Liberal Forum

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 12:32 pm » wrote: Yea, that's kind of the way things work in our world. Do you advocate grabbing people off the street to stop them because they might rob a bank?

If you really think that jackholes like the guys in that picture are helping the cause of gun rights activists, then you're as stupid as they are.
They are only alienating people with their antics.

Misty » 18 Jun 2014 12:41 pm » wrote: If you really think that jackholes like the guys in that picture are helping the cause of gun rights activists, then you're as stupid as they are.
They are only alienating people with their antics.

That wasn't your question.

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 12:38 pm » wrote: See the times on those headlines? Where is the rest of the day?

Don't ask me, ask Drudge. He posted it. Those are all of the headlines he posted for Monday.
http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/dsp/links_recap.htm

You seem to be denying the fact that Drudge NEVER lead with the story of the arrest of a suspect in the Benghazi attack.
So can you show me the headline that said that Ahmed Abu Khatallah was captured?

For a year and half he lead with story after story (or non-story) on Benghazi, and when an arrest is made, he doesn't lead with that? ROFL

Misty » 18 Jun 2014 12:45 pm » wrote:
Don't ask me, ask Drudge. He posted it. Those are all the headlines for Monday.

You seem to be denying the fact that Drudge NEVER lead with the story of the arrest of a suspect in the Benghazi attack.
So can you show me the headline that said that Ahmed Abu Khatallah was captured?

For a year and half he lead with story after story (or non-story) on Benghazi, and when an arrest is made, he doesn't lead with that? ROFL

I am denying your claim because your claim is a lie.
I already showed you the link: *19:18:36 USA captures Benghazi suspect in secret raid...
It goes to the Washington Post because that's what ALL of the links on his site do, they go to other news sources.

The current headline: TODD TURNS: OBAMA 'OVER'takes you to the Washington Examiner.

There are 3 of them that were headlined on Tuesday in the post above, highlighted in red. Sorry for the formatting, for some reason, the site didn't take my parsing of the headlines.

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 12:45 pm » wrote: That wasn't your question.

You never answered my question.
How do you tell if these guys are gun rights activists or criminals coming in to rob the place?

If you're eating in a restauarant and this jackhole walks in, how do you know he's not there to rob the place?



The answer is you don't, but according to you, we should just sit there and wonder and hope that they aren't there to commit a robbery.
I was in a supermarket one day and two guys with rifles walked in and guess what? They robbed the place.
So forgive me if I don't have as much faith as you that these are probably not criminals.

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 12:38 pm » wrote:But a correction on my part... it was Tuesdays headline, not Monday.

Right and I was talking about Monday's headlines.
Ahmed Abu Khattala was captured on Sunday and Drudge waits until Tuesday to post it? LOL

Misty » 18 Jun 2014 1:04 pm » wrote:
Right and I was talking about Monday's headlines.
Ahmed Abu Khattala was captured on Sunday and Drudge waits until Tuesday to post it? LOL

So, why are you showing TUESDAY'S Drudge headline, instead of Monday's?

Misty » 18 Jun 2014 12:20 pm » wrote:After a year and a half of wall to wall headlines about Benghazi.........


What is the headline on the Sludge Report when Ahmed Abu Khatallah is captured?



His source for that story?

Misty » 18 Jun 2014 12:58 pm » wrote: You never answered my question.
How do you tell if these guys are gun rights activists or criminals coming in to rob the place?

If you're eating in a restauarant and this jackhole walks in, how do you know he's not there to rob the place?



The answer is you don't, but according to you, we should just sit there and wonder and hope that they aren't there to commit a robbery.
I was in a supermarket one day and two guys with rifles walked in and guess what? They robbed the place.
So forgive me if I don't have as much faith as you that these are probably not criminals.

I did answer your question. You don't know anything about ANYONE, ANYWHERE until they act.
Just like you don't know if someone in the lobby of your bank is a there to commit a robbery.

Do you think we should profile people now? I thought you liberals were against that.

Washington Post reported this story on Tuesday at 8:30 pm
The NY times not time stamped, but hit their website on Tuesday.
Fox News: Tuesday at 4:24 am.
NY Post Tuesday 11:42 am.
CNN: 10:10 PM EDT, Tue June 17, 2014

Did ANYONE report this story on Monday? Not that I can find, how about you?
Not sure how they COULD have reported it Monday, when according to these stories, the Administration didn't announce it until Tuesday.

Dick Cheney creates yet another job for his failure of a daughter Liz.
During the Bush administration he got her a job in the State Dept. overseeing Middle East policy, a job which I'm sure she was eminently qualified for.

Dick and Liz Cheney have now founded a new nonprofit, the Alliance for a Strong America.
Nevermind that their last group, Keep America Safe, which questioned the loyalty of Justice Department lawyers who worked in the past on behalf of detained terrorism suspects, was a total failure and roundly criticized even by Republicans.

Liz Cheney's primary challenge against incumbent Republican Senator Mike Enzi also went bust.

Cheneys Shock With Lack Of Self Awareness-Video

The Cheneys failed to secure all the domain names with the name of their new non-profit in them.
If you go to Alliance-For-A-Strong-America.com you get a webpage devoted to Dick Cheney's failures.

