Liberal Forum

Misty » 19 Oct 2016 2:23 pm » wrote: Sorry. I'm not going to reply to Huey's question through you.
What I actually have said is that I don't think that you should refer to anyone as a 'rapist' if they have never been convicted of or even charged with that crime.
I have no problem calling them an 'accused' rapist or an 'alleged' rapist.

You are the hypocrite who refers to Bill Clinton as a 'rapist' but don't seem to want us to believe the women accusing Donald Trump of improper sexual conduct.
I have no problem referring to all the women involved with both BC and DT as their 'accusers' because at this point, that's what they are.

You guys picked this guy, now you want to pin his problems on me.
I told you he was a piece of ****.
You should have listened.

Clinton is a rapist. He settled lawsuits for close to a billion dollars, proving that fact.
There is nothing indicating Trump is.

Liberals are hypocrites.

Donald Trump's attorney: Trump's sexual-assault accusers 'aren't even women he'd be attracted to'.

Michael Cohen, an attorney for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, implied on Tuesday that the more than a dozen women accusing Trump of various forms of sexual misconduct were not attractive enough to grope.

"Beauty is in the eye of beholder ... these aren't even women he'd be attracted to," Cohen said in a CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer.

Mr Cohen doesn't seem to know that sexual assault is an act of power and control and not necessarily about someone craving sexual activity.

golfboy » 19 Oct 2016 2:25 pm » wrote: Clinton is a rapist. He settled lawsuits for close to a billion dollars, proving that fact.
There is nothing indicating Trump is.

Liberals are hypocrites.

A billion dollars? Wow. Cool story.

Misty » 19 Oct 2016 2:47 pm » wrote: Mr Cohen doesn't seem to know that sexual assault is an act of power and control and not necessarily about someone craving sexual activity.

Also remember how it was said Hillary was mean to Bill's mistresses by calling them rednecks, or loons whatever.
Now we have Trump and his lawyer calling these women ugly. And no problem for cons.

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 3:13 pm » wrote:Also remember how it was said Hillary was mean to Bill's mistresses by calling them rednecks, or loons whatever.
Now we have Trump and his lawyer calling these women ugly. And no problem for cons.

You don't think there's a double standard, do you?

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 2:57 pm » wrote:A billion dollars? Wow. Cool story.

I had no idea that the Clintons even had a billion dollars.

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 2:57 pm » wrote: A billion dollars? Wow. Cool story.

A million. Sorry, that was a typo.
Here is just ONE payment: Clinton Will Pay $850,000 to End Paula Jones Suit

Misty » 19 Oct 2016 3:18 pm » wrote: I had no idea that the Clintons even had a billion dollars.

Not anymore lol

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 3:23 pm » wrote: Not anymore lol

It is sad how you and yuor Twitter Twit pal laugh at sexual assault victims who are against yuor political ideology.

Deplorable in a real way.

Huey » 19 Oct 2016 4:11 pm » wrote:
It is sad how you and yuor Twitter Twit pal laugh at sexual assault victims who are against yuor political ideology.

Deplorable in a real way.

I'm laughing at golfboys stupidity not any victims.

Hey Huey Trump's defense has been that his accusers are too ugly for him to grope. How do you feel about that?
Oh and since you voted twice for Bill and are about to for Trump that means 3 times you've voted for a sexual predator 3 times to my zero. So get off your high horse.

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 4:35 pm » wrote: I'm laughing at golfboys stupidity not any victims.

Hey Huey Trump's defense has been that his accusers are too ugly for him to grope. How do you feel about that?
Oh and since you voted twice for Bill and are about to for Trump that means 3 times you've voted for a sexual predator 3 times to my zero. So get off your high horse.

I may be voting for trump, son.

No sir, again, your ignorance show. Clinton's sexual issues did not really come to the public eye until after his 2nd election. In addition, you did not have the available news sources you have now. You were too young to remember or too stoned. So I will remain on my ho horse on that count.

Next, concerning the Clinton's, my gripe is not with bill dumb one. It is with Hillary's treat,net of the victims and your diversions and silence on those discussions. So again, I remain on the high horse,

As far as trump these allegations are not proven, like an ignorant dron you are running with the story you are told to run with. You are not a smart person. I say that with pity. The most famous of the groping incidents has been debunked. An eyewitness AND the women's own story, which may be false anyway.

My point stands.

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 4:35 pm » wrote: I'm laughing at golfboys stupidity not any victims.

Hey Huey Trump's defense has been that his accusers are too ugly for him to grope. How do you feel about that?
Oh and since you voted twice for Bill and are about to for Trump that means 3 times you've voted for a sexual predator 3 times to my zero. So get off your high horse.

