Lmao!onlyaladd » 12 Oct 2016 5:36 pm » wrote: From the retard who can't form a sentence or spell your.
Yuor lack of Hillary post...wtf
Trump's defenders are pigs just like him.‘You’re On Your Own’: FBN Host Stunned by Curt Schilling Defending Lewd Trump Remark
Curt Schilling appeared on Fox Business Network today and defended Donald Trump‘s lewd remark to a 10-year-old in a way that stunned host Trish Regan.
One of the recently-unearthed past Trump remarks includes The Donald looking at a group of preteen girls and joking about one of them, “I am going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?”
Schilling argued to Regan today, “How many times have you looked at a young man and said ‘Wow, he’s a beautiful young man’ or ‘Wow he’s a gorgeous young man’?”
Regan said, “Zero.” Schilling called that a “lie” because, he insisted, “there’s no way you haven’t seen somebody else’s son and said ‘Wow, he’s beautiful.'”
Regan responded, “And thought I oughta be dating him? No, sorry You’re on your own on this one.”
She told Schilling that she wouldn’t look at a young boy and say she’d date him in 10 years, because “that would be pretty sad if I did.”
Watch the video at link in title.
Misty » 13 Oct 2016 4:00 pm » wrote: Trump's defenders are pigs just like him.
I swear I can taste the bile.Can You Guess What Donald Trump Thinks Makes a Woman Good in Bed?
New audio reveals Donald Trump’s secret formula for what makes a woman good in bed.
It’s being emotionally damaged.
From a 2004 conversation transcribed by My Fox 8 between two men (Trump and Howard Stern) who, as far as I know, are not currently on any kind of registry, but maybe should be—about Lindsay Lohan, who was, at that time, a teenager:
Sexual prowess and what he thinks of women in bed want is not relevant unless he is thinking of going to bed with Angela merkelMisty » 14 Oct 2016 4:37 pm » wrote: I swear I can taste the bile.
People should indeed mind their own business instead of working to harm the freedoms of others (they supposedly don't care about).crimsongulf » 16 Oct 2016 2:07 pm » wrote:
The majority could care less about ***
AS I said, the majority could give a rats *** less about ***.onlyaladd » 16 Oct 2016 2:51 pm » wrote: People should indeed mind their own business instead of working to harm the freedoms of others (they supposedly don't care about).
Then act like it. Not giving a **** is an improvement over those who actively are trying to impose on their rights.crimsongulf » 16 Oct 2016 4:02 pm » wrote:
AS I said, the majority could give a rats *** less about ***.
Nope. Every Time that you post that folks think *** are relevant, I am going to point out that they are a gnat on an elephants ***.onlyaladd » 16 Oct 2016 6:20 pm » wrote: Then act like it. Not giving a **** is an improvement over those who actively are trying to impose on their rights.
If they aren't significant, why spend effort trying to defeat them?crimsongulf » 16 Oct 2016 6:28 pm » wrote:
Nope. Every Time that you post that folks think *** are relevant, I am going to point out that they are a gnat on an elephants ***.
Because you keep trying to make them relevant. I enjoy pointing out ignorance.onlyaladd » 16 Oct 2016 6:43 pm » wrote: If they aren't significant, why spend effort trying to defeat them?
How are you not understanding?
Well, you self-indict to "retardation" then. I see all kinds of errors in your writing.onlyaladd » 12 Oct 2016 5:36 pm » wrote: From the retard who can't form a sentence or spell your.
Yuor lack of Hillary post...wtf
I see you have asked this question of Misty at least twice now and get no answer...she'll say she has you on ignore, otherwise would have answered...right.Huey » 09 Oct 2016 6:43 pm » wrote:
When it is politically expedient Misty does not believe in shaming victims. Right not now it is ok because the first female president is involved.
Do you agree with calling sexual assault victims trailer trash, bimbos, skanks, etc.
Good luck!larryc12 » 17 Oct 2016 7:51 am » wrote: I see you have asked this question of Misty at least twice now and get no answer...she'll say she has you on ignore, otherwise would have answered...right.So maybe she'll read MY post and answer. I have read her responses to the claims against Billyboy for years now and it's inevitably, "has he been tried and convicted of rape? NO!....so therefore stop condemning him of it....". So Trump has been accused of all this sexual misbehavior and she has no trouble bringing it all out, bit by bit. So in Trump's case, accusations are quite enough for her. Just a wee bit inconsistent, don't you think? Perhaps she can explain to us how Hillary is not hypocritical on all this and include how she (Misty) isn't hypocritical either. I won't hold my breath, though.
Sorry. I'm not going to reply to Huey's question through you.larryc12 » 17 Oct 2016 7:51 am » wrote:I see you have asked this question of Misty at least twice now and get no answer...she'll say she has you on ignore, otherwise would have answered...right.So maybe she'll read MY post and answer.
What I actually have said is that I don't think that you should refer to anyone as a 'rapist' if they have never been convicted of or even charged with that crime.larryc12 » 17 Oct 2016 7:51 am » wrote:I have read her responses to the claims against Billyboy for years now and it's inevitably, "has he been tried and convicted of rape? NO!....so therefore stop condemning him of it....". So Trump has been accused of all this sexual misbehavior and she has no trouble bringing it all out, bit by bit. So in Trump's case, accusations are quite enough for her. Just a wee bit inconsistent, don't you think? Perhaps she can explain to us how Hillary is not hypocritical on all this and include how she (Misty) isn't hypocritical either. I won't hold my breath, though.