You idiots claimed the celebrations didn't happen, and changed your attack after that was proven to be a lie.onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 1:22 pm » wrote: About what he said.... What you said he didn't say. The thousands and thousands of New Jersey muslim celebrating. Prove it. If he was right why did you try to claim he didn't even say that?
You claimed he didn't say there were thousands and thousands of people in New Jersey that he watched on tv. Now you've changed your tune after I proved you lied to be "you idiots claimed there were none"golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 2:41 pm » wrote: You idiots claimed the celebrations didn't happen, and changed your attack after that was proven to be a lie.
Yet you continue this stupidity.
Some genius.
Being wrong isn't a lie. I was wrong. You're a liar.onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 2:54 pm » wrote: You claimed he didn't say there were thousands and thousands of people in New Jersey that he watched on tv. Now you've changed your tune after I proved you lied to be "you idiots claimed there were none"
Another lie.
So do you believe Trump's statement and if so why'd you lie and claim he never said it?.
Can you please respond about your lie without covering it with another lie? That would be great, thanks in advance.
Liar.golfboy » 14 Mar 2016 3:53 pm » wrote: He didn't say he saw thousands of Muslims celebrating 9/11 in NJ.
He said he saw Muslims celebrating, and he has been proven correct:
Are you really this stupid?onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 2:58 pm » wrote: Liar.
“I watched when the World Trade Center came tumbling down. And I watched in Jersey City, New Jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down. Thousands of people were cheering,” Trump said Saturday at a rally in Birmingham, Alabama.
He didn't say muslims he said thousands and thousands of people. Exactly the opposite of what you just claimed you stupid **** liar.
Don't bother answering that, it's self evident.golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 2:55 pm » wrote: Being wrong isn't a lie. I was wrong. You're a liar.
Prove Trump is wrong, if you can. Otherwise admit you're a liar.
That'd be great. Thanks in advance.
Now he's frantically trying to get my attention. LOLonlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 1:38 pm » wrote:Yeah he literally forgets that he lied and then somehow has the balls to claim victory.
Kasich is too sensible for you, it appears.golfboy » 14 Mar 2016 9:05 am » wrote: That says more about you, than it does about his coverage.
Kasich has gone full Dummycrat, because he knows no Republicans will vote for him.
What would you accept as evidence that thousands and thousands of people were NOT cheering in New Jerssey on 9-11?golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 2:55 pm » wrote: Prove Trump is wrong, if you can. Otherwise admit you're a liar.
The only confirmed celebrations I know of were the jews who were dancing with glee and arrested by police. Are you saying there were other confirmed celebrations?golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 2:41 pm » wrote: You idiots claimed the celebrations didn't happen, and changed your attack after that was proven to be a lie.
There were SMALL POCKETS of celebrations but not thousands of people.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2016 3:27 pm » wrote:The only confirmed celebrations I know of were the jews who were dancing with glee and arrested by police. Are you saying there were other confirmed celebrations?
I don't think that many right wing flying monkeys understand that if it was Hillary vs. Kasich, many Liberals like myself would vote for Kasich over Hillary.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2016 3:23 pm » wrote:Kasich is too sensible for you, it appears.
The results of the bush open border and the obama open border require real statecraft - not the wingnuttery that you favor.
Is my impression that cruz is not open about his sexuality correct - or is he on the record as a gay?Misty » 16 Mar 2016 4:14 pm » wrote: I don't think that many right wing flying monkeys understand that if it was Hillary vs. Kasich, many Liberals like myself would vote for Kasich over Hillary.
But, they seem determined to shoot themselves in the foot by nominating Drumpf or Cruz.
How do you feel about Hillary's claim that a video caused the Benghazi attack...and now she says we didn't lose a single person in Lybia?
Yes.Cannonpointer » 16 Mar 2016 3:27 pm » wrote:The only confirmed celebrations I know of were the jews who were dancing with glee and arrested by police. Are you saying there were other confirmed celebrations?
No, I'm kicking your *** with facts, you stupid bitch.
And what many left wing lunatics like misty don't understand is if kasich, who is mathematically eliminated, back doors the nomination, many cons will stay home.Misty » 16 Mar 2016 4:14 pm » wrote: I don't think that many right wing flying monkeys understand that if it was Hillary vs. Kasich, many Liberals like myself would vote for Kasich over Hillary.
But, they seem determined to shoot themselves in the foot by nominating Drumpf or Cruz.
Oh look, Only ran away again. Not man enough to admit he's a liar.golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 3:00 pm » wrote: Are you really this stupid? Don't bother answering that, it's self evident.
So Joe Biden was speaking in the hypothetical, since there was no vacancy at the time, and he said that a President should not nominate anyone during the summer of his last term.McConnell’s main argument, of course, relied on what he calls the “Biden Rule,” a reference to statements that then-Senator Joe Biden made in 1992 urging then-President George H.W. Bush not to nominate a hypothetical Supreme Court justice (there was no vacancy at the time) in the final year of his term.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/shock-mi ... k-garland/