Liberal Forum

I'm not a psycho like you, that's for sure.Could an honest, sane person really believe the following?Why do Republicans love to shoot protesters (Nixon-Kent State)?Gosh,I don't know. Because they make big, easy targets?

MistyBlue, on 18 Sept 2008 - 18:07, said:Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?That smear could be "asked" about a woman in her 40's or 50's, but you imply she's underage; i.e. "molest." It is unquestionably an attempt to smear a decent man. He didn't "molest" anyone.Molest simply means to subject to unwanted or improper sexual activity.Most people believe that having sex with a woman whose mother you also had sex with is 'improper sexual activity'.Once again.......A question is an inquiry by someone seeking more knowledge on a subject.A smear, like as lie, is a slanderous statement.Therefore a question cannot be a smear or a lie, because it is not a statement.

Not that it matters what I say, because you're going to believe what you want to believe, but when I asked the question, I had no idea how old the daughter was. Like I said, I had heard something about some kind of a scandal involving John Fund and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend. I didn't know any of the facts of the case until I looked it up. That's why I asked the question.A question is an inquiry. I was seeking more knowledge on the subject.A lie as you put it, is a false statement.Therefore a question cannot be a lie, because it is not a statement.So now you want to debate grammar? Go debate what the meaning of "is" is with the serial felon/ rapist/ impeached disgrace who you dishonestly defended for years. when I asked the question, I had no idea how old the daughter was.So you smeared him without even knowing the facts? You smeared him as a child molester without even knowing the facts?Just like you blindly defended Bill Clinton on a rape charge before you knew what the facts were?Then told lies on a rapist's behalf for years after?You're a lying, partisan hack.A "question," she bleats oh, so innocently.Didn't little Miss Marxist rip off lots and lots of money from her best friends? Hey, I'm absolutely not making any accusation, just "asking." Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?Amazing that you can't admit that you tried to smear him.

So now you want to debate grammar? No Puss, there is no debate.You have over and over accused me of 'lying' about John Fund simply for asking a question about him.As I have proven, a question cannot be a lie.Why do you get so bent out of shape about John Fund anyway?Do you have some kind of a man crush on him?John Fund is a tool who routinely fabricates things to smear people.Just ask Juan Cole of whom Fund said, "He calls Israel the most dangerous regime in the Middle East" or Sidney Blumenthal who he accused of spousal abuse.

While the wingnuts are obsessed with the cancellation of White House Tours, here are some real effects of the sequester.Sequestration Effects: Cuts Sting Communities NationwideThe grips of sequestration are just now beginning to be felt and the effects are already quite dramatic.Organizations and companies have begun laying off workers, while many more have decided not to staff vacant positions. Schools on military bases are contemplating four-day weekly schedules. Food pantries have closed, as have centers that provide health services. Farmers have been forced to go without milk production information, causing alarm in the dairy industry and the potential of higher milk prices. Workers at missile-testing fields are facing job losses. Federal courts have closed on Fridays. Public Broadcasting transmitters have been shut down. Even luxury cruises are feeling the pinch, with passengers forced to wait hours before debarking because of delays at Customs and Immigration. Yes, sequestration is creating the possibility of another poop cruise.On the national level, sequestration may be defined by canceled White House tours and long lines at airports that never materialized. But on the local level, it is beginning to sting.Read about 100 effects of the sequester in the link in the title.Air Force Base Jobs Lost... Medical Response Times Lengthened... Convention Industry Suffers Nationwide... Tourism Jobs Take A Hit... University Research Jobs Lost... Special Education Programs Cut... Mine Safety Agency Gutted... Workers At Most-Contaminated U.S. Nuclear Site Lose Jobs... Military Tuition Assistance Suspended... Head Start Slashed... Border Agents Furloughed.....but all we care about is those White House tours.

John Fund is a tool who routinely fabricates things to smear people.Lies the troll. Could an honest, sane person believe the following?Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected?The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 years?Does that give you a hint?Yes. It gives me a big hint that you're bad word Looney Tunes.You think you can see things that are in sealed boxes.So the evidence doesn't exist, because I personally cannot see in the boxes. Hey, that's believable. While the wingnuts are obsessed with the cancellation of White House Tours, here are some real effects of the sequester.Air Force Base Jobs Lost... Medical Response Times Lengthened... Convention Industry Suffers Nationwide... Tourism Jobs Take A Hit... University Research Jobs Lost... Special Education Programs Cut... Mine Safety Agency Gutted... Workers At Most-Contaminated U.S. Nuclear Site Lose Jobs... Military Tuition Assistance Suspended... Head Start Slashed... Border Agents Furloughed.....but all we care about is those White House tours.Gosh, isn't it awful that goverment has 0.5% less money? Obviously what the country needs is a huge tax hike, so Americans have less to spend on themselves and their families.Stupid moonbat.

