Yes, you should handle every gun as if it were loaded, and if this jackass had been required to take some kind of a gun safety course before he was able to purchase a firearm, perhaps his nephew would still be alive and he would not be headed to prison.According to State Police, Olm, who lives in Wild Acres, was showing his gun collection to his son and 11-year-old nephew, Hunter Pederson.
Investigators said, while showing the guns off, Olm pointed his Glock 27 pistol at at his nephew's forehead and pulled the trigger.
The gun fired and hit Pedersen just over his right eye. The boy died on scene.
"You should handle every gun with a manner that it is loaded," Lieutenant Christopher Paris, with the Pennsylvania State Police, said. "That's any safe firearms protocol. This is a terrible tragedy."
Man Shoots, Kills 11-Year-Old Nephew
Same tactic used by Golfboy in this thread.Cannonpointer » 03 May 2014 12:39 am » wrote: Tell that to your partisan posts. You're all, "Oh yeah? THIS!" and, "Oh yeah? THAT!" And when she drops the hammer, you're all, "This ain't my ares of expertise."![]()
Bet your bottom dollar if it was a Lib who made the death threats he would care...a lot.golfboy » 06 May 2014 4:28 pm » wrote:I couldn't care less if some idiots makes a death threat against someone. Hopefully whoever did that will be found and prosecuted.
I'm not responsible for other people's actions.
Lol. I have seen him criticize a lib for a barely discernible critique of a parent, in a thread begun by a conjob for the specific purpose of dragging the parent through the mud. I called him on it - he just remained gooey.Misty » 06 May 2014 5:27 pm » wrote:
Same tactic used by Golfboy in this thread.
Unable to criticize one of his own for making death threats, he does everything he can to avoid the subject and finally says:
Bet your bottom dollar if it was a Lib who made the death threats he would care...a lot.
Don't single out the conservative hacks numnuts.....Cannonpointer » 03 May 2014 12:39 am » wrote: Tell that to your partisan posts. You're all, "Oh yeah? THIS!" and, "Oh yeah? THAT!" And when she drops the hammer, you're all, "This ain't my ares of expertise."![]()
Gowdy said on MSNBC today that fellow Republicans should not fundraise off of the Benghazi attacks, stating: "Yes, and I will cite myself as an example. I have never sought to raise a single penny on the backs of four murdered Americans."
Like their counterparts in the media, the main Republican Party campaign apparatuses are actively fundraising off of Benghazi.
The Republican National Committee has a donation page asking Republicans to demand "the truth about Benghazi" by contributing money.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee asks Republicans to "donate today" because of Benghazi.
And the National Republican Congressional Committee has a fundraising page stating: "You're now a Benghazi Watchdog. Let's go after Obama & Hillary Clinton. Help us fight them now."
The page features an image of President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with the text, "Benghazi Was A Coverup. Demand Answers."
Here are five recent examples of conservative pundits raising money off their Benghazi witch hunt:
Fox News Host Mike Huckabee
Fox News Contributor John Bolton
Fox News Contributor Allen West
Accuracy In Media
American Center For Law And Justice / Jay Sekulow
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/05/07 ... ion/199199
Sorry, pal, but there are people on this board with 15 different standards - a standard for every occasion. And you're giving me ****, for only having two?Southern indep » 07 May 2014 8:52 pm » wrote: Don't single out the conservative hacks numnuts.....
When 97% of all the liberals here are partisan hacks as well...
You are getting pretty bad yourself
What we have here ...is a failure to think
What a bunch of vultures repukes are - also, they have illicit sex in men's rooms.Misty » 08 May 2014 1:10 pm » wrote:Probably one of the more disgusting things I've seen in politics in a long time.
Even though the man tapped to be chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), has said that his fellow Republicans should not be fundraising on Benghazi and that he himself has never sought to raise a single penny on the backs of four murdered Americans, it seems that his fellow Republicans are not listening.
Both the National Republican Congressional Committee and various right wing media figures are routinely invoking Benghazi to ask followers for money.
I had a friend whose father was an FBI agent. One day he took us aside and talked to us about firearms safety. He put the above in the best language I think it can be put. He saidMisty » 05 May 2014 8:02 pm » wrote:Today my four year old grandson told me that a boy near where he lived was shot and killed by a relative, and I thought he was just making up a story.
Unfortunately it was true. This happened in the community that he lives in and it could very well have been one of my grandkids.
This asshole pointed a Glock 27 pistol (which he was sure was not loaded) at his nephew's forehead and pulled the trigger.
Seems any idiot can own a gun in this country, and if it were up to the NRA, every idiot would.
Yes, you should handle every gun as if it were loaded, and if this jackass had been required to take some kind of a gun safety course before he was able to purchase a firearm, perhaps his nephew would still be alive and he would not be headed to prison.