Hey junior, are these the allegations you are crying about:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... ald-trump/

Huey » 19 Oct 2016 4:59 pm » wrote:
Hey junior, are these the allegations you are crying about:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... ald-trump/

Lol right off the bat.
The butler said it didn't happen? Well that should settle it. And your site denies that there are six people who have come forward to support the claims of the People mag reporter.

At what point when Trump tells you he does this do you believe him?

onlyaladd » 19 Oct 2016 5:16 pm » wrote: Lol right off the bat.
The butler said it didn't happen? Well that should settle it. And your site denies that there are six people who have come forward to support the claims of the People mag reporter.

At what point when Trump tells you he does this do you believe him?

Really? So you got one questionable debunking. Just one. The others are thoroughly debunked.

No, the question is at what point do yuo start questioning the spin you are told to believe? I asked you to post it but you have since refused. You are part of the Hillary protection team. You cling to these false stories as too divert from direct questions about DNC election fraud, money laundering to hire instigators of violence, etc. why do you run, junior?

Misty » 19 Oct 2016 2:23 pm » wrote: Sorry. I'm not going to reply to Huey's question through you.

What I actually have said is that I don't think that you should refer to anyone as a 'rapist' if they have never been convicted of or even charged with that crime.
I have no problem calling them an 'accused' rapist or an 'alleged' rapist.

You are the hypocrite who refers to Bill Clinton as a 'rapist' but don't seem to want us to believe the women accusing Donald Trump of improper sexual conduct.

Where did you get that little "tidbit"? I believe he was an asshole to some women. Assholes do those things to/with women. But what's worse? An asshole who gets out of line with women, or a woman who put lives at risk internationally (emails), turned her back on Americans at death's door (Benghazi), lied to the parents of Benghazi victims and then called THEM liars, sold (Foundation) the rights of U.S. uranium reserves to our enemies (Uranium 1), and laughs after getting a known-proven rapist off for raping a 12 year old child? You tell me.

I have no problem referring to all the women involved with both BC and DT as their 'accusers' because at this point, that's what they are.

You guys picked this guy, now you want to pin his problems on me.

I certainly didn't pick him and to say anyone is pinning his problems on YOU, is ludicrous. Good Lord.

I told you he was a piece of ****.
You should have listened.

Oh, that's it. The wisdom of ol' Misty and nobody listened. I had him pegged a terrible candidate before you ever **** anything out about him.

larryc12 » 20 Oct 2016 4:09 pm » wrote: Where did you get that little "tidbit"? I believe he was an asshole to some women. Assholes do those things to/with women. But what's worse? An asshole who gets out of line with women, or a woman who put lives at risk internationally (emails), turned her back on Americans at death's door (Benghazi), lied to the parents of Benghazi victims and then called THEM liars, sold (Foundation) the rights of U.S. uranium reserves to our enemies (Uranium 1), and laughs after getting a known-proven rapist off for raping a 12 year old child? You tell me.
I certainly didn't pick him and to say anyone is pinning his problems on YOU, is ludicrous. Good Lord.
Oh, that's it. The wisdom of ol' Misty and nobody listened. I had him pegged a terrible candidate before you ever **** anything out about him.

You are going to make her head explode with all those real issues concerning Clinton. No pictures, no memes, actual facts and issues. I hope you feel guilty for the headache you just gave her by making her think.
and add me to the terrible candidate comment.

Huey » 20 Oct 2016 4:12 pm » wrote:
You are going to make her head explode with all those real issues concerning Clinton. No pictures, no memes, actual facts and issues. I hope you feel guilty for the headache you just gave her by making her think.
and add me to the terrible candidate comment.

The "yeah, buts" will be forthcoming.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-trump ... SKCN12L265

Unless they find twelve jurors who have been living under a rock for the last 18 months, I think the cat is already out of the bag.

larryc12 » 20 Oct 2016 4:09 pm » wrote:I believe he was an asshole to some women. Assholes do those things to/with women. But what's worse? An asshole who gets out of line with women, or a woman who put lives at risk internationally (emails), turned her back on Americans at death's door (Benghazi), lied to the parents of Benghazi victims and then called THEM liars, sold (Foundation) the rights of U.S. uranium reserves to our enemies (Uranium 1), and laughs after getting a known-proven rapist off for raping a 12 year old child? You tell me.

WOW! I see you have your FOX News/Sean Hannity talking points down.

Lots of mischaracterizations (to put it mildly) in that post.

larryc12 » 20 Oct 2016 5:07 pm » wrote:The "yeah, buts" will be forthcoming.

Wouldn't waste my time.