Dave Agema, Michigan Republican National Committeeman, Refuses To Resign, Posts More Anti-Gay Remarks On FacebookLess than one week after posting a controversial article condemning the "filthy" lifestyle of "homosexuals," Michigan Republican Dave Agema has once again taken to Facebook to voice his opinion on the LGBT community, warning his Republican colleagues that accepting "this lifestyle" in the party's platform will "cause great harm to society."Responding to a petition posted on Facebook calling for Republican leaders to adopt "a more inclusive tone," Agema -- a Michigan Republican National Committeeman -- refused, writing, "the homosexual community is pushing same sex marriage which will be taught in schools as an alternative lifestyle."Brad Fingeroot, the Oakland County Young Republican who posted the petition, thanked Agema for engaging in the discussion, but asked that the former state lawmaker "keep the smut on the sidelines."Agema, in response, accused Fingeroot of “trying to change” the Republican Party's long standing principles."I can send you reems (sic) of studies showing the negative health affects (sic) of this lifestyle," Agema wrote. "Instead you would have us accept it, teach it to our kids, include it in our platform and cause great harm to society.""The people of America have the right to know what lays ahead if the Supreme Court rules the wrong way," Agema continued. "You want to change the landscape of our party in a direction that had not been accepted for over 230 years. I'm trying to maintain or (sic) platform."Agema's most recent anti-gay Facebook remarks come just two days after he appeared on Michigan's WWMT Newschannel 3 to distance himself from the article he posted last Wednesday attacking the LGBT community.When pressed by WWMT on whether he agreed with the article's claim that gays and lesbians account for a high percentage (50%) of murders, suicides and diseases, Agema responded, "I not only believe it, it's substantiated by several different articles and studies. That's just a fact."Although Agema is refusing to resign from his post as a Michigan Republican National Committeeman -- claiming that calls for his resignation are a "joke" -- members of his party are continuing to press Agema to step down.Read more at link in title.So......how's that rebranding effort working out for you, Reince?

So......how's that rebranding effort working out for you, Reince? Why don't you respond to whether his statements are accurate? Like the following: "I can send you reems (sic) of studies showing the negative health affects (sic) of this lifestyle," Anyone familiar with their lifestyle knows this is true.

John Fund is a tool who routinely fabricates things to smear people.Lies the troll. Says the coward who was too chicken to look up how John Fund fabricated quotes and accusations in regards to Juan Cole and Sidney Blumenthal.Misty, on 02 Apr 2013 - 12:45, said:So......how's that rebranding effort working out for you, Reince?Why don't you respond to whether his statements are accurate?Why don't you?One of the things that Agema posted on Facebook was that gays are responsible for half of the murders in large cities.Is that statement accurate Puss?"I can send you reems (sic) of studies showing the negative health affects (sic) of this lifestyle,"Anyone familiar with their lifestyle knows this is true.How familiar are you with the gay lifestyle Puss?

Says the coward who was too chicken to look up how John Fund fabricated quotes and accusations in regards to Juan Cole and Sidney Blumenthal.Why don't you?I'm familiar enough with the Blumenthal story to know that a false leak was made from the Clinton White House with the specific intent of suing the parties to whom it was leaked.It was a set up. Typical troll, you're blaming the victim.Clinton was virulently anti-free speech when his political well being was threatened.He and his allies tried to drive the American Spectator out of business, using both Federal agencies, the Injustice Dept. and private lawsuits.Says the coward who was too chicken to look up how John Fund fabricated quotes and accusations in regards to Juan Cole and Sidney Blumenthal.Do you really think I'll waste my time trying to refute every lie you tell?Stupid moonbat. Could a sane, honest person really believe the following?Like you care about ordinary working Americans. Liar, liar, pants on fire.

I'm familiar enough with the Blumenthal story to know that a false leak was made from the Clinton White House with the specific intent of suing the parties to whom it was leaked.Link?ROFL..who am I kidding?The only thing your statements ever link to is your own ***.It was a set up.What about the Juan Cole thing?Was that a set up too?Knowing your penchant for a good woman on horse video, I hope this gif doesn't get you too worked up Puss.

I'm familiar enough with the Blumenthal story to know that a false leak was made from the Clinton White House with the specific intent of suing the parties to whom it was leaked. Link? ROFL..who am I kidding? The only thing your statements ever link to is your own ***. Oh gosh, are your eyes failing again? Because your vision goes without fail whenever I cite a link. Strange thing about that.

Link?ROFL..who am I kidding?The only thing your statements ever link to is your own ***.I bring more links to the board than likely anyone.You can't tell the truth to save your moonbat, butt, can you. Could a sane, honest person really believe the following?RichClem Hates Sick PeopleHey, that's believable.