Cannonpointer » 08 May 2014 2:10 pm » wrote: Sorry, pal, but there are people on this board with 15 different standards - a standard for every occasion. And you're giving me ****, for only having two?
Well, I don't expect you to read every thread I post in, but I DO expect you to have a general idea that I have called out the left in PLENTY of threads on this board. I won't bother with a full tally, but the Treyvon issue and the Bundy issue alone sort of dampen any pretense that I'm a purely partisan poster, son. Then there was me calling out both the left AND the right over the Sterling ****, for participating in an electronic lynching and the vile gotcha politics of personal destruction. Perhaps it is a jaundiced eye which thinks it spies the yellow in me?Southern indep » 08 May 2014 5:53 pm » wrote:
I just expect better from you.....
Southern indep » 08 May 2014 5:53 pm » wrote:
I just expect better from you.....
It looks to me like I will not meet your expectations merely by living up to your stated standard - I would have to conform to your politics. Sorry, but I really DO see 3,000 dead on home soil as more important than 4 dead on foreign soil - especially when the 4 dead were combatants in dirty wars, not innocent citizens just going to work. And I really DO see a pretense otherwise as hypocritical and partisan.Cannonpointer » 09 May 2014 3:22 am » wrote:
Freest to do WHAT? Freest within what parameters?
You're freer in France to start a small business - less paper work and less hassle. You're freer in any nation but MAYBE Cuba and North Korea from the prying eyes of government.
We have more people in prison, both per capita AND in raw numbers, than any nation on earth. How can we then be said to be the "freest nation in the world?"
That's just a marketing slogan - and a mostly debunked one, at that, - until you modify it with some definitions. Freest how? Please don't say we have freedom of religion. Rastas cannot take communion in the accustomed fashion of their faith. Neither can Navajos use Peyote or the northwestern tribes use Amanitas Muscaria. Even cancer patients cannot have good and true medicine - they are forced to used artificial medicines which enrich the corporatocracy.
Please, tell me any other lie: The check is in the mail, I'm the best you've ever had, size doesn't matter - but DON'T tell me we are the freest nation on earth. It's just a **** lie - a marketing slogan that almost no one on this planet buys anymore.
I will vouch for you on that. You are not a partisan hack. I have seen you part ways with the left on several issues.Cannonpointer » 09 May 2014 4:47 am » wrote: Well, I don't expect you to read every thread I post in, but I DO expect you to have a general idea that I have called out the left in PLENTY of threads on this board. I won't bother with a full tally, but the Treyvon issue and the Bundy issue alone sort of dampen any pretense that I'm a purely partisan poster, son.
I wonder if Ben Sasse believes that all religions should be exempt from following the law if it conflicts with their religious beliefs, or just his religion, you know the Christy one.Nebraska Senate Nominee Says Religious Beliefs Can Justify Breaking Any Law
“Our right to the free exercise of religion is co-equal to our right to life,” according to the campaign website of Ben Sasse, a Nebraska Republican who won his party’s nomination to the United States Senate on Tuesday.
The question of when religious belief exempts believers from following the law is at the forefront of our national debate right now, with the Supreme Court poised to decide whether religious business owners can refuse to offer birth control coverage as part of their employer-provided health plans, even when doing so would violate federal law. Yet, even the plaintiffs before the Supreme Court acknowledge that religious liberty is not an absolute right to violate any law at any time. As the crafting chain Hobby Lobby says in its brief to the justices, the government may limit religious believers actions when it uses“‘the least restrictive means of furthering’ a ‘compelling governmental interest.’” This is the standard set by federal law, although there is some uncertainty about how the justices will interpret this legal standard in its Hobby Lobby decision.
Sasse, however, apparently believes that this law does not go far enough, even if the Court gives Hobby Lobby everything it is asking for. His proposed rule — that government cannot require someone to act counter to their religious beliefs “under any circumstances” — would mean that literally any law could be ignored by someone who held a religious belief counter to that law. According to National Geographic, for example, “[h]undreds, if not thousands, of women are murdered by their families each year in the name of family ‘honor,’” and while this practice “goes across cultures and across religions,” some of the perpetrators of honor killings are motivated by their religious faith. Under Sasse’s formulation of religious liberty, a person who killed his own sister because he believed he was under a religious obligation to do so would be immune from prosecution for murder.
Similarly, religious beliefs have been used to justify discrimination against racial minorities, women, and LGBT Americans at different points in American history.
In an opinion upholding Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage, a state judge wrote that “Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages.
The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.” Former Mississippi Gov. Ross Barnett offered a similar view in 1960, claiming that “the good Lord was the original segregationist.” The conservative Bob Jones University drew a similar connection between religion and racism to justify excluding African Americans entirely until the early 1970s, and then to justify a ban on interracial dating and marriage among its students.
