Liberal Forum

Question: Hillary stole the nomination - what should be done about that felony?
Answer: Putin.

Wow! He got hold of his phone and he's been Tweeting up a storm today.
Poor KellyAnne must be tied up in a closet somewhere in Trump Tower.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 12:57 pm » wrote:Wow! He got hold of his phone and he's been Tweeting up a storm today.
Poor KellyAnne must be tied up in a closet somewhere in Trump Tower.

You have become a sad, irrelevant human being. I really do pity you.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 12:56 pm » wrote:Question: Hillary stole the nomination - what should be done about that felony?
Answer: Putin.

As Huey says, I'm kinda dumb, so perhaps you can explain to me how exactly the nomination was stolen from Sanders and what felony was committed?

The main problem with the notion that the DNC rigged the results for Clinton is that it requires one to assume the improbable.

The DNC had no role or authority in primary contests, which are run by state governments.

Clinton dominated the primaries.

The DNC, through state parties, had a bit more influence over caucuses … where Sanders dominated Clinton.

No, the DNC Didn’t Rig the Primary in Favor of Hillary

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:04 pm » wrote: As Huey says, I'm kinda dumb, so perhaps you can explain to me how exactly the nomination was stolen from Sanders and what felony was committed?

No, no, sweetie. I don't have to explain why the sky is blue - YOU have to explain why it isn't, since you're saying it isn't.

Why did Debbie Watermelon Schults resign?

Explain her resignation, if the DNC she chaired gave hillary no improper assistance against her opponent.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 1:09 pm » wrote:No, no, sweetie. I don't have to explain why the sky is blue - YOU have to explain why it isn't, since you're saying it isn't.

Sorry Sugar, you're the one who said that a 'felony' was committed, so it's on you to prove that.
You also need to prove how the Clinton campaign rigged the primaries that are run, not by the DNC, but by the individual state governments.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 1:09 pm » wrote:Why did Debbie Watermelon Schults resign?
Explain her resignation, if the DNC she chaired gave hillary no improper assistance against her opponent.

Apparently Podesta and others wanted her gone as far back as the fall of 2015, and the leaked emails gave them just the excuse they needed to get rid of her.
Why would he have wanted her gone back then if he thought she was going to help his candidate?

Inside the scramble to oust Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Several senior Democratic officials with ties to Hillary and Bill Clinton told POLITICO that campaign higher-ups have been trying to replace the oft-off-message Florida congresswoman from the start of Clinton’s campaign late last year.

Riddle me this CP, do you think that if Bernie had gotten the nomination, he would have won the election?
Think the country was ready for a 74 year old Jewish socialist?

And of course the ****-In-Chief lied again.

Why some of your Facebook friends are wearing safety pins.

The trend doesn't have to do with fashion, but plays off the "safety" part of the item's name to indicate that the person wearing the pin is a safe person for those who might feel in danger, whether that's due to their race, religion, nationality or other status.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:23 pm » wrote: Sorry Sugar, you're the one who said that a 'felony' was committed, so it's on you to prove that.
You also need to prove how the Clinton campaign rigged the primaries that are run, not by the DNC, but by the individual state governments.

Election tampering is a felony, my dulcet darling.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=election+tampering&ia=web

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:23 pm » wrote: Apparently Podesta and others wanted her gone as far back as the fall of 2015, and the leaked emails gave them the excuse they needed to get rid of her.
Why would he have wanted her gone back then if he thought she was going to help his candidate?

Who is podesta, and who are others?

I'm talking about Debbie Watermelon Schultz, who was caught abusing her position as DNC chair to collude with the hitlery clinton campaign to cheat Americans out of a legitimate Democrat candidate for pResident.

You can keep kicking up dust and pointing at podesta - when you're done, the felonious election tampering your party got up to remains on the record.

I guess that in your world, receiving the questions in advance, so that they could ambush bernie with gotchas, is yet another aspect of hitlery being the innocent victim?

Your party fielded an illegitimate candidate in 2016 - just as the repukes did in 08 and 12. That you continue to run distractions and denials merely confirms that you're not a true, kasich supporting republican - you just liked his anti-gay, anti-abortion rhetoric, I guess.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:23 pm » wrote: Riddle me this CP, do you think that if Bernie had gotten the nomination, he would have won the election?
Think the country was ready for a 74 year old Jewish socialist?

I honestly think he'd have won.

It would have been an ersatz right wing agent of change against a legitimate left wing agent of change.

When the ballots were counted, America's genuine nature would have been revealed. As it stands, neither candidate won. One candidate lost. This election was not about the direction we want to go. It was about the direction we DON'T want to go - about who we trust LEAST, not who we want to lead us MOST. The direction we DO want to go was not on the ballot.

tRump has won the "man of the people" position by DEFAULT, rather than by ELECTION - and this, because your party chair and media scuz corruptly tampered with an American election.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 1:44 pm » wrote:Election tampering is a felony, my dulcet darling.

Right, but you haven't shown how the state primary elections were tampered with.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:23 pm » wrote:Your party fielded an illegitimate candidate in 2016 - just as the repukes did in 08 and 12. That you continue to run distractions and denials merely confirms that you're not a true, kasich supporting republican - you just liked his anti-gay, anti-abortion rhetoric, I guess.

