Liberal Forum

deezer shoove » 24 Apr 2014 10:32 pm » wrote:You can try to box me in with the other enemies you perceive (righties). Waste your time for all I care.
I proposed the bet based on your shoving an assumed "plot" about Anne Ramsey Clinton running for prez down someone's throat. Also your saying she hasn't even 'declared' as though the other poster was crazy for thinking that. Now you got this stuff you're trying to flail ME with... Granny Piano legs, and Chelsea. As if I care. I am just saying it is a foregone conclusion that she IS running and you seemed to deny that. Stay focused. Beat the other assholes with their ****. Beat me with mine.

Misty » 25 Apr 2014 5:24 pm » wrote: I did not deny that she is running, in fact I'm almost positive she will.
What I said was that she hasn't declared YET.
My point, which I guess was over your head, is that it's ridiculous to say that Chelsea only got pregnant to benefit her mother.
Anyway, can you explain how being a Grandmother would help her campaign?
If that's the case Romney would be president right now since he had a **** of grandkids when he ran.

Misty » 25 Apr 2014 5:27 pm » wrote:Rachel Maddow points out

golfboy » 25 Apr 2014 6:48 pm » wrote:How would "grandma" Clinton be helped? By it softening her image as an ambassador killing troll. Isn't that obvious, even to you lefties?

golfboy » 25 Apr 2014 6:52 pm » wrote: bWWWHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

Evidently Bundy's black bodyguard isn't buying into the leftwing hype.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-talks-to ... t-for-him/

Army vet Jason Bullock told CNN based on all the time he’s spent with Bundy he can’t believe the man is a racist.

Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2014 12:21 am » wrote: Bridge Gate, mother ****. GET THAT FAT BASTARD'S COCK OUT OF YOUR MOUTH!

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

Misty » 25 Apr 2014 5:24 pm » wrote: I did not deny that she is running, in fact I'm almost positive she will.
What I said was that she hasn't declared YET.
My point, which I guess was over your head, is that it's ridiculous to say that Chelsea only got pregnant to benefit her mother.
Anyway, can you explain how being a Grandmother would help her campaign?
If that's the case Romney would be president right now since he had a **** of grandkids when he ran.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

deezer shoove » 25 Apr 2014 10:36 pm » wrote: Bold admission. That's all I was interested in.

The rest is off track for me.

Across the west, the BLM and U.S. Forest Service manage 13.3 million AUMs (Animal Unit Months) on 250 million acres of public land.
One month of grazing one cow/calf combination or five sheep (the definition of an AUM) costs $1.35—a fee that’s substantially below the present-day cost of $16-$20 per month to graze livestock on private land (BLM evidence of this disparity is noted here.)
The direct loss to taxpayers, according to Wild Earth Guardians’ interpretation of GAO data, is huge: at least $123 million a year. Indirect but related costs push the total to as much as $1 billion, all to produce less than 3% of the nation’s beef supply.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/vickeryeckh ... ld-horses/

Misty » 27 Apr 2014 2:06 pm » wrote: Admission? ROFL What admission?
My post had nothing to do with whether or not Hillary will run.
It was all about the far right wing nuts who see a hidden conspiracy in everything that happens, even a pregnancy.
The only thing off track is your brain.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

deezer shoove » 27 Apr 2014 8:16 pm » wrote: Re-read the thread.

Misty » 19 Apr 2014 7:19 pm » wrote:Here come the Chelsea Clinton Truthers.

Chelsea Clinton announced that she is with child, and just like clockwork the right wing flying monkeys are saying that the pregnancy was timed to help her mother's presidential campaign.
Never mind that the election is not until 2016, and Hillary has not even declared that she is running, and never mind that Chelsea got married in 2010, and it would not be at all unusual for someone who has been married for three years to want to start a family, and never mind that Chelsea said in an interview last year, that she and her husband were planning to start a family this year.

It must be some kind of a plot.

And So It Begins: 'Chelsea's Pregnancy Was A Forced Hillary Campaign Ploy'

deezer shoove » 27 Apr 2014 8:16 pm » wrote: I'm done.

Misty » 28 Apr 2014 12:12 pm » wrote: It was about the far right wing nuts who think that Chelsea deliberately got pregnant to help her mother...

golfboy » 28 Apr 2014 12:24 pm » wrote: Does that include the leftwing nuts that immediately came out saying this would help Hillary?

golfboy » 28 Apr 2014 12:24 pm » wrote: Does that include the leftwing nuts that immediately came out saying this would help Hillary?

Tea party PACs reap money for midterms, but spend little on candidates.

A Washington Post analysis found that some of the top national tea party groups engaged in this year’s midterm elections have put just a tiny fraction of their money directly into boosting the candidates they’ve endorsed.

The practice is not unusual in the freewheeling world of big-money political groups, but it runs counter to the ethos of the tea party movement, which sprouted five years ago amid anger on the right over wasteful government spending. And it contrasts with the urgent appeals tea party groups have made to their base of small donors, many of whom repeatedly contribute after being promised that their money will help elect conservative politicians.

Out of the $37.5 million spent so far by the PACs of six major tea party organizations, less than $7 million has been devoted to directly helping candidates, according to the analysis, which was based on campaign finance data provided by the Sunlight Foundation.

The dearth of election spending has left many favored tea party candidates exposed before a series of pivotal GOP primaries next month in North Carolina, Nebraska, Idaho and Kentucky.

Roughly half of the money — nearly $18 million — has gone to pay for fundraising and direct mail, largely provided by Washington-area firms. Meanwhile, tea party leaders and their family members have been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in consulting fees, while their groups have doled out large sums for airfare, a retirement plan and even interior decorating.

The lavish spending underscores how the protest movement has gone professional, with national groups transforming themselves into multimillion-dollar organizations run by activists collecting six-figure salaries.

Three well-known groups — the Tea Party Patriots, the Tea Party Express and the Madison Project — have spent 5 percent or less of their money directly on election-related activity during this election cycle. Two other prominent tea party groups, the Senate Conservatives Fund and FreedomWorks, have devoted about 40 percent of their money to direct candidate support such as ads and yard signs.

Misty » 29 Apr 2014 6:33 pm » wrote: Who said that? And did they say that Chelsea only got pregnant to help her mother's chances?
And how does being a grandparent help someone win an election anyway?
Romney was a grandfather many times over and it sure didn't help him did it?

golfboy » 29 Apr 2014 6:51 pm » wrote: Start here: http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/04/ ... y-clinton/
Then here: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... st-to-ask/

And no, it didn't help Romney that he was a grandparent, in fact the left attacked Romney's family.
Including his black grandson.

golfboy » 29 Apr 2014 6:51 pm » wrote: Start here: http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/04/ ... y-clinton/
Then here: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... st-to-ask/

And no, it didn't help Romney that he was a grandparent, in fact the left attacked Romney's family.
Including his black grandson.

Misty » 29 Apr 2014 7:09 pm » wrote: A former ambassador to Spain saying it will soften her, and one comedian making a stupid joke hardly constitutes 'the left.'