ThinkProgress contacted the Sasse campaign to offer them an opportunity to clarify whether the candidate truly believes that any practice, including “stoning adulterers or putting to death those who work on the Sabbath” should be allowed if it is justified by a religious belief. As of this writing, we have not received a response.
Lying comes so easily to these teabaggers.The Truth About Rand Paul’s Deceitful Pro-Gun Fundraising Letter (Images)
In a fund-raising letter from Senator Rand Paul — on the outside of the envelope, to be precise — President Obama is brazenly misquoted. See that “quote” in the lower right-hand corner of the envelope?
Yeah, that’s pretty scary. Except he never said that. The first part of this quote was taken from his speech concerning the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. But the part in the brackets is pure fantasy. The President never said that. Here is what he DID say:
“In the coming weeks, I’ll use whatever power this office holds to engage my fellow citizens, from law enforcement, to mental health professionals, to parents and educators, in an effort aimed at preventing more tragedies like this, because what choice do we have? We can’t accept events like this as routine.”
Sounds a little different when it’s correctly quoted, doesn’t it? But the real quote doesn’t cut it with the gun-nut crowd. Especially not
The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), an organization that makes the NRA look mild by comparison. Its founder, Dudley Brown, is adept at lying.
But that’s not the only weird thing about this fund-raising appeal. See the return address? A Post Office box in Fredericksburg, Virginia. Rand Paul is a Senator from Kentucky. What’s the deal? It seems that PO box is the address for… Saber Communications (aha!). Michael Rothfield’s company. The same guy who is on the NAGR Board of Directors. You don’t have to be an Einstein to figure this one out.
Will this come back to bite Rand Paul in his Teabagging ***? We shall see. But, until we find out, we can at least smack him (and Saber Communications) down for misquoting the President just to scare stupid gun owners. Hopefully, the gun owners who aren’t this dumb will remember this cynical attempt to frighten them.



He's a lying prick. just like Grandpa Bush : Read my lips. NO NEW TAXES!Misty » 05 Jun 2014 7:39 pm » wrote:Not only have politicians done a 180 on the release of Bowe Bergdahl, but ordinary folks too.
Internet comedian and contributor/producer at @MajorityFM, Matt Binder showed how many conservatives on Twitter blamed Obama for not bringing home the last American P.O.W. in Afghanistan.
Then the president brought him home and they did a complete 180.
He actually dug up their Tweets, before and after.
Here are a few examples:
There are many, many, many more.
https://twitter.com/MattBinder
Just goes to show you that some people will fault this President no matter what he does.
He can't win.
A bunch of things come to mind but the one thing I most wonder, is how to deal with the fears and confusion of a child now associating guns with the death of kids just like himself...and caused by people who's actions a kid would never question....Misty » 05 May 2014 8:02 pm » wrote:Today my four year old grandson told me that a boy near where he lived was shot and killed by a relative, and I thought he was just making up a story.
Unfortunately it was true. This happened in the community that he lives in and it could very well have been one of my grandkids.
This asshole pointed a Glock 27 pistol (which he was sure was not loaded) at his nephew's forehead and pulled the trigger.
Seems any idiot can own a gun in this country, and if it were up to the NRA, every idiot would.
Yes, you should handle every gun as if it were loaded, and if this jackass had been required to take some kind of a gun safety course before he was able to purchase a firearm, perhaps his nephew would still be alive and he would not be headed to prison.
Every time the DOJ talks about domestic terrorism, the right gets their bloomers all in a twist.Armed ‘Sovereign Citizen’ Terrorist Nabbed in Courthouse Takeover Attempt
Authorities shot and killed a heavily armed self-proclaimed “sovereign citizen” outside of a Georgia courthouse, in yet another display of how America is going utterly insane.
Earlier this week, the DOJ released a report that announced they would be re-establishing a committee devoted to investigating domestic terrorism and the political right went nuts.
Early this morning, the political right proved why the committee is necessary.
The so-called “sovereign citizen” arrived at the Georgian courthouse in Forsyth County Administrative building armed with an assault rifle, a bulletproof vest, zip-ties, smoke grenades, and, according to authorities, an intent to take hostages.
Forsyth Sheriff Duane Piper told the media that the shooter, Dennis Marx, “came here with the purpose of occupying the courthouse.” The shooter deployed stop sticks to prevent other vehicles from getting closer and then opened fire with his assault rifle. He was met outside of the courtyard by a deputy who distracted the terrorist and then shoot him through the windshield, killing him.
Amen.Witnesses estimate 50 gunshots were fired, meaning the money the NRA spent blocking legislation that would limit magazine capacity was well-spent.