Liberal Forum

Misty » 21 Oct 2014 7:50 pm » wrote: They are talking about the character assassination of other posters on the forum, not public figures, Kitten.
You win first prize on that one.

Stunning. You're the one doing the whining.

Accurately pointing out that you're a liar of psychotic proportion is not character assassination, troll.

Your endless lies about conservative public figures is.

So quit whining about the way I treat you.


Tough s***.

RichClem » 21 Oct 2014 7:56 pm » wrote: Gosh, are they the one that regurgitate every Democrat Talking Point Lie that's ever been written, and refuse to the most obvious of lies, no matter what the circumstances?

Are they the ones that stonewall and evade every important question and point that doesn't fit those talking points?

Yes, you're a troll.

That troll thing really struck a nerve with you, huh Pumpkin? LOL

Once again, you are seeming a little incoherent.
What do you mean by the phrase 'and refuse to the most obvious of lies?'
I'm a little bit worried about you Puss.
You have been making a lot of statements like that lately that don't make much sense.

Misty » 21 Oct 2014 8:04 pm » wrote: That troll thing really struck a nerve with you, huh Pumpkin? LOL

See that little laughing guy? That's how I reacted to your bulls***.

Once again, you are seeming a little incoherent.
What do you mean by the phrase 'and refuse to the most obvious of lies?'
I'm a little bit worried about you Puss.
You have been making a lot of statements like that lately that don't make much sense.

Oh gosh, you couldn't possibly have figured out that I left out the word "admit" could you?

Troll.

Misty » 21 Oct 2014 7:50 pm » wrote:They are talking about the character assassination of other posters on the forum, not public figures, Kitten.
You win first prize on that one.

Uh, help me with this. Is it character assassination to call someone a "Nazi?"


Is it character assassination to lie that someone "doesn't care about rape?"

This is not going well for you, is it.

Misty » 21 Oct 2014 7:29 pm » wrote:We seem to have a few of these here:

Internet TROLLS, also known as paid “forum posters”, “internet bloggers,” or if we call them what they really are, SHILLS, are employees that answered a work at home job ad on craigslist or some other venue.

2 – DEMANDING IMPOSSIBLE PROOF
Disinformation shills will “demand proof” then ignore it when it’s presented, or continue to demand impossible proofs.
Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, they will deem the material irrelevant and demand unattainable proof that is virtually impossible for the opponent to retrieve; for the purpose of detracting focus from the mounds of legitimate data available.

Wow, what a coincidence. That's exactly how you act regarding voter fraud!

I give you the names of two entire books filled with examples of voter fraud, several threads filled with examples, and all you do is bleat,"There's no evidence! There's no evidence!"

Hey, this troll stuff if fun. Thanks!

RichClem » 21 Oct 2014 8:09 pm » wrote:Oh gosh, you couldn't possibly have figured out that I left out the word "admit" could you?
Troll.

You have been leaving a lot of words out of your posts lately or using words that don't make any sense.
I'm worried about you Kitten. It might be the onset of senility.

RichClem » 21 Oct 2014 8:24 pm » wrote: Uh, help me with this. Is it character assassination to call someone a "Nazi?"
Is it character assassination to lie that someone "doesn't care about rape?"
This is not going well for you, is it.

You of course just ignore the fact that you are the one who started the character assassination almost from the first day I posted at LF.org.
Did you really just expect me to sit back and take your abuse without fighting back?
Would you like a little reminder of some of the things you have said to me and about me?
Here is just a small sample:

I despise you....dishonest partisan hack, Missy Poo, shrieking hysteric and deceitful Clinton toady, coward, fawning, groveling toady and partisan liar, shrieking hysteric Missy Poo, dishonest, Hard Left, fawning toady Missy Poo, deceitful propaganda artist, dishonest coward, Hard Left shrieker, hysteric Missy Poo, complete and utter hack, deceitful partisan toady, Left wing twit, Hard Left hysteric and Clinton toady Missy Poo, comically stupid, freaking loon, liar, deceitful hack, wackjob, shrieking hysterical loon, foolish fringe left wackjob, resident hysteric Missy Poo, fawning brainless toady, fawning, groveling Clinton toady, despicable, deceitful, fawning toady, fawning, groveling toady, deceitful partisan hack, fawning partisan toady, dishonest Hard Leftist, deceitful Hard Left hack, shrieking hysteric, lying twit, deceitful partisan toady, despicable partisan hack and a liar, paranoid wackjob Left Winger, propagandist, deceitful troll, deceitful propaganda artist, dishonest partisan, freaking liar, fawning Obama toady, lying troll, heap of trash, brainless twit, one-sided Propaganda from a Hard Left wackjob, Left wing wack job, dumb as a post, I don't like you. I don't like your ideas, foolish fringe left wackjob, Silly twit, deceitful partisan hack, freaking cement head, needs a brain transplant, very, very low character, Take a freaking valium, you twit, Get stuffed, you silly twit. Stupid, ignorant twit.Shameless harlot! stupid, dissembling troll. I don't like your wackjob Hard Left philosophy. I don't like your ugly lies.
I don't like you.

