Liberal Forum

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 7:38 pm » wrote:Now you're calling a celebration a protest lol. No one claimed there were zero muslims who were happy about 9/11 you are a liar. And if you feel so compelled to defend his stupidity about thousands and thousands of protestors on the tv it should be easy to prove.

Misty » 14 Mar 2016 3:43 pm » wrote:First he saw something that wasn't there (thousands of Muslims in NJ celebrating 9/11) and now he doesn't see something that actually IS there.

golfboy » 14 Mar 2016 3:53 pm » wrote:He didn't say he saw thousands of Muslims celebrating 9/11 in NJ.
He said he saw Muslims celebrating, and he has been proven correct:

onlyaladd » 14 Mar 2016 5:01 pm » wrote:"I watched in Jersey City, N.J., where thousands and thousands of people were cheering" as the World Trade Center collapsed.
Trump

golfboy » 15 Mar 2016 4:55 pm » wrote:So how many were there?
When this first broke, you idiots said it didn't happen.
Then multiple news reports were shoved up your ***.
So how many DID cheer the WTC collapse?

onlyaladd » 15 Mar 2016 5:56 pm » wrote:I'll tell you the exact number as soon as you explain why you lied.

golfboy » 15 Mar 2016 10:08 pm » wrote:I didn't. You're the idiot who called Trump a liar... with no proof to back up your claim.
And somehow it's always MY fault that you make an *** of yourself.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 1:02 pm » wrote:So you did or did you not claim Trump didn't say what he said. Lol

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 1:03 pm » wrote:Did you prove him wrong? No.
Funny how it's always my fault when you faceplant like this.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 1:11 pm » wrote:So you did or did you not claim Trump didn't say what he said. Lol

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 1:12 pm » wrote:I didn't. You're the idiot who called Trump a liar... with no proof to back up your claim.
And somehow it's always MY fault that you make an *** of yourself.

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 1:12 pm » wrote:Trump was right. You're wrong. It's my fault.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 1:12 pm » wrote:Yes he has not proven his statement. And your statement that he did not say what he said was a lie. Why are you being a coward about that?

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 1:20 pm » wrote:He doesn't have to prove his statement.
You idiots called him a liar and said the celebrations didn't happen. After multiple news reports were found from CNN, WaPo and other liberal outlets documenting the fact that these celebrations did in fact occur, you morons globbed onto the "thousands" aspect, to continue calling him a liar.
What you can't do, is show that he lied.
Because you're a *******.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 1:22 pm » wrote:About what he said.... What you said he didn't say. The thousands and thousands of New Jersey muslim celebrating. Prove it. If he was right why did you try to claim he didn't even say that?

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 2:41 pm » wrote:You idiots claimed the celebrations didn't happen, and changed your attack after that was proven to be a lie.
Yet you continue this stupidity.
Some genius.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 2:54 pm » wrote:You claimed he didn't say there were thousands and thousands of people in New Jersey that he watched on tv. Now you've changed your tune after I proved you lied to be "you idiots claimed there were none"
Another lie.
So do you believe Trump's statement and if so why'd you lie and claim he never said it?.
Can you please respond about your lie without covering it with another lie? That would be great, thanks in advance.

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 2:55 pm » wrote:Being wrong isn't a lie. I was wrong. You're a liar.
Prove Trump is wrong, if you can. Otherwise admit you're a liar.
That'd be great. Thanks in advance.

Misty » 16 Mar 2016 7:49 pm » wrote:
It's like pulling **** teeth.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 7:38 pm » wrote: Now you're calling a celebration a protest lol. No one claimed there were zero muslims who were happy about 9/11 you are a liar. And if you feel so compelled to defend his stupidity about thousands and thousands of protestors on the tv it should be easy to prove.

Misty » 16 Mar 2016 7:49 pm » wrote: It's like pulling **** teeth.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 7:30 pm » wrote: Lol ****. I proved you lied and now you are pathetically projecting. If you were simply "wrong" you would quit defending Trump's stupidity, yet you keep at it. Idiot. I've never ran from you especially when I have you pinned down and squealing like this.

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 7:38 pm » wrote:No one claimed there were zero muslims who were happy about 9/11 you are a liar. And if you feel so compelled to defend his stupidity about thousands and thousands of protestors on the tv it should be easy to prove.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You raised some eyebrows yesterday with comments you made at your latest rally. I want to show them, relating to 9/11.

STEPHANOPOULOS: “You know, the police say that didn’t happen and all those rumors have been on the Internet for some time. So did you misspeak yesterday?”

TRUMP: “It did happen. I saw it.”

STEPHANOPOULOS: “You saw that…”

TRUMP: It was on television. I saw it.

STEPHANOPOULOS: “…with your own eyes?”

TRUMP: “George, it did happen.”

STEPHANOPOULOS: “Police say it didn’t happen.”

TRUMP: “There were people that were cheering on the other side of New Jersey, where you have large Arab populations. They were cheering as the World Trade Center came down. I know it might be not politically correct for you to talk about it, but there were people cheering as that building came down — as those buildings came down. And that tells you something. It was well covered at the time, George. Now, I know they don’t like to talk about it, but it was well covered at the time. There were people over in New Jersey that were watching it, a heavy Arab population, that were cheering as the buildings came down. Not good.”

STEPHANOPOULOS: “As I said, the police have said it didn’t happen.”

