Liberal Forum

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 7:28 pm » wrote:

Of course he's going to be acting in his own interests, and the right wing flying monkeys who were running around screaming about 'pay for play' in regards to the Clinton Foundation will be just fine with it.

Idiot, before you start your loinfo speculating let's see if he puts his interests in a blind trust like most presidents.

Additionally, we have little respect for your concerns because you had absolutely no criticism for Hillary's pay for play schemes. You lost any bit of credibility you might have had Miss senior moderator.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 7:28 pm » wrote:


Of course he's going to be acting in his own interests, and the right wing flying monkeys who were running around screaming about 'pay for play' in regards to the Clinton Foundation will be just fine with it.

Clinton was proven, you are speculating.

Add to that the Treasonous Trump campaign working with the Russians, Rudy Giuliani and his buddy Jim Kallstrom working with some rogue FBI agents in the NY office who leaked some phony info about an imminent indictment and Jim Comey's letter to Congress. And she still managed to win the popular vote. LOL

crimsongulf » 11 Nov 2016 7:41 pm » wrote:Clinton was proven, you are speculating.

Yeah, it's just me. I'm the only one who's concerned about this.
He has business with foreign governments and banks all over the world.
To say that doesn't present a conflict of interest is laughable.
But I know that your Circus Peanut Messiah could never do any wrong in your eyes.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 7:55 pm » wrote: Yeah, it's just me. I'm the only one who's concerned about this.
He has business with foreign governments and banks all over the world.
To say that doesn't present a conflict of interest is laughable.
But I know that your Circus Peanut Messiah could never do any wrong in your eyes.

Like I said, Clinton was proven and you and the media (that was so very wrong) are speculating.

When and if something actually happens, knock yer happy *** out.

crimsongulf » 11 Nov 2016 7:58 pm » wrote:Like I said, Clinton was proven and you and the media (that was so very wrong) are speculating.
When and if something actually happens, knock yer happy *** out.

Clinton is irrelevant now. She's toast.

His children who are going to be running the businesses are now part of his transition team that will be choosing who will head up the various government agencies, and work in his administration.
But I'm sure they will never consider their own self interest in making those decisions. LOL
Are you naive or just plain stupid?
You can choose to trust the con-artist fraud all you want. I don't.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 8:20 pm » wrote: Clinton is irrelevant now. She's toast.

His children who are going to be running the businesses are now part of his transition team that will be choosing who will head up the various government agencies, and work in his administration.
But I'm sure they will never consider their own self interest in making those decisions. LOL
Are you naive or just plain stupid?
You can choose to trust the con-artist fraud all you want. I don't.

Again, that is all speculation. Until someone proves that his kids running the empire is against the law then all you have is yet another lib call for a WAAAAAMBLANCE

crimsongulf » 11 Nov 2016 8:22 pm » wrote:Again, that is all speculation.

Well here is something that is NOT speculation.

According to a Politico report, Trump’s transition website seems to have lifted some passages from the nonpartisan nonprofit the Center for Presidential Transition.
The group is a project under the Partnership for Public Service, which was founded in 2001 to inspire and reward those who worked in the federal government.

That's how they operate.
His wife steals Michelle Obama's speech, his daughter rips off her shoe designs from an Italian designer and his website plagiarizes a non-profit.
A bunch of grifters and frauds is what they are.
The whole **** family.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 8:20 pm » wrote: Clinton is irrelevant now. She's toast.

His children who are going to be running the businesses are now part of his transition team that will be choosing who will head up the various government agencies, and work in his administration.
But I'm sure they will never consider their own self interest in making those decisions. LOL
Are you naive or just plain stupid?
You can choose to trust the con-artist fraud all you want. I don't.

I'll be honest loinfo. Although you are only parroting the opinions of those who are smarter than you I don't give a **** if he benefits IF he gets out of the mess you and yours created and the country as a whole benefits.

I am also aware that you are a disingenuous bitch and will misquote this post in the future.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 9:05 pm » wrote:
Well here is something that is NOT speculation.




