Liberal Forum

Henry_ » 08 Jun 2016 10:03 pm » wrote: lol When you think about, who else could do that, she exceeds at transformations!

She does.
Goodnight Henry.

Misty » 08 Jun 2016 10:08 pm » wrote: She does.
Goodnight Henry.

Back at ya.

Henry_ » 08 Jun 2016 9:50 pm » wrote:
No one has to try hard nor harder for you. YOU laughed at links you were given
and dismissed the ACLU out of hand. Only after it was pointed out to you, your
alleged liberal creds kicked in.

You're a joke.

Blah blah blah. Are you a **** parrot, moron? You repeat the same **** each time. You ain't got ****, son, beyond progressive talking points.

Get the **** out here. You ain't smart enough to continue.

Misty » 08 Jun 2016 9:30 pm » wrote:Is it just me or is there something strange about a presidential candidate promoting his businesses on social media?
I have to wonder what right wingers would say if Hillary were doing this.









Looks to me like the only thing he wants to make great again, is his wallet.

No. He isn't president yet,. Then there is a problem.

Do you not see a problem with a presidential candidate who speaks about the evils of alleged income inequality receiving over 20 milliion dollars in 2 years by giving speeches to wall street execs? THen refuses to release the transcripts of those speeches? Or how about the same candidate discusssing income inequality while wearing Armani clothers worth thousands? No problems,huh?

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 4:48 am » wrote:
Blah blah blah. Are you a **** parrot, moron? You repeat the same **** each time. You ain't got ****, son, beyond progressive talking points.

Get the **** out here. You ain't smart enough to continue.

Your inaction on the evidence YOU asked for told me all I needed to know.
I am repeating it for you, dopey because you thought you had some
great " liberal " creds going for you. You ignored the link and laughed
until I pointed out to you, you're a joke.

There is nothing to continue, and there are no talking points from me,
all the links demonstrate the divide of the Democratic Party as WE
see it. No one gives a **** what you deem relevant or not on those
issues.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 8:07 am » wrote:
Your inaction on the evidence YOU asked for told me all I needed to know.
I am repeating it for you, dopey because you thought you had some
great " liberal " creds going for you. You ignored the link and laughed
until I pointed out to you, you're a joke.

There is nothing to continue, and there are no talking points from me,
all the links demonstrate the divide of the Democratic Party as WE
see it. No one gives a **** what you deem relevant or not on those
issues.

And I replied. As you can tell I even read your links. I commented on the Patriot Act Issues and the ONE individual on Health Care. You ignored it. You also ignored valid questions on other topics. You are nothing but a sheep.

There is no divide in your **** party, loon. They give you everything you big government types want.

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 8:27 am » wrote:
And I replied. As you can tell I even read your links. I commented on the Patriot Act Issues and the ONE individual on Health Care. You ignored it. You also ignored valid questions on other topics. You are nothing but a sheep.

There is no divide in your **** party, loon. They give you everything you big government types want.

lol Yea, tell that to Clinton.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 9:08 am » wrote:
lol Yea, tell that to Clinton.

You mean the presumptive nominee for the Democrats? Some divide.

Yeah, tell it to your congresscritters.

Fool.

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 9:42 am » wrote:
You mean the presumptive nominee for the Democrats? Some divide.

Yeah, tell it to your congresscritters.

Fool.

Clueless, Huey. lol

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 9:45 am » wrote:
Clueless, Huey. lol

Where is this divide? Hmm? Your divide was 6 years ago when your side kicked out the blue dogs, if you are aware of what they are. The divide in the GOP is occurring now with their establishment attempting to kick out the Tea Party conservatives.

Your alleged divide is really a fight over the young voters looking for free stuff.

You sure you want to throw around words like clueless? Come on, let's discuss.

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 11:11 am » wrote:
Where is this divide? Hmm? Your divide was 6 years ago when your side kicked out the blue dogs, if you are aware of what they are. The divide in the GOP is occurring now with their establishment attempting to kick out the Tea Party conservatives.

Your alleged divide is really a fight over the young voters looking for free stuff.

You sure you want to throw around words like clueless? Come on, let's discuss.

Yea, because you are clueless and I already gave you examples and you dismissed them.
For you to even suggest this election cycle for Democrats is about " free stuff" tells
me how poorly informed you are about the Sanders campaign. Your other mistake is believing
I am interested in convincing you..there are cons here who get it better than you do.

