Liberal Forum

KKK, American Nazi Party praise Trump's hiring of Bannon

President-elect Donald Trump is drawing praise from the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and other white nationalist groups for appointing former Breitbart executive Stephen Bannon as his chief strategist.

“Perhaps The Donald is for real,” Rocky Suhayda, chairman of the American Nazi Party, told CNN in an segment that included interviews with several white nationalists.

David Duke, a former KKK leader who lost his Senate bid last week in Louisiana, called Bannon’s hiring an “excellent” decision.

I wonder why those groups are so happy about the hiring of Steve Bannon?

Misty » 15 Nov 2016 7:44 pm » wrote:
I wonder why those groups are so happy about the hiring of Steve Bannon?

Trump and his son rejected them...but we still have your buddies to deal with.


http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/11/15/ ... signs.html

Bill O'Reilly Explodes on Live TV Over Megyn Kelly's Book

Bill O'Reilly exploded on live TV as he came to the defense of Fox News Tuesday morning, saying it is "open season" on the network.

"I've had enough of it!" The O'Reilly Factor host told CBS This Morning.

"It's a good place to work, all right? We do good work! We do honest work!"

The former Inside Edition host vented his frustration after anchor Norah O'Donnell asked if he had read his colleague Megyn Kelly's new book, Settle For More.

Meanwhile, Kelly has been making the rounds on morning TV, promoting her new book in which she says she was sexually harassed by former Fox News honcho Roger Ailes.

Ailes denies the allegations.

And O'Reilly says it's time to put the Ailes scandal to rest.

"I'm not interested in litigating something that is finished that makes my network look bad, okay?

I'm not interested in making my network look bad at all.

That doesn't interest me one bit," he said.

Of course Mr. Loofah/Falafel doesn't want to talk about sexual harassment.

In 2004, Bill O’Reilly was accused of sexual harassment by Andrea Mackris, an associate producer who worked with the TV host at Fox News Channel. Mackris’s New York State Supreme Court complaint is bursting with examples of the 65-year-old O’Reilly’s alleged sleaziness (which apparently was surreptitiously memorialized via Mackris’s tape recorder).
The lawsuit was settled within two weeks and the parties agreed to confidentiality provisions intended to shroud O’Reilly’s purportedly pervy ways.

The legal settlement reportedly included a fat check for the 43-year-old Mackris, who said that O’Reilly could be “paternal and engaging” and then “tyrannical and menacing.”

Mackris’s complaint--filed by attorney Benedict Morelli--remains a better read than any of O’Reilly’s subsequent best sellers.

Mainly because the lawsuit includes topics such as:

Vibrators
Masturbation lessons
Phone sex
A “short brown” Balinese woman who allegedly was “amazed” when she saw O’Reilly’s penis
Threesomes
The loss of O’Reilly’s virginity in a car at JFK airport
Sex with two Scandinavian stewardesses
A Thai sex show
Al Franken
O’Reilly’s masturbation
O’Reilly’s climaxing
Caribbean shower fantasies
“One of those mitts, those loofa mitts”
Falafel
O’Reilly’s “big cock”
More vibrator-aided ejaculation

Bill O'Reilly's Falafel Lawsuit

roadkill » 15 Nov 2016 7:46 pm » wrote: Trump and his son rejected them...but we still have your buddies to deal with.

That doesn't answer the question.
Why are these groups so attracted to Trump and/or Bannon?
What do they see or hear from them that they like?

Clinton Lost Losers » 15 Nov 2016 5:41 pm » wrote:you will all miss me after i retire

Why would you do that?

I wonder if I could get 'disappeared' for this? LOL
If I ever vanish from this forum....it was Trump!

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/798647324687929344

Misty » 15 Nov 2016 8:02 pm » wrote: That doesn't answer the question.
Why are these groups so attracted to Trump and/or Bannon?
What do they see or hear from them that they like?

Did you ask these questions about the black panthers, and the nation of Islam?

Thin-Skinned Nazis At Breitbart Gonna Sue You For Saying They’re Racist, Truth Absolute Defense Against Libel

Breitbart.com, whose greatest scalps include that nice black lady who got fired from the Department of Agriculture, the multicultural organizers of ACORN, and all of human decency and civilization with the ascension of its CEO, Stephen Bannon, to the West Wing, is planning to sue “a major media company” (doubtless NBC) for saying it is “white nationalist.”

The website, which includes a dedicated tag for “black crime,” just as Wonkette.com includes a dedicated tag for “Breitbart racist,” has become the locus for overt white nationalists and racist-frog memes David Duke has called the elevation of Bannon to the White House “excellent.”