That's how they operate.
His wife steals Michelle Obama's speech, his daughter rips off her shoe designs from an Italian designer and his website plagiarizes a non-profit.
A bunch of grifters and frauds is what they are.
The whole **** family.

Cry me a river snowflake.

you got beat, face it like a tranny.

Run hide and deflect from your failures.

If you were right, you would have won.

You didn't.

crimsongulf » 11 Nov 2016 9:12 pm » wrote:Cry me a river snowflake.
you got beat, face it like a tranny.
Run hide and deflect from your failures.
If you were right, you would have won.
You didn't.

I didn't have a dog in this fight Red.
I never wanted HRC to run in the first place.

I voted for John Kasich in the primary and would have voted for him in the general had he gotten the nomination.

I'm not hiding from anything.
You nominated and elected this piece of ****, now it's on you to defend him for the next four years and you had better believe that I'm going to hold your feet to the fire.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 9:16 pm » wrote: I didn't have a dog in this fight Red.
I never wanted HRC to run in the first place.

I voted for John Kasich in the primary and would have voted for him in the general had he gotten the nomination.

I'm not hiding from anything.
You nominated and elected this piece of ****, now it's on you to defend him for the next four years and you better believe I'm going to hold your feet to the fire.

So, why was Trump your one and only target. why no vitriol for clinton>

crimsongulf » 11 Nov 2016 9:18 pm » wrote: So, why was Trump your one and only target. why no vitriol for clinton

Because while she was a terrible candidate and I didn't want her to run, he is the most deplorable human being that has ever run for POTUS.

The Birther thing was enough for me, but then there was the mocking of the disabled guy and the ****** grabbing video.
I just couldn't get past that ****.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 9:16 pm » wrote: I didn't have a dog in this fight Red.
I never wanted HRC to run in the first place.

I voted for John Kasich in the primary and would have voted for him in the general had he gotten the nomination.

I'm not hiding from anything.
You nominated and elected this piece of ****, now it's on you to defend him for the next four years and you better believe I'm going to hold your feet to the fire.

The problem is you are a disingenuous lowinfo. You have one set of standards for limbs/progs and another for cons, not that trump is a con. He is more aligned with YOU than he his with us. Nope, the problem is you deal in loinfo charges. You lie, you falsify, and never, ever admit you are wrong.

So when you claim you are holding people's feet to the fire it is an empty threat. IF AL said that I would respect it. But you will sell out your beliefs if your political masters told you to. You are not that bright.

Kasich is a perfect Example. For the 6 years or so I have read your posts I know you are very pro choice. You have been the most vulgar lefty I have seen on the issue, insulting anyone who supports PP, free BC, forcing pharmacists who refuse to issue the abortion Pill, etc in the most vulgar of terms. Kasich has A zero percent NARAL rating. So I think you are either full of **** or you are lying your *** off. The next time your gutter mouth opens up and attacks a proliferation poster I will remind the entire forum of your hypocrisy.

The next example is your complete silence, and ignorance concerning Clinton. Again, you have you the most foul mouthed insults to insult anyone who disagrees with your whine about crony capitalism, Wall Street, etc. yet, you remained silent about Hillary who represented everything you posted against in that respect. Additionally, although you were too ignorant to gauge the political feelings of your own state, youndid post if you thought it was going to be close you would vote for Clinton. But again, your refusal to even address Clinton's actions in these areas shows you are willing to remain silent to achieve your political goals.

next, I have seen you attack, again, on the most vulgar of terms, those who disagree with you on victims rights and the right of an accuser to be heard. Again you lost all credibility in this area with your defense of Hillary's actions. Lu have become a laughing stock, the target of a late night tv shows comedy skits. You make Palin look like a genius.

So please, if your charges of holding people's feet to the fire make us laugh, it is your own doing.

roadkill » 11 Nov 2016 11:50 am » wrote:
It will be a lot better than what your rotten party did to the country.

This old boy sings about what your culture has done...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMwhl4IrPNc

It'll be more of the same, *******.

Electing tRump was a pyrrhic victory - but I'll take what I can get.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 12:12 pm » wrote:Trump on the electoral college in 2012.



