Funny I already explained why someone who has already survived past 70 is more likely to exceed the average than meet it. Are you playing dumb or not playing?golfboy » 07 Mar 2016 7:45 am » wrote:Of course. What does that have to do with the likelihood of bernie reaching the end of his first term?
The averages say he won't.
You're the idiot trying to say the numbers are irrelevant.
Stolen without attribution. Just like a liberal.Misty » 06 Mar 2016 9:04 pm » wrote:The worst answer in debate history:
lol... strange you've shown no mathematical analysis to back up that claim. Why is that, I wonder?onlyaladd » 07 Mar 2016 8:06 am » wrote: Funny I already explained why someone who has already survived past 70 is more likely to exceed the average than meet it. Are you playing dumb or not playing?
Post 6054golfboy » 07 Mar 2016 8:18 am » wrote: lol... strange you've shown no mathematical analysis to back up that claim. Why is that, I wonder?
Another "everyone knows" response from a liberal, when he can't back up his claims.onlyaladd » 07 Mar 2016 8:41 am » wrote: Post 6054
It's very basic common sense. I'd love to hear a counter argument.
Unbelievably stupid. No counter argument huh?golfboy » 07 Mar 2016 8:55 am » wrote: Another "everyone knows" response from a liberal, when he can't back up his claims.
Failed statistics too, did you?
I need no "counter argument" to your claims about what "everyone knows".onlyaladd » 07 Mar 2016 9:06 am » wrote: Unbelievably stupid. No counter argument huh?
This is very simple you mathematical moron.
1. If someone dies at 30 do they pull the average up or down?
I'm sure you will bluster and run away.
Lol you failed statistics. Life expectancy is based on mean not median. Yes if they make it past 70 they have a higher chance of reaching 80+golfboy » 07 Mar 2016 9:17 am » wrote: I need no "counter argument" to your claims about what "everyone knows".
Clearly you failed statistics, or never bothered to take it.
Question: If someone is 70 years old, what is that person's odds of reaching the median age of 77?
lol... OMG, this is hilarious.onlyaladd » 07 Mar 2016 1:56 pm » wrote: Lol you failed statistics. Life expectancy is based on mean not median. Yes if they make it past 70 they have a higher chance of reaching 80+
Quite simply some people die much younger and never reach 70 and pull down the average. You can reach 70 and die in your 70s but the mere fact that you made it there means you're more likely to be someone that reaches 80+
This is so **** simple I'm amazed you are attempting to make a counter argument.
Oh good! The desperate Republican shills will have a FIT!
Funny that they don't say who the drunken man was.Wife of Eagles founding member Randy Meisner accidentally shot herself dead after drunken domestic disturbance.
The wife of founding Eagles member Randy Meisner accidentally shot herself dead Sunday after a drunken domestic disturbance at the couple's California home, police said.
Lana Rae Meisner, 63, called the cops around 5:30 p.m. to report a drunken man in their Studio City house. Police took a domestic violence report and left without incident.
But Randy Meisner, 69, called police about 90 minutes later, saying his wife had been shot, police said.
His wife died in a closet after a rifle accidentally fired, hitting her in the face or head, a police source told the Daily News.
She had tried lifting the gun from a case, but another item in the case hit the trigger and pulled it, police said.
“Based on the evidence at the scene, it appears to be a complete accident,” a police source told the Daily News.
“No foul play whatsoever. There is nothing indicative that it was a murder at all.”
Randy was in another part of the house when the gun went off, police said. The former Eagles bassist has not been charged for any crime.
But last year Sean Hannity asked Drumpf if he, as president, could get 50 million Americans out of poverty.It was a campaign that should have never been lost. You're running against a failed president. He came up with the 47 percent. He demeaned 47 percent of the people in our country, right?
The famous 47 percent. Once that was said, I'll be honest, once that was said, a lot of people thought it was over for him.
I would create incentives for people to work. People don't have an incentive. They make more money by sitting there doing nothing than they make if they have a job. We have to create incentives that they actually do much better by working. Right now they have a disincentive. They have an incentive not to work.
The problem we have right now—we have a society that sits back and says we don't have to do anything. Eventually, the 50 percent cannot carry—and it's unfair to them—but cannot carry the other 50 percent.
If Trump is the nominee we will have to be sure and play that quote over and over like we did to Romney.Misty » 07 Mar 2016 8:30 pm » wrote:Donald Trump's 47 Percent (50%) Moment
What Drumpf said about Romney:
But last year Sean Hannity asked Drumpf if he, as president, could get 50 million Americans out of poverty.
Drumpf said of course and he added:
Good for her, but I wonder how much of this she will actually collect?Jury Awards Erin Andrews $55 Million Over Nude Videos
Sportscaster Erin Andrews won a $55 million judgment Monday against a stalker and the owner of a Nashville, Tennessee, hotel where he recorded secret nude videos of her.
The judgment, announced by a state circuit court jury in the late afternoon, is less than the $75 million Andrews had sought from the owner and operator of the Nashville Marriott at Vanderbilt University and the stalker, Michael David Barrett, who has already served a prison sentence.
The jury deliberated for less than eight hours, splitting the blame — and the damages — roughly equally between Barrett, who will have to pay about $28 million, and the two companies, which are on the hook for about $26 million.
Andrews originally included Marriott International in the suit, but the judge dismissed the company early in the process, ruling that it wasn't responsible for security at a hotel run locally by a franchisee.
Yes I agree, good for her. Wonder if they are going to appeal.Misty » 07 Mar 2016 8:54 pm » wrote:
Good for her, but I wonder how much of this she will actually collect?
Yes it is. You changed the parameters to medisn after your logic failed. Tell us again how he's unlikey to survive one term. Idiot.golfboy » 07 Mar 2016 2:07 pm » wrote: lol... OMG, this is hilarious.
Funny how you STILL haven't shown how your claims are supported by statistics.onlyaladd » 08 Mar 2016 9:32 am » wrote: Yes it is. You changed the parameters to medisn after your logic failed. Tell us again how he's unlikey to survive one term. Idiot.
Never mind that Trump, like Romney, is right.Misty » 07 Mar 2016 8:30 pm » wrote:Donald Trump's 47 Percent (50%) Moment
What Drumpf said about Romney:
But last year Sean Hannity asked Drumpf if he, as president, could get 50 million Americans out of poverty.
Drumpf said of course and he added:
It's logic. Please present a counter argument so I can laugh at you or stfu. Isn't it funny how you always get yourself in trouble when you come at me?golfboy » 08 Mar 2016 9:44 am » wrote: Funny how you STILL haven't shown how your claims are supported by statistics.
You won't either, because you're wrong and you know it. Or perhaps worse, you DON'T know it, and can't figure it out.