Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
23 Feb 2016 7:40 am
Not what I said. My point, since you obviously were not able to keep up with the thought, is that your position is that the EPA has been lying.bingster » 22 Feb 2016 9:59 pm » wrote:
and you think the EPA shouldn't "go after oil companies, given the chance" under any president?
But why would THIS administration, who clearly hates oil companies, lie to protect them?
Do you get it now, or do I need to dumb it down for you a bit more? Maybe I can get Technocrat to explain it to you. He seems to operate at your level.
23 Feb 2016 12:22 pm
And it starts again.
9:33, 9:38, 9:40.....
You are starting to look like a nut.
And I know they are all directed at me because they are also showing up in my Notifications.
Dude! I think you might be having some sort of a mental breakdown.
Don't you get it?
I have not responded to any of your posts for a very long time, and I don't intend to do so any time soon.
I would rather scrub my *** raw with steel wool than interact with you.
9:33, 9:38, 9:40.....
You are starting to look like a nut.
And I know they are all directed at me because they are also showing up in my Notifications.
Dude! I think you might be having some sort of a mental breakdown.
Don't you get it?
I have not responded to any of your posts for a very long time, and I don't intend to do so any time soon.
I would rather scrub my *** raw with steel wool than interact with you.
23 Feb 2016 12:29 pm
No matter how much you pretend to be ignoring me, you continue to prove you can't.Misty » 23 Feb 2016 12:22 pm » wrote:And it starts again.
9:33, 9:38, 9:40.....
You are starting to look like a nut.
Your problem is that you can't deal with getting your *** kicked, and you're not smart enough to keep it from happening.
23 Feb 2016 10:26 pm
23 Feb 2016 10:39 pm
I think the Senate should obey Scalia's wishes and not leave the court short one member for over a year.Justice Scalia Explains Why Leaving His Seat Vacant Is A Terrible Idea
Today, Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee agreed that they will not only oppose any nominee Obama makes for the Supreme Court but will not even hold a hearing.
If the Senators stick to this position, which would be unprecedented, it will leave Scalia’s seat vacant — and the Supreme Court with just eight Justices — for at least a year and possibly longer.
One person who would not like this idea at all: Antonin Scalia.
In 2004, the Supreme Court heard a case from the Sierra Club challenging the secrecy of the Bush administration’s Energy Task Force, which was chaired by Vice President Dick Cheney.
The Sierra Club petitioned Scalia to recuse himself, citing his personal relationship with Cheney. They had, famously, gone duck-hunting together.
Scalia rejected the request and, in so doing, explained the adverse impact of that losing a justice has on the court. Here is the key passage from Scalia’s memo, noted by a former law clerk for Scalia, Ian Samuel:
Here, the Republican Senate is essentially creating an eight person court for an entire year or longer, something that would create the problem Scalia warned about in every single case heard by the Court until his replacement is confirmed.
More broadly, Republican Senators are intent on turning the 2016 presidential election into a referendum on the Supreme Court. Scalia also spoke out against the politicization of the appointments process.
“I am not happy about the intrusion of politics into the judicial appointment process,” Scalia said in 2010.
24 Feb 2016 4:13 pm
OMG, now this one too?
Buy a clue will ya Huey? I haven't responded to your posts in like a year.
I want nothing to do with you or your conjoined twin Golfboy, with whom you share a brain.
You are both a couple of obnoxious and obsessive freaks.
Now all we need is for Clem to show up and we'll have a **** trifecta.
Buy a clue will ya Huey? I haven't responded to your posts in like a year.
I want nothing to do with you or your conjoined twin Golfboy, with whom you share a brain.
You are both a couple of obnoxious and obsessive freaks.
Now all we need is for Clem to show up and we'll have a **** trifecta.
24 Feb 2016 4:34 pm
They won't.Misty » 23 Feb 2016 10:39 pm » wrote: I think the Senate should obey Scalia's wishes and not leave the court short one member for over a year.
24 Feb 2016 4:35 pm
Still proving that she can't ignore people she put on her "ignore list".Misty » 24 Feb 2016 4:13 pm » wrote:OMG, now this one too?
Buy a clue will ya Huey? I haven't responded to your posts in like a year.
I want nothing to do with you or your conjoined twin Golfboy, with whom you share a brain.
You are both a couple of obnoxious and obsessive freaks.
Now all we need is for Clem to show up and we'll have a **** trifecta.
She continually responds to my posts, proving she uses the "Display this post" link.
24 Feb 2016 4:39 pm
Yea because Saturday was SO very long ago.Misty » 23 Feb 2016 12:22 pm » wrote:And it starts again.
9:33, 9:38, 9:40.....
You are starting to look like a nut.
And I know they are all directed at me because they are also showing up in my Notifications.
Dude! I think you might be having some sort of a mental breakdown.
Don't you get it?
I have not responded to any of your posts for a very long time, and I don't intend to do so any time soon.
I would rather scrub my *** raw with steel wool than interact with you.
Misty » 20 Feb 2016 8:15 pm » wrote: That's exactly what it was. A story, from a book by Christopher Andersen, who wrote two hit pieces on the Clintons, and several other unauthorized biographies.
The book is filled with unsourced speculation and assertions presented as fact and is devoid of any kind of supporting evidence.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/hildabeast.asp
First time in a long time I read one of your posts and of course it's the same old ****.
24 Feb 2016 5:02 pm
24 Feb 2016 5:24 pm
Poor Misty, still can't ignore me.
24 Feb 2016 5:26 pm
24 Feb 2016 5:33 pm
24 Feb 2016 5:35 pm
26 Feb 2016 7:33 pm
These Donald Trump parody Tweets are so close to the real thing that many people actually mistake them for real Trump Tweets.
26 Feb 2016 7:37 pm
26 Feb 2016 8:57 pm
You seem to have mistaken me for a Hillary supporter.crimsongulf » 26 Feb 2016 7:37 pm » wrote:Skeered Billary can't hold her water against Trump?
My feelings about Trump have absolutely nothing to do with her.
Like Rubio said, the man is a Con-Artist and he is pulling the biggest scam of his life.
Even bigger than the Trump University scam.
Do you really want Republicans to win so badly that you would accept this clown in the White House?
The debate last night was shameful. Rubio, Trump and Cruz were acting like a bunch of 12 year old boys calling each other names.
The only adult in the room was Kasich, and he can't get any traction.
I don't count Carson because I think he slept through most of the debate.
26 Feb 2016 9:07 pm
Three mass shootings in less than a week.
Michigan, Kansas and now Washington.
Haven't seen anything on the forum about any of them.
I guess none of the shooters were Muslims.
Michigan, Kansas and now Washington.
Haven't seen anything on the forum about any of them.
I guess none of the shooters were Muslims.
26 Feb 2016 11:01 pm
26 Feb 2016 11:16 pm
Quite the contrary. Really.crimsongulf » 26 Feb 2016 7:37 pm » wrote:Skeered Billary can't hold her water against Trump?
Who is online
In total there are 12069 users online :: 7 registered, 16 bots, and 12046 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Squatchman, ROG62, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: NING, DuckDuckGo, okhttp, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, YandexBot, ADmantX, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, CriteoBot, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot