Liberal Forum

First Leonard Cohen, now Leon Russell.
This was a bad week for music.

R.I.P. Leon Russell.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H7qFT8U5uo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UW4ELmVD9M

Music like this is my salvation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRYYQVY3j2c

Stupid place won't let me log out.
I keep getting a 'General Error' message.

I'm gone.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.
I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.
I doubt you'll find any posts from me where I was singing her praises.

Now you can stick a fork in me, I'm done with this subject.

You cared deeply? A bit like calling Trump a thin, black woman.

Their obsession with having to have an enemy who possesses views 180 degrees from their own, even if there are none, is getting boring. I may leave them to it for the most part. Pop in on occasion to watch them cannibalize each other or fight over the scraps before they move on to better feeding swamps.

greatnpowerfuloz » 13 Nov 2016 4:36 pm » wrote: You cared deeply? A bit like calling Trump a thin, black man.

Or like saying larry and huey voted for Trump because he grabs women's pussies.

I see AA is not working out for ya.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.

Tamayda, tamahda.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.
I doubt you'll find any posts from me where I was singing her praises.

Now you can stick a fork in me, I'm done with this subject.

Fork it all - we have a clown instead of a demon.

greatnpowerfuloz » 13 Nov 2016 4:36 pm » wrote:You cared deeply? A bit like calling Trump a thin, black woman.
Their obsession with having to have an enemy who possesses views 180 degrees from their own, even if there are none, is getting boring. I may leave them to it for the most part. Pop in on occasion to watch them cannibalize each other or fight over the scraps before they move on to better feeding swamps.

I hear ya.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 6:45 pm » wrote: I hear ya.

You ain't gonna see partisan nut jobs with mental problems ignoring the **** of the administration or candidates.

That's your world psycho. Go ahead and lie about my posts psycho. I will slam your disease ridden *** with facts.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.
I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.
I doubt you'll find any posts from me where I was singing her praises.

Just a ton where you were defending the whore.

Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.
I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.

How'd that work out for you?

greatnpowerfuloz » 13 Nov 2016 4:36 pm » wrote:
You cared deeply? A bit like calling Trump a thin, black woman.

Their obsession with having to have an enemy who possesses views 180 degrees from their own, even if there are none, is getting boring. I may leave them to it for the most part. Pop in on occasion to watch them cannibalize each other or fight over the scraps before they move on to better feeding swamps.

Wait oz...here's Misty's latest cartoon...someone slipped her the wrong script.



https://pjmedia.com/video/watch-hillary ... tasic-pup/

Misty » 12 Nov 2016 8:35 pm » wrote: Do you like your position larry?
You know, the one with your nose up Huey's ***?

Oh, please Miss T...can you ever get off this ****? You can't abide more than one conservative giving you **** over your disingenuous, lying crap, so you go to the BFF accusation. Grow the **** up, would you? You and ol' Ozzie have teamed up right in this thread, so your hypocrisy rings loud and clear yet again.

My 'position' on using the 'c' word is not the same when it pertains to members of this forum as it is when it pertains to public figures.
Huey keeps trying to make it sound like it is, but as usual he's lying.

Oh, well that just makes you little Snow White, now doesn't it? How about sucking underage boys dicks? Never said that about members either?

I have never, and would never, call another member of this forum a ****.
Although I must admit, when it comes to you and Huey, I'm tempted.

Go right ahead....you won't see either of us wah wahing about it.

Huey is just bent out of shape because I called Ann Coulter a ****.

Pointing out hypocrisy is not "bent out of shape"....

Please spare me your phony outrage.
Both of you.

Phony outrage? No outrage at all. Why must you always lie?

Misty » 12 Nov 2016 8:35 pm » wrote: Do you like your position larry?
You know, the one with your nose up Huey's ***?

My 'position' on using the 'c' word is not the same when it pertains to members of this forum as it is when it pertains to public figures.
Huey keeps trying to make it sound like it is, but as usual he's lying.

I have never, and would never, call another member of this forum a ****.
Although I must admit, when it comes to you and Huey, I'm tempted.

Huey is just bent out of shape because I called Ann Coulter a ****.
As far as I know, she does not post here.

Please spare me your phony outrage.
Both of you.

You may call me a ****. I mean it is not as bad has accusing a father of three boys of having experience sucking the dicks of underage children.

Additioinally, you made no stipulations on the word ****. Not until you got busted using it. Noope, there is nothing about a distinction concerning those on the forum. Again, your own words busted you.