LOL

http://allianceforastrongamerica.com/

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 4:12 pm » wrote: I did answer your question. You don't know anything about ANYONE, ANYWHERE until they act.

So, IOW we just have to sit there like sitting ducks until the shooting starts, just because you gun rights jackholes want to be free to carry your big penises guns around.
There is no reason at all that people need to carry guns like that into restaurants.

Misty » 19 Jun 2014 2:28 pm » wrote: So, IOW we just have to sit there like sitting ducks until the shooting starts, just because you gun rights jackholes want to be free to carry your big penises guns around.
There is no reason at all that people need to carry guns like that into restaurants.

Yes. That's exactly what you have to do.
Unless of course you want to reimpose profiling.

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 4:25 pm » wrote:Washington Post reported this story on Tuesday at 8:30 pm
The NY times not time stamped, but hit their website on Tuesday.
Fox News: Tuesday at 4:24 am.
NY Post Tuesday 11:42 am.
CNN: 10:10 PM EDT, Tue June 17, 2014

Did ANYONE report this story on Monday? Not that I can find, how about you?
Not sure how they COULD have reported it Monday, when according to these stories, the Administration didn't announce it until Tuesday.

So, nothing from Misty about how she's holding Drudge to a different standard than the Lame Stream Media.

Obama Derangement Syndrome - The acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the statements -- nay -- the very existence of Barack Obama.

From the first few pages of No Holds Barred.

Obama Putting Publc Health At Risk.
Obama incompetence: The final proof!
Obama is Responsible for THIS Happening in Iraq
Will Obama repeat his Iraq mistakes in Afghanistan?
Øbama Does His Best Bogie...
Soon Obama Will Mandate We Give Up Our Underwear- UNDERWEAR CRISIS!
Does Øbama Have a Firm Handshake?
More Obamacare fallout
Even MSNBC admits Obama's presidency is over! LOL
This Is Pretty Sad....Nice Going Obama!
Obama Knew About The Border Kids In January!
So Obama Is Sending Troops Back into Iraq? Imagine that.
How Will Øbama Pay For Iraq?
Why Isn't Obama Bombing The ISIS?
GOP Rep Says There’s ‘Probably’ Enough Votes To Impeach Obama
Nixon’s vs. Obama’s Corruption: a ratio of 58,400 times worse
War Monger Øbama Starts Negotiations...

golfboy » 19 Jun 2014 4:07 pm » wrote: So, nothing from Misty about how she's holding Drudge to a different standard than the Lame Stream Media.

Matt Sludge is a hack who gets it wrong more often than he gets it right.
Many of the news stories he has authored himself have been proven to be untrue.
I remember being on Lucianne Goldberg's website once, and she had a rule that no one was allowed to post any original stories from Sludge.

Here you will find some examples of...............Drudge still smearing, distorting quotes, and touting fake allegations.

golfboy » 19 Jun 2014 4:06 pm » wrote: Yes. That's exactly what you have to do.
Unless of course you want to reimpose profiling.

What I want is for guns not to allowed in restaurants at all, especially the type of guns carried by those two jackholes.
If I'm paying for a meal, I want to be able to eat it without wondering if some clown is going to start shooting up the place.
I will not eat in a restaurant that allows idiots like that to carry their big penis substitutes guns into it.
And from the looks of it, more people seem to agree with me than with you, since these jackholes have been told by more than one restaurant that they can't bring their guns in.

I guess courtrooms shouldn't ban people from carrying guns in cuz that would be "profiling".

So.....'buffer zones' are permissible around circuses, churches, and funeral services (and of course the Supreme Court), and you can have 'free speech pens' around political conventions, but women who are seeking their right to a legal medical procedure, are now allowed to be harassed up close by a bunch of so-called 'pro-life' bullies.

For Chief Justice John Roberts to call these zealots 'peaceful sidewalk counselors' is ludicrous.
I guess he forgot that the reason that the Massachusetts law was passed in the first place was because two clinic workers were shot and killed by a gunman peaceful sidewalk counselor at abortion clinics in Brookline in 1994.

The Justices Don't Like Buffer Zones, Unless It's A Buffer Zone Around The Supreme Court

golfboy » 18 Jun 2014 12:23 pm » wrote: This is a simple question, with a simple answer. Their actions determine if they are a good guy, or bad guy.

golfboy » 19 Jun 2014 4:06 pm » wrote: Yes. That's exactly what you have to do.
Unless of course you want to reimpose profiling.

danobivins » 25 Jun 2014 7:08 pm » wrote:I guess courtrooms shouldn't ban people from carrying guns in cuz that would be "profiling".

What about the Capitol Building? Why aren't people allowed to bring guns in there?
If, according to Golfboy, I have no other choice but to sit in a restaurant and wonder if I'm going to get shot any minute, why doesn't that also apply to members of Congress?

Misty » 28 Jun 2014 2:16 pm » wrote:What about the Capitol Building? Why aren't people allowed to bring guns in there?
If, according to Golfboy, I have no other choice but to sit in a restaurant and wonder if I'm going to get shot any minute, why doesn't that also apply to members of Congress?

Congress always exempts itself from the rest of America.