Finally I agree with him on something.

So do I. In fact, it utterly destroys a democracy. It's anathema to democracy.


Of course, we are not a democracy, so I say let's keep it.

Huey » 11 Nov 2016 9:31 pm » wrote: The problem is you are a disingenuous lowinfo. You have one set of standards for limbs/progs and another for cons, not that trump is a con. He is more aligned with YOU than he his with us. Nope, the problem is you deal in loinfo charges. You lie, you falsify, and never, ever admit you are wrong.

So when you claim you are holding people's feet to the fire it is an empty threat. IF AL said that I would respect it. But you will sell out your beliefs if your political masters told you to. You are not that bright.

Kasich is a perfect Example. For the 6 years or so I have read your posts I know you are very pro choice. You have been the most vulgar lefty I have seen on the issue, insulting anyone who supports PP, free BC, forcing pharmacists who refuse to issue the abortion Pill, etc in the most vulgar of terms. Kasich has A zero percent NARAL rating. So I think you are either full of **** or you are lying your *** off. The next time your gutter mouth opens up and attacks a proliferation poster I will remind the entire forum of your hypocrisy.

The next example is your complete silence, and ignorance concerning Clinton. Again, you have you the most foul mouthed insults to insult anyone who disagrees with your whine about crony capitalism, Wall Street, etc. yet, you remained silent about Hillary who represented everything you posted against in that respect. Additionally, although you were too ignorant to gauge the political feelings of your own state, youndid post if you thought it was going to be close you would vote for Clinton. But again, your refusal to even address Clinton's actions in these areas shows you are willing to remain silent to achieve your political goals.

next, I have seen you attack, again, on the most vulgar of terms, those who disagree with you on victims rights and the right of an accuser to be heard. Again you lost all credibility in this area with your defense of Hillary's actions. You have become a laughing stock, the target of a late night tv shows comedy skits. You make Palin look like a genius.

So please, if your charges of holding people's feet to the fire make us laugh, it is your own doing.

He seems a tad adamant, but the little darling has a point, misty.

Voting for a fella with a zero NARAL rating DOES seem a smidge out of your wheel house. And the implicit pretense that hitlery would have been better is a conclusion based on evidence which is evidently not in evidence - that's pretty evident.

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 9:21 pm » wrote: Because while she was a terrible candidate and I didn't want her to run, he is the most deplorable human being that has ever run for POTUS.

The Birther thing was enough for me, but then there was the mocking of the disabled guy and the ****** grabbing video.
I just couldn't get past that ****.

The ****** grabbing. I don't believe I've ever, in my entire life, heard a man brag about being entitled to grope any vagina he chose. And it was that, the entitlement rather than the phrase that bothered me most. A glimpse into the mind of a certain kind of pervert, I guess. I couldn't watch him after that and couldn't even listen to the debates in their entirety.

I would consider it a woman thing but female Trump supporters claim it didn't bother them. I guess they let strange men grab their pussies as a form of introduction or instead of a thank you card. Bizarre culture they've got going there.

So maybe it's just us.

greatnpowerfuloz » 11 Nov 2016 11:28 pm » wrote:
The ****** grabbing. I don't believe I've ever, in my entire life, heard a man brag about being entitled to grope any vagina he chose. And it was that, the entitlement rather than the phrase that bothered me most. A glimpse into the mind of a certain kind of pervert, I guess. I couldn't watch him after that and couldn't even listen to the debates in their entirety.

I would consider it a woman thing but female Trump supporters claim it didn't bother them. I guess they let strange men grab their pussies as a form of introduction or instead of a thank you card. Bizarre culture they've got going there.

So maybe it's just us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJIydD7ULz8

Misty » 11 Nov 2016 9:05 pm » wrote: Well here is something that is NOT speculation.


That's how they operate.
His wife steals Michelle Obama's speech, his daughter rips off her shoe designs from an Italian designer and his website plagiarizes a non-profit.
A bunch of grifters and frauds is what they are.
The whole **** family.

That's what people get for leaving their stuff just lying around. And besides, Hillary........