Misty » 14 Jul 2016 8:02 pm » wrote: I don't know what his question is because I do my best not to read his posts if I can help it.
I don't really want anything to do with someone who thinks that any woman who disagrees with someone politically deserves to be called a ****.
I think that's my prerogative.

So cut the **** misty. You lied.

Misty and Oz sure have quite the fan base, or stalker base, depending on how you look at it.

Good thing this is all online, real life there would be a lot of ****** grabbing going on.

Fuelman » 14 Nov 2016 10:31 am » wrote: Misty and Oz sure have quite the fan base, or stalker base, depending on how you look at it.

Good thing this is all online, real life there would be a lot of ****** grabbing going on.

I doubt it. One is old and crusty and the other has been around the block to many times.

Huey » 14 Nov 2016 10:38 am » wrote:
I doubt it. One is old and crusty and the other has been around the block to many times.

JMO,
This^^^^ only reinforces the image many have about conservative men that women are old and useless or whores.

You and several others have crossed the line in the attacks on Misty and Oz, your message gets completely lost when the language goes in the gutter.

I'm sure I have used a few choice words aimed at them but, damn, several of you have to insert in every post the derogatory comments.

Makes me wonder how you treat other women in your life and can't help but think something is missing.

I challenge you to treat them like your wife or daughter for the next month. Their voices are the most important ones on this forum, don't **** it up!

I'm sure I'll pay the price for this.

Fuelman » 14 Nov 2016 11:45 am » wrote: JMO,
This^^^^ only reinforces the image many have about conservative men that women are old and useless or whores.

You and several others have crossed the line in the attacks on Misty and Oz, your message gets completely lost when the language goes in the gutter.

I'm sure I have used a few choice words aimed at them but, damn, several of you have to insert in every post the derogatory comments.

Makes me wonder how you treat other women in your life and can't help but think something is missing.

I challenge you to treat them like your wife or daughter for the next month. Their voices are the most important ones on this forum, don't **** it up!

I'm sure I'll pay the price for this.

Why are their voices more important than anyone else's especially when they are incapable of telling the truth?

golfboy » 14 Nov 2016 11:52 am » wrote: Why are their voices more important than anyone else's especially when they are incapable of telling the truth?

"Truth is in the eye of the beholder".

JMO,
A women's perspective should always be a part of the conservation either right or wrong.

Fuelman » 14 Nov 2016 11:45 am » wrote: JMO,
This^^^^ only reinforces the image many have about conservative men that women are old and useless or whores.

You and several others have crossed the line in the attacks on Misty and Oz, your message gets completely lost when the language goes in the gutter.

I'm sure I have used a few choice words aimed at them but, damn, several of you have to insert in every post the derogatory comments.

Makes me wonder how you treat other women in your life and can't help but think something is missing.

I challenge you to treat them like your wife or daughter for the next month. Their voices are the most important ones on this forum, don't **** it up!

I'm sure I'll pay the price for this.

No, but I will set the record straight.

I treat those two as I they treat me and I didn't call either a whore. Here is an example of a misty post:

Misty » 12 Jul 2016 7:56 pm » wrote: Sorry. Dick sucking before the age of consent is not within my field of knowledge.
I can't believe your manufactured phony outrage over the killing of a brown person.

Maybe you should ask Huey about dick sucking before the age of consent.
Something tells me he might have some knowledge about that subject.

I wasn't even posting to her in that particular conversation.

But wait, there is more:

Misty » 12 Jul 2016 8:44 pm » wrote: Are you finally going to tell me how you managed to get a 14 inch zucchini stuck in your ***?

These are just a few examples of the rhetoric Misty participates in. If misty wants to be treated equally misty can not play the women card when her own style is used against her.

And finally if misty talks to the rest of us the way our mothers and wives talk to us I will take you up on our challenge. I suggest in the future you understand what is happening prior to a knee jerk reaction.

Fuelman » 14 Nov 2016 12:10 pm » wrote: "Truth is in the eye of the beholder".

JMO,
A women's perspective should always be a part of the conservation either right or wrong.

They are more then welcome to give their perspective. AL does often. Funny, I don't speak to her that way. Could there be a reason? Could it be she doesn't accuse us of sucking dicks, sticking objects up our ***, calling people ****, pussies, dicks, etc?

This is an ongoing feud misty started with us years ago. Overtime you will lean misty is one of the most vulgar, foulmouthed, trash talking, loinfo individuals I have come across on the forums I have posted to. She is rebel without a dick.

Go type the word dick and misty's name in the advanced search function and see how many hits you get.

If I talk to someone like Annoyed Liberal like that I would accept your criticism. Misty gets what she gives.