“You have an individual, Mr. Bannon, who’s basically creating the ideological aspects of where we’re going,” added Duke. “And ideology ultimately is the most important aspect of any government.”

Bannon himself has called Breitbart.com “the platform for the alt-right,” the politically correct, safe-space name for “white nationalists,” which is already the politically correct name for “people who think European-American citizens are superior to the mud people,” but don’t like to be called “racist” because it makes them

If the white nationalist shoe fits …..

I love Wonkette.

And from the looks of it a raging alcoholic.



He looks like William H. Macy's character on Shameless.

Misty » 15 Nov 2016 10:25 pm » wrote:
And from the looks of it a raging alcoholic.

You have a lot of experience with raging alcoholics?
I can see how you would drive men to drinking.

Huey » 15 Nov 2016 4:37 pm » wrote:
Notice I did not reply in kind. I want to see her try harder.

Misty » 15 Nov 2016 9:51 pm » wrote:



https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/798647324687929344

Funny cause the NSA was the leak. Clinton is a corrupt criminal who will end her days in prison where she belongs.

Huey » 15 Nov 2016 4:37 pm » wrote:I have three grand kids, 4 adult sons, and a daughter. So that doesn't impress me.

I love how granny frames the discussion, indon't care who anyone attacks. What I find funny if you need to go on antidepressants when anyone mentions your family but you certainly will bring others family members int it. And before you go mental I did not say you attack them.

That's right grampy. I did not attack them, because before you posted that I had no idea if you had any kids, or grandkids.
And the line about you finding someone to procreate with was a joke.
I keep forgetting that you don't have a sense of humor.

I don't go ballistic when anyone 'mentions' my family.
I do however go ballistic when people say things like my family should have all been killed on 9/11 or they should die in a fiery crash right in front of me.
Both of those things have actually been said to me on this forum or the old one.

I also have an issue with people asking me if it hurt the first time my father (who died when I was 12) penetrated me.
And more than one person has asked me that here.
But you don't seem to have an issue with that.

Huey » 15 Nov 2016 4:37 pm » wrote:What I also find downright hilarious is you are one of the most vulgar posters on the forum and you are here, all righteous, over someone using vulgarity. There is no sting to it coming from you. That's why we laugh at you.

First of all, if you think I'm one of the most vulgar posters on this forum, you must not be reading anyone else's posts.
I see lots of the men here accusing each other of engaging in 'anal sex' (to put it mildly), being pedophiles, or having a vagina (again, not the word they use).

Secondly, I am NOT all self-righteous. But when someone calls me a 'whore' a 'prostitute' or a '****' which they do regularly, do I not have the right to voice my displeasure?

Huey » 15 Nov 2016 4:37 pm » wrote:Yes, you know have kids. Myou have mknown for years that I have kids.

Sorry, you don't get to tell me what I know.
I don't know or care to know what your family situation is.

There are several reasons for that.

1. I don't usually read your posts if I can help it, since I find you obsessive and overbearing.
2. You have never made an attempt to engage in any type of a civil conversation with me, where that subject came up.
3. I don't get very involved in people's personal lives on this forum. I don't know if most of them are married or have kids, and in some cases I don't even know what gender they are.
4. I have a notoriously bad memory, so if indeed I had ever read anything about you having kids, I forgot it.

Huey » 15 Nov 2016 4:37 pm » wrote:Don't give me that **** about on ignore.

I don't know why you keep saying that it's ****.
I do have you on ignore and have for probably about a year and a half now.

That would be very obvious to anyone who cares to look back through your posts in this thread alone and see how many times your posts go unanswered by me.

I guess you don't know how ignore works.
I can choose to read your posts if I want to, and sometimes I do, mostly when I start a new thread because I feel that it's my duty to defend my own thread.

I can see what you have posted when someone else quotes you, which is the only reason I am engaged in this back and forth right now.
I saw what you said when Fuelman quoted you the other day.

Huey » 15 Nov 2016 4:37 pm » wrote:Notice I did not reply in kind. I want to see her try harder.

Try harder at what?
What exactly is it that you are trying to browbeat me into doing Huey?

If you want me to change my behavior on this forum, forget it.
That's not going to happen.

If you don't like the things I say, then I suggest that maybe you don't read my posts, and stop starting threads with my name in the title to get my attention.

Misty » 17 Nov 2016 11:42 am » wrote: That's right grampy. I did not attack them, because before you posted that I had no idea if you had any kids, or grandkids.
And the line about you finding someone to procreate with was a joke.
I keep forgetting that you don't have a sense of humor.

I don't go ballistic when anyone 'mentions' my family.
I do however go ballistic when people say things like my family should have all been killed on 9/11 or they should die in a fiery crash right in front of me.
Both of those things have actually been said to me on this forum or the old one.