Not my party.
I have never been a registered Democrat and I chose not to participate in the Democratic primaries this year.
They had nothing to offer me.
I chose instead to change my voter Registration from unaffiliated to Republican so as to be able to vote for the person I thought was the best of the 17 candidates that they were running.

I honestly don't give a **** about Hillary, Bernie or the Democratic party right now.
I'm a lot more concerned about the horror that the Trumpkins have rained down upon us.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:41 pm » wrote:Why some of your Facebook friends are wearing safety pins.

The trend doesn't have to do with fashion, but plays off the "safety" part of the item's name to indicate that the person wearing the pin is a safe person for those who might feel in danger, whether that's due to their religion, nationality or other status.

Wow. This country is in trouble.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 1:51 pm » wrote:I honestly think he'd have won.
It would have been an ersatz right wing agent of change against a legitimate left wing agent of change.
When the ballots were counted, America's genuine nature would have been revealed. As it stands, neither candidate won. One candidate lost. This election was not about the direction we want to go. It was about the direction we DON'T want to go - about who we trust LEAST, not who we want to lead us MOST. The direction we DO want to go was not on the ballot.
tRump has won the "man of the people" position by DEFAULT, rather than by ELECTION - and this, because your party chair and media scuz corruptly tampered with an American election.

Again....not my party.
I am a Liberal, but I have never been a registered Democrat, except for a few months in 2008, when I registered as a Dem because I wanted to vote in the Democratic primary election, not so much FOR Obama, but more AGAINST Hillary.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:04 pm » wrote: Again....not my party.
I am a Liberal, but I have never been a registered Democrat, except for a few months in 2008, when I registered as a Dem because I wanted to vote in the Democratic primary election, not so much FOR Obama, but more AGAINST Hillary.

Ride with outlaws, hang with outlaws.

You've been a hillary agent from day one.

If you're not representing hillary in this argument, the ****-up shutting should commence forthwith.

We got the lesser evil, according to the non democrats. We got the greater evil, according to the democrats.

Where do YOU fall, anti-abortion, anti-gay rights, conventional republican kasich supporter?

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 1:59 pm » wrote: I honestly don't give a **** about Hillary, Bernie or the Democratic party right now.
I'm a lot more concerned about the horror that the Trumpkins have rained down upon us.

You cared deeply about hillary getting elected, right up until you lost - then you quit caring.

Election tampering remains a crime, and debbie watermelon shultz remains a dnc chair who improperly colluded with the clinton campaign, and had to resign when exposed.

Keep denying criminal activity when YOUR party commits it - keep straining at gnats while swallowing camels. All it does is prove the truth - you're a hillary supporter. You were during the election and you are still. Denying that she stole the nomination when the collusion between her and the dnc chair, her and the media, are known facts, is merely more proof.

Donald Trump '.gov' Transition Website Plugs Firm's Properties

Misty: Of course it does.

Donald Trump may have the new title of president-elect, but he's still plugging his old gig as the head of a massive business empire.

Trump's transition website is now equipped with the official ".gov" federal web address.

And while the "Meet The President Elect" section is typically dedicated to outlining an official's vision and background, there is one particular emphasis in his resume.

More than one-quarter of Trump's bio refers to his business properties around the world.

The focus on Trump's individual private properties, from which he draws his income, is a break from the political norms of a candidate transitioning into the White House.

Barack Obama, for example, had a similar bio page during his transition as president elect that outlined his career achievements and charitable work.

Nowhere did Obama mention his books, which were best-sellers and the driving source of his wealth while he served in the White House.

Trump also plugs his wife's jewelry line on his official .gov website.


https://www.greatagain.gov/meet-future-first-lady.html

I would expect no less from the man who did this during the primaries:



Tacky...tacky....tacky.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 2:15 pm » wrote:Ride with outlaws, hang with outlaws.
You've been a hillary agent from day one.

I guess that's why I said that I never wanted her to run, and didn't vote for her in the primary for the second time.
I don't give a **** about Hillary.
She's toast.

Accuse her of whatever you want.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:30 pm » wrote: I guess that's why I said that I never wanted her to run, and didn't vote for her in the primary for the second time.

No, that was for cover.

What gives you away as a hillary agent is not - as you fib - your protestations to the contrary.

What gives you away as a hillary agent is the dozens of partisan posts revealing that you will condemn tRump for things that you overlook when someone in your party is caught doing them. Denying that she stole the nomination, for example, gives you away as a hillary agent.

Shrieking against tRump for maybe, possibly one day making money by allowing the keystone xl, then disappearing like dust in the wind when it was exposed the obama DOES MAKE MONEY off blocking it - those are the sorts of things which demonstrate your partisan bias.

Thanks for axing.

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2016 2:21 pm » wrote:You cared deeply about hillary getting elected, right up until you lost - then you quit caring.

You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.
I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.
I doubt you'll find any posts from me where I was singing her praises.

Now you can stick a fork in me, I'm done with this subject.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.
I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.
I doubt you'll find any posts from me where I was singing her praises.

Now you can stick a fork in me, I'm done with this subject.

Go find someone wearing a safety pin.