You deserve everything I have ever said about you and more.
And if someone truly cares about rape, they don't make jokes about it.

RichClem - Feb 27 2009, 04:05 PM
Hee, hee, hee, sure, I wish I was the one who first wished you'd be raped by wild dogs. How imaginative.

Misty » 22 Oct 2014 7:39 pm » wrote: You of course just ignore the fact that you are the one who started the character assassination almost from the first day I posted at LF.org.

No, not almost. I was reasonably patient to determine what your character is.


When it became clear you are shamelessly dishonest, I called you that.


Stop lying, and I'll stop calling you a liar.

But you obviously can't. It's crystal clear that you're a literal psychopath.

Misty » 22 Oct 2014 7:39 pm » wrote:You deserve everything I have ever said about you and more.
And if someone truly cares about rape, they don't make jokes about it.

Oh wow, a troll dictate. How impressive.

If someone truly cares about rape, would they tell a decade of lies on behalf of an actual, real life rapist, as you have?

Stunning that you'd bleat in fake outrage about one single joke I picked up on, but be perfectly comfortable lying for a rapist.

RichClem » 22 Oct 2014 10:03 pm » wrote: No, not almost. I was reasonably patient to determine what your character is.

When it became clear you are shamelessly dishonest, I called you that.

Stop lying, and I'll stop calling you a liar.

But you obviously can't. It's crystal clear that you're a literal psychopath.

hey dicknose…. you are a scumbag liar as proven many many times on this forum.

ANYONE that hopes that someone else get raped by a pack of wild dogs does NOT get to make a call on who is a psychopath.

RichClem » 22 Oct 2014 10:03 pm » wrote:No, not almost. I was reasonably patient to determine what your character is.
When it became clear you are shamelessly dishonest, I called you that.
Stop lying, and I'll stop calling you a liar.
But you obviously can't. It's crystal clear that you're a literal psychopath.

Do you have any idea how crazy you actually sound?
Your idea of a liar is anyone who disagrees with you.
You throw the word around so much it has lost any meaning when you use it.
You see a post from me, and you automatically type the word liar without any thought behind it.
It's almost like a reflex or a conditioned response much like one of Pavlov's dogs.
It matters not if it's an opinion I'm stating, a sarcastic remark, a bit of hyperbole or even a joke.
They're all lies to you.
You will never stop calling me a liar unless or until I stop posting here.
Of course, you never seem to offer any proof that anything I have said is untrue, other than your own assertions.
I guess you don't even realize that you have little to no credibility.

Reasonably patient my ***.
You don't know what the word reasonable means.

Misty » 22 Oct 2014 10:15 pm » wrote: Do you have any idea how crazy you actually sound?
Your idea of a liar is anyone who disagrees with you.

Oh geez, this is tiresome. Here's one crystal clear example of your dishonesty.

You can't even admit there's evidence in the boxes of evidence that Schippers and House Impeachment Managers collected for weeks.

How freaking hopelessly dishonest is that?

RichClem » 22 Oct 2014 10:24 pm » wrote:You can't even admit there's evidence in the boxes of evidence that Schippers and House Impeachment Managers collected for weeks.

Really screwed that post up, didn't we Pumpkin?
I'm telling you, your posts are becoming more and more incoherent and just plain **** up.
I suspect the onset of senility.
Have you seen your doctor?
You get free healthcare with your SSI, don't you?

RichClem » 22 Oct 2014 10:24 pm » wrote: Oh geez, this is tiresome. Here's one crystal clear example of your dishonesty.

You can't even admit there's evidence in the boxes of evidence that Schippers and House Impeachment Managers collected for weeks.

How freaking hopelessly dishonest is that?

claiming that you are human is a lie

who else should be raped by a pack of wild dogs, clemmy… do you have an official list?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
yeah, people take you seriously… HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHA

Misty » 22 Oct 2014 10:28 pm » wrote: Really screwed that post up, didn't we Pumpkin?
I'm telling you, your posts are becoming more and more incoherent and just plain **** up.
I suspect the onset of senility.
Have you seen your doctor?
You get free healthcare with your SSI, don't you?