I also have an issue with people asking me if it hurt the first time my father (who died when I was 12) penetrated me.
And more than one person has asked me that here.
But you don't seem to have an issue with that.
First of all, if you think I'm one of the most vulgar posters on this forum, you must not be reading anyone else's posts.
I see lots of the men here accusing each other of engaging in 'anal sex' (to put it mildly), being pedophiles, or having a vagina (again, not the word they use).

Secondly, I am NOT all self-righteous. But when someone calls me a 'whore' a 'prostitute' or a '****' which they do regularly, do I not have the right to voice my displeasure?
Sorry, you don't get to tell me what I know.
I don't know or care to know what your family situation is.

There are several reasons for that.

1. I don't usually read your posts if I can help it, since I find you obsessive and overbearing.
2. You have never made an attempt to engage in any type of a civil conversation with me, where that subject came up.
3. I don't get very involved in people's personal lives on this forum. I don't know if most of them are married or have kids, and in some cases I don't even know what gender they are.
4. I have a notoriously bad memory, so if indeed I had ever read anything about you having kids, I forgot it.
I don't know why you keep saying that it's ****.
I do have you on ignore and have for probably about a year and a half now.

That would be very obvious to anyone who cares to look back through your posts in this thread alone and see how many times your posts go unanswered by me.

I guess you don't know how ignore works.
I can choose to read your posts if I want to, and sometimes I do, mostly when I start a new thread because I feel that it's my duty to defend my own thread.

I can see what you have posted when someone else quotes you, which is the only reason I am engaged in this back and forth right now.
I saw what you said when Fuelman quoted you the other day.
Try harder at what?
What exactly is it that you are trying to browbeat me into doing Huey?

If you want me to change my behavior on this forum, forget it.
That's not going to happen.

If you don't like the things I say, then I suggest that maybe you don't read my posts.

I call ****. This is third time you have acted surprised that I have kids. So it was not "until I posted" this. We had this discussion when you accused me of sucking dicks (YOUR WORDS) before the age of consent. YOU KNEW THIS ON THE LTHER FORUM. And we discussed it here.

I am not trying browbeat you into anything. Never have. I Laugh at you like most do, I point out your lies, your hypocrisy, and ****. You tried to chase me away years ago by browbeating me and it failed. Trust me, if you continue I will just repost that thread where you got caught lying 6 or 7 times. Or you can let it go, your call. Remember, I like to use the sticky function.

Try honesty honey.

Next, no need to change your behavior. Again, you are either being intentionally obtuse to shift blame and LIE yet again, or you really are obtuse and continue to miss the point.

Yeh I have is it? If you really are obtuse I will stop because I feel bad poking sticks at the retard.

Fuelman » 16 Nov 2016 11:08 am » wrote:

Maybe you can tell me what it is that Huey wants to see me 'try harder' at?

It seems to me that he is trying to get me to change my behavior on this forum.

He doesn't seem to have any problem with the plethora of vulgarity that comes from his own gender on this forum.
It only seems to bother him when it comes from a woman, or more likely from this woman.

Huey is angry because I ignore him most of the time.
I do that because just like I told him, I find him obsessive and overbearing.

I also feel like he is one of the people here who literally hates people based on their political ideology, and I don't agree with that.
There are many people here who I do not agree with on anything when it comes to politics, but I still respect them as a human being.
I don't get that vibe from Huey.

I don't mean to get you involved here Fuelman.
You don't even have to respond to that.
It's mostly rhetorical anyway.

Sorry Huey.
I'm not going to give you any more of the attention you crave.

Misty » 17 Nov 2016 12:00 pm » wrote:

Sorry Huey.
I'm not going to give you any more of the attention you crave.

Whenever the spoiled princess is busted she runs like a coward.

Remember, the Twit posted to me. She can't ha doe the answer because mentally she ain't all there. She really hates it when people challenge her lies.

Some people just can't take a hint.
Get a life Huey.
I'm not interested in anything you have to say.

OMG, this is so creepy.

Trump Spied on Mar-a-Lago Phone Conversations Using Personal Switchboard

BuzzFeed’s Aram Roston has a bonkers scoop that four former employees at Donald Trump’s Florida resort Mar-a-Lago say he had a telephone console in his estate bedroom that he used “to eavesdrop on calls involving staff.”

The four former Mar-a-Lago employees would not go on the record with their names because of nondisclosure agreements, but they told the site that Trump listened to calls between club employees as well as between staff and guests in the mid-2000s.

Good to know that soon he will have the power to listen in on all of our calls.