It is essentially corporate interests placed above the interests of the people, aka corruption.
We know exactly why Clinton will not push for universal health care and we know what WS
receives in exchange for the money paid to her.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 7:36 pm » wrote:
Yea, because you are clueless and I already gave you examples and you dismissed them.
For you to even suggest this election cycle for Democrats is about " free stuff" tells
me how poorly informed you are about the Sanders campaign. Your other mistake is believing
I am interested in convincing you..there are cons here who get it better than you do.

It is essentially corporate interests placed above the interests of the people, aka corruption.
We know exactly why Clinton will not push for universal health care and we know what WS
receives in exchange for the money paid to her.

Jeez dude, you are a one trick pony. I addressed your links but like a **** dembot you repeat the same **** over and over. I gave numerous issues to address where no dems spoke up and you ignore them ..that tell me you are just another loinfo with a decent vocabulary.

How about that CFPB?

How about EPA regs killing industry without congressional consultations?

Oh never mind. You are just going to repeat "you ignored my links". Which is ****.

Buh bye William.

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 7:47 pm » wrote:
Jeez dude, you are a one trick pony. I addressed your links but like a **** dembot you repeat the same **** over and over. I gave numerous issues to address where no dems spoke up and you ignore them ..that tell me you are just another loinfo with a decent vocabulary.

How about that CFPB?

How about EPA regs killing industry without congressional consultations?

Oh never mind. You are just going to repeat "you ignored my links". Which is ****.

Buh bye William.

You have your answers, you don't like them.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 7:36 pm » wrote:
Yea, because you are clueless and I already gave you examples and you dismissed them.
For you to even suggest this election cycle for Democrats is about " free stuff" tells
me how poorly informed you are about the Sanders campaign. Your other mistake is believing
I am interested in convincing you..there are cons here who get it better than you do.

It is essentially corporate interests placed above the interests of the people, aka corruption.
We know exactly why Clinton will not push for universal health care and we know what WS
receives in exchange for the money paid to her.

, *******, one of your links addressed here:

Huey » 07 Jun 2016 4:23 pm » wrote:
LMMFAO! Nothing on over reaching they the EPA. One example of healthcare. And not because conyers thought it was unconstitutional. Because he he didn't think it went far enough.

You get an F on your examples.

****.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 7:36 pm » wrote:
Yea, because you are clueless and I already gave you examples and you dismissed them.
For you to even suggest this election cycle for Democrats is about " free stuff" tells
me how poorly informed you are about the Sanders campaign. Your other mistake is believing
I am interested in convincing you..there are cons here who get it better than you do.

It is essentially corporate interests placed above the interests of the people, aka corruption.
We know exactly why Clinton will not push for universal health care and we know what WS
receives in exchange for the money paid to her.

Hey ****, stop lying:

Huey » 08 Jun 2016 5:51 pm » wrote:
Blah, blah, blah blah blah.

The ACLU is not a leftist organization, moron. I respect the ACLU. I respect and support them although I don't always agree.

If that is all you have to hang your hat on you ain't got ****, boy. And do not confuse me with a republican or a modern day con. I am more liberal then you can ever hope to be and respect the constitution more than establishment pubs or progs like you think you do.

So try harder. AND I AM STILL ROTFLMMFAO!

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 7:52 pm » wrote:
You have your answers, you don't like them.

Yup, **** has no clue. Typical Will the Shill answer.

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 7:54 pm » wrote:
Hey ****, stop lying:

Yea, only after it was pointed out to you, Mr Real Liberal. lol

Huey » 09 Jun 2016 7:56 pm » wrote:
Yup, **** has no clue. Typical Will the Shill answer.

You keep flattering yourself that your demands to "go look it up, boy"
on your topic should have an interest for me. That you have no idea about
the split in the Democratic Party all these months centers around corruption
within my party's elite is too funny for words.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 8:03 pm » wrote:
You keep flattering yourself that your demands to "go look it up, boy"
on your topic should have an interest for me. That you have no idea about
the split in the Democratic Party all these months centers around corruption
within my party's elite is too funny for words.

Will Henry still ignores valid points.

Go hang out with bingster. You two loinfos have a lot in common. You guys are almost as loinfo as misty.

Henry_ » 09 Jun 2016 8:03 pm » wrote:
You keep flattering yourself that your demands to "go look it up, boy"
on your topic should have an interest for me. That you have no idea about
the split in the Democratic Party all these months centers around corruption
within my party's elite is too funny for words.

Ps. You have gotten the breaking news that Bernie will work Hillary to fix the alleged divide. Seems the divide, *******, is exactly what I said it was.

Thanks for playing Willie.