call him a "professional liar?" From the troll who has told every Democrat Talking Point Lie that's ever been written?

F*** off, troll.

Misty » 18 Feb 2014 1:08 pm » wrote:Here's a piece from Forbes, not Media Matters, on John Fund's dishonesty about voter fraud.
I'm sure you'll dismiss that too, as you dismiss anything that comes from someone on the left, which is ironic considering the amount of phony info that comes from the right, which you seem to swallow without any hesitation.

Here's the self-description of the author.

I am a Senior Political Contributor at Forbes and the official 'token lefty

So a leftist disagrees with Fund. So?

His poor judgment makes Fund a "professional liar?"

Imbecile.

RichClem » 18 Feb 2014 1:26 pm » wrote:
Here's the self-description of the author.


So a leftist disagrees with Fund. So?

His poor judgment makes Fund a "professional liar?"

Imbecile.

another impeccable source for clemscum….. unless it shows what a partisan toady his is…..
ZERO credibility

Brattle Street » 18 Feb 2014 1:31 pm » wrote: another impeccable source for clemscum….. unless it shows what a partisan toady his is…..
ZERO credibility

He's not having a good week.