Liberal Forum

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 3:43 pm » wrote: I'm not a con, moron. I criticize him as I see fit, not your idiotic criteria.

The coal industry has been in trouble for years, as evidenced by the recent announcement by Peabody Energy, the world’s largest private-sector coal company, that it may have to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

There are a number of reasons behind the demise of the U.S. coal industry, but the biggest factor is displacement of coal by natural gas in the power generation sector.

Despite the fact that renewables took the lion’s share of new electrical generating capacity installed last year, it was natural gas that seized the largest share of power production from coal utilities.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/201 ... 3e5cb45281

Misty » 07 Jun 2016 3:48 pm » wrote: LOL that GB thinks it was Obama who killed the coal industry and that the gas industry is dead.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/201 ... 3e5cb45281

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 3:43 pm » wrote: I'm not a con, moron. I criticize him as I see fit, not your idiotic criteria.

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 3:50 pm » wrote: LOL +10

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 3:41 pm » wrote:
You don't get out much do you? There are numerous examples, here are a few of
the pertinent ones:

http://www.thenation.com/article/welcom ... l-america/
https://www.aclu.org/blog/washington-ma ... n-policies
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... eaning-him

Huey » 07 Jun 2016 4:16 pm » wrote:
Lmao!

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 4:18 pm » wrote:
When the ACLU and Democrats go after Obama, which they did, that is criticism.

On edit:

You shouldn't EXPECT them to be critical of Obama using YOUR dumb ideas.

Huey » 07 Jun 2016 4:23 pm » wrote:
LMMFAO! Nothing on over reaching they the EPA. One example of healthcare. And not because conyers thought it was unconstitutional. Because he he didn't think it went far enough.

You get an F on your examples.

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 3:41 pm » wrote: You don't get out much do you? There are numerous examples, here are a few of
the pertinent ones:

http://www.thenation.com/article/welcom ... l-america/
https://www.aclu.org/blog/washington-ma ... n-policies
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... eaning-him

golfboy » 07 Jun 2016 5:32 pm » wrote: Strange that The Nation used this picture to attack Obama:



And that the ACLU used THIS picture to attack Obama:




Or that The Hill used THIS picture to attack Obama:





Do these idiots not know who Obama is?

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 5:34 pm » wrote: They know perfectly well, yes.

golfboy » 07 Jun 2016 5:39 pm » wrote: So why are they blaming everyone BUT Obama?

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 5:49 pm » wrote: They're not. Read the OP's, don't depend on pictures.

golfboy » 07 Jun 2016 5:56 pm » wrote:lol... yea, the pictures are irrelevant to the articles, right?

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 6:37 pm » wrote: I said don't depend on pictures, read the OP's.

You want comics, try a different forum.

golfboy » 07 Jun 2016 6:57 pm » wrote: So you're saying the editors of all three links you provided, are idiots and used pictures that were not related to the stories?

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 7:01 pm » wrote: No, not at all. I calling you an idiot.

Henry_ » 07 Jun 2016 4:42 pm » wrote:
Yea, the ACLU is wacked. lol To a con they are but not to me.

Huey » 08 Jun 2016 4:47 am » wrote:
I have no issue with the ACLU, moron.

Next excuse...,.

Henry_ » 08 Jun 2016 8:08 am » wrote:
Then stop dismissing the links you were given which included their positions and your
response was to laugh.