I bring more links to the board than likely anyone.Always with the weasel words huh, Puss?'Likely' anyone?......ROFLThat's the biggest crop of **** I've ever heard.You may underline a lot of stuff, but you're not fooling anyone.They're not links.I bring more links to the board than likely anyone.I whine and complain more than anyone on this board.Yes you do Puss.You sure do know how to dish out the insults, but when they come back your way, you whine like a little girl who had her all day sucker snatched away from her.

There is no evidence that Bush raped anyone, other than one woman's story....Defending a rapist Puss?No sympathy for that poor woman?

I see you were just as popular back in 2007 as you are today Puss. LOLTrying to find some sympathy for your mindless rant are you Clem?Rich appears to be an attention whore--no more, no less.What Rich is is a whiner. Anyone who disagrees with him offends him. It's my understanding that he keeps a steady flow of whines going to the mods because he thinks he's being discriminated against. IMO, he may be the most offensive LF member ever. No sense of humor, no dialogue, no redeeming features that I can see. But maybe he wears matching socks. I just don't know.Well pundit-hater, I don't blame you for leaving a board with a troll like Clem on it . He's not here for intelligent conversation, he's just here to troll and his input seems to be be appreciated more than yours is.Other than being able to spell Iraq he doesn't know anything about Iraq or any other topic on the board for that matter.I know this is probably too much to ask, but grow up, Rich.dude your like a stalker! I dont even know who this pundit-hater is and i already feel bad for the guy. i think you need to realize that hes just not that into you and you some come to terms with that and find another guy who appreciates you for who you are! lolThere are psychotropic medications available for those obsessional thoughts.Give it up Clem. You are still considered a troll and stalking PH is proof of it. This is just another of your mindless rants.

I bring more links to the board than likely anyone. Always with the weasel words huh, Puss? 'Likely' anyone?......ROFL That's the biggest crop of **** I've ever heard. You may underline a lot of stuff, but you're not fooling anyone. They're not links. You really ought to consult a physician for your terrible eyesight. Every regular on the board knows how many sources I cite. "Weasel words?" For using the word "probably?" Stupid moonbat. There is no evidence that Bush raped anyone, other than one woman's story.... Defending a rapist Puss? No sympathy for that poor woman? Wow, a new smear. Bush is a rapist? Yeah, sure, liar. I see you were just as popular back in 2007 as you are today Puss. LOL Liars, trolls and moonbats hate me. So? I get the respect of people whose judgment and character I respect.

Lane Rees, Florida Republican Committeeman, Arrested on Child Porn ChargesLane Rees is a current Republican state committeeman, a former Walton County commissioner, the 2011 Walton County man of the year, a Jeb Bush appointee and a former board chair for the Foundation for Evangelism. He's also now a suspected child pornographer.Rees, who is 61, was arrested yesterday on charges of possession and transmission of child pornography.Authorities were tipped of in February by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children that images of child porn were being traded from Rees's IP address. After a monthlong investigation, Walton County Sheriff's Deputies arrived yesterday afternoon at Rees's Santa Rosa Beach house to arrest him. According to North West Florida Daily News, authorities also seized Rees's computer.They said that "pretty significant images" of child pornography were found in the home, but the exact number hasn't yet been determined.Rees had been active in numerous political and Evangelical christian group. In 2002 he was appointed by then-Gov. Jeb Bush to serve on the Florida Medical Examiner Commission.A Republican State Committee member is an elected position. Members get a vote at party meetings, and are allowed to set party rules and chose the state chair. Rees's wife is Walton County's Republican State Committeewoman.If convicted, Rees could face more than 10 years in jail.Cue Clem to tell me that this is no big deal. After all, if sleeping with both a mother and her daughter or e-mailing bestiality videos to all of the people in your address book is nothing, then what's a little kiddy porn?

Cue Clem to tell me that this is no big deal. After all, if sleeping with both a mother and her daughter or e-mailing bestiality videos to all of the people in your address book is nothing, then what's a little kiddy porn?F*** you, your lies and your smears.You for years have dishonestly defended an actual real-life rapist.There was no credible evidence whatsoever that Bill Clinton raped anybody, yet a wingnut like you ignored that and tried to ruin him.You failed. And smeared the rape victim.So the tearful statement of the victim and her 3, 4 contemporaneous witnesses who saw her distress that day and her badly bitten lip, including a nurse who treated her, have no credibility whatsover to little Miss Marxist.....Miss Broaddrick and her so-called witnesses were likely on Richard Mellon Scaife's payrollGet some professional help.

F*** you, your lies and your smears.Temper, temper, Puss.You for years have dishonestly defended an actual real-life rapist.And smeared the rape victim.Get some professional help.Here's a hint Puss.An 'actual real-life rapist' is someone who was convicted of that crime.Your obsession with Bill Clinton is really unhealthy.(Obsession: the domination of one's thoughts or feelings by a persistent idea)