Why would a ******* protest a contest that they lost fair and square?greatnpowerfuloz » 12 Nov 2016 8:49 pm » wrote:
I heard there was a handful of protests that got out of control. Some isolated flag burning (I never understood the concept behind that) but most protesting was of the peaceful nature. Maybe there just weren't as many as you imagined. I highly doubt they were 'purged'. News is news and violence is big news.
And I am relieved to see that the right is not physically assaulting anymore young Muslim women. Guess the social rejects found something more entertaining to do.
But you would have been fine with a bunch of brainwashed morons voting for a Wall St crack hoMisty » 12 Nov 2016 8:52 pm » wrote: I didn't have a candidate in this race.
My guy was John Kasich.
I'm angry because a bunch of brainwashed hero worshippers bought a line of **** and inflicted this racist, misogynistic piece of **** on us.
I refuse to normalize him, and pretend that he's just like any other person who has ever sought the office.
In case you didn't notice he didn't lift a finger to honor the veterans that he always brags about loving so much on Veterans Day.
He got your vote, so he's done with you.
greatnpowerfuloz » 12 Nov 2016 8:49 pm » wrote: I heard there was a handful of protests that got out of control. Some isolated flag burning (I never understood the concept behind that) but most protesting was of the peaceful nature. Maybe there just weren't as many as you imagined. I highly doubt they were 'purged'. News is news and violence is big news.
And I am relieved to see that the right is not physically assaulting anymore young Muslim women. Guess the social rejects found something more entertaining to do.
That's right. Other than the Russians (who were in contact with the Trump campaign) helping him with their steady drip of hacked emails, the FBI's involvement including Comey's letter and the rogue agents from the NY office leaking false info about an imminent indictment, and the myriad of voter suppression tactics, it was fair and square.crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2016 8:54 pm » wrote:Why would a ******* protest a contest that they lost fair and square?
Racist.greatnpowerfuloz » 12 Nov 2016 8:34 pm » wrote: you people
Misty » 12 Nov 2016 9:00 pm » wrote: That's right. Other than the Russians (who were in contact with the Trump campaign) helping him with their steady drip of hacked emails, the FBI's involvement including Comey's letter and the rogue agents from the NY office leaking false info about an imminent indictment, and the myriad of voter suppression tactics, it was fair and square.
Trump was right about the system being rigged.
It was rigged in his favor.
I don't remember your outrage when the system was rigged to rip off bernie.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 9:00 pm » wrote: That's right. Other than the Russians (who were in contact with the Trump campaign) helping him with their steady drip of hacked emails, the FBI's involvement including Comey's letter and the rogue agents from the NY office leaking false info about an imminent indictment, and the myriad of voter suppression tactics, it was fair and square.
Trump was right about the system being rigged.
It was rigged in his favor.
I thought it was all purged? Or is it only purged from the internet?Huey » 12 Nov 2016 8:58 pm » wrote: Yeah, they are too busy watching the lefties implosion and riots on TV.
As usual.
No. I would not have been 'fine' with that, but since that was our only choice I would have preferred that to a man who thinks that because he is a 'star' he has the right to sexually assault women.crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2016 8:55 pm » wrote:But you would have been fine with a bunch of brainwashed morons voting for a Wall St crack ho
Did that involve the Russians and the FBI?Cannonpointer » 12 Nov 2016 9:04 pm » wrote:I don't remember your outrage when the system was rigged to rip off bernie.
It's okay to steal nominations - just not elections.
No, read it again. I am looking for the riots and violence that occurred when Obama won.greatnpowerfuloz » 12 Nov 2016 9:05 pm » wrote: I thought it was all purged? Or is it only purged from the internet?
A FoxNews conspiracy!
I am much better off with an unknown vs a known liar, cheat and cuck.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 9:05 pm » wrote: No. I would not have been 'fine' with that, but since that was our only choice I would have preferred that to a man who thinks that because he is a 'star' he has the right to sexually assault women.
You realize that your party has now given up the right to call yourselves the 'family values' party don't you?
You can't ever use that weapon to bludgeon Democrats/Liberals with again.
Woman,You re smarter (I think) than your sore loser *** is coming across/Misty » 12 Nov 2016 9:00 pm » wrote: That's right. Other than the Russians (who were in contact with the Trump campaign) helping him with their steady drip of hacked emails, the FBI's involvement including Comey's letter and the rogue agents from the NY office leaking false info about an imminent indictment, and the myriad of voter suppression tactics, it was fair and square.
Trump was right about the system being rigged.
It was rigged in his favor.

Get it straight Red, this has nothing to do with me being a sore loser.crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2016 9:18 pm » wrote:Woman,You re smarter (I think) than your sore loser *** is coming across/
The voters rejected the liberal agenda.
Suck it up buttercup
With a lot of help from the Russians.crimsongulf » 12 Nov 2016 9:20 pm » wrote:Trump won fair and square.
ACCEPT IT.
We didn't elect a liar in chief and folks recognized that she lied and people died.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 9:23 pm » wrote: Get it straight Red, this has nothing to do with me being a sore loser.
This has to do with the fact that this country elected a Birther-In-Chief.
If the voters were rejecting the liberal agenda, then why did they vote for a NYC Liberal?
Oh that's right. You think he's a Republican.
![]()
![]()
Check the state level red/blue map. Accept it. Hell, even you voted for a candidate with a ZERO Naral rating and a sketchy gay rights agenda.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 9:23 pm » wrote: Get it straight Red, this has nothing to do with me being a sore loser.
This has to do with the fact that this country elected a Birther-In-Chief.
If the voters were rejecting the liberal agenda, then why did they vote for a NYC Liberal?
Oh that's right. You think he's a Republican.
![]()
![]()