Hey, great job at ignoring my point and bleating stupidly about some software glitch.

If you're not a psychopath, you certainly do a great impression of one.

You can't even admit there's evidence in the boxes of evidence that Schippers and House Impeachment Managers collected for weeks.

There, are you going to admit the obvious truth?

No? Never thought you would.

RichClem » 22 Oct 2014 10:37 pm » wrote: Hey, great job at ignoring my point and bleating stupidly about some software glitch.

If you're not a psychopath, you certainly do a great impression of one.

You can't even admit there's evidence in the boxes of evidence that Schippers and House Impeachment Managers collected for weeks.

There, are you going to admit the obvious truth?

No? Never thought you would.

claiming that you are human is a lie
who else should be raped by a pack of wild dogs, clemmy… do you have an official list?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

yeah, people take you seriously

…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHA

RichClem » 22 Oct 2014 10:37 pm » wrote: Hey, great job at ignoring my point and bleating stupidly about some software glitch.

That's not a software glitch Pumpkin.
I'm afraid the only glitch is in your brain.

Misty » 22 Oct 2014 10:58 pm » wrote: That's not a software glitch Pumpkin.
I'm afraid the only glitch is in your brain.

If you're not a psychopath, you certainly do a great impression of one.

You can't even admit there's evidence in the boxes of evidence that Schippers and House Impeachment Managers collected for weeks.

There, are you going to admit the obvious truth?

No? Never thought you would.

Joni Ernst, the Republican state senator who is running for the U.S. Senate in Iowa has a Sharron Angle problem.
A piece of tape has emerged where Joni Ernst, like Sharron Angle before her, is threatening to
turn to armed violence against the government if she doesn`t get what she wants through the political process.

Joni Ernst addressing the crowd at an NRA event in 2012:

STATE SEN. JONI ERNST (R), IOWA: I have a beautiful little Smith & Wesson, 9 millimeter and it goes with me virtually everywhere.
I do believe in the right to carry. And I believe in the right to defend myself and my family, whether it`s from an intruder
or whether it`s from a government should they decide that my rights are no longer important.

Earlier this year, "Talking Points Memo" turned up a survey in which Joni Ernst said she supports legislation to allow local law enforcement in Iowa to arrest anybody who tries to implement Obamacare in that state.

In a survey distributed by the Ron Paul group, Campaign for Liberty, question five was, will you support legislation to nullify Obamacare and authorize state and local law enforcement to arrest federal officials attempting to implement the unconstitutional health care scheme known as Obamacare?

Joni Ernst answered yes to that question.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/56329906/ns/m ... FLOxvnF-So

Ask any Republican about climate change, and their standard talking point is, "I am not a scientist."
But that doesn't seem to stop them when it comes to being experts on Ebola and Birth Control.

In a debate for the governor's race in Colorado, Republican candidate Bob Beauprez referred to the IUD as an 'abortifacient.'
Dr. Stephanie Teal, an OB/GYN from the University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora was asked if IUDs can be accurately characterized in this way.
Teal's unambiguous answer was NO. She added that there's no disagreement about this distinction in the medical community and suggests that the only dispute comes from politicians who thrive on what she politely called "differences."

After the debate, Beauprez told The Denver Post: "Do you understand how IUDs work? The egg is fertilized and never allowed to impact. That's why people who consider that life begins at conception believe (IUDs) are an abortifacient."

Impact? ROFL I think the word he was looking for was implant, but even then he would be wrong.
That is not how the IUD works.

There are two types of IUDs, the copper and the hormonal known as the Mirena.
Both types of IUDs work primarily by preventing sperm from fertilizing an egg.
The copper IUD releases copper into the uterus, which works as a spermicide.
The Mirena releases a form of the hormone (progestin) into the uterus.
Hormonal IUDs may prevent the egg from leaving the ovary. Pregnancy cannot happen if there is no egg to join with sperm.
Progestin also prevents pregnancy by thickening a woman's cervical mucus. The mucus blocks sperm and keeps it from joining with an egg.

So they do not prevent a fertilized egg from 'impacting' in the uterus.
The only thing they 'impact' is the sperm by preventing it from fertilizing an ovum.
These far right pinheads would have you believe that any woman who uses the IUD is a walking abortion clinic having abortions all the
time.