— Exchange on ABC’s “This Week,” Nov. 22, 2015

onlyaladd » 16 Mar 2016 7:59 pm » wrote: Pretty epic *** kicking when it's splayed out like that huh?
Funny to watch him twist in the wind when his blustery **** is thrown in his face.

Donald Trump Warns Supporters Could Riot If He Doesn't Get GOP Nomination

Donald Trump warned on Wednesday that his supporters would respond with "riots" if he fails to secure the nomination at July's convention in Cleveland.

"I think you'd have riots," Trump told CNN on Wednesday. "I think you'd have riots. I'm representing a tremendous many, many millions of people.

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 8:16 pm » wrote: You guys DID call Trump a liar when he said Muslims celebrated 9/11.
After proof was shown, you moved the goalposts to this crap about "thousands".

So now you call him a liar again, and still offer no proof that he is wrong.

golfboy » 16 Mar 2016 8:26 pm » wrote:Liar.

Clinton mouthpiece saying less than 6 months ago, that celebrations didn't happen.

onlyaladd » 17 Mar 2016 8:55 am » wrote:
The police did say his version of thousands celebrating didn't happen. So what's your point?

TRUMP: “There were people that were cheering on the other side of New Jersey, where you have large Arab populations. They were cheering as the World Trade Center came down. I know it might be not politically correct for you to talk about it, but there were people cheering as that building came down — as those buildings came down. And that tells you something. It was well covered at the time, George. Now, I know they don’t like to talk about it, but it was well covered at the time. There were people over in New Jersey that were watching it, a heavy Arab population, that were cheering as the buildings came down. Not good.”

STEPHANOPOULOS: “As I said, the police have said it didn’t happen.”

onlyaladd » 17 Mar 2016 8:42 am » wrote: No one ever said there were zero muslims happy about 9/11.

TRUMP: “There were people that were cheering on the other side of New Jersey, where you have large Arab populations. They were cheering as the World Trade Center came down. I know it might be not politically correct for you to talk about it, but there were people cheering as that building came down — as those buildings came down. And that tells you something. It was well covered at the time, George. Now, I know they don’t like to talk about it, but it was well covered at the time. There were people over in New Jersey that were watching it, a heavy Arab population, that were cheering as the buildings came down. Not good.”

STEPHANOPOULOS: “As I said, the police have said it didn’t happen.”

golfboy » 17 Mar 2016 9:18 am » wrote:
You claimed that no one said there were no protests. I quoted Stephanopoulos saying exactly that to Trump.
You going to admit you're a liar?

GOP’s SCOTUS strategy misfire: Orrin Hatch is blowing apart the Republicans’ obstructionist argument.

If your position is that the American people should have a say in who selects the next Supreme Court justice, then obviously it doesn’t make any sense to vote to confirm Obama’s nominee at any point during the remainder of his presidency.

But doing so during the lame-duck session would be the most flagrant violation of that so-called principle imaginable.

Not only would you be considering the nominee of a president whose successor had been chosen, you’d also potentially have several senators who’d been voted out of office voting to confirm or deny that nominee.

Hatch and his colleagues say they want the American people to have their say, but they’re also open to defying the people once they’ve spoken.

Misty » 17 Mar 2016 4:39 pm » wrote:One of the senior Republicans hypocrites on the Senate Judiciary Committee Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch signaled on Wednesday that he was open to moving Garland’s nomination in a lame duck session after the election in November, presumably only if a Democrat wins the White House.

So all that **** about allowing the next president to choose the nominee goes right out the window if Hillary wins the election. LOL

On Friday March 11th Sen. Orrin Hatch (R.-Utah) told Newsmax that Obama could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man, but he probably won’t do that because this appointment is about the election.

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/718871

So Merrick Garland was a 'fine man' on March 11th, but on March 16th, not so much.

In a 2011 interview on the Joy Behar Show, Andrew Breitbart offered up this assessment of Donald Trump, describing him as a self-interested master manipulator of the media.

“I think Donald Trump — and I don’t say this in the negative sense — is for Donald Trump, and right now he’s doing an amazing job of promoting his brand. He’s utterly entertaining.
He’s winning, a la, you know, Charlie Sheen, playing the media for what it is. It’s obvious,” Breitbart told Behar.

In recent weeks, a series of staffers have quit Breitbart News, the company that was founded by the late Breitbart and has become known in the last year or so for its pro-Trump coverage. Ben Shapiro, one of the longtime editors who resigned, wrote in a statement that “Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed. Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy.”

In 2011, Breitbart seemed keenly aware of Trump’s power over the media, telling Behar, “Well, the other candidates are starting to realize what they should have realized, I don’t know, 40, 50 years ago when Ed Sullivan got on the air, is that media is everything, and that these guys don’t understand that a Donald Trump can go out there, know how to play the media and rise through the ranks when two years ago he was supporting Nancy Pelosi.”

He compared the Trump show to a circus.

“Look, entertainment uber alles,” he said. “He’s very entertaining. You’re enjoying it, I’m enjoying it, and I didn’t like it when I would hear people on the right doing it. But now that it’s become sort of like the center ring at the circus, I’m sitting back and I am enjoying it.”

onlyaladd » 17 Mar 2016 8:42 am » wrote: No one ever said there were zero muslims happy about 9/11. No matter how many times you repeat that stupidity.
Trump's statement about seeing thousands and thousands in NJ on the news was a fabrication. You insist on defending it